Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

18258268288308311855

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    There's always the "have we peaked too soon" or the Sexton health issues. Like S.A, we are tied down to Sextons health and Porter. If Porter goes down we are fcuked.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,280 ✭✭✭ZookeeperDub


    You posted:

    Munster fans will remember how SA crashed before the last WC as it caused them to lose their coach. SA were a mess and going into the competition many people thought it would catch up with them,, as Aloof makes clear above.

    Along with other statement to say how terrible SA was prior to 2019. Including that nobody had them in for winning the competition. I provided the bookies and loads of others seen the form of SA and had them in as a favuorite.

    Now you are saying???

    Maybe it times to admit you make an error



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,691 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    The England performance against NZ in the 2019 RWC was typical Eddie Jones. When he has a lot of time, he comes up with a game plan specifically to win a big one off match against a certain opponent but then has nothing for the next match and gets found out. Look at his teams in the 2003, 2015 and 2019 world cups. It's why I could see Aus beating the ABs this weekend.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,751 ✭✭✭ersatz


    What's the error? SA were poor before the last World Cup but because they have a habit of winning it no-one would bet against them, basically the same point Ive been making for a couple of days here. Same goes for NZ, they might be terrible but they could still win the WC. Even before their performance against SA recently many pundits had them as favourites/joint favourites w France. I repeat, SA were in poor form throughout the period before the last WC yet they were highly favoured anyway because they are SA who are always likely to win it. Are you arguing that because the bookies had them as one of the favourites they'd been excellent in the previous period because the record does not near that out?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,280 ✭✭✭ZookeeperDub


    You posted:

    In 2019 they drew with NZ and beat the other two in a 3 match run. No-one was jumping up and down about them and when NZ beat them in the group stage they were written off. They'd been off form for years at that stage. Rassie primed them perfectly as it turned out but if they'd been blown out of the group few people would have been surprised. In 2018 the went 1-1 against both OZ and NZ, winning at home and losing on the road.

    From another

    More generally SA have to be given a real shot partly because they came into the last WC as no hopers, 

    Doesn't seem to align

    When have NZ been terrible? they have won the last two Rugby Championships.....

    SA wasn't in poor form before the last WC. I repeat they won the rugby Championship.

    I am pointing out the glaring issues



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,751 ✭✭✭ersatz


    You're just refusing to read it. SA not great before the last WC but won it anyway. In my view they're just as dangerous this time even with their problems at 10 and the front row. I would never count them out. You can disagree with it but I've no idea what doesn't align.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,122 ✭✭✭Shehal


    I remember that year like it was yesterday and I can tell you that this is in fact false.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,122 ✭✭✭Shehal


    Trust me I aint dying on any hill! This is an opinion forum so I'm not going to criticise you for having an opinion but what I wont do is let you spread false information and get away with it. In 2019 SA were in the top 4 teams in the world, 2nd in the odds and rugby championship holders. To say they weren't a very good team is factually incorrect so continuing to say they weren't is just damaging you're credibility.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,122 ✭✭✭Shehal


    Yes but that is a pretty subjective term...I could point to any of the top 10 sides in the world as the best teams...

    I agree about SA at least, I still think NZL have room to grow even more but at this stage I would still have doubts ngl.

    SA winning the RC in 2019 shows that they clearly weren't the terrible side many try to make them out to be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭Ray Donovan


    You don’t get a star on your shirt for winning the RWC.

    You get to put the emblem of the William Webb Ellis trophy on your sleeve and the year you won it underneath. And only on jerseys worn at following RWCs.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,012 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    But aren’t you dismissing SA chances this time?

    Despite them being the same ranking (4th) and shorter odds (7/2 today vs 9/2) now as vs 2019?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,280 ✭✭✭ZookeeperDub


    Read your own posts and they don't align. You said SA was a basket case and nobody had them to win the last WC. Anyway it seems you are playing the standard online forum game. Make a statement and when its wrong ignore you made it in first place



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,374 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,122 ✭✭✭Shehal



    Ill answer you're 2nd question first. Basically what all the stats in 2019 prove is that SA weren't "no hopers" going into that WC that people claim.

    One thing I'll caveat with those stats both in the betting and ranking is when Erasmus took over SA were like 7th in the world and their odds were alot longer (in September 2018 they were 12/1 so can only imagine they were alot longer when Erasmus took over after the 2017 season) so what you can see between when he took over and the RWC they went up 3 places in the rankings and had their odds slashed both in terms of positions and the odds themselves. This time however they've went from 1st in the world to 4th and their odds havent really moved at all ( I would imagine this largely down to the fact that England/Wales/Australia have collapsed and Ireland have really shortened so almost by default SA have held their position) so when you break it down SA have gone backwards despite the data being similar as they started in a far FAR stronger position this cycle compared to when Erasmus took over.

