Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1635636638640641915

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,386 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    The amount of full-time adult ( not students) workers on the minimum wage is minimal. Generally retail and entertainment are paying 14-15/ hour minimum to fulltime staff. They are generally categorized as a shift lead or head waiter/ barman.

    At a guess minimum household income now for a couple both working In very ordinary jobs is probably 55-65k/ week before tax.. Minimum earning in construction is now probably above 700/week before tax is taken out.

    Median household income @45k is after tax as often that is what people report and I think I saw somewhere that they taught the figures were under reported as many do not fill it out correctly. It's a figure I be wary of taking into consideration as it includes single households, couple, pensioners etc. Sole traders are a terror for underreporting there income.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,009 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    We had a poster absolutely insistent that it was all coming down in August 2021 and would be 50-75% down by August 2023.

    Primary claimed reason for them was WFH which, if anything, has put residential prices up in a lot of locations and only down for commercial property. Also major misunderstandings of vacancy figures, a conviction that the state would run out of money to buy properties for councils / fund AHBs and some nonsense about there being a massive probate backlog that would suddenly rush out. I think the OECD 15% tax rate was going to cause every single MNC to move HQ and all their staff to Hungary too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,592 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Agree with all of that. Post wasn’t meaning to blame older people - they, like my parents, are just making logical decisions in their own best interest (why wouldn’t they). Just speculating the changing economic winds (specifically higher rates) may alter the logic a bit!

    Only place id differ is I’d probably use a small bit of stick as well as a healthy dose of carrot. 100% bridging loans are a great idea as this is a real barrier to moving. There was also talk of reduced stamp duty for downsizers (I think they should go much further on the incentives here) but not sure where that got too!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,386 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Since house prices started to rise in 2014 we have had a selection of posters predicting a price crash of 20-50% ever year since.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 8,685 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sierra Oscar


    Dead cat bounce! I was advised to hold off purchasing in 2014.

    In all seriousness, the interest rate rises were expected to have a far more profound impact on property prices. Nothing major as of yet though. It's been nearly a year since the ECB announced that initial earth shattering .5% interest rate rise which was subject to intense discussion on here all last summer and into the Autumn.

    A lot of that discussion was insistent that a major downturn in prices would start to filter through from Q1 this year onwards. No sign of any profound downturn just yet. We're a few days away from Q3 now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,697 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Post wasn’t meaning to blame older people - they, like my parents, are just making logical decisions in their own best interest (why wouldn’t they). Just speculating the changing economic winds (specifically higher rates) may alter the logic a bit!

    As mad as it sounds the reality is a lot of the arrears demographic are also just making logical decisions in their own best interest too!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 713 ✭✭✭manniot2


    I think this is because the banks have yet to pass on the interest rate increases to new mortgage applicants but people fear they soon will so are queuing up to buy now instead of holding off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    Banks aren’t pricing mortgages based on the ECB rate. The historic relationship between mortgage rates and the ECB rate needs a positive yield curve something that we don’t have at present.

    Instead we have an inverted yield curve where rates further out the term are lower than overnight rate’s despite inflation. To put simply the market expects lower rates than present in the future. Whether they have got it totally wrong or not is a different debate but that is the situation we have at present.

    with regards house prices you also have to take into account that wages have been increasing which puts upwards pressure on house prices and as a result negates the impact of rising rates.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,633 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    BPFI figures on mortgage drawdowns last year had median income of FTBs at something like 90k. It was definitely under the 100k+ figures people on here would consider a normal household income.

    And that figure has no distortion from part time workers or those who are totally priced out of market - these were mortgage drawdowns.

    It was discussed at length on thread sometime last year - I had hoped it would put the average income question to bed. But now we're back again



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 579 ✭✭✭theboringfox


    It is 91k for FTB nationwide, then 103k for Dublin FTB and think its 109k for mover purchaser. The point is correct though that the people buying properties seem to have substantial family incomes. This kind of makes sense as a lot of people (me included) don't buy until well into 30s and often as couple. Real killer at moment is buying with two young kids and uve to show ability to cover creche costs and sensitised mortgage repayments.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,633 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    The “median basic household income” of first-time buyers of existing properties in the second half of last year was €74,000 per annum. This rose to €91,000 for first-time buyers of new homes and to €109,000 for mover purchasers.

