Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

F1 2023 thread

1383941434474

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,640 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    If F1 went electric there is no way F1 and FE would co-exist. They would likely merge or one would take over the other.

    Unless all top tier racing goes electric, there would be no point in them having competing electric formulae.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,047 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    The direction they want to go is hydrogen from what I gather. It can burn similar to petrol and engines can make the same noises.

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,640 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    The football a analogy is weak. Football hasn't built its reputation as the trailblazer of cutting edge real life technology. It built its popularity on other foundations which will never be available to F1 such as accessibility (jumpers for goalposts and so on).

    The horse racing analogy is better. But likewise, horse husbandry, training and racing has a history thousands of years old. F1 is old at 70 years, but it's not like horse racing.

    Age and cultural popularity aside, the difference between horse and car racing is much greater than the difference between F1 with ICE power and F1 with electric power.

    F1 has a choice. Keep with its modus operandi of being the cutting edge of future technology, or abandon that tradition in favour of sticking with old ICE technology. I don't know what they'll do innthe medium to long term. F1 might not even exist in the long term.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,646 ✭✭✭Harika


    Le mans was thinking of going hydrogen for 2030, stupid as battery technology should be far further than now. Efuels will be the gap until then. https://www.motorsport.com/lemans/news/le-mans-wants-hydrogen-only-top-class-by-2030/10474311/


    If we look at comparison, we can look at series that are sticking with the petrol engines only. NASCAR & DTM both are haemorrhaging fans and DTM had to reinvent and be sold to survive. Btcc stcc are shadow of themselves.

    In comparison

    F1 is booming, wec on the high although you would expect them to be more volatile soon enough. Manufacturer wanting to go there as hybrid is atm the selling point. In some years battery technology will be strong enough to replace the combustion engine. Will be a break but for future fans that only know hybrid turbos just another step.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,508 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    When will the gap between Verstappen and Perez and Alonso and Stroll become an issue? Both ferrari and Mercedes have evenly matched drivers, but red bull and Aston don't. And Aston in particular are missing out on a decent chunk of points at this stage.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,646 ✭✭✭Harika


    Red Bull are leading comfortable, so no issue.

    Aston Martin will look sooner than later to 2024 at the driver lineup. Still who is available to offer an improvement?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭quokula


    The problem is when you have a driver of the caliber of Verstappen or Alonso, nobody is going to match up to them in the other seat. Remember that Max was often a minute or more ahead of Gasly and Albon by the end of every race, both of whom have proven to be very fine drivers at other teams - for example a simple mathematical qualifying gap comparison of Russell vs Latifi then Latifi vs Albon in consecutive Williams seasons suggests that Albon is a quicker driver than Russell unless Latifi somehow dramatically lost performance from one year to the next. Meanwhile Perez has had an extremely solid career prior to joining Red Bull, often dragging less competitive cars to podiums and even a victory. He's just not in the same league as his current teammate but nobody is.

    Meanwhile for his part, back in the day Alonso completely destroyed fellow world champion Kimi Raikkonen in the same car, as he did to almost-world-champion Felipe Massa before that. I don't think Fernando is quite the same driver he was back then as age catches up on everyone and he was outscored by Ocon over their time together at Alpine, the first teammate to ever do that in his career albeit aided by a lot of luck and reliability. But he's clearly got a new impetus and motivation with a more competitive car and he's looked like he's been performing close to his best again.

    It's easy to look at other teams and say they have more evenly matched drivers, but that's easier to achieve without that kind of once in a generation talent in one of the seats that RB and AM currently enjoy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,282 ✭✭✭✭Jordan 199


    Since Red Bull won their 100th race yesterday, here is an article about when other teams won their 100th race.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,321 ✭✭✭✭klose


    Is DeVries in risk of getting the chop? I know the Alpha Tauri package ain't up to much, but he's really languishing at the back, would they not prefer Liam Lawson getting mileage considering Nyck isn't a red bull academy driver?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,670 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    F1 is leaning more towards sustainability, which isn't fully electric, but a vastly reduced carbon footprint with the eco-fuels they are developing.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,670 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Alonso has scored more points this season, than his previous 7 seasons in F1 combined. That actually makes me happy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,018 ✭✭✭✭PsychoPete


    You'd assume they thought that De Vries would do a solid job because he's an experienced racer but he doesn't look up too it at all. I thought Lawson would have gotten the seat, he's driving pretty good and he's currently 2nd in Super Formula. He's probably contracted to do the full season maybe ? Hard to see De Vries in F1 next season



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,343 ✭✭✭thefa


    Hell yeah. Some of those barren seasons were his own doing but great to see him have the opportunity and prove he’s still got it near the front. Just need a win now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,183 ✭✭✭afatbollix


    WEC is already great, Making fuel from the waste from the wine making industry. It has manufacturers hounding the EU saying why ban engines when we can run them on wine!

    This is where R&D money is being poured in at the moment, Not just on engines but on fuels/oils. This is where F1 should be heading.

    I also like the idea of WEC where they give them how much power they have over a lap and just let them at it, Different engines, fuels and hybrid systems. For F1 budgets it's mostly put down as a R&D budget as they get more tax breaks than putting it down as marketing so let them off to spend billions on a crazy idea, instead of making a floor with little bits that get that 0.1 a lap but we can't understand why Red bull is faster than a merc!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 629 ✭✭✭CONSI


    Could alpha Tauri get Ricciardo for the rest of the season as part of the wider Red Bull family...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,670 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    F1 is really leaning into it also though. I think motorsport as a whole will be far more sustainable in the coming years than ever before.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭Hijpo


    A couple of weeks ago Marko hinted that this would be the case if DeV didn't raise his game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,459 ✭✭✭✭Dont be at yourself


    Ric could be in the red bull with Perez back to AT on current form.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,617 ✭✭✭NinjaTruncs


    That is highly unlikely. The only way I see Perez leaving red bull mid season is if he stops scoring any points. As long as he helps with the constructors and doesn't impede Max winning the driver's championship Perez will have done his job.

    The only other way I see it happening is if Max's form dips, then there would be more pressure on Perez to help guarantee the constructors championship.

    But as things are going Perez is doing enough to keep his seat for the rest of the year. Next year is a different story though.

    4.3kWp South facing PV System. South Dublin



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,018 ✭✭✭✭PsychoPete


    I honestly don't think he's doing enough, He hasn't got that RedBull into 4 out of 7 Q1's which is slightly embarrassing. Checos qualifying is pretty poor overall. He shouldn't be as far behind Verstappen as he has been even if you took Verstappen out of the championship, Checo still wouldn't win it



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,047 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    All 20 drivers get into Q1, it's Q3 he's struggling with. And it's 4 out of 8 as he qualified on the front row alongside LeClerc in the Baku Sprint.

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,640 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    He still wouldn't win the championship in the best car. That's the story with Perez. He's alright, he's not bad, he's a bit above average, but that's it. He has a real skill for getting the best out of tyres on a long stint. And that's a handy skill a few times a season, but it does not a top driver make.

    He's being judged against the standards of a top driver and falling well short. But he was hired as a second driver to support max. A "tail gunner" as he was described when he was able to get far enough up the grid to do the job. He's falling short of that too at the moment but he's missing that target by a smaller margin than he's missing the target of being a top driver. He's basically irrelevant to Max at the moment. He's just scoring points in the constructors.

    There's no way they'll replace him mid-season but he might have to argue for his place next season. I suspect he'll win that argument but we'll have to see how it goes.

    Post edited by El_Duderino 09 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,569 ✭✭✭recyclebin


    Perez is doing just like Ferrari did last season. He gave everybody false hope at the start of the season with some nice wins, but since then he has been awful. He just needs to get back to being somewhere in the middle to keep his seat. There is no competition in the constructors, Aston Martin only have one good driver, and Mercedes are not going to beat Red Bull either.

    Red Bull have won 18 out of the last 19 races. This kind of domination isn't good for the sport, especially if they want to grow the casual American fan base. The novelty of Miami and Vegas could wear off pretty quickly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,670 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    It'll be on other teams to catch up though, surely?

    I don't love the domination despite being a Max fan. At the same time, RB have nailed it with this car and concept and is making teams look silly, and so what? The FAI might have to step in and do something, but I do hope it is not done to appease the American market. I know it is important but dear god to hinder a team for a sake of that would be so dumb, especially with no teams really asking for a rule change.

    Even Toto has applauded RB on the job they have done, it really should be up to teams to catch up. It is also only year 2 of this rule set, and the budget cap and the limited windtunnel time. Teams can catch up, look at the leap that AM made since last year, it can be done.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,140 ✭✭✭muckwarrior


    Also, Red Bull aren't that far ahead. We're not talking Ferrari 2004 or Merc 2014 levels of dominance. They have a slightly quicker car than the rest, plus a particularly effective DRS, plus the best driver on the grid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Red bull dominance might be bad, but the Merc dominance for 8 years hardly stunted the growth of the sport?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭Hijpo


    I have no idea why people find it valid to roll out the "dominance is not good for the sport" line.

    Either they are completely new to the sport or have been saying it every year when their chosen team is not winning. Im relatively knew and even i know there has always been one team well out in front of the rest, and here we are in a new era focused on aero with another team doing really well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,569 ✭✭✭recyclebin


    Been following F1 since 1995, so have seen lots of fans come and go when they got bored of Schumacher winning, and then Vettel winning, and then Hamilton winning. Dominance is not good for any sport.

    I don't think we've really seen Red Bulls full pace either. Verstappen is cruising to victories now, and they are already talking about designing next years car.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,018 ✭✭✭✭PsychoPete


    I don't the RB19 is that far a head of the rest, it's more Verstappen and the car being in perfect harmony well except for the downshifts he's always giving out about



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Regional West Moderators Posts: 62,857 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gremlinertia


    Good doc on tg4 currently, don't know much about it, only watching while on break



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement