Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1659660662664665943

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    You didn't understand the premise. You put your price of 1.5m and you can sell if and only if it hits that advertised price. If you want to lower it, then you will have to re-advertise it at 1.2m for a minimum reasonable period of time thereafter. The 1.2m would have to be logged on some official register maybe too. No getting around it with rebates etc. You can ask for 10m if you want. But you'd only be wasting your own time in that scenario.


    The advantage is that it isn't wasting other people's time. You can ask for what you want, and if you ask for something that they don't want to pay then they can walk on to the next one.



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You didn’t understand my answer, all sellers would put their prices up, fearing they would have to accept a bid lower than market price. The market would stagnate as sellers would wait before incrementally lowering price, then accept a price lower than the initial advertised price. In effect you are handing control of the market over to sellers rather than allowing buyers to bid against each other.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,161 ✭✭✭wassie


    See, not only can I read what you posted earlier, I can ask you how handling bids that way would make the process better. Simples.

    Introduce selling via simple formal offer & acceptance process as I posted earlier as opposed to the drawn out sale agreed process which is essentially only an invitation to treat until contracts are exchanged.

    All offers must be in writing using standard forms of contract. If dummy bids are suspected, EA should be able to provide verifiable proof.

    No need for regulated third party and could all be managed under the current The Property Services Regulatory Authority (PSRA).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    No. It would help with price discovery which is a prerequisite for any efficient market.

    Go to daft.ie now and list up houses in any area. Say you want to buy in mullingar and your budget is 300k. You'll see some houses with notional prices of 200k, 300k and 400k. How many of them are within your budget in reality? The answer is that you don't know.


    If you are not going to sell for less than X, what difference will being forced to advertise at x rather than 75% of X make? Advertise at 125% of X if you want. Then you are just wasting your own time.

    Under the system I proposed, there is no stagnation. When the asking is met, the sale is done. Currently you have no idea when it is done. The seller might list at 750k, really want 1m, it hits 1.1m and they decide there has been interest in it so they'll sit on it longer.



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I would be surprised if any seller chose not to sit on their property whilst bidding continues, that is price discovery at its simplest, and finest.

    Taking your approach, it would be inconceivable that any seller would consider setting their price point at anything other than a level above the maximum they think the market would pay. That in turn may lead to buyers paying far more than the price point which would have been reached by the current bidding process.

    I don’t think anyone believes that guide/advertised prices are anything other than arbitrary numbers which have to be put on the ad. Sellers may have a price below which they will not sell, but if you want them to set a price at which they will, you shouldn’t be surprised if it’s way above your expectations, or that someone will be willing to pay it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Yeah I don't care. Put a billion Euro as the listed price if you want. Good luck with getting an estate agent to advertise it for you though. If you put it too high then it won't sell. There is no price discovery under the current system. Go to daft, search for the first house in any area and come back to me and tell me what price it is currently making or what you would have to put on the table to buy it tomorrow


    the system I proposed would cut out all this wasted time and expense of multiple people trying to bid on multiple houses for months. The buyer offering you your advertised might also be offering the advertised on another 5 properties - he just has no idea which one, if any, he might get accepted on. 4 of those bids will be withdrawn if he does get one.

    It helps the seller too as you will see an actual view of the transact-able prices in your area at the time you are selling rather than a delayed PPR price a few months later.



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The significant drops we sometimes see in high end listings indicates that EAs have no issue with advertising properties at inflated guide prices.

    Surely the market discovers the price with the highest bid? You can find the price you need to put on the table, by looking at the PPR after it sells. It is simply not possible to accurately anticipate every time what the market will pay for a property, you can at best make an educated guess, and yet we are all still surprised at times at the prices properties achieve.

    This is getting silly so I’ll leave it at that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Here is the first listing on daft. Can you please tell me what price I need to pay to secure this property? Thanks


    The only silly thing is suggesting that an opaque bidding process offers more price discovery than a definite price the seller will accept and will have to accept. The analogy would be that you would claim that the general public would be better able to tell what the price a packet of jaffa cakes will cost them if shops stopped displaying actual prices and instead every shop auctioned off their jaffa cakes to customers advertising only a wishy washy guide price. With all due respect, that would be nonsense.


    There are people right now bidding on houses, and sitting on the highest bid for maybe a few weeks who still don't know what the eventual price of the house will be when it is sold.



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Ah ok. You can't tell me. That's fine. Point proven.


    If we don't know the price, we can't know where the market is at. We can only really know what it was a few months ago.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,227 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Did I not long since specifically request that you two place each other on ignore? If not, this is that request. Drop the current back and forth on here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 7,729 ✭✭✭jj880


    https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2023/0810/1399050-ecb-is-on-back-foot-and-for-once-its-down-to-germany/

    This is forcing a change of tune at the ECB -- from ruling out a pause in its steepest and longest streak of interest rate hikes to openly talking about one as soon as next month.


    "We continue to expect the ECB to pivot significantly over the next few months, with no further hikes this year and March kicking off a series of rate cuts," economists ABN-AMRO said in a note to clients.


    Is any of this any way probable or are RTE just stuffing an article with anyone they can find saying this for a headline?

    >>> BOARDS IS IN TROUBLE - SUBSCRIPTIONS NEEDED <<<

    Info 👉️ Important News!!

