Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Western Rail Corridor / Rail Trail Discussion

1162163165167168185

Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,804 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,870 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    You’re using “might” to do a hell of a lot of heaving lifting there



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    Measuring indirect economic benefits are difficult. Is it possible to see the growth rate of rail connected villages / towns versus non rail connected over the last 30 years? Also, the possibility of a tourist route would bring huge economic benefits. Tourists spend tonnes of money.

    Can't for the life of me understand this enormous opposition to restoring closed railway lines, despite the miniscule cost versus other major projects.

    People need to realize that the focus is switching away from roads over to public transport. We don't need to fight for every last cent anymore. Multiple rail projects / upgrades can, and will, happen simultaneously.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,870 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    People want projects that can be demonstrated to bring immediate & significant tangible benefits to be prioritised over projects that any rational analysis can see are "might" at best bring very limited benefits.

    If WOT and their like-minded supporters actually cared about improvements for the West (as opposed to being driven by nostalgia and blindly focused on an old, failed alignment) then we'd see them campaigning for double-tracking of the Galway-Athlone mainline, significant upgrading of the Sligo-Mullingar line, and improvements on the Athlone-Westport lines and Manulla-Ballina branch line. All projects which could be delivered faster, and which would bring much more significant tangible benefits.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,394 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The money would be better spent on other transport projects, that's why. Providing a faster, more reliable service on existing routes is of a much higher benefit than reopening a goat track to some villages



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,001 ✭✭✭Westernview


    "If anybody is enthusiastic rail freight about from Claremorris that is because there is an existing operational rail line running through there"

    That's completely untrue. As has been said many times on this thread there has been enthusiasm for freight on the WRC from Baxter, Rosslare and Eamon Ryan. That's all on record, some of it quoted the last few days here, so while you can argue for or against the whole idea as much as you want you can't pretend there isn't support for it.

    "We certainly don't have to spend more than €100m to accommodate that freight. Fairly modest upgrades could facilitate much more services to/from Mayo, be they passenger or freight."

    Have you the costing analysis for that figure of €100m and what improvements it would lead to?

    "If the AIRR recommends further reopening the WRC then it is basically toilet paper."

    This just amounts to you rubbishing a report because it may not say what you want it to say. We haven't even seen it yet but because the indications are that it will support opening the WRC you don't want to know about it. Of course if it said otherwise you'd almost certainly use it to back your point of view.

    "There is so much untapped potential in the existing network which could be unlocked with relatively modest investment."

    Again what does modest mean. Is it the aforementioned €100m?

    "Spending a nine figure sum to reopen another limited capacity line which connects into the existing network which has little capacity for additional services would be absolutely criminal."

    Consultants and government departments north and south will have input into the AIRR since it was commissioned in 2021 but like some others on this thread you think you know better about what should or shouldn't be done. Its not all about the direct viability of the track itself but about the difference it makes to towns in address regional imbalances. Thinking of rail lines in isolation is a mistake but its something that critics keep focusing on over and over again. As I said recently most regional airports should be closed based on their performance in isolation but governments continue to subsidise them based on their importance to local economies. A town like Tuam will gain little or no benefit from upgrades on current lines if it's not itself connected but it is much more likely to prosper having it's own railway and being interconnected with other towns in the region.

    I know all this falls on deaf ears and you can complain all you want but the truth is that it is almost certain that the WRC is going to reopen. It will take a time but it's on the way.



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I know all this falls on deaf ears and you can complain all you want but the truth is that it is almost certain that the WRC is going to reopen. It will take a time but it's on the way.

    So long as it is not prioritised over main line improvements to other lines in the West then I don't think anyone has a problem with that. I certainly don't. More rail lines is better imho.

    Prioritising it over those lines though, yeah that would just be braindead based on the numbers using WRC phase 1 given that phase 2 would have a major population centre at the other end like phase 1 has i.e Limerick

    The main lines are screaming out for major investment for decades



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    Tuam is the largest town in county Galway. Claremorris is the largest town in county Mayo and could be connected to Galway city, the largest city in the West-northwest region.

    Your reference to goats and villages demonstrates your blatant bias.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    You constantly refer to WRC phase 1 to justify your assumption that WRC phase 2 will immediately fail. The Athenry to Tuam section is a dead straight line. The Athenry to Galway section will have double or more capacity following the Oranmore upgrade.

    The people of Tuam, the largest town in Galway, will see enormous benefit from phase 2, at a relatively cheap cost versus other upgrades.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,870 ✭✭✭blackwhite



    Claremorris is not the largest town in Mayo - it's the 4th largest - and it is a hell of a long way off being the 3rd largest, never mind the largest

    Why lie about something that is so easily proven false?

    One could say it demonstrates your blatant bias (and tells everyone exactly how much weight to put to any other claims you make to boot)


    image.png




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,001 ✭✭✭Westernview


    Yes I agree that generally priority has be to given to where demand is greatest. I'm certainly not blindly saying put loads of money into the west and stop things elsewhere. You will actually meet people with that mindset but thats just a parish pump mindset.

    I totally get your point about the major population at Limerick end and I'd never suggest that the numbers compare. However I'm talking about the region as a whole and how the country will look in the future. The Northwest was recently ranked 218th out of 234 EU regions based on lack of infrastructure. For a country as small as we are I think that's kind of embarrassing for us on the European stage. We are probably the most capital-centric country in the EU based on the dominance of Dublin.

    We need to maintain spending on public infrastructure in Dublin and I'm fully in favour of the metro despite the earth-watering cost of it. Its a European capital and we need a proper airport link. But beside that there's a bit of chicken and egg situation in Dublin - keep investing there and dragging more and more people into its spraling boundaries and then you need to keep pumping money into services and infrastructure as a result.

    Its only a single north-south rail line in the northwest and west region we are asking for (forget the north of Claremorris part) not a warren of tracks throughout the region. Other countries are much better than Ireland at long term planning - often catering for 50 to 100 years ahead. Our population is expected to keep increasing albeit it more slowly in the West than the East. So its a choice between continuing to prioritise other areas with greater demand or else give those areas the bulk of the investment and let the west have a small slice of the pie, even if it means a spending bias.



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The Athenry to Tuam section is a dead straight line. 

    No idea why you bold that.....is that a massive reason to justify prioritising WRC 2 over main line improvements or something?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,804 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Measuring indirect economic benefits are difficult. Is it possible to see the growth rate of rail connected villages / towns versus non rail connected over the last 30 years? Also, the possibility of a tourist route would bring huge economic benefits. Tourists spend tonnes of money.

    This is complete muck talk. Tourists don't like plodding around on slow trains all day. They are here for limited time and like to use it wisely. The Limerick-Galway rail line can't compete with the bus time so why would anything north of there on much worse alignments be of benefit to tourists? Are tourists going to go to Swinford because it has a train line?

    Can't for the life of me understand this enormous opposition to restoring closed railway lines, despite the miniscule cost versus other major projects.

    Because there is about 30 years worth of backlog works on the currently open parts of the railway network that are overdue, there isn't cash going around to waste.

    People need to realize that the focus is switching away from roads over to public transport. We don't need to fight for every last cent anymore. Multiple rail projects / upgrades can, and will, happen simultaneously.

    What do buses travel on?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 812 ✭✭✭rustynutz


    Tourists are more likely to come to swinford if the disused railway was turned into a greenway, than a pointless rail line that wasn't viable when it closed 50 years ago, and is less viable today with the massive improvement of roads.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,331 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    Tourism is a low value industry, which adds next to feck all to the Irish ecobomy. 90%+ of people employed in tourism are earning half or less of the median income, its valuable to countries like Egypt where the additional jobs can help lift people from poverty, but it doesn't add much to developed economies, least of all one of the most developed economies that has ever existed. Ireland has extremely low unemployment, we actually don't have the staff available to fulfill a large expansion of tourism and attracting staff to remote regions for a low wage is basically impossible. The hospitality industry even in Dublin is awash with staff wanted signs.

    People oppose further expansion of the wrc because its seen as diverting money from projects that are actually needed and will actually get people out of cars like Cork's light rail or expanding heavy rail to places where there is actually a demand like Navan or the large towns in west Cork, the villages in Mayo theoretically served by the wrc are mostly empty as planning policy encouraged people to abandon villages in favour of dispersal of the population to isolated dwellings in farm land.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,739 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    actually, it's ironically more viable now because of the roads as the roads will not get any more capacity upgrades and they will eventually reach full capacity.

