Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1309430953097309931003690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,040 ✭✭✭Polar101


    I think that figure includes the 1,000 destroyed Leopard 3 and 4 tanks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,415 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Screenshot_20230707-202910.png

    More aid from the US.

    Obviously the cluster munitions were a given, but another 31x 155 howitzers, 32x more Bradleys and 32x Strykers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,532 ✭✭✭Virgil°


    Maybe Ukraine only really have the capacity to reasonably operate 100-150 Bradleys as they're currently set up.

    But they have the 150 Bradleys on free refill like a Coke in WowBurger. Russia's going to have to destroy an awful lot more Bradleys before its more than a rounding error to the US.

    This is why I'm hopeful about this war. Providing the orange idiot doesn't reappear. They'll be pretty set once the F16s/Abrams show up. Once the tap is in service that's the end of it. Even if the UAF only operate 20-50 F16s Russia would literally have to down hundreds of the things to make any real difference. And that won't be happening.

    Bit disappointing not to see the ATACMS in this round though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,415 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    AFAIK Ukrainians are still being trained on combined arms, so this could be a newly trained battalion/brigade (what ever the term) being formed.

    It's always a let down when ATACMS aren't announced, especially now Storm Shadow was given to Ukraine and also Ukraine are in talks with Poland about purchasing an air to sea & land attack system with 200km range.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,839 ✭✭✭.Donegal.


    Sky news US correspondent says the US cluster bomb deal is clear sign the war isn’t going well for Ukraine but that they could shift the momentum significantly on the ground, wiping out heavily dug in Russian troops.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,574 ✭✭✭rogber


    The Pentagon (Kahl) have even come out and said the counter offensive is going "slower than hoped" and that the Russians have dug in more successfully than expected.

    Yet still some here will claim everything is going perfectly according to plan.

    At least the US is more honest in its appraisal. But let's hope they deliver what's necessary to give more momentum before another autumn rolls around.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,758 ✭✭✭macraignil


    Considering how long the forces of putin had to prepare for the Ukrainian counteroffensive I think it is very unlikely that there was a rigid plan that the moskovyte defenses would have already been weakened enough for the Ukrainians to have serious momentum in their efforts to liberate their country back to the internationally agreed borders. I'm only looking at a limited amount of this war coverage on social media but to me it seems highly plausible that Ukraine is now quite content to turn the forces of putin into fertiliser where they stand rather than loosing more Ukrainian lives simply to see more moskovyte surrounded and forced to surrender or run away without paying for their crimes.

    image.png




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,415 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    People expected (or hoped) for a Kharkiv (fast paced) kinda result but it's looking more like Kherson (slow and attritional).

    Both of which were successful, let's not forget.

    Let's not also forget that Ukraine has still not committed the bulk of it's forces to the frontline. There's still in the region of 70% of forces held back.

    It's still in the prodding and probing phase.

    Hopefully with the addition of cluster shells they can just target the weakest spot on the frontline and obliterate it before then committing the main force.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,898 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    Stupid fricking article. “America risks losing the moral high ground”

    Country A invades country B. Country C helps country B by providing the munitions B is asking for. That risks the “moral high ground” for Country C how, exactly?

    And what is the increase of the effective range of a weapon mounted on “moral high ground” anyway? I suspect Ukraine’s needs are more practical than moral.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 447 ✭✭thereitisgone




  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,567 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    Exactly. Or, more generally, if someone dies in war Im sure they arent too concerned about the exact mechanism of their death.

    The use of cluster munitions on an entrenched position containing only soldiers is a morally higher ground than using a precision guided high explosive missile on a pizza restaurant containing civilians, for example.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Odd to see 'human rights organisations' falling over themselves to condemn USA for supplying cluster munitions to Ukraine for use on the battlefield. When it was reported iirc last year that Russia used these on civilian targets like the train station. Fly these protestors out to the frontlines and let them advance on Russian positions waving their placards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,128 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    After a year and a half it seems people and the world still aren’t taking this war seriously.


    Still that underline sympathy for Russia and forgetting all the misery it has brought on Ukraine.

    As if we should feel any guilt in using cluster bombs against an invading country who are using the same bombs themselves and commit war crimes daily and for the whole world to see on top of kidnapping and raping kids.


    The world has truly lost itself.


    Never again we were told….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,733 ✭✭✭seenitall


    “Human rights” of a murderous invading army. Would you stop. That whole two-word concept has become so deceptive and hollow in recent years, as it is being used to undermine democracies and sow division where it rears its head in the too compliant west. One rule for the west, another for everyone else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,839 ✭✭✭.Donegal.


    Bit surprised by this below. Can’t see how it does much to affect nato unity?

    US decision to send cluster munitions to Ukraine 'runs the risk of fracturing NATO' Joe Biden's decision to send cluster munitions to Ukraine "runs the risk" of fracturing the NATO alliance, a former chief of general staff for the British Army has said. 

    When making the announcement, the US president said he decided to send the controversial weapons, which have been banned by 120 countries, because Kyiv is "running out of ammunition". 

    Speaking to Sky News, General Lord Dannatt said it must have been a "very difficult decision", and he is not alone in being "very uncomfortable" about it. 

    "From personal experience, when I was commander British forces and we went into Kosovo in 1999, the only two soldiers that we lost were as a result of unexploded munitions from NATO's cluster weapons, which at that stage were still allowed to be used," he said. 

    "I can understand why the Americans want to provide this additional firepower to Ukraine to help its counteroffensive along.

    "But as we're coming up to Vilnius NATO summit, where one of the most important things is that we show the unity of NATO together, I think to announce deployment of these weapons at this moment when so many other NATO countries have banned them, runs the risk of fracturing to an extent that NATO harmony." 



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,616 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    The foreign policy of western nations does not give Russia a free pass over its actions in Ukraine. Its possible to both oppose American Foreign Policy over the years and still condemn Russia's war in Ukraine



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,733 ✭✭✭seenitall


    My post was about the pliability and sham of the term “human rights” as used and weaponised against democratically elected governments by various groups and institutions in the west nowadays.

    You oppose the American foreign policy, good for you. Carry on.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Is there a potential future problem alongside the flood of mines, where unexploded ones are gonna kill dozens years after the war ends?

    I can see the moral argument where in a desperation to clear the entrenched Russians - and by and large it seems like this will do the job - Ukraine's setting itself up for a humanitarian crisis down the road when it's rebuilding the country and dealing with the unexploded ordinance



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,011 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Explosives are explosives, no matter what fancy names they are given, The problem I have with cluster bombs is that as they use parachutes to float down, but the parachutes also mean that they can be blown way off course from their target area, and second, too many fail to explode on impact, and remain lethal for a long time. In this respect, the Chinese and Russian made cluster bombs are the worst offenders. Having said that , there's some bang off them, and I would not like to be anyone on the receiving end of them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,128 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Biden letting it slip Ukraine is running out of ammunition isn’t helpful.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    More like vocalising that support has to be constant and consistent; a few once off gestures won't suffice if America is serious about support in the medium to long term. Stating the obvious that Ukraine is gonna run low - armies win battles but logistics win wars.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,616 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    You said one rule for the west, and another for everyone else. You oppose western double standards. Well done. To reiterate this does not mitigate against ongoing Russian Human Right abuses in Ukraine .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,664 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    It is Ukraine deploying these munitions. Clearly they are morally entitled to determine if using these weapons is the right call versus being Infested with the current worst human rights abusers in the world.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,733 ✭✭✭seenitall


    Nope, what I said is one rule for the west where it is meant to stringently uphold “human rights” of various groups with very tenuous claims on victimisation, while Russians, Saudis or whoever else have no care in the world resolutely NOT upholding “human rights” and at the same time find no impediment to chairing the UN Security Council or its ahem Human Rights Council. Those, worldwide-set, double standards is what I meant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,362 ✭✭✭Sigma101


    It has nothing to do with the human rights of Russian soldiers. The issue is the threat that cluster munitions present to the civilian population long after they are deployed. In other words Ukrainians are putting their own population in danger by resorting to these weapons. Places where cluster munitions are used at scale become uninhabitable for years. 



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,046 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Russian soldiers attacking Ukraine have no human rights. If they don't see fit to surrender or turn around and go home, then they should be rendered 'combat ineffective' in whatever way is most efficient. Preferably, if they die, their deaths should be so swift as to be essentially painless, but I think Ukraine should prioritise Russian casualties over the most merciful method of inflicting them, unless these two things are one and the same.

    There is a way to save these Russian lives, however, and it rests in mr. Putin's hands. Call off this war - let these young men go back to their families, work, and raise families of their own. Let them live lives of relative happiness and peace.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,733 ✭✭✭seenitall


    I would trust Ukrainians with any and all decisions regarding their land, the well-being of their people and the future of their children, as a matter of course but especially so at this juncture in time. I am sure no decision in that government is taken lightly. If they don’t want the cluster ammunitions, they will say so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    1. I don't think anyone is making the case against cluster munitions due to the human rights of Russian soldiers. Every opponent to this decision that I have seen or read is purely down to the lasting damage that these munitions will do long after the war
    2. That argument is a moot point at this stage though given that the front lines are already littered with all sorts of mines and that the Russians have been extensively using cluster munitions since the very beginning. Having a unilateral ban at this stage would only help Russia, especially given that the Ukrainians face a shortage of ammunition and the USA has large stock piles of these weapons.
    3. The people who will be most affected in the long-run by cluster munitions hidden on the land will be whomever holds this land into the future. Given that the Ukrainians are fighting to win this land then they are the only ones whose opinion truly matters. They want them. That's good enough for me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,079 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    What's more concerning is the manner in which the offensive is taking place.

    People mocked Wagner for the slow pace of their advance at Bakhmut and the tactics they employed. Ukraine have been doing something very similar in the counter attack at the same place for the last 2 months. There are many videos and clips out there, you can go back in time in the Deepstate map to see the daily advances. What we're seeing is well-trained Ukrainian forces going trench to trench where advances in a day if they happen are measured in metres.

    Untitled Image

    You can see some of the formations involved with the current assault on Klishchiikva. The Azov Brigade, Aidar, 5th assault, the forces Ukraine are using aren't insignificant.

    It would seem to me that the war is being fought on Russian terms. The attrition that an attacking force will suffer is greater than the territorial gains that are being made.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 843 ✭✭✭I.am.Putins.raging.bile.duct


    USA is sending MORE guns that need more ammo which they are also sending in the form of cluster shells of which they have millions in storage. Ukraine should have artillery superiority eventually. Russian troops misery just multiplied. I wouldn't be concerned about unexploded munitions as the entire country will be intensely demined anyway they'll get the duds.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement