Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

19469479499519521834

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,782 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I'm sure he did. And he was wrong (though almost right).

    But while awec is being slightly flippant, his general point is still correct. Leinster did not take that match seriously.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    I wouldn't go that far. I would assume they took it seriously, if not, that's shameful.



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    They put out a team that should have won objectively.

    you could make a convincing argument that if you combined the 23s Leinster would have 10 starters.

    Seems like a poor argument to me. Leinster fans want to simultaneously believe a ton of guys on that team are international standard way ahead of other provinces, but when you lose… you threw it.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,782 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl




  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    But you are.. and that’s the argument you are making?

    That team was loaded with guys who most people on this site would swear are better than guys in other provinces. So, they should have won.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,594 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Leinster lost by the bounce of a ball (cue Awec frothing at the mouth). That team was more than good enough to win, and most days probably would have.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,863 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    frawley missed a relatively straightforward conversion too



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,782 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    A) I was and am vociferously opposed to what Leinster did

    B) leinster could and should still have won

    C) I'm just explaining awec's point. Yes success was "shared around" but it was done so by leinster very actively choosing not to take a semi final seriously. Calling it "throwing a game" is flippant but it was a clear signal they didn't care that much about it.



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It just feels like a cop out to me. We don’t know if the first team would have won. We also are constantly told how good the leinster B team are.

    I do see your point though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,339 ✭✭✭hold my beer


    It's very annoying that they didn't field a stronger team. Hopefully we've learned our lesson.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    I was all in on the idea of resting the front liners. But, we **** the bed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,708 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Yeah, not even a mixed bag if we are being honest. Very poor on the grassroots development side, still the lions share of the Irish team coming from a handful of schools in Dublin, Im not sure the needle has moved on that at all. Moving players around between provinces has been haphazard and seemingly whimsical, there is no actual policy or system in place to get the most development into the most players. Europe has been a failure basically, 1 cup in a decade after 5 in the previous ten years. The only area of success is in the national team and that has papered over cracks elsewhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    What system would or should be put in place for player movement? It's not like they can force players to move.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,594 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    But harsh to judge purely on results for the HC. Leinster have lost 3 finals, that's not indicative of a failure from a goal perspective imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    image.png

    By their own targets for provincial 15s, 1 HC is a failure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,316 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    They could incentivise moves. More money, give them a Leinster mentor at the new province etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    True enough. But Ulster are loaded with Leinster players. As are Connacht. There's been some movement. Alternatively, Leinster have only 1 Ulsterman in the squad and 1 Connacht man

    I fail to see how this benifits Leinster?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    If JOB doesn't **** up and Sexton and Keenan don't get in each other's way, Leinster probably crawl over the line 2 years back. That's on Sexton and O'Brien, nothing whatsoever to do with Nucifora.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,316 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    It's not about benefitting Leinster. It's about benefitting Irish rugby overall.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    At Leinster's cost? How is this remotely fair?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,316 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Is it fair that the IRFU signed a deal with Aviva that means internationals can no longer be played anywhere other than Dublin, despite a rich tradition of internationals in Belfast?


    No.


    Was it the smart move for the game here, given the money involved?


    Yes.


    We're asking questions about the best way to organise the game here off the back of missing out on another of our stated goals, again, going out in the QFs, again, and the first parameter everyone puts down is "no action should be taken that will inconvenience my province".


    If moving players about improved the overall health of the game and upped talent and competition for the international team, you'd be against it because there'd be no direct benefit to your province?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,708 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Actually you can force players to move, it's a joined up system. The IRFU is the BOD or c suite or whatever corporate analogy you want to draw. They employ everyone else through subsidiaries which are the provinces. The IRFU could literally institute a draft tomorrow and distribute young pros between the provinces. I'm not suggesting that they should but simply that they could and players can decide to go along with it, not become pros or head off abroad and try their luck. Such and such doesn't want to live in Galway or Belfast, So what? This is really not a problem, people move for work all the time, particularly if one office has a surplus of accountants while another has a deficit. I don't believe we have ever heard that guards shouldn't have to move to where they are assigned because all their friends and family are in Cahersiveen, people would laugh if you suggested it, but somehow if a kid's family and friends are in Blackrock the idea of being 'forced' to move 90 minutes down the road to Limerick is some kind of human rights violation.