    50 years ago isn't relevant really, ireland was a backward impoverished country which was under the control of the catholic church, we are not that any more and things have changed thankfully.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,739 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,804 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Reopening Victorian lines with speeds that don’t compete with road based transport (the bus) connecting low density low population dispersed towns through open countryside is not modernisation. It’s misguided nostalgia



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,739 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    every rail line in the country is victorian.

    realistically if there is wide scale support for the reopening of a line then there is obviously justification for it as otherwise any proposals would be ignored and have no support outside a specific individual advocating for them.

    the reality is that generally any line that would be reopened more then competes with the bus, as even if it does have a slightly lowere speed then the main road part of the journey, traffic rates along part of the route make road based transport slower as a whole over all due to the traffic rates.

    when we get people out of the cars on to rail along routes like the atlantic corridor, then the bus can offer fast journeys from areas that genuinely do have a low population and genuinely wouldn't justify rail.

    the atlantic corridor has areas where that wouldn't apply hence why ryan wants to reopen the closed part of the east-west railway corridor and hopefully improve the speeds finally on the opened part, and reopen part 2 of the western railway corridor.

    so yes modernisation as far as i can see and long, long over due.

    now whether it will be delivered is another question but at least it is getting support in government circles.

    Post edited by end of the road on

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 39,779 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Most capital-centric country in the EU? Luxembourg, by a mile.

    Of course capital cities draw in people and investment, it's what they're for.

    Dublin is the engine of the entire economy. The neglect if not outright hostility it's faced from every government in the history of this state is a disgrace. It makes everyone in this country less well off than they would be in a country with a modern capital with proper infrastructure.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    I meant to say Castlebar, my apologies. Castlebar will be connected to Galway city. Cmon like



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,535 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    You are going to have to provide quotes to back up your claims that Baxter and Rosslare (presumably the port) are enthusiastic for freight on the WRC (which you say is "all on record"). Baxter's freight is being accommodated on existing infrastructure and more capacity could be provided faster and at lower cost than by reopening WRC. Rosslare Europort are undertaking a huge investment programme but doing nothing for rail freight, they are focusing on RORO and passenger operations.

    It is far from "almost certain that the WRC is going to reopen". Multiple line specific reports have found no justifiable case for reopening. You have convinced yourself that the AIRR will recommend reopening but that means nothing. It's not part of the NDP and a viable Business Case under the PSC needs to be found.

    And you are the one thinking of rail lines in isolation, despite making out it is a mistake everyone else is making. You talk of Tuam but the benefits to it from connecting it the the rail network are small compared to the cost. Looking at it regionally, the same money spent on double-tracking part of the existing network would allow an increase in services to/from multiple larger towns. Connecting Tuam might benefit Tuam itself but does nothing for the wider region.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,394 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    With probably one or two changes on a service that can't compete with bus.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    Another lie / falsehood.

    You assume the line would be "super slow and, obviously, Irish Rail wouldn't add any new direct services between the biggest towns / cities in the West. Really?

    Castlebar to Claremorris - 19mins (actual timing. 25km)

    Claremorris to Tuam - 26mins (est. timing. 27km)

    Tuam to Athenry - 20mins (est. timing. 25km)

    Athenry to Galway - 15mins (actual timing, 21km)

    80min journey time possible without any speed improvements on the current network. Driving takes 70-80mins at best and up to 2hrs in traffic.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,095 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    And if there was works to improve the bus journey times? Bus lanes and the like? At a fraction of the cost of reopening the rail line.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    Best case, the bus is the same time as the train. It's widely accepted that a train service is no match for a bus. If you believed that, you'd be pushing for road infrastructure upgrades instead of expensive rail upgrades.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,739 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    it would still not negate the need for the reopening of the rail line.

    the works should still be done as it will benefit those who want to use bus services, but the rail line is needed as well as it will give greater public transport options and services, which is better over all and will encourage greater PT take up, which is what we all want.

    Post edited by end of the road on

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,009 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Spend your own 100 million on it so , and if you can deliver any sort of service for 100 million you should get an award and a title ,

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,957 ✭✭✭kirk.


    Nobody down the west will will use trains for public transport



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,739 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



Advertisement