Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Spain - Women World Cup Champions - 1 week later. (How not to manage a crises)

18911131417

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,508 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    If his view evolved,he should have quit. He looks stupid now presiding over a team with no staff and no players.

    You make sure never to criticise Rubiales, even when nearly everyone of his supporters has deserted him for his stupid antics this week. I will stop asking you for an honest assessment of his actions as I can see now there is no occasion where you think he has done anything wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,261 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    There is no criminal liability. Repeating it won't make it so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,623 ✭✭✭crusd


    Once there was no conviction they were always going to be left with obligation to pay the remainder of the contract. If the statement could have been interpreted as judging there was a case case for Greenwood to answer, it could have been interpreted as impacting potential future earning. Would be pretty sure there is an agreement in place between United and Greenwoods over the wording of Uniteds statement designed to enable a path to employment at a future club.

    There were lots of reports than United should be encouraged to donate any fee to women's charities. United have not said they would though. It looks more likely any transfer will be a loan, which of course would involve the club taking him paying much if not all of is wages, saving United money



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,786 ✭✭✭DownByTheGarden


    You can see even from this thread alone why he wants it to go to a proper court instead of the kangaroo court that is the internet.

    At this point if he resigns the rest of his life he is going to presumed guilty of all sorts of shenanigans. At least if he gets it into the court room proper evidence of his misdeeds and accurate reports of what he said she said etc have to come out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,555 ✭✭✭Augme



    No one said there is criminal liability. We are discussing why United made a determination that based on their investigation Greenwood did not commit the criminal acts he had been accused of. That isn't the role of an employer and has never been the role of an employer in employment law.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,601 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    How many times does it have to be said that the issue that Rubiales faces is not one of a criminal nature.

    Sexual harrassment is not necessarily a crime, threatening to sue an accuser is not necessarily a crime, claiming that a woman consented when she said she did not is not necessarily a crime (if it is was, rape convictions would be at 100% rather than 1%), clutching your crotch in public is not necessarily a crime, etc.

    If this gets as far as a courtroom, Rubiales is doomed, but he is doomed regardless because his actions are those of a clownish, misogynistic, bullying buffoon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,786 ✭✭✭DownByTheGarden


    If you want him out of his job your are going to have to go the legal route. He is making sure of that. Actually, he is doomed if it doesnt go the legal route. Going the legal route will expose the total overblown drama stirrers around this once and for all. Its a typical internet mob situation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,261 ✭✭✭✭Boggles



    Would be pretty sure there is an agreement in place between United and Greenwoods over the wording of Uniteds statement designed to enable a path to employment at a future club.

    Well yeah, they said it in their statement that will actively help him find a new club and keep supporting his family.

    So far no one has came in with a concrete offer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Court was aways the best place for this case. Especially when seen by tens of millions.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,261 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Again, United don't make "criminal determinations".

    That's a courts remit.

    United as a employer had to determine if he committed gross misconduct. Or whatever the equivalent wording would be contained in his contract.

    They determined he didn't.

    How do you suppose they determine that unless they investigate it?

    Or do you think there should have been no club enquiry and he should just been reinstated immediately after the CPS dropped the charges?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,261 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    If this gets as far as a courtroom, Rubiales is doomed

    Why?

    A Jury would be made up of people across a wide spectrum of society that have to determine innocent or guilt on the facts presented to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Cops investigate themselves and find no wrongdoing all the time too. That doesn’t stop internal affairs, or superior law enforcement from their own determinations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,623 ✭✭✭crusd


    Gross misconduct in not an easy bar. What happened, happened in private and the alleged victim has pulled out of the case. They would not have been able to invalidate the contract based on what was in the public domain. So once they changed their mind from reinstating to no longer playing the player they had to have a format of words that would not have implied a finding of culpability.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,261 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    United didn't commence their investigation until the CPS determined he had no case to answer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,261 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Gross misconduct in not an easy bar. What happened, happened in private.

    What happened was recorded.

    So once they changed their mind from reinstating to no longer playing the player they had to have a format of words that would not have implied a finding of culpability.