    Edit: my mistake, misinterpreted the above.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭the.red.baron


    You don't seem to understand what you are saying


    In a market with adequate supply, people can move freely when they need

    A functional market

    It doesn't cause demand

    Yet again disproving the Irish times article that there is supply



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,100 ✭✭✭Browney7


    The piece in the IT was a bit all over the shop and he seems to be hinging his argument solely around the level of vacancy. The vacancy figures need more scrutiny in general as to what is actually included but I guess is McCartney's point that nothing stays the same forever and if a portion of people who hold these vacant properties decide to rent or sell combined with the ratcheting up of delivery do we pivot to oversupply quickly?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭the.red.baron


    its common sense that you could re-act to any changes in the market and not just plow on regardless

    this is the whole problem, the government spent 10 years just sitting on their hands, probably on purpose, while this developed

    there are low vacancy levels in dublin, high in leitrim which skews his figures and in the vacant properties left in dublin, considerable effort would be needed to bring these on line in comparison even to completion of new houses. The downside of new housing is these are not necessarily getting built where people want to live.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,697 ✭✭✭hometruths




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭the.red.baron


    but it would takes years to both bring these online and to balance out the 10 years of no building

    on the vanancy numbers these have been falling, the census which is the basis isn't that indicative as its not every year

    but he uses a blended number which doesn't account for the fact that vacancy in dublin 2% and in leitrim its 12

    it seems a mad article from a stats person to bring out



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,909 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Average and median incomes are distorted by the high end and the low end, that's why we measure average and median.

    All need housing so it's quite obvious that we need seperate supply mechanisms rather than it all being left to the private sector at massive cost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,452 ✭✭✭herbalplants


    Also what nobody seem to point out here, is that there a lot of professional people on a good salary buying on their own. Everyone seem to mention here couples whose joint salary may be 130k, but I know two people who would be looking to buy on their own and they are not early 30.

    Remember the shills only get paid when you react to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭the.red.baron


    but the numbers on 90k or 100k is low as discussed many times previously, it makes buying on your own difficult



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,909 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Maximum damage phase of the celtic tiger was 03 to 07 where house prices were not allowed to correct naturally and subsidy after subsidy after loose lending were thrown at it to prop the pyramid scheme up. The weakest buyers were herded in at the maximum price at the end leaving the collapse inevitable.

    Today Ireland has decided to relax lending, increase subsidies and place more of the cost of construction on the taxpayer by reducing/eliminating development levies in a time when every country in the world at a high level is attempting to fight back on inflation

    This to me seems a blatant attempt to prevent property from falling to somewhat more affordable levels

    Your last paragraph is a slip in your normal quality contributions



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭the.red.baron


    without new homes do you think property will fall back to affordable levels?

    the mistake is to let private construction dictate housing policy

    this is the exact opposite of 2007



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,909 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Base effects for measuring inflation will be less favourable after next month when the commodity price rise peaked as a result of the war

    Globalisation effects are reversing

    Lack of competition amongst banks domestically. The deposit levels at banks are back to pre covid levels so that source of cheap funding for the banks is depleting fast

    Anti immigration movements

    Esg discouraging investing in mining and gas oil exploration which provide the raw materials to allow for energy transition.

    Global warming and more crop failures.

    Wars are inflationary and detrimental to supply cgains

    Many other factors just too numerous to mention. On the other side there will be global recession, but dropping rates to zero or negative will not be an option as it will stoke the inflationary fires again



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,909 ✭✭✭Villa05


    A house build in the eighties was F rated on present building regulations and bears little resemblance to those house at present. House were much more basic than at present

    Purchased in an estate built in the late 60's early 70's. I wouldn't swap it for anything built since.

    The regulations of that time was your reputation. If you did not build quality you were out of business quickly.

    Today you can build crap with fire safety and water ingress issues and continue building on the same site for the state on juicy contracts while giving 2 fingers to those that purchased the crap you built earlier protected by the law

    Regulations not worth the paper they are written on



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    This has probably been asked before, but is there any sign that banks will start offering interest on savings accounts in line with interest rates? I don't keep much money in cash, but I'd be happy enough with a 5% interest rate if it were available...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,633 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    No. Not likely to change much.

