Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

17727737757777781852

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 5,433 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Argentina generally could because it was one of few times they had their players all together for any extended period not the same for any of the 6N/tri nations



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,007 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I think ROG said in the aftermath that the maul won them the game, tho, but fair enough.

    I’d agree there’s little bearing to Ireland alright. I think back to the SA game in the AI’s; I think SA had something like 7 mauls in the first half and didn’t get much purchase whereas we got 1 and scored our try.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,690 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    Cool. Just know that you are arguing against 99% of the rugby world when it comes to the definition of a playmaker. But I'm sure you'll convince us all that you are right.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,353 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Maradona was as much a playmaker as chopper harris ;)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,007 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I've been watching the last few games of Munster's season over the last week or 2 and I think there's a really strong case for Crowley to get the 22 jersey for the RWC, assuming Sexton is fit. 

    He plays flatter and offers a stronger running threat than Ross Byrne, he's more versatile enabling Farrell to get a centre into the 23 jersey which we know he likes, and he's brought real direction to Munster's attack. 

    Throw in some brilliant clutch kicking, and kicking from hand and the case gets stronger. 

    He was genuinely brilliant during that run-in, in the biggest and most high-pressured games of his career thus far. 

    Get him in, Andy. 



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,868 ✭✭✭leakyboots


    Another thing about Crowley that may be in his favour against Byrne is that he's performed behind a pack that wouldn't be as on top as Leinster's are throughout the season. I don't think Ireland will have that level of dominance against the better sides and that makes a little bit nervous about Byrne. Neither are the finished article though, hanging the whole thing on Sexton may come back to bite us, hopefully not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,070 ✭✭✭jacothelad


    Half the thickness of a rugby upright cost Leinster the game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,007 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    And the maul is what allowed LAR back into the game.

    Both things can be true.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    Along with playing low risk rugby and holding on to the ball. Poor kicking from Leinster in clearing their lines. Poor decision making by JGP in the last 10 minutes. The maul may have been an element in them winning but it certainly wasn’t the reason that they won.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,075 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    In counter argument, Byrne was excellent for nearly all of the season and only really fell flat in the LAR game (keeping in mind he didn't play against Munster). Not as eye-catching, for sure, but very good in a very different way.

    By contrast, the sample size for Crowley being brilliant is very, very small.

    That's not a criticism of Crowley, it's just how things are. Farrell won't be picking anyone on the basis of two or three games. If Crowley spends the next 3 months proving that he is the player you describe, then he'll get past Byrne handy enough.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,007 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Rog, a coach known for his honesty, has named-checked the maul as what won them the game.

    More down to how much it sapped Leinster forwards rathe than the advances they made on the maul themselves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,007 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Even with a smaller sample size, there’s less risk putting him in the 22 jersey than as a starter.

    I think there’s more upside to Crowley there than Ross Byrne.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,493 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    He's doing a good job of showing that the areas Byrne is strongest in are no weak points for himself anyway!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    Yeah, hard to argue with any of that. Only thing is that Byrne regained the #2 spot by the 6N, so Crowley would probably still need to get a run of performances together in the warmups to get that spot back by September. I have every confidence he will though. Whatever was holding him back against Australia, he'll have a lot more confidence in himself now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    I know Farrell the coach and Farrell the player are considerably different entities, but Crowley's absolute extermination of Harry Byrne in the game winning drive will have surely drawn a proud nod from the former Wigan captain.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,075 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    More potential upside absolutely, and more potential downside.

    Again, I'm not criticising Crowley, but if he's not picked at 22 (or 10 if Sexton not fit) come the RWC, there is going to be an absolute sh1tstorm directed at Farrell, but we absolutely haven't seen enough to say he's definitely earned it, nor will we see anything of what Farrell sees in the next two months.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,889 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Good for him. He's also known for his **** stirring. The maul did not win that game, maintaining possession and Leinster's inability to clear their lines did.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    ROG known for his honesty? Are you trolling? I think you should give yourself a warning for that comment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,007 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    One area that Byrne is very strong is physicality in defence, but even with they Crowley has shown some serious dog.

    I think it was the Leinster game he went in to attempt holding up in the tackle 3 times, and managers a rip turnover in one of them, and melted a couple or rucks too.

    For me, its the differences, like how flat he takes it and his running threat that separate him tho.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,007 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    We’ve seen plenty to have the discussion tho.

    What areas do you think Byrne is better? And what areas do you think Crowley is? How how does the relate to how Ireland play overall? Or the balance of the bench selection?

    That’s all far more interesting than repeating “we don’t see what Farrell sees” to every discussion about selection that comes up.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 397 ✭✭El Vino


    He is also a much better defender than Byrne who needs to be hidden in matches, I would only have Byrne ahead in goal kicking and knowledge of our play book. I feel he is the one player who would put doubt into opposition's current analysis of Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,660 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Bryne is a better kicker overall, both from the tee and hand. We saw Crowley struggle with that in the final at times. I think Bryne has a better attacking sense, in how to structure an attack, how to use a pass to unlock a defense. He's massively deficienct athletically. I'm not sure I've seen a slower player on the pitch



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,007 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I’d say overall Byrne is a better kicker, but think Crowley has improved significantly as the season has gone on.

    And I honestly don’t think he struggled with it in the final tho.

    • He a brilliant kick from hand to get to 5m prior to the first try, straight after the Stormers intercept try. Huge momentum swing.
    • He had the kick pass (an area that Byrne is particular strong in) for the other try.
    • And he had the conversion for the Hodnett try.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Byrne is a very good defender. He's above most 10's. Crowley looks very good too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    I hope Crowley comes good. I really do. He's got the tools to succeed.

    Byrne is a competent reserve, imo. He's reliable and experienced and he is a good defender.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    Wait, so ROG is dishonest/a troll in interviews?

    The same ROG who is lauded, both outside Munster and France, and even outside rugby, for his forthright, no-nonsense interactions with media?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,075 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    That’s all far more interesting than repeating “we don’t see what Farrell sees” to every discussion about selection that comes up.

    Ah, is that necessary? Like, when a guy has such a small and uneven track record as Crowley, isn't it perfectly reasonable to state that he'll be picked (or not) based heavily on what the coach sees in training? Why get so stressed about a valid comment?

    But let's talk about what Farrell has seen. He's seen all of what you've described.

    He's also seen Munster go to the Sharks with Crowley at ten, be absolutely rudderless and get hammered. He saw Munster go back to the same venue a few weeks later and be in deep trouble until Crowley was replaced by Healy and the game turned. He saw Crowley play against Glasgow who had 14 men and no outhalf for 55 minutes - and saw Munster fail to score for 50 of those minutes. He saw Crowley play well against the Leinster second string, I think that will cut less ice than you think.

    So even in the run-in alone, there was just as much to suggest that he might not be the solution as to suggest that he is, none of which you brought up. As you're so fond of boring the arse off the rest of us by saying - you can't have it both ways.

    And before you bite my head off, and the rest of them come rushing in to pile on me, you asked.



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    He did also see Byrne and his 9 who also plays for ireland somehow not even be on the same page in a super high pressure situation. They play together all the time and somehow never talked about a situation where they might have to kick a drop goal. Or before the lineout. Or before they kicked down a line. For a guy who isn’t a great athlete, and his point of difference is that he can lead, that’s not leading.

    Also, by my count there were more ireland players on that leinster B team than on that Munster team (9-6).

    I would also say that putting a on new ten doesn’t mean the other one if failing. If Leinster had of put on Frawley earlier, he would have at least had the boot to attempt that penalty. I’d say his range is longer than Byrne.

    Utilizing the bench and trusting your players is good coaching.

    Edit; as an aside this is all pretty simple i think. Byrne knows the system and isn’t going to make any egregious mistakes. No one is ever going to worry about him carrying the ball himself. Crowley has elite ten upside but it might be too early for him.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,075 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    That's all fair re Byrne, but it's also one match.

    No one is making any great claims for Byrne to be the next Lions 10, but if the Irish 22 jersey is being decided on proven ability in big matches, Byrne will get the nod and it won't even be close. Crowley needs to hope that he can overtake him in the next two months.

    The "system" thing isn't an argument, because Crowley has been in the squad longer. If Byrne can pick it up better in less time, as you suggest, then he's a smarter player and maybe deserves the spot.



Advertisement
Advertisement