    I imagine the format of words would have been consistent in either scenario, no?

    i.e. he didn't do what he was originally charged with doing.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,601 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The facts would be laid out in the courtroom in front of the whole world and even if he is not found guilty (remember Greenwood wasn't even prosecuted), the facts as known to date, damn him. He might be innocent of the crime of sexual assault, but that doesn't mean he isn't a clownish, misogynistic, bullying buffoon, which is enough to make his job untenable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,623 ✭✭✭crusd


    It was untenable in the right thinking mind, but in law? They had no grounds to dismiss once there was no prosecution and no other evidence



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,601 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Grounds to dismiss are a much lower threshold.

    If you are talking about Greenwood, then there may not be sufficient grounds to dismiss, especially if the private investigation backed up the claims that he was not guilty, and there was at least one possibly different interpretation from a longer audio tape.

    However, if you are talking about Rubiales, which I am in this thread, there is more than sufficient evidence in the public arena to ensure that he can be dismissed on the basis of bringing the organisation into disrepute. By itself, the ham-fisted attempt to get Spain and Spanish clubs to be thrown out of European competition, on the grounds of the Spanish government interfering with soccer administration by commenting and acting on his personal situation is enough to get him fired, as he was putting himself before the organisation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,061 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Plus the pictures of the smiling Hermoso with her mobile laughing on the bus has muddied the water somewhat.

    In my cynical mind someone in the Spanish FA 'got' to the girls. Sees it has a opportunity as a good way to oust Ruibales And everything else is just a smokescreen. i see it as an internal Spanish FA power struggle. With this incident being a means to an end.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,555 ✭✭✭Augme



    No, United did make a criminal determination in their statement, which is below.

    "Based on the evidence available to us we have concluded........ that Mason did not commit the offences in respect of which he was originally charged"


    A courts remit is to carry out criminal prosecutions. But anyone can make their own determination on a crime like united did with the above statement, it just carries no weight.


    I never claimed they didn't investigate it. I have no doubt united investigated it. What I don't know is, who investigated it, who made the final decision, Did they engage an independent panel of legal experts to make a finding etc. I heard no mentioned of any independent investigation being carried out.


    How united conducted the investigation of the extremely talented player they really wanted to keep was up to themselves. They decided to conduct an their own internal investigation and, AFAIK, decided not to engage any external third party expertise to make an impartial decision for them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,261 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    How united conducted the investigation of the extremely talented player they really wanted to keep was up to themselves

    United are worth about a reported 6-8 billion. That's a real money, not share price nonsense.

    I could name probably 15-20 young players of talent akin to Greenwood in the past 15-20 years off the top of my head, none of which made it at United.

    Bit of critical thinking required for this one.

    United negotiate multi billion euro commercial deals and are currently in the middle of an astronomical priced buyout, the biggest ever in terms of football.

    Why would Arnold potentially put any of that risk given the public perception for a player who statistically was not going to make it at United.

    Why would he put his reputation at risk?

    The reality is and I have a lot of sympathy for Arnold on this, he had to make a decision and explain a decisions whilst being precluded from releasing any details on how he came to that decision.

    The narrative that they just really really wanted him so they tailored an investigation just so they could keep him is dangerously stupid in the extreme.

    The easiest thing for United to do it terms of what was best for the club in terms of perception and financially was to find him guilty of gross misconduct and terminate his contract.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    United are worth about a reported 6-8 billion. That's a real money, not share price nonsense.

    Is it?

    Until it's sold for real money then it's not real money.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,508 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    So some shadowy persons got at the 81 players to have them all decide not to play for Spain under Rubiales. Perhaps we should wait for more information to come out before leaping to wild conspiracy theories.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,358 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Well I would assume that the CPS have access to at least the same evidence that Man UTD did, hence they came to the same conclusion, nothing to defend here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,261 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    That's why I used the word reported based on an actual reported bid.

    It's been reported the Americans want 8 billion. Your link suggest 6.

    Therefore we get my statement of "United are worth about a reported 6-8 billion"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,061 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Well it is all a bit coincidental that Hermoso initially laughed it off (making jokes about it) and suddenly the issue got 'serious'. All those 81 could have been promised more recompense when the new Spanish FA head gets the gig along with their support. Win win for everyone. Plus there is the positive press and attention, and crucially sympathy for cause leading to more marketing opportunities for the women etc.

    There is money to be made here. Look at the American women that play soccer, played the 'equality card'. Despite the fact that they had a better contract than the men. But wanted to re do the contract when it suited.



    Make no doubt the Spanish women will profit financially from this Rubiales 'scandal'.

    Post edited by gormdubhgorm on

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,555 ✭✭✭Augme



    There is a bit of critical thinking required on this one. Let's see if you're up for it.


    "A player who was not going to statistically make it'. He's played 83 times for United's first team. Does that not constitute making it? If not, what exactly is thr criteria for making it. Also, do name the 15-20 young players who played 80+ games for United and who never "made it" too.


    You mention risk and why would Arnold risk any commercial deals or the selling of the club for Greenwood. Sorry, but when did Arnokd do that? As United have announced, they are not going to retain Greenwood so Arnold never placed any risk on those deals. Now United and Arnold did try and get Greenwood back in to the team while hoping none of those commercial deals would be impacted but that failed, so they then decided to get rid.


    What United wanted to do was to get Greenwood back playing for the club, when they couldn't do that without it causing a financial risk they got rid of him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Yes you said it was reported, then you said it was "real money"

    And?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,358 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Who defines "sexual harassment"?

    Sexual Assault is most definitely a crime in Spain.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,865 ✭✭✭TokTik


    The victims father doesn’t seem to be especially protective. The morning after the audio etc were released he made a statement saying he hoped they made up. What chance does the victim have in that situation.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,508 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    I see no link between players benefiting from the situation and the FA head actually causing the situation. This event doesn't need a shadowy puppet master to orchestrate it, Rubiales just made a number of unfortunate decisions since the event to tank his career.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,061 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    I do I am very suspicious how it was all a laugh and a joke among the women - now the polticians have weighed in and so on and the narrative has become a lot darker and so on. I see it as a power play by the women egged on by those against Rubiales in the Spanish FA, along with some Spanish political support.

    I am not saying Rubiales was not stupid for what he did, he was. But I am starting to question the real motives behind those who want him out - there seems to be a lot of agenda at play here. Much like the women's soccer 'equal pay' narrative I think it comes down to the thought of future money to be made. Where that be by the legal route or recompense by the Spanish FA. Also this 'scandal' is going to massively increase the women's profiles more followers online and so on. From those who would have little interest in the actual football - they can become influencers to them etc.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,508 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    So Rubiales lied about their team mate, released a statement claiming she supported his statement and then threatened her and now they don't want to play under someone like that you believe that is not primary reason for wanting to get rid of him, but instead they are doing it for money?

    You seem to have a very low opinion of these women.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,865 ✭✭✭TokTik


    From listening to multiple English football podcasts there was zero legal input into the investigation. It was just internal staff with no legal background.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57,274 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Catch me up, here: are folks actually pressing for prosecution, conviction and possible jail for this kiss?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    I was never clear on this point, threads moving fast, did the player say she was interested in pressing the charge. It falls apart or has legs depending on her choice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57,274 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    I think the player, albeit not happy with his forced kissing, doesn’t feel in any way hurt about it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,508 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Well she does like 80 other female Spanish players want him sacked. But you have to take into account his actions after the kiss as being a major contributor to that position.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57,274 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Sacked is not what I was wondering on, really. I’d have little issue with his sacking. I was wondering about folks thinking he should be criminally prosecuted for his kiss.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Given that if she wanted to press charges, she'd have a very good go at it legally here: if she just wants him sacked, he should quit and say thank you while doing it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,599 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    doesn’t feel in any way hurt about it.

    I think that is going a bit too far.

    Her statement, bold mine.

    After achieving one of the most important objectives of my sports career and after a few days of reflection, I want to sincerely thank my teammates, fans, followers, media, and everyone who has made this dream come true; your work and unconditional support were a fundamental part of winning the World Cup.


