Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Premier League Thread 2023-24 Mod Note in op 27/6/23 And 21/05/24

11516182021410

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,032 ✭✭✭✭noodler


    Let's not have sports washing adopted on boards as well!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,567 ✭✭✭✭martyos121


    I’m pretty sure the Saudis would quite like us to call Newcastle that.

    I mean look at their away kit:

    Untitled Image image.jpeg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,952 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,807 ✭✭✭Dave0301


    To be fair, the club has been/is being run by idiots for a long time now. Hopefully the negative response that this is generating will make them rethink the Greenwood decision. I also wouldn't be surprised if they don't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,865 ✭✭✭Pauliedragon


    The Athletic did a very interesting podcast yesterday specifically on the Greenwood situation. Well worth a listen.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,350 ✭✭✭POKERKING




  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 58,128 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,869 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    If this is true, he could be in big trouble. Would this be classified as match fixing, or spot-fixing?




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,473 ✭✭✭Royale with Cheese


    Pakistani cricketers got jail time for spot fixing on aspects of matches while playing in the UK. He's in massive trouble if there's any truth to that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,674 ✭✭✭doc_17


    I think it’s important, in the absence of proper oversight from UEFA and the PL, that we recognise City* most likely broke many rules to win their titles. And as for Newcastle/Saudi, it is a sportswashing operation so I’ll call it what it is.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,724 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hammer Archer


    It would be absolute peak West Ham if one of our best players were to be banned due to bets placed with the company that's our shirt sponsor.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 18,758 Mod ✭✭✭✭DM_7


    Mod: Quoting this post as you asked about the OP.

    The soccer forum charter is clear and such names or adjustments should not happen here unless posters want to get a yellow forum warning.



  • Posts: 45,738 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I can't see him coming back at Utd. Not a single utd supporter I've encountered wants him back. It seems to be similar on here when the topic comes up.

    One listen to that recording is enough for anyone to make their mind up.

    He's toast.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,361 ✭✭✭✭retalivity


    Do not underestimate the idiocy/greed/callousness/tone-deafness of football owners/rich people when it comes to money or 'protecting the value of an asset'



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,882 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    The mad thing about those accusations is that there were people online at the time who noticed that he was bizarrely odds on for the yellow card.


    Obviously those tweets have only come to light now that it’s public news, but you’d imagine the investigation has been going on since then (that surely wouldn’t escape the bookies notice)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    Sure look at the state of things.

    “That lad is a disgrace , should never play football for a big club.”

    But then we get from some people

    “Don’t slag the name of that club who’s owners are accused of human rights abuses, it’s childish”

    Such is the hyperbolic , hypocritical, shameful, hysterical, real lacking in self awareness double standards of society. If there was consistency, there’d be consistent outrage and City/Newcastle would be booed everywhere they went. We don’t need recordings to read about the kind of hideous immoral behaviour their owners engage in.

    But they aren’t booed because it’s easier to focus on one person and give them all the abuse. I mean somebody even quoted Man City as an example of how to treat a player in a sex scandal. I get why they quoted city, but that’s like quoting Harvey Weinstein if he said “rape is bad”. That club is sportswashing its owners image, getting rid of the player was part of projecting that image , it was not a moral position taken by the club.

    I mean that’s not even asking questions about them allegedly cheating in their accounts but that’s not the worst thing their owners do so let’s park that.

    Football is just an immoral , soulless mess. We all choose what to get upset about. This Greenwood stuff isn’t the worst thing in football or worst thing a club has done, it’s just people pick and choose when to care about stuff.

    Greed drives the EPL, Fifa and all major clubs, nothing else. Sure look at all the top clubs signing up to a super league without any consideration of fans. This is the sport. Why are people so animated and shocked at United taking back a player in this instance? It’s like the madeleine McCann story that got a disproportional amount of coverage then it deserved.

    Greenwood deserves to be publicly hung drawn and quartered, city and Newcastle deserve to be allowed to play football and we should respect their projects. Yeh that’s a totally proportionate , objective , reasonable way to make sure we uphold our principles consistently.



  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That's some monumental whataboutism



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    If you are taking my post as a defence of Greenwood , it’s not in anyway defending him or United.

    It’s just an unfiltered truth about the state of the game that people choose to ignore.

    But if you’d like to actually address what you feel is false, I’d gladly converse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,882 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    But whataboutism is still exactly what it is. If the idea is that you have to have the energy for everything or nothing, then that’s setting up for a massive degradation of standards.


