Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Western Rail Corridor / Rail Trail Discussion

1164165167169170185

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 438 ✭✭andrewfaulk


    I was down about 4-5 weeks ago..

    Not sure what you are building but sounds like another white elephant.. No need for more Lo/Lo capacity in the south east, just a rail link into the port with some hard standing



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It'll be greenway north of Claremorris to preserve the line so

    However, he said the final part of the old western rail corridor from Claremorris to Collooney in Sligo was not expected to be earmarked for restoration in the report.

    “I think the first and most important priority is doing the connection between Athenry and Claremorris. I think we can preserve that line [to Collooney].

    Depending on what the report outlines for a timeline, it will be an "on the line to be moved to the side later" greenway from Athenry (if its a long timeframe to reinstate the line) or it'll be a "running alongside" greenway from Athenry (if its a shorter timeframe).

    Personally, I couldn't care less which option so long as something makes use of this asset though I think it makes the most sense to build on the line now and shunt it to the side when they go to reinstate as building a parallel greenway now and then the line later will be a massive waste as they'll likely have to rebuild the greenway again.

    As for timelines to reinstate it, I can't see it being anything but a very long-term goal

    Ryan’s plan deals with proposed rail investment over a 30-year period. Short term projects would be developed in this decade, medium in the 2030s, and so on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,464 ✭✭✭Economics101


    I agree, no need for more Lo-Lo capacity in the SE. I wasn't advocating building a line: I just thought it was pointless, and the cost was probably a gross underestimate, as is the usual case when someone advocates "investment".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    The Irish Rail journey planner for Castlebar-Claremorris shows 19mins for several of the journeys, which I assume is excluding the 1 minute stopping time in the PDF timetable. As for Galway to Athenry, that's fair so let's call it 17mins, which is currently possible, including a stop at Oranmore and without the passing loop complete.

    Current line speed assumptions:

    - Limerick to Athenry 69km/h

    - Galway to Athenry 74km/h

    - Castlebar to Claremorris 75km/h


    My updated estimate:

    Castlebar to Claremorris - 20mins

    Claremorris to Tuam - 25mins (assuming 65km/h)

    Tuam to Athenry - 21mins (assuming 74km/h)

    Athenry to Galway - 17mins

    Total estimated journey 83minutes.


    As I said previously, this is assuming line speeds are not improved. A measly 10% improvement on line speeds could see a direct Castlebar-Galway service running at 75minutes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭StudentDad


    The sooner this line is rebuilt the better. If I could get rid of my car in favour of reliable and decently priced public transport I would.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 295 ✭✭Ronald Binge Redux


    What bemuses me is the assumption of low line speeds. The world has moved on but the conversation hasn't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    This is exactly my point. People in this thread insist on claiming, as fact, the Claremorris-Athenry line is immediately doomed to fail, as it will be slower than driving, and a bus line would be better.

    However, when you provide back-up data and estimates (based on sound reasoning), they obsess over a "1 minute" inaccuracy in my data, and then refuse to constructively discuss the point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,535 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Your timings are irrelevant because the ability to travel at a certain speed is not the only constraint. It may be possible to do Castlebar - Galway in 83 minutes (hardly amazing in itself) pre 6am but unlikely for the rest of the day. And even if that time can be regularly achieved, how many people want to make the journey?

    At either end of the Athenry - Claremorris section, you have single track which accommodates main line intercity services. For a train to get from Castlebar to Galway via WRC, it has to join/leave two other lines, this limits through paths. An available path heading east out of Castlebar might result in the train approaching Athenry when other services are scheduled to use the station (bear in mind that WRC Phase 1 trains use the station to change direction).

    The single track mainlines mean serious limitations on what can be achieved in terms of adding new services from a branch. Obviously the existing intercity services will be given priority as they connect the west to bigger towns (i.e. Athlone, Tullamore, Portlaoise, Kildare, Newbridge, Naas, and of course Dublin). The freight angle is a red herring as freight is already been carried on the existing network and more could be added with targeted investment without WRC.