    I dont think I have dismissed their chances, they definitely are contenders and could very well end up as champions but if I look at the 4 sides they are the only ones with massive red flags sticking out, you don't see Ireland or France having shockers like 2 weeks ago for instance and to be having those shockers with more or less you're best team only 50 days or so out from the tournament would be hugely concerning, you cant exactly come out and say they were experimenting or anything looking at that team. NZL I still would have just behind Ireland & France as they have had a tendency of drifting in and out of games like v Australia (in Melbourne), England, Scotland, SA (both times), Argentina (home) and even to an extent that game against SA in Auckland. You see in those games for the most part why they will be a huge threat at the RWC but then you also see why they still have a bit of work to do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭Must love hardship


    What happens between now and Ireland naming their final RWC squad? https://the42.ie/6129290

    Murray Kinsella has an excellent piece here on what the squad is up to over the next few weeks.

    There were a few people asking a few pages back on why don't ireland just stay in France after the final warm up game but I think it's all laid out here.

    Currently on week off then back to carton house before the game v Italy and then a week in Portugal where they will train with the Portuguese rugby team too and then back for the England game.. and then off to Biarritz for a week before coming home and announcing the final squad. Seems pretty well laid out. With some breaks for down time in-between.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,083 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Sounds like a good programme - the trip to Portugal after the Italy game is a great idea and Tours is a nice spot to be based in during the tournament.

    Mad that it's only ten days to the first warm-up game. It will be interesting to see if everyone gets a run, or whether some guys fall at the first hurdle. You'd have to think that guys like Blade, Osborne and Nash need to be involved next weekend or they're done.

    I see that Conway is training with Munster so looks like he wasn't called up by Ireland.

    Post edited by Former Former Former on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,868 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    is it this week that conway is with munster? he could have been sent back to them for the off week to get more training in. id think hes a long shot still but AF is a big fan so i wouldnt be surprised if hes being given the best chance possible or even being first on the injury call up list



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,854 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    Munsters squad update from this week confirmed that Conway (and Diarmuid Barron) were with the Irish squad last week.

    Training pictures confirm Barron but hadn't spotted Conway in any



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,083 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    That's interesting about Barron, I wonder is there an injury concern over one of the hookers? (there usually is with Kelleher)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,280 ✭✭✭ZookeeperDub


    Conway is up a while, they had pictures of event ages ago and he was sitting in the very back of a group photo...some eagle eyed fans picked it out



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,281 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    I don’t know if it means anything but Blade is an entertaining player to watch. An excellent improviser.

    At this stage I just hope our main men don’t pick up any injuries before the opening match. After that the serenity prayer will be deployed on multiple occasions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 373 ✭✭VayNiice


    Just after watching the first half of the AB v Boks game from a few days ago.


    Must say I'm a lot more worried about our chances in the RWC now. I'd definitely be hoping to face France if New Zealand keep improving.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 464 ✭✭Iamabeliever


    I agree, but first we need to get out of the group. If we do get to a QF Ireland will more or less go full strength round 2,3,4 and then QF. Group B winners and runners will practically have a month off. New Zealand seem to be trying to peak for the France game. So I understand why there flying at the moment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,280 ✭✭✭ZookeeperDub


    NZ want Ireland

    France probably want Ireland to be honest

    Our WC record is terrible and they will want Ireland instead of SA who could turn up and sneak out a win



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 301 ✭✭redmca2


    After yesterday's match between SA and Argentina when SA were pummelled for almost all the 2nd half I wouldn't rate SA as a major threat, either that or Argentina are a serious dark horse



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,189 ✭✭✭typhoony


    Our group is suddenly looking a lot more appealing, I guess of we can get through with a couple of 60 minutr performances then we will be fresh for what's to come, or yesterdsys results will be a kick up the backside for SA and Scotland



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,122 ✭✭✭Shehal


    Based on the championship I'd lean more towards SA not being great. I do think though based on the draw Argentina can be considered dark horses, right now I'd give them the best chance from the weaker side of the draw to trouble the top 4.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,122 ✭✭✭Shehal


    Am I living in some alternate universe or something because by some miracle SA odd's have actually shortened after the last 2 round of the championship and Ireland drifted, have punter accidentally mixed the two countries up when placing bets or have they just lost their mind?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,670 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    It's kinda mental alright. Ireland have had the best defense in the world over the last 2 seasons, and SA have shown nothing that would be overly troublesome for me. NZ remain to be seen, they still look overly reliant on counter attacking to score



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,453 ✭✭✭PMC83


    Hard to pick who I'd like Ireland to face in the quarters (should we get there). We're a better team then we were 4 years ago, we've gotten the better of the Abs on a number of occasions. The mystique is well and truly gone. Yes they are on the up, but the reality is Ireland will have no fear of them, we have the players to beat them IMHO. Sam Cane will look at POM knowing he was bang on the money with that barb.

    France are a more familiar foe, its always an arm wrestle. With the exception of this years 6 nations a lot of the recent meetings have ended in one score games. At club level, our starting 9 and 10 have consistently gotten the better of their starting 9 and 10. But of course its their world cup.


    In truth I'd probaly rather the Abs. If they could, I'd love to see Ireland put them out.



Advertisement
Advertisement