    Things are gonna be hypocritical sometimes for perfectly natural reasons and there isn’t a lot we can do about that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,674 ✭✭✭doc_17


    Some interesting posts online about another PL player and how he may have treated his partner.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    You can call that whataboutery, but I don’t understand how you feel that this is the most important thing to take from me highlighting a bigger moral/corrupt issue in the sport.

    It’s just not about about caring for everything though. It’s also about the inconsistency and disproportionate reaction/response.

    I mean you had people dieing daily building football stadiums for a tournament many watched or owners whitewashing their crimes against humanity that seems to be just an accepted norm now. Even sex scandals with other footballers , Ronaldo included , seem to go under the radar relative to this and can’t get any traction.

    On another level I think It’s just sad that woman’s groups have to latch onto this one case to get any sort of meaningful attention. Once this dies down most people won’t give it a second thought while sex cases that don’t have recordings will be relatively ignored.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,629 ✭✭✭Augme


    Who respects or wants the owners of city or Newcastle involved in football? Since PIF took over Newcastle there has been nothing but criticism for the PL for allowing it to happen.


    Not sure what point you're trying to make either. Because there’s been inconsistencies with how issues like this have been dealt we that people should then just ignore the Greenwood issue and pretend like it never happened and welcome back to football with open arms?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,841 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    What club? The danger is that there could be a bit of metoo come to play in emotional situations, obviously some individuals are getting large payments to stay stum, there needs to be evidence, recordings, witnesses etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,952 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    United. Ex wife has made reports to police. Apparently club doctors were involved and actually treated her.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    I never said people should ignore the Greenwood issue or welcome him back nor have I remotely implied it. Please don’t make false accusations, ask me if you don’t understand what I am saying.

    I think we are terrible, as a society, at addressing corruptions and abuses. We seem to need individual stories to latch onto to get us animated. We are terrible at focusing on wider , cultural issues and once the headlines die down we move on.

    We quite often ignore worse crimes (particularly when there’s more people affected) because it’s more work and harder to digest.

    Just annoys me when you see this sort of energy going into one moment, one case and next week it will be just last weeks news, unless there is visceral evidence (as another poster put it) to get the crowds animated again.

    If whataboutery is the most important thing many of you took from my post, then it kind of validates the point.



  • Posts: 14,734 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,882 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    It’s not about whether I call it whataboutery though. That’s literally what the term means.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,629 ✭✭✭Augme



    I do agree as a society we are terrible at addressing abuse and corruption issues. If some asked me for an example I'd use the Greenwod situation as a perfect example that shows how bad we are at dealing with abuse.


    Until those individual situations change, society won't change. That's why so much energy goes into one moment, because one moment has the ability to compeletey change a situation or dynamic forever, or at the very least shine and spotlight on it to an extent that hasn't happened before.


    Take Rosa Parks sitting at the front of the bus. It would have been easy to ignore that and complain how that's only one moment and shouldn't be viewed as being that important and black people were on the receiving end of much worse treatment than having to sit at the back of the bus so we shouldn't focus on this one moment. It should be obviously why that happening would have been terrible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    Thank you for your respectful response. I actually agree with your post , except I’ve less tolerance for how sh*t we are at addressing issues. I’m not angry at people being angry at the greenwood stuff, I’m angry that it takes these things for people to give it their attention. That’s life, that’s humans, we all do it, but it’s just a statement of fact.

    I don’t want to say much more because I have asked multiple mods that this conversation be deleted because there are defamatory implications to the way people have engaged me.

    People need to understand you can’t go around accusing or implying people of being effectively a rape apologist because they are looking to expand on a topic in a manner that you don’t like.

    And with that , just because a person wants to expand on it, does not automatically mean they are looking to deflect or defend an alleged abuser.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,629 ✭✭✭Augme



    No problem. As I said, I completely with what you are saying as well. But I do understand why people find it easier to latch onto individual moments rather than abstract situations. I put that down to the limited brain capacity more than anything else. When it comes to everything, humans struggle to understand more abstract concepts or situations solely portrayed using stats or data.


    I understand about expanding a topic, but the reality is the rape apologists and Greenwood defneders will use a very similar argument that you have to justify United keeping him or how he hasn't really done anything wrong. Wanting to have a wide discussion on bow society deals with abuse to women but doing it on the back of an individual situation is always going to be risky.


    But always a good discussion to open up anyway, even if you catch a bit of unfair flack or criticism for it.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement