Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

2023 RWC Buildup, Squads, Fixtures 'etc'

1232233235237238306

Comments

  • Posts: 2,457 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    An aside. Last night you asked about any conversion block downs before. Stringer for the BaBas v James O'Connor, Australia.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,812 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    The lopsided draw definitely went against Ireland, but that is a world rugby seeding issue. What I found odd prior to the NZ v Ireland match. It was not just confidence that the ex Irish players and Irish media spoke with. It veered towards cockiness, NZ were being dismissed. The advert with Donal Lenihan assuming that Ireland would go past the QF and beyond. All a bit presumptuous.

    It was almost assumed. I get the no1 in the world narrative all those games unbeaten but is knock out sport anything can happen.

    NZ have great pedigree and pride. They didn't do anything fancy it seemed to me, just ground out the result, get the lead and defend like dogs. You can talk about the 'what if's' if Sexton was more accurate on his kicks or whatever.

    Some will term it as 'choking' due to the level of expectation built up, but at least this time it was not losses to Argentina or Wales. It was New Zealand. Also there were no shock losses in the group like to Japan.

    Ironically Ireland (in hindsight) might have been better off finishing their usual second in the group instead of facing a NZ with point to prove. To me Ireland did alright in this world cup. The best team in the world does not always win the knockout competitions like the World Cup - ironically New Zealand know that only too well.

    This time Ireland just got beaten by the luck of the draw and the vagaries of sport. The only difference this time, the former Irish players and Irish media had started to get REAL notions.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,339 ✭✭✭✭walshb




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,442 ✭✭✭OldRio


    Imagine being that someone who registers for this site so he can laugh at the Irish rugby team and it's supporters. Why would one bother. It takes a certain mentality to do that.

    Heyho.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,339 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Something I said earlier. Some folks (who I think were being deliberately disingenuous) were espousing this idea that the ABs were nothing but a stepping stone to a semi final.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 2,457 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    'you lost' you say. What country are you from?

    If Ireland why not 'we'? If you don't support your own country, any bit of credibility you have is gone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,699 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I think people pre-tournament underestimated just how difficult the draw was. France or NZ in the QF was always going to be a massive challenge and giving us no more than a 50-50 chance at best of even getting through to the semis.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,532 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    TBH and it would take more analysis but referee's in the tournament generally seemed to not bother about rule breaking in the lineout. Massively affected ours against NZ and SA who routinely infringed. I don't think it was an issue in our other games.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 464 ✭✭Iamabeliever


    Could a team manipulate the HIa system to potentially give some of their front line players a break mid game and then bring them back for the last 10 mins. Seems very unsportsmanlike? Just curious how SA got so much rotation in that second half



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,532 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    We'll see how England and Argentina cope when faced with teams of Ireland's quality.

    That's the test.

    We came up against one of the best and we lost out by 4 points. We'll see how much they win or lose by and then make a calm qualitative judgement.

    We won't be on their forums trying to wind people up after making a total of 2 or 3 posts. That would just be ineffably sad and worrying if we did. What kind of person would do that



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,122 ✭✭✭Shehal


    You're still in it because you go to play Fiji rather than NZL/SA due to the joke of a draw that was done based on rankings from 2019. You'll get the reality check of a lifetime next week!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,122 ✭✭✭Shehal


    Would be nice if we weren't faced with playing either the bookies favourite* or 2nd favourite* as our options in a QF not once but twice in a row. Imagine if we had the option of playing the 10th best team in the world in a QF...

    *Based on bookies odds pre tournament.



  • Posts: 2,457 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    No just strange an Irish man referring to his own country men as 'you'. Great effort at moving the goal posts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,003 ✭✭✭✭ednwireland


    Honestly I can see England dragging SA down to their level and it could be won by a score.

    I hope not, I think there style of rugby deserves to be blown away.

    My weather

    https://www.ecowitt.net/home/share?authorize=96CT1F



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    I can see this as a fairly low scoring game. England are not very good but will drag the boks down to their level.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,076 ✭✭✭crusd


    Is reading comprehension a problem for you? "Due to the draw it was always 50/50" does not equal blaming the draw, it acknowledges that with 4 very even sides a good performance from any of them could still result in defeat no matter when they met.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,076 ✭✭✭crusd


    It must have been in your imagination that all this was happening. Expressing confidence that a good performance could result in victory is not arrogance. An average performance nearly did.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,076 ✭✭✭crusd


    All the teams who had success in disrupting Irelands line out cut off the space by closing the gap. Scotland tried but it was policed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,076 ✭✭✭crusd


    The prevailing view was that if we could beat New Zealand a Final was likely. It was always acknowledged that there was f-all between the top 4 teams. Expressing confidence is not arrogance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,076 ✭✭✭crusd


    Scotlands QF win was against Samoa.

    Cannot look at this match it the context of previous defeats. The level they played at in the QF this year was their highest ever at this stage, even if they did not reach their full potential.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,339 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Expressing confidence is fine. But slating your team (bottlers/chokers) because they lost a match against NZ in practically a 50/50 match that was dead tight, reeks of arrogance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,612 ✭✭✭twinytwo


    Which is funny, as Ireland knows better than nearly anyone else... there are no easy games against NZ.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 968 ✭✭✭moycullen14


    The whole group phase is really an ar*e. Of the 8 teams that got to the QF, 6 have now lost one match, Fiji have lost two and England are unbeaten. All the losses have been to other teams in the 8.

    If there was some way to organise it, it would be great to have the 8 teams that made the QF in 2 groups of 4, based on current world rankings. The groups would play out and the top two in each group go forward to a semi-final/final.

    The premature draw has really screwed some teams. Not only have you harder opposition but you are exhausted for future matches (this is where in RWC differs from the soccer equivalent).

    Maybe you'll never get a completely fair system but with this world cup they may as well have just drawn the QF out of a hat and let them off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,911 ✭✭✭McFly85


    I honestly don’t know anyone who thought that NZ was a foregone conclusion. Everyone was incredibly nervous and thought it was a tight game but we definitely had a chance. If anyone genuinely thought NZ posed no threat then they haven’t a breeze about rugby.

    I did see a lot of “the worst NZ team in 30 years” posts alright, but these seem to be from people determined to stick the boot into the Ireland team and label them as bottlers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,532 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Every pundit I listened to was saying 'Ireland can win, but...'

    You are right, nobody thought it was going to be a walkover.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,300 ✭✭✭Jacovs


    Thanks, we are going to need it if we get to the final against New Zealand. Wont be the same game as pre-world cup Twickenham, thats for sure.

    Just on this, and im not replying to you as such, I have done a bit of analysis this morning, only on Ireland and SA, because they were in the same pool playing the same opponents, and its the 2 teams I have an interest in.

    The lack of depth have cost Ireland dearly. Coaches have no faith in the back up players. There are 10 players in the Ireland team who started each of the 5 games, with a further 5 players who played in each of the 5 games, either starting or off the bench. Thats 15 players who played each of the 5 games. Not to mention, 2 of those players (Aki and Keenan) played all 400 minutes. That is insane. There are also a further 4 players who averaged over 50 minutes per game each, 3 players with over 60 minutes average per game, and another 4 players with over 70 minutes per game average. And they were still performing at high levels until about the 60 minute mark against NZ, then you could tell it started getting to them.

    Looking at the time played for each of your players across the 5 games, it is a testament to their talents/skills/spirit to have got within 5 points of a semi final, against a New Zealand team who were playing very well.

    But it is also a failure of the coaches/system. They could have rested some of the players against the likes of Tonga and Romania. It is an absolute gut punch for the second string players to not even get a start against those teams, for coaches not to have faith in you to win even those games. And those are the players you have going forward, tough building to be done, to get the players to trust the coaches after not being trusted themselves.

    Couldnt find a back up team to the current team, now you have to find a replacement first team and a back up team too. Tough times ahead I think, but I am happy to be proven wrong.


    In contrast, I looked at the SA player stats thus far.

    There is not a single player who started each of the 5 games. There are only 2 players who played in each of the 5 games (Kitshoff and Nche), either starting or from the bench. Kriel was selected for all 5 games, but 1 of those he wasnt used off the bench, so only played 4 games.

    Only 2 players in the whole squad have played on average over 50 minutes average per game (Kriel and Willemse), if I average it across the whole 5 game tournament, not the games each player actually played.

    Yes, Ireland do have a much smaller player base/talent pool to choose from, but each team brought 33 players to the tournament (fair enough we used 34 with Pollard, not used Am yet), and you need to rely on each of those 33 players. Maybe not all equally, but more equally than Ireland have done in this tournament.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,339 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    And wait for it. If SA win the WC, our win over them was a nothing. Shur, SA didn’t bother to try..Twas only a “silly” group match



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,300 ✭✭✭Jacovs


    This is the worst part for me, with Ireland losing. We wont have a chance to beat them. So even if we win the WC, we wont be able to say we beat all the top teams on the way to the WC.

    We beat NZ recently, France, Scotland, hopefully England next (and we did less than a year ago), Italy, Wales, Australia, Argentina, just Ireland we havent beaten recently (last 12-18 months). Wouldve been an epic final.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,532 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,699 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I was actually leaning towards the weakest NZ team in years thing, but after about 15-20 mins of the game, I realised it was nonsense and I had seriously underestimated them. They played pretty much like all the top class All Black teams of the past.



Advertisement
Advertisement