Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1631632634636637943

Comments

  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You cannot financially cripple a farmer just because he/she wants to farm the family land, based solely on public servants changing the zoning on their farm.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    You’re not financially crippling them….if the land is needed for housing it gets rezoned it’s no different to farmland being CPO’d for a motorway. Farmer is still walking away with substantially more than the agricultural value of the land. As for politicians if they don’t take action to solve the housing crisis that impacts large numbers of people over a few landowners then they won’t be in power come the next election and they know it.



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    CPO’s involve the State paying market value (plus other amounts which can be claimed) to the owner, this is the polar opposite to your proposal that an 80% tax be paid by the owner on the value of the land when the council zones it. If the land was CPO’d after zoning, the costs to the State would rise as the market value rises.

    Last year 170k people were directly employed in agriculture, when you take into consideration family members and those who indirectly benefit from the sector, the fact that many politicians and councillors have farming background, and one of the strongest lobby groups in the State, the prospect of legislation being introduced that would heap and enormous tax burden on a farmer, who wants to continue farming on land owned for generations, that has been zoned seems so outlandish, it’s actually laughable. Timing belt I usually agree with most of what you post, but an 80% value tax on land to be paid by farmers, even if they have no intention of selling/profiting from development, seems a huge departure from your usual good sense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    You cannot levy a tax on the increase in value of land if the increase is not actually realised - ie. the land hasnt been sold yet.

    I think that is the sticking point here - increase in land value after rezoning is only realised once sold. The profit should absolutely be highly taxed however.

    This leads to much more efficient land use like all over Europe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    Of the 170k less than 1k would be possible impacted and when you take into account farm land already bought by developers waiting to be rezoned it drops to a handful.

    you have a hang up with paying tax that yet again you miss the point. When land is CPO’d for motorways it is done at market value of agricultural land plus a bit extra it’s not CPO’d as zoned land. Any land rezoned that a landowner wishes to sell would still get the agricultural price and 50% (if that’s what is being proposed) of the difference between the sale price and agricultural price) that would be a higher price than most land CPO’d for a motorway.

    Also let’s not forget that there is loads of land already zoned for residential and if it’s not being built on then the rezoning of new land (after tax) will mean that the value of it drops. This along with a robust vacant land tax means that land hoarding will not be attractive and badly needed housing should be built.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    I believe it needs to be applied at the time the land is rezoned otherwise you have developers becoming farmers overnight and not selling or developing the land and we are no better than where we are today.



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Who is to say only 1k would be affected? The other 169k would think their time will come.

    So, you want the owner to pay tax on the zoned value, but the CPO value would be the pre-zoned price?

    This is silly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    If they hoard the land they will still be liable for the tax when they inevitably do sell. So long as the tax is based on "market value - pre-zoned value", as opposed to market value - ag land value, because price of ag land can increase over time too and minimise tax liability.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    Silly is assuming that farmland in the middle of nowhere would be impacted. Of the 170k you quoted how many are bordering a large town or city?

    with regards the tax it is calculated on difference between the market value of Agricultural land and the market value of residential land. How hard is that to understand?

    Anyway we will need to see what is in the bill that is brought forward come autumn.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    As I understand it if the farmer has no intention of cashing in for development and wishes to carry on farming the land they can appeal the zoning decision and request the land be dezoned.

    This would address most of your concerns.

    the point is to tax some farmers who do wish to s ell land for development in order to speed that up.

    not to drive farmers off their land who have no wish to sell.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    If it is accompanied by an aggressive vacant land tax on land zoned as residential then yes any windfall tax could be paid at time of sale.

    if there is a vacant land tax that is full of loopholes (which will probably be the case) then doing so at time of sale would mean the land would still be hoarded.



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    This I can understand, but timing belt indicated he/she thought that 80% should apply on the land whether or not the farmer decided to sell.

    This is what @Timing belt posted:

    ”Have you missed the point yet again that the tax needs to be paid when land gets rezoned regardless whether the landowner decides to sell”

    My point being, no landowner/farmer should be subjected to an 80% tax on the value of zoned land just by virtue of a change in zoning, when they have no intention of doing anything other than farming their land, and no politician would ever introduce such legislation.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Yes that works too.

    Council rezones land and farmer has two choices:

    1) Appeal the rezoning and request the land is dezoned. Does not have to pay 80% tax.

    2) Pay the 80% tax.

    Either way no farmer is going to be forced to pay 80% of the residential development value of his land just so he can continue milking cows.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    To me the problem with this is everyone would just cling to the land in the hopes that some political party in future would remove the tax. Think it would massively increase the risk of hoarding.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,349 ✭✭✭The Student


    A question? Surely someone has to apply to have agri land rezoned for residential? Or are the councils deciding to rezone an area at will.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,927 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Ya in the majority of cases the LA just decide to rezone land,

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,551 ✭✭✭amacca


    I didn't think one would apply tbh, I thought it was to do with proximity to towns, villages etc whether it's in the county development plan..


    **** if I knew you could apply, I'd buy the cheapest plot I could find in Leitrim and have it rezoned high density residential/commercial and charge appropriately...but I don't know the ins and outs of it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,349 ✭✭✭The Student


    Then the council are effectively forcing landowners to do something against their will if a tax is imposed. Say for example a farmer who has not intention of using the land for anything other than farming.