    Double-tracking and capacity increases are needed first on the existing network but even that doesn't guarantee the fastest theoretical time Castlebar - Galway as you still have crossing manoeuvres which require time and good timing. This is why this focus on a Ballina - Rosslare "spine" is only a distraction, the real spine is the existing network which will have to support an expanded network.

    The claim then is "we can do both, it doesn't have to be one or the other", well in the real world of limited resources and capacity constraints (funding, labour, planning system, etc.), we need to prioritise and first progress that which will have most benefit. All the media attention around the AIRR has been on reopening lines (WRC, Waterford - Rosslare, Navan, spur to Donegal) and clearly a lot of politicians are on that bandwagon (which the MfT is steering), it only detracts from what needs to happen first. If the AIRR is to be worth the paper it's printed on, it should be making this clear.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 438 ✭✭andrewfaulk


    £3 million, all it needs is some Civils and minimal trackwork.. The main cost is signalling..

    I wasn't advocating investing in it, I was merely pointing out that the argument that Rosslare doesn't handle containers/can't handle rail freight doesn't stack up.. Like I said, it makes little sense re-opening Athenry to Claremorris and Waterford to Rosslare to run containers from Mayo to Rosslare, that would cost multiples of fixing the issues in Rosslare for maybe 2 trains per week(that would likely be poorly loaded as the economics of it are crap)..

    If we are talking about investment for freight in this country, then re-doubling Athlone to Portarlington should be priority 1 as it would benefit all currently operating freight services as well as passenger services to Westport and Galway.. The ROE would be far more favorable than anything further west and TDs and councillors in the West should be pushing for this project to happen within the 2020s..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,708 ✭✭✭serfboard


    Even when Bertie Ahern was firing around borrowed money like snuff at a wake we still did not have unlimited resources and we also had capacity constraints. However, rather than doing "what need[ed] to happen first" (double-tracking Portarlington to Athlone, or double-tracking Athenry to Galway, to cite two examples) we went ahead and built Ennis-Athenry at a cost of over 100 million. We did this because the politicians were under the mistaken belief that this was what the public wanted, thanks to the relentless (and admittedly successful) campaigning of a small pressure group.

    Of course, once it was built, the public showed, by their refusal to use it, that it was not what they wanted at all. But sure what harm, 'twas only 100 million.

    No politician is ever going to get their photo in the paper double-tracking a line. It's just not a mediaworthy item. So, despite the limited resources and capacity constraints we have now, I wouldn't underestimate the likelihood of it happening. I haven't heard one politician from the West of Ireland oppose it, or suggest that the other work should be done first, even though they may know that to be the case.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,860 ✭✭✭intellectual dosser



    Where to start? Maybe you’re just unloading.

    The Bertie thing, I’d imagine politically it would have been challenging to get Galway to Athenry double tracked while Galway to Athenry/Dublin was getting a motorway - then the money ran out. I can’t recall, just a guess.

    The public do use Limerick to Athenry/Galway.

    If the door to Ceannt Station got a new handle you’d better believe Hildegard Naughton would be there for a photo. Double Tracking or any infrastructure improvement is always a prominent story.

    There are politicians in the west that are quiet on the WRC issue, but one in particular who appears to be making it their legacy that WRC doesn’t happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,393 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    That politician is smart enough and honest to the electorate in fairness. No point putting the cart before the horse. What's there position on double tracking Athenry to Galway City?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,860 ✭✭✭intellectual dosser


    Is there anyone putting the cart before the horse? Seems to be a real phantom wedge in this thread.

    Irish Rail have commenced feasibility studies on double tracking, the additional platform at Oranmore is going to planning. It’s going to happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,005 ✭✭✭Westernview


    Confirmation today that the AIRR has recommended opening the WRC to Claremorris

    https://www.thejournal.ie/rail-review-report-donegal-cavan-monaghan-6127273-Jul2023/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,267 ✭✭✭Jizique


    Not much use if going to a factory in Ballybrit



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,734 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Bad urban planning on the part of galway council is hardly grounds to ignore any rail upgrades.