    Savings rates on offer by banks drive very little business, most people will not move their savings between banks even for a gain of 2-3% more as DIRT makes it not worth chasing.

    A few % of rates isnt worth much if you are a small saver, however on a several 100k mortgage its worth a lot. Much more preferable for the customer that banks keep mortgage rates lower than ECB and subsidise through customer savings, than seeing mortgage rates and savings rates go up.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,697 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Ok, I'll give you a very simple example.

    Consider a hyper local micro property market consisting of just 4 properties, with no demand for people to leave the area, and no demand for new people to enter the area.

    Apartment A - rented by Jill, single young professional

    Apartment B - owned by Jack, single young professional

    Semi-D house - owned by Paddy and Mary, couple with two small kids

    Detached house - owned by Dinny and Denise, couple living with 20 year old daughter

    They're all happy out, nobody wants to move, they're all housed according to their needs. As everybody views the market as to what is happening right now, as far as they're concerned - all is well. The narrative is there are no problems.

    Fast forward three years.

    Jack and Jill are now a couple, looking to buy a house to move in together and start a family, but they cannot buy because there is nothing on the market. As far as they're concerned market is in chronic undersupply.

    Paddy and Mary's kids are bigger and they want to upsize but they can't because there is nothing on the market. As far as they're concerned market is in chronic undersupply.

    Dinny and Denise want to downsize to an apartment and their daughter wants to move out and start renting. But they cannot buy because there is nothing on the market, and their daughter cannot rent because there is nothing on the market. So they're stuck too, as far as they're concerned the market in chronic undersupply.

    So now the narrative about the current market has moved in short order from no problem to chronic undersupply. Even though there are the same amount of people requiring to be housed and the same amount of properties in housing stock - I.e there has no increase in demand or decrease in supply to the equation that has caused this chronic undersupply.

    The housing stock is perfectly adequate to house everybody according to their needs. Jack and Jill would be very happy to buy Paddy and Mary's house. Paddy and Mary would be very happy to buy Dinny and Denise's house. Dinny and Denise would be very happy to buy Jack's apartment. And their daughter would be very happy to rent Jill's apartment.

    The solution is obvious but nobody can see it because they're blinded by narrative that has been caused by what's available on the market right now - nothing.

    So everybody is screaming chronic undersupply, we need to build more houses, increase supply to accommodate demand, it's absurd to deny it, otherwise how do you explain why there is nothing on the market available to buy or rent.

    Canny McSavvy builds two new houses and two new apartments to balance out the disparity in apparent supply demand.

    Fast forward three years.

    Everybody put their house on the market so they could move into Canny's new development. But as soon as they did so they discovered a problem.

    There is now oversupply of two apartments and two houses. 

    These are empty, languishing on the market but you cannot give them away because the market has moved into extreme oversupply. There is now more than enough supply to house everybody according to their needs, but now they're not so happy, they're in negative equity, screaming that it's not fair, where's my bailout, how did nobody see this coming?

    If Canny McSavvy had listened to the data rather than narrative he would have seen there was no demand for the new builds no matter how strong the narrative seemed to be.

    This is obviously a very simplistic example. But it illustrates the dangers of basing the entire narrative of the long term demand for housing stock on what is available to buy or rent on the property market right now today.

    But there is an element of this happening on a huge scale in the Irish market. The data is being ignored in favour of the narrative.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    They don’t have to go negative or to zero…. As they have headroom to cut rates if there is a recession…



  • Administrators Posts: 55,122 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I suspect that Irish banks would prefer to keep deposit rates low so they can keep mortgage rates low, rather than have to increase mortgage rates (which they'd have to do to offset an increased deposit rate).

    For both business and political reasons. Low mortgage rates helps everyone, high deposit rates is only really good for wealthy people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,909 ✭✭✭Villa05


    The post was to give an explanation why I believe we won't see mortgage rates as low as they were early last year



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,909 ✭✭✭Villa05




Advertisement