    By all means impose a tax if the owner requests rezoning and the value goes up but the existing arrangement seems arse about face.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 940 ✭✭✭mike_cork


    I've highlighted some interesting areas of the article below:

    "HOUSING PRICES IN the second quarter of 2023 were 0.5% lower than a year ago, according to the latest Daft.ie House Price Report released today.

    This marks the first time since mid-2020 that asking prices have fallen in year-on-year terms."

    "Cork and Galway cities saw larger falls in year-on-year terms, of 3.3% and 2.1% respectively."

    "“But while demand has weakened, the post-Covid recovery in supply also appears to be weakening, in both new and second-hand segments. Thus, while this year is unlikely to bring any substantial increases in housing prices, underlying issues stemming from housing shortages will persist.” "



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 584 ✭✭✭theboringfox


    Not seeing much cooling in Cork market. Anything in a good location that you can move into as is seems to be going strong. Definitely think there is some softening where it was house that needed full works just to move in. Good to see this.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,657 ✭✭✭Royale with Cheese


    I'm sale agreed on a doer upper and there was no other interest in it. Got outbid in a ridiculous bidding war for a property in a similar condition in the same location only 9 months prior. I've been keeping an eye on the market in case something better comes along as we haven't signed any contracts yet but to be honest there is extremely little. Prices being down slightly is all well and good but if there not much coming up for sale it's not of that much use to anyone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,159 ✭✭✭wassie


    All the talk of in the media of the flood of BTLs that were meant to come to market with when the eviction ban was overturned certainly has not transpired.

    Given that there are very few rentals for people to move into, the reality is its probably a difficult & time consuming process in trying to get vacant possession.



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 940 ✭✭✭mike_cork


    My own experience in the Cork City market- I bid on a house approx 2 months ago. Really nice area but the house needed a good bit of work. Was told by estate agent i was the highest bidder at 3.5% under asking. Then estate agent called me to say they had received a bid matching mine but it was a cash offer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,036 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Real Estate alliance report

    Landlords exiting the market were linked to 36pc of sales




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31 syrgian


    How come this report points out to increasing house prices in Dublin, while the CSO reports decreases? I see the statistic in this report is a lot more simplistic: it just looks at 3 bedroom semi-d sales, so it would be imprecise if the kind of houses sold changes (i.e. more modern, or better located) than in the reference period, and they don't mention the CSO report at all. Does RAE and/or independent.ie have interest in misrepresenting the truth?


    Edit:

    Just looked what they said in June 2007:

    It's plain to see, nevertheless, that this opportunity for buyers may not be with us for very long - it may even have run its course by September/October of this year.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20071119025347/http://www.realestatealliance.ie/?vec_action=news_detail&id=71

    And September 2007:

    Real Estate Alliance members are reporting that the signs are good for a busy Autumn period as viewing numbers are up over the last week. Vendors need to bear in mind that house prices are up on average 25% - 30% since January 2005.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20071119030741/http://www.realestatealliance.ie/?vec_action=news_detail&id=74

    Not surprised this kind of organization would want to pump prices all the time, no matter the environment.

    Edit 2:

    Just realized the independent is mentioned as a culprit of the bubble in the wiki:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_property_bubble#Role_of_the_media



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,159 ✭✭✭wassie


    Prices rose in Cork (1.4pc to €360,000), Limerick (2.9pc to €280,000), Waterford (1.8pc to €285,000) and Galway (0.3pc to €335,000). This was largely due to demand for good-quality homes combined with limited supply. Landlords exiting the market were linked to 36pc of sales.

    Theres no context to that stat. Is this 36% of sales nartionally or just Cork, Limerick, Waterford & Galway? And what is the actual number. It says above supply is limited.

    Either way, without an increase in supply pricing is not dropping anytime soon.



  • Administrators Posts: 56,219 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    It's an article aimed at first time buyers. FTBs are usually buying 3 bed semi-ds, and the article is pointing out that this segment of the market is still seeing prices go up.

    It's not misrepresenting the truth. And it's not more "simplistic". It's just another pivot on the data.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,595 ✭✭✭techdiver


    I'm a home owner (well mortgage holder)so not directly effected by any of this, but is there ever going to be light at the end of the tunnel for this dysfunctional system. For my entire adult life (I'm in my 40's now) the property market in Ireland has been a complete **** show. It went from complete batshit prices in the mid 00's to a property crash and and now straight back to batshit crazy again. What makes the current situation worse in my opinion is even Dublin the high days of the property bubble it was still relatively easy to obtain rental accommodation (I rented in Dublin during a 10 year window from 2004 - 2014).

    I live in the midlands now and even in a town like Mullingar there are "zero" properties listed for the rental market. How/when does this all end? With demand still increasing, homelessness at an all time high, and supply not even close to matching demand from an existing stock point of view and what is currently being developed and planned, how do we ever get out of this? I have family members still renting and at the behest of landlords who sell properties out form under them with a months notice (this has happened twice in the last 12 months).

    I can't see in the long term how this doesn't all come crashing down again. The "younger" generation (those in the their 20's and 30's) are in a considerably worse position than I was at their age and I lived though the worst economic disaster since the great depression. We're told the economy is going gang busters but all I see is a younger generation who are shackled with lower wages (relative to cost of living), less/stunted/delayed career opportunities and a housing market that they can never enter.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Very few FTBs in Dublin are buying 3bed semi-ds these days at 500k a pop. Thats beyond the reach of the vast majority of FTBs.



Advertisement
Advertisement