Harry and Meghan

so you're making it up then.

grand so.

Ouch.

That is nonsense that you think she would follow that RF lie. QEII might have followed that rule, but the rest of them don't.

As for Chelsy - how do you know that she is not absolutely furious about her phone being tapped and she might be due a very, very large payout? As well as that, it seems that Harry and Chelsy are still good friends and that she is happy he is pursuing this?

Or, hotels were unwilling to take them because of the pap invasion which would affect their other guests. Maybe they own the property they were going to stay in and they didn't want the paps finding out where it is? Or even if they were staying with friends, they didn't want them beseiged by paps.

Its quite amazing here, that people keep saying they are begging for publicity and at the same time saying that no one is interested in them. Can anyone explain to me how this line of thought is rationalised?

given he is and has been correct on everything he has stated in relation to them, no because it isn't true and he doesn't need to.

it is a fact that there are elements, mainly on the far right, who are out to sabotage them and they are in that case, victims.

lead by the hard to far right elements of the british tabloid press, many of who's readership hang on every word.

the attempt to access the records by the right wing think tank has been dismissed recently apparently, as it is ultimately none of their business anyway and is between the US and harry, the US so far not making any moves to withdraw his legal status.

it is right they hold the racist, far right elements of the british tabloid press to account as said elements are out of control.

Well, I’d agree Chelsy and her husband are, but I don’t see any evidence that H&M are. Quite the reverse, unfortunately. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t bear H&M any ill will. I just really don’t like their stunning hypocrisy and double standards.

Simmons is being very unprofessional making comments like that. Netflix are the ones with the wrong strategy of just throwing money at big names and hope they will deliver. Some of the complaints I've read were that Meghan wasn't producing enough (unlike Joe Rogan who is on for about 10 hours a week).

From what Simmons said about Harry and their video call, I'd say that maybe H&M were not going to go down the route that Simmons wants (more like Joe Rogan interviewing conspiracy theorists like Robert Kennedy Jnr last week for 3 hours, never actually correcting him on any of his wild claims). From Simmons reaction to Harry, its more like Harry told him (and Spotify) to get lost.

Your right about Joe Rogan knowing what sells - any only ****, bullying, anti-vax misinformation etc. The US public really do have a very large appetite for that kind of stuff. Spotify got into trouble over his misinformation and agreed to monitor it, but from last week, it seems they are not bothering any more.

Right wing Christian crowd / Fox News devotees are behind it, wound up by Fox News and Murdock (who is in the dock for a lot of **** stuff). Its a right wing think tank were in court to try and pin something on Harry (when it was clearly none of their business anyway since he has never had a criminal conviction). Nile Gardner (Maggie Thatchers former tea boy) is front and centre of a lot of this,

you are seeing what you want to see tbh.

it's quite clear that both h&m are happy, currently at least.

they are away from the RF, the british tabloids are deranged as their money makers said that's it we're leaving, and harry has been back to the UK a few times and only royal cultists got uppity over it.

Even the time traveling cell phone or the life-threatening danger of a wheelchair-speed chase?

Do you not consider it dangerous for innocent bystanders if paps on motorbikes are using the sidewalk in the chase. That is what was considered life threatening by Sussexes. I'd be inclined to agree with that.

There are no victims in this scenario. Spotify and Archewell have parted company. Are you trying to claim that Spotify is a victim of H&M? You would think that Spotify would be able to put a tight enough contract together that they didn't turn themselves into victims. LOL.

By the way, the podcast won the People's Choice Award, so I'm not sure why it was dropped because it wasn't popular. I suspect that they wanted a weekly podcast and Meghan wasn't prepared to do that.

Yet they provided zero evidence that this actually happened. In a city that has millions of people with phones and CCTV cameras all over the place, no footage of this so called chase has ever come out.

Some triumvirate you have produced there - the daily mail, the NY Post and the Spectator! It seems to have been started by NY Post and the others have spun it. It was one interviewee who happens to live in New York. Fortunately, Gimlet has a studio in New York. So, for Meghan to interview her, she would have had to either go to New York or for Yarris to travel to LA. Fair play to them for saving the planet. The interviewee does seem to have been delighted to have been involved in the podcast.

As for the low productivity comment. That could have meant that two seasons were agreed initially and the 2nd season didn't get to be produced.

Worth reading this article from Fox Business on how Spotify are changing their business model to now just providing the tools to podcasters and have got rid of 200 of their production staff in an effort to cut costs.

https://www.foxbusiness.com/entertainment/meghan-markles-archetypes-podcast-spotify-wont-be-renewed-one-season-report

PS - that bloke Simmons didn't do Spotify and himself any favours with his comments. If that is how he is going to speak about his clients if they don't do what he wants, I think some will give him a wide berth.