    "The situation shocked me given the celebrations that were taking place at the moment, and with the passage of time and after delving a little deeper into those initial feelings, I feel the need to report this incident because I believe that no person, in any work, sports, or social setting should be a victim of these types of non-consensual behaviours. I felt vulnerable and a victim of an impulse-driven, sexist, out of place act without any consent on my part.


    "I want to make it clear that at no time did the conversation to which Mr. Luis Rubiales refers to in his address take place, and, above all, was his kiss ever consensual. I want to reiterate as I did before that I did not like this incident.

    "The situation shocked me given the celebrations that were taking place at the moment, and with the passage of time and after delving a little deeper into those initial feelings, I feel the need to report this incident because I believe that no person, in any work, sports, or social setting should be a victim of these types of non-consensual behaviors. I felt vulnerable and a victim of an impulse-driven, sexist, out of place act without any consent on my part.


    "Simply put, I was not respected.


    "I was asked to make a joint statement to alleviate the pressure on the president, but at that moment all I had in mind was to enjoy the historic milestone achieved with my teammates. For this reason, I always conveyed to the RFEF and its various interlocutors, as well as to media and people I trust, that I would not make any individual or joint statements on this matter, as I understood that doing so would take even more prominence away from such a special moment for my teammates and me.


    "Despite my decision, I must state that I have been under continuous pressure to make a statement that could justify Mr. Luis Rubiales' actions. Not only that, but in different ways and through different people, the RFEF has pressured my surroundings (family, friends, teammates, etc.) to give a testimony that had little or nothing to do with my feelings.


    "It is not up to me to evaluate communication and integrity practices, but I am sure that as the World Champion, we as a team do not deserve such a manipulative, hostile, and controlling culture. These types of incidents add to a long list of situations that the players have been denouncing in recent years.


    "This incident, one in which I have been involved, is the final straw and what everyone has been able to witness on live television during the celebration also comes with attitudes like the one we saw this morning and have been part of our team's daily life for years.

    "For all these reasons, I want to reinforce the position I took from the beginning, considering that I do not have to support the person who has committed this action against my will, without respecting me, at a historic moment for me and for women's sports in this country. Under no circumstances can it be my responsibility to bear the consequences of conveying something I do not believe in, which is why I have refused the pressures received.


    "I have ZERO TOLERANCE for these behaviors.


    "I want to conclude by making it very clear that while it is I who is expressing these words, it is all the players from Spain and around the world who have given me the strength to come out with this statement. In the face of such a display of disrespect and inability to recognize one's own mistakes and take responsibility, I state here and now to everyone of my decision not to play for the National Team again while the current leaders remain.

    "Thank you all for the messages of support and encouraging words received. I know I am not alone, and thanks to all of you, we will push forward more united than ever. I leave this matter in the hands of TMJ and FUTPRO, and the people I trust. They will continue working on the next necessary steps."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 698 ✭✭✭TedBundysDriver


    Just seen the video of the women laughing and joking about the kiss. If that's sexual assault then i guess they think it's funny.

    Amnesty International’s new investigation shows that Israel imposes a system of oppression and domination against Palestinians across all areas under its control: in Israel and the OPT, and against Palestinian refugees, in order to benefit Jewish Israelis. This amounts to apartheid as prohibited in international law.



  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 78,392 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    The topic is Spain and its women's football team and the incident after the World Cup Final. It is not Manchester United and it is not Mason Greenwood. If you wish to discuss that then start another thread on it (but be aware of libel laws if you do).

    And stop the bickering, as threadbans will follow any more of it. I am sure the main culprits know who they are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,062 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    Player power, can I mention Vera Pauw here?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,508 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    You can but it has no relevance here. A total different situation I'm not sure it's fair to include Vera Pauw I'm the same conversation as Rubiales



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,843 ✭✭✭✭gmisk




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,939 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    Neither the time or the place for that soapboxing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    What a bewildering comment to make. How is it neither the time nor the place?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,939 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    She was there to receive an award for coach of the year not to turn it into some political stunt which she did.

    Politics has no place in sport, none.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement