Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The emergence of "Zombie" by The Cranberries as an Irish sporting anthem

1394042444554

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,069 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It was incredibly statesmanlike from Martin. I am far from his biggest fan but it was some putdown.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    It very much is, there was nothing in the comments made by sf supporters that were 'a shocking interpretation of the song'

    People had criticized the song for the same reasons when it came out.

    People have also criticized Band Aid for similar reasons, and a whole host of anti-war songs have been criticized similarly over the years.

    Martin did just as Trump does. He put 2 + 2 together and instead of getting 4 he conveniently got sf supporters = terrorism.

    Just like Trump puts 2 + 2 together and gets democrats = antifa.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,725 ✭✭✭downthemiddle


    The only thing that is Trump like is your effort to distort the truth. You attempts to rewrite history on this thread are pathetic.

    In your head, Zombie.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,220 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    You're struggling mate. Martin didn't say what you claimed he said and now you're tying yourself in knots trying to defend your position. Its entertaining. I love how you're trying to claim Martin is using Trump style politics when SF have actually been imitating Trump for years. They spout populist BS with no explanation about how they will do what they promise. Part of me would love to see SF get into government just watch them fail to deliver. But I live in this country so maybe not.

    And I see you're still bringing up Band Aid. Too much effort to start a thread to discuss it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    Speaking of history...

    A historic record on child homelessness this week.

    Meanwhile...

    Varadker's off telling the English how to run their country.

    Martin's weighing in on a 30 year old debate on whether a pop song oversimplifies history, so he can throw muck at SF and ruin rugby.

    Some leadership haven't we.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 1,264 ✭✭✭ Mara Quaint Washbowl


    "They spout populist BS with no explanation about how they will do what they promise. Part of me would love to see SF get into government just watch them fail to deliver."

    Unless they've changed their tune recently, this continues to be SF economics as I understand it...

    socialism.png




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,725 ✭✭✭downthemiddle


    This thread is about playing Zombie at rugby matches.

    Michéal Martin said "That's absurd. I think that's a shocking interpretation of the song." when asked if he felt the song was partitionist.

    Can you explain what was wrong with that comment as you find it objectionable?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    I think it's quite fair to ask why Mr Martin is jumping into commenting on songs played at Irish rugby matches!

    As for what's wrong with the comment itself, which has to be placed in the context of the rest of his statements, the most obvious initial issue for me is to ask just who Micheal Martin thinks he is to be telling other people how to interpret songs?

    This is the same guy who's a champion of free speech when it suits him remember?

    Aside from whether the song being partitionist or not being quite a subjective matter, I find it a reasonable position to take if looking at the term 'partitionist' as that which denotes people from Northern Ireland as other or even lessor.

    I believe this was how former FG politician and co-founder of the SDLP Austin Currie often used the term.

    It comes back then to the same criticism levelled at the song on it's release which suggests it might 'oversimplify' the history of the troubles. From that lens the idea that the people of the North just kept blindly reliving 1916 over and over, 'It's the same old theme since 1916, in your head Zombie', while we in the south moved on, could I think be seen as 'partitionist'.

    Does that in any undermine the songs anti-violent message? Of course not, but Mr Martin's in Trump world now where anything goes, even dragging this shite into a beloved national sport.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,725 ✭✭✭downthemiddle


    What a disingenuous crock of shite.

    This is the world the Shinners occupy. One of spin, lies, bluster and deception.

    MM was asked about the response to the song, a response generated by Shinnerbots online. He didn’t jump into anything. However you already know that as it has been pointed out to you a number of times on this thread. You have also attempted to drag the IRFU into this even though, in a similar manner, it has been pointed out to you that they are not responsible for the song choice.

    I have bad news for you. A significant majority in this country see through the Shinners. We don’t buy the bridge you are selling.

    If we beat Scotland tomorrow I hope the song is played again so we can remind you

    In your head, Zombie.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,069 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Last I checked Micheal Martin was the Tanaiste and MFA. That means there is an onus on him to explain Ireland to the world, it is a part of his job. This controversy has attracted international headlines with people horrified that some would take offence at it. By putting the record straight on the song, he is doing Ireland a service, as is his job.

    By the way, are you suggesting that there is something wrong with being partitionist? As you know since the GFA, we amended our Constitution to recognise the reality and the legitimacy of partition. We no longer have a territorial claim on the six counties, we instead aspire to unite the people of this island, which may, or may not, involve political and territorial unification. Most of the people of Northern Ireland identify themselves as British or Northern Irish at least in part, which is other than Irish. Are you also saying that this is a lessor identity? Once again, the bigotry of the position that there is only one true Gael shines clear through your posting.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    You know he was talking to Ciara Kelly on Newstalk breakfast right? He wasn't addressing the UN!

    As for 'one true Gael' shining through in my posting, I'd love to reply, but I just can't for a minute follow the logic that got you there sorry.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,069 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    "The singer was particularly offended that terrorists claimed to have carried out these acts in the name of Ireland.

    "The IRA are not me. I'm not the IRA," she said. "The Cranberries are not the IRA. My family are not.

    "When it says in the song, 'It's not me, it's not my family,' that's what I'm saying. It's not Ireland, it's some idiots living in the past."

    "In the UK, the song reached number 14 in the charts - its success perhaps hampered by the BBC's decision to ban the video.

    The original was shot by Samuel Bayer, who had previously directed the videos for Nirvana's Smells Like Teen Spirit and Blind Melon's No Rain.

    He travelled to Northern Ireland and shot footage of the troubles, including images of children holding guns, which the BBC (and Ireland's national broadcaster RTE) objected to."

    I think that article clears up a number of the falsehoods pervading this thread.

    The ban at the time wasn't because the lyrics were controversial - in fact the video was banned, not the song, because of images of children holding guns. So all of the nonsense about the song causing offence at the time can now be dismissed as more rubbish.

    Secondly, the provenance of the song is also clear and its success and popularity are down to that provenance. People were sick and tired of the PIRA at the time, sick and tired of their pathetic excuses for killing women and children, sick and tired of their psycho Zombie mentality.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    Here's an interesting article which is critical of the song Zombie, while still seeing it as an anti-violence anthem.

    Again I like the song, but I choose to look at it as a raw, emotional response rather than an accurate history of the troubles.

    I think that's quite fair. It is after all a three minute pop song.

    But not according to our Tanaiste, who seems almost close to tears, when claiming essentially that anyone 'undermining the songs lyrics' is pro-violence.

    Is he being genuine? I really don't think so. It's such a ridiculous stance, especially for someone who seemingly is all about hearing other people's perspectives.

    Do we need a harmless singalong at a match turned into this type of politics. I really don't think so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    Remind me at the match?

    Sure I won't be watching it now.

    There's plenty other sports out there that aren't being used as a platform for these kind of nasty politics.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    Here's an interesting article on one writer's take on negative portrayals of Irishness in cinema and tv...

    Are these perspectives outrageous? Do they undermine the message of these movies?

    I'm dying to hear Micheal Martin's take on it. He's clearly got f**k all better to be doing.

    https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/new-figures-show-record-3895-children-homeless-in-ireland-1532817.html#:~:text=In%20total%2C%203%2C895%20children%20were,3%2C873%20set%20in%20September%202019.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,725 ✭✭✭downthemiddle


    All credit to Megaman he has hung around longer than the cowards that planted a bomb in the bin in Warrington.

    However he shares something in common with them, the truth bares no relevance to the message he is attempting to portray. Thankfully the decent people of this country rejected this message at the time and continue to do so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,725 ✭✭✭downthemiddle


    Nasty politics? That’s hilarious considering we are discussing a song condemning the murder of two innocent children. Your lack of self awareness on this subject would be breathtaking if it wasn’t a common Shinner tactic.

    Keep repeating the same lies and misinformation in the hope that eventually some people accept it as reality. It is something the Russians have done repeatedly.

    Not a normal party.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    My message? I'd like to think of myself as a pacifist, so it's not what you're trying to make out it is!

    Keep your Trump politics out of Irish sports.

    I guess that's my message.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,069 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    I think it is one of the most genuine contributions from Micheal Martin ever.

    As for the Loudersound article, that it views a racist tripe of a song like "Give Ireland back to the Irish" (and I am a huge McCartney fan) as "sincere and well-meaning", kind of puts the kibosh on any other argument it makes. By comparison to that song, "Zombie" is a multi-dimensional anthem.



  • Posts: 1,125 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Your inability to follow logic is clear in your relentless postings. Why stop now?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    There's a professor of sociology, Bill Rolston, University of Ulster, who's written a very interesting article on the history of music in the troubles.

    http://statecrime.org/data/2011/10/rolston2001a.pdf

    From my reading, he takes issue with how difficult it is to grasp the complex history of the conflict within the format of a pop song. Here's his take on 'Zombie'

    A third theme involves condemnation of the protagonists. However, not all foes are equal. Specifically, loyalism's violence is invisible and goes without censure; condemnation is reserved for violent republicanism. The Cranberries' reference to a central date in republican history, 1916 in `Zombie' (Island 1994) makes this clear: `It's the same old theme since 1916./In your head, in your head they're still fighting.'

    Now I don't know about you, but I'm guessing this guy isn't calling for children to be bombed in the streets.

    Is he allowed comment on the song, is his take outrageous, Micheal Martin?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,759 ✭✭✭standardg60


    So anyone here who shares MMs perspective is taking a ridiculous stance and not being genuine?

    This from the person who while having no issue with the song themselves is happy to post page after page reasons why 'some' may have an issue with the song.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    Not at all, maybe some of you are genuinely of this very simplistic mindset where criticizing a pop song equates to supporting violence.

    I suspect Mr Martin is trying to be a degree more cunning.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭coolbeans


    Great, finally. So it is about you being offended! The song refers to republican terrorists and that offends you because you're a supporter of the IRA. You'd like to see all killers including loyalists treated treated equally in song. Finally, we got there.

    Maybe you should write to the Cranberries and ask them to include a line or two referring to loyalists so that violence supporting republicans like yourself can feel better about the whole thing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    Lol, It's just another criticism I'm sharing of the song which doesn't equate to supporting violence.

    As I said before, I quite like the song, just the notion that holding it up, as some sort of unquestionable history of the troubles, to attack sf supporters, is weak.

    But not just weak... it's also dragging nasty politics into our sporting realm. Which I cannot stand.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,416 ✭✭✭crusd


    Its gas he thinks the song was some carefully constructed thesis, not words selected for a rhyme😂

    "Its the same old theme since 1690" doesn't quite have the same punch.

    Songs are not a traditional narrative and more often than not are not a literal representation of an opinion



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,069 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Supporters or apologists for violent republicanism are going to object to the song, that is clear, we have said that from the start. Digging up articles and commentary from those who sympathise with violent republicanism only supports the viewpoint of people like myself and Micheal Martin, it does nothing to support the argument that you are making.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    How dare you 'attack the lyrics' of this song.

    Disgusting child murder supporter!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,725 ✭✭✭downthemiddle


    Lies, misinformation and spin. Repeat ad nauseum. Could Megaman be any more predictable?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    What evidence do you have that the criticisms of the song I shared are from 'supporters of violent republicanism'?



Advertisement