    Why bother double tracking galway to athenry if its of no use to commuters going to parkmore



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    AIRR released

    For the WRC it calls to "Reinstate the Western Rail Corridor between Claremorris and Athenry." But then it was always going to.

    It also projects the cost of the Athenry to Claremorris section as 400-600 million.....thats some window, but it further shows that the WOT estimate was hilariously wrong and I mean HILARIOUSLY!!

    The full report is viewable below

    It boggles the mind that they aim to double track Galway-Athenry and Athlone to Portarlington but the section between Athenry & Athlone will be left as single line

    image.png

    On the plus side, Mayo CC now have zero excuses to fall back on to not proceed with a greenway on the disused portion between Claremorris and Bellaghy



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,331 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    So I think more less everyone agrees the Portadown to Mulingar part is by far the most, shall we say, imaginative. What annoys me is why did they not just draw that line a lil bit further to Portarlington, if you're gonna dream that hard, might aswel finish



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,464 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Bring back the Horseleap Branch ! 😁

    Seriously, there is too much fantasy stuff in this report, whihc no doubt will exercise the journalists and useless Co Councillors.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,096 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Yes, the media are running with all the new lines to places like Cavan, with the nuts and bolts of the report only getting brief mentions if at all.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 39,780 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Lines which won't happen in any of our lifetimes.

    What is the point of a report like this?

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,005 ✭✭✭Westernview


    The predictable glass-half full brigade out in force here - unable to focus on the positive aspects of the report relating specifically to the WRC. Too busy talking about cycle tracks and lines in other parts of the country.

    Great to see WRC being included in phase 1 of schedule of works. Looking forward to seeing the line up and running in the years to come.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,804 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    If Tuam-Claremorris does open, it presents a right headache for TII. 4 level crossings on the N17 will be a proper pain.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,804 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Tomorrow's 18:44 from Ennis to Gort takes 47 minutes to complete this journey, about 30km. What's the story there?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,786 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Yes,

    The southerly LC is on a stretch of road due to be improved, isn't it?

    The two LC either side of Ballindine could be removed by building a new 1km railway line east of the village.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    It's waiting for another train to pass. They really need a passing loop halfway between those towns.

    Given the plan to increase line speeds, one would assume new bridges are included in the plans. Especially with a pricetag of 4-600m



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Half a billion to run a line between Claremorris and Athenry, feck me but the boom times are getting boomier as Bertie would say

    That being said, there isn't a snowballs chance this will pass the PSC review at that price tag. Maybe, and its a massive maybe, if the price tag includes multiple P&R's, a greenway alongside, a high frequency schedule, 6am to midnight running and so on, it might. In other words, a massively attractive service that will see significant modal shift.

    Otherwise you're looking at spending this to run the same numbers as the WRC phase 1 or lower, on a service that will be slower than the bus equivalent, running maybe 3-4 times a day, at (best case) 2 hr intervals. All while leaving the main Galway-Dublin line with significant portions still being single track into the 2050's.

    Honestly if this goes ahead, if its not double tracked (or at least CPO'ed to allow for it later) then its just a stupid fkin idea from the get-go as it'll be doomed until the next century to be a shite service with zero possibility of improvement



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭StudentDad


    I welcome the day when I can hop on a train on the Westport - Dublin line and get to Galway. Granted I'll have to change in Claremorris and again in Athenry. Hell of an improvement on Westport - Athlone - change - Athlone - Galway. Perhaps, even go on to Limerick or Cork. No car needed. Happy days.



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You can already do that

    • bus route 456
    • runs 5 times a day, every 3 hrs from 6am to 6pm,
    • 2 hr journey time
    • 13.50 eur one way fare
    • No changeovers

    Thats a shite service and one I don't think WRC phase 2 would even hope to come close to



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭StudentDad


    Except it's a bus. Not a fan of buses. If I'm going to get stuck in traffic, I'll take my car.

    The connection of the rail makes a longer journey possible.



Advertisement