    The HC is Europe, no other way to judge it. Not winning is not winning, its not harsh to judge a sports team who keep failing at the final hurdle. Why? Something is going wrong. Leinster fans often don't like to hear it but there is a problem at Leinster when ROG can pick them apart 3 years in a row when they have most of the best rugby team in the world on their roster. Same goes for Saracens. I don't know whether the coaches think its good enough but if they do we need better coaches.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    But where is the cut off? Do we just send Porter, VDF and a couple of others to Ulster? To make Ulster good. While disabling Leinster. Who's going to gain from that? Exactly what competition would VDF or Ryan have at Ulster? They stroll into that side sleepwalking.

    Ulster have had, Jordie, Jack Mc, Timoney, EOS and they just took Brigg into the academy. I'm not knocking Ulster but, weakening 1 province to prop up the others is not the answer. Connacht have taken 4 Leinster players into their academy. Munster took 1. It's not like there's no movement. It seems, some want the international Leinster players dispersed among the other provinces rather than produce their own talent.

    If it happens, fine. But there is nothing to suggest that another province will beat Toulouse etc, even with a couple of Leinster player.

    I want the game to grow and I believe it is in some parts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    So force them! Go ahead and prop up provinces with Leinster players. It would basically just cut off a pathway for young players in the other provinces.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,469 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    To be honest my heart sinks a little everytime Ulster sign a Leinster B or C player. Sometimes they work out well such as Cooney, Timoney and O'Connor, most of the time they don't.

    I'd far rather we produced our own, and I sometimes think we don't back our own young players enough.

    That said, whether the redistribution of players is fair to Leinster or not is irrelevant. As Paul says there are plenty of things in Irish rugby that aren't fair to the other provinces, but we have a pyramid system that all points to the Ireland team. If Harry Byrne (for example) was sent to Ulster, it wouldn't be to boost Ulster, it would be to create more depth in Irish rugby and benefit the international team.

    Realistically are Ulster ever going to compete with Leinster if a third of our team are made up of players who wouldn't even be second choice at Leinster?!

    The lesson is the provinces need to produce their own, but the fact is we don't have the resources Leinster have so will probably never have the depth except for generational cycles (see 80s for Ulster and 00s for Munster). We have a decent schools system, Leinster have probably the best in the world, or at least comparable to SA and NZ. They're almost always going to be the main source of players for Ireland and a comfort blanket for the other three provinces when they are light in certain areas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    What's unfair about the provinces producing their own lads?



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    If it is actually a problem then there is a simple enough fix. You can’t get picked for ireland if you aren’t consistently in your province’s 23 for big games.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,469 ✭✭✭✭bilston




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    If Harry B goes to Ulster, it would boost Ulster. Nothing wrong with that. Same if Pat McCarthy went to Ulster. He'd bypass Reid in a month and EOS by the years end. I Don't dispute the benifits. But the benifits are for the other provinces. If Connacht were to win a trophy it would be due to the multitude of Leinster players in the system.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,316 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Well, the answer is exactly the same. The international team - the top flight.


    I don't want it to happen. I don't think it will happen. But if the IRFU thinks a draft system will improve Irish rugby, Leinster would just have to take it on the chin, and there are ways and means. That's all the point that I was making - certainly no-one was talking about established internationals moving, and when I talked about competition, I didn't mean intra-team competition.


    No other province would beat La Rochelle. But would Irish rugby be in a better place if we had two provinces in semi-finals and two out in quarter finals rather than Leinster losing in the final again? If the answer is yes, then it's worth thinking about how they make that happen.



Advertisement
Advertisement