    Progress 👉 https://keepboardsalive.com/

    Subscribe 👉️ https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 863 ✭✭✭Zenify


    Looks like headline stuff. ECB announced all this at their last meeting. They haven't given any new guidance since. This is just linking opinions of economists to what the ECB said in July. No new information on the ECB decision making process.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,037 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Biggest danger to the Irish economy imo

    Raising rates were done to cool economies and suppress inflation for obvious enough reasons

    Our government and central banks implemented measures that reversed these effects such as shared ownership and relaxed mortgage lending and prevented the bubble from deflating in a controlled manner.

    A cut in rates now will overheat the Irish economy and accelerate the car as the brick wall approaches

    Our rates should be higher than the US never mind EU



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 747 ✭✭✭drogon.


    I have said this before and will say it again, just increasing rates will kill the economy. Any interest rate hikes will take 6 months to a year to show any effects.

    So called experts in the US were saying rates will climb and then come down as quickly as they raised it earlier this year, unfortunately that doesn't make any sense. You need to raise rates, once stuff starts levelling out you leave the rates at a steady pace to let it soak into the economy. Remember it was only last July when ECB took the rate from 0% -> 0.5%.

    That being said I am not saying they won't raise rates again, but don't expect they will do it every time they meet. Also don't expect rates to come down for at least another year or two years (unlike the article), and when it does come down I expect it to hover between 1% ~ 2% for the next decade at least. Unless something dramatic happens.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 747 ✭✭✭drogon.


    But aren't borrowing limits in the UK closer to 4.5x the salary, so even at 4x we are still at the lower end. I would say in the US it might be higher than 4.5x.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 7,729 ✭✭✭jj880


    Jaysus. I think most (well me and anyone I talked to) underestimated how much things are fvcked and need corrected.

    When my mortgage ends I'll have paid more than if Id fixed my rate for sure. Im ECB+1.25% with 5.5 years left from July 2022. Payments up 80 euro pm so far since then.

    >>> BOARDS IS IN TROUBLE - SUBSCRIPTIONS NEEDED <<<

    Info 👉️ Important News!!

    Progress 👉 https://keepboardsalive.com/

    Subscribe 👉️ https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    US has non recourse mortgages and simple and quick foreclosure process. So there isn't the same need for centralised control.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 996 ✭✭✭Ozark707


    Only 11 states have non recourse mtges in the US, the majority don't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 747 ✭✭✭drogon.


    Yeah I agree, but I think overall 3.5% LTI was fairly stringent and I don't believe the Central Bank did it to prevent the deflation of the property value as the previous poster mentioned. If you do 5 minutes of research, you will find that the Central bank were doing studies as far back as 2016 and 2018, it is just coincident that it happened during IR hikes.

    image.png




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Not quite. All federally backed mortgages are non-recourse, even if in a recourse loan state. Although they tend to be insured



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Our Euro-area interest rate is still only 3.5%. Its 5.5% in the US currently, and 5.25% in the UK.

    Euro area inflation is still running at 5.3% overall as of July, 10.8% for food. That 5.5% overall figure was being dragged down by cheaper oil and gas prices too which were at -6% in July, but which have gone into reverse in recent weeks. So the overall figure is going to be trending up again soon.

    Plenty of Euro countries also still have extremely high overall inflation - Slovakia (10.2%), Croatia (8.1%) Lithuania (7.1%) etc.

    I wouldn't be betting on the increases to stop yet.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 747 ✭✭✭drogon.


    Again not saying they won't increase it. All I am saying is they really need IR hikes to soak in the economy for it to take effect! Any rate hike won't see impacts for at least 6 months to a year after it was done.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,161 ✭✭✭wassie


    The 4x LTI only applies to FHB. Otherwise, its still 3.5x with exemptions for a small portion of borrowers, so the average is somewhere in between.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,037 ✭✭✭Villa05


    You'll find that the in 16 and 18 the central bank were strongly opposed to relaxing the rules and in fact tightened the numbers that could borrow at 4 times income in 18, despite intense political pressure. This coincided with a stabilisation of prices up untill covid

    This stance only changed when the cental bank head changed. An appointment heavily critiqued by many including previous heads of the CB that were tasked with cleaning up the mess from the celtic tiger regime



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,037 ✭✭✭Villa05


    If an economy can't cope with normalization of rates, one suspects the economy was murdered prior to the rate rises rather than a consequence of rate rises



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,037 ✭✭✭Villa05


    What do you think 30% shared ownership plus 10% ftb grant does. Your 4x income may only be purchasing 60% of a home where as its greater than 90% in UK and US

    I'm also pretty sure you are aware that both the UK and US have significant storm clouds gathering, with affordability in the US worse than the 07/08 peak



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 747 ✭✭✭drogon.


    I totally agree here, The EU economic growth was mediocre at best when the interest rates was 0% for close to a decade. So I can only imagine what is in front of us. But remember it is the same people that made those decision still at the helm of the ship.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 747 ✭✭✭drogon.


    The issue is all these scheme are aimed at building more houses. But at the same time the policy implies that average Joe can't buy these houses and Bob the builder can't build them at a reasonable price. Hence they need massive subsidies, which again isn't very sustainable.

    But since these subsides are aimed at new builds, which are only a small percentage of the housing market. But no doubt they will have impact on the market.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 345 ✭✭SimpleDimple


    Went to view a house on Thursday, it’s listed at an ambitious €665k. Spoke to the agent a few days after, having had the third viewing they now have an offer of €630, the vendor isn’t interested in selling at that price. I was also at a different viewing where the agent acknowledged the price was too high but the seller insisted on it so as a result they weren’t getting offers.

    I’ve been to a few others like this, sellers not getting what they think the house of worth and so leaving it up there. Hopefully (as a perspective buyer) it’s an indication of some cooling off.



Advertisement
Advertisement