Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Transgender man wins women's 100 yd and 400 yd freestyle races.

1126127129131132300

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,232 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    Ah here. We are back to the silly arguments like "gay men can get married to women therefore they don't need marriage equality"

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 278 ✭✭SnazzyPig


    Are you equating going through a legal process with taking biology altering drugs?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,232 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Posts: 2,263 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,985 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    Ive read this comment 10 times at least and still cannot figure out what its supposed to mean in relation to the post you quoted.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,585 ✭✭✭J.O. Farmer


    I agree with you that they are not born disadvantaged in the category relating to their sex.

    I think it's also correct to say a transgender person taking hormones will be disadvantaged in the male category and that was the point I was making.

    I also wouldn't equate medical treatment with cigarette smoking.

    I agree that transwomen shouldn't be competing in female only categories but that is because it would be unfair on the cisgender females which comprise the majority.

    It can be unfair on transgender people but you can't be fair to everyone. It's not fair either on people who take other medical treatment (e.g cancer treatment) that affect their performance but life isn't always fair.



  • Posts: 1,656 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I also wouldn't equate medical treatment with cigarette smoking.

    Normal (non-trans) athletes can have medical conditions, require treatment, require medication that disadvantages them (or is on prohibited list). This is life. There is nothing special about transgenders in that regard. A normal male can have asthma - it will affect his performance. If he takes a treatment (inhaler) he might be banned from competition.

    Furthermore transgenders do not need medical treatment. Their bodies are healthy. There is no pressing medical need for a transwoman (biological male) to take female hormones, or to have his testes removed. Nobody gets rushed to an ER, 'quick get this guy some oestrogen stat!'. It's a choice they make, for cosmetic reasons (they want to "pass" better). It is akin to a female boxer choosing to get breast implants (cosmetic surgery) and then finding she is banned from competition (which is the case in some jurisdictions).

    That's why the smoking analogy is apt. Taking hormones is a choice they make.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,585 ✭✭✭J.O. Farmer


    Have you heard of therapeutic use exemptions? It would cover the asthmatic. These have also been known to be abused but that's another issue.

    I'm also not saying that transmen should get them to take testosterone to compete in female competition but they should for male competition.

    I don't know enough about gender dysphoria to make an assessment of whether treatment is needed, I would imagine there's a spectrum rather than being black and white.

    There's a lot of chronic ailments for example anyone could have that don't necessarily need treatment but treatment improves quality of life.

    There is no benefit to anyones quality of life from smoking tobacco. I would assume medical treatment for transgender people does improve their mental wellbeing and quality of life.

    The case of breast implants in female boxers it might be a more apt comparison. It may be done for similar reasons (mental health) but perhaps the reason they are then banned is perhaps due to some potential performance benefits.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,802 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    He kinda got stuck with me Enduro, there are some who would consider that a biological disadvantage 😂 But thanks though, appreciate it 👍

    I’m not asserting their are no performance differences though between males and females; there are of course, both at a group level, and at an individual level between athletes. I don’t have any issue with the creation of male and female sex categories either. Where the issue arises, is in the treatment of athletes who are transgender, and whether or not they are being treated fairly. That’s why I said earlier we could argue the toss, because you don’t see their treatment as unfair, whereas I do, and I’ve explained why I do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,802 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    The male advantage refers to males who are transgender competing in female competitions. The methodology and the data used to support the policies is fundamentally flawed; the numbers of athletes who are transgender competing in sports is simply insufficient to draw any meaningful conclusions from any available data.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,802 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    Almost every sporting event I've taken part in during my multi-decade sporting career has been mixed participation. Not once have I ever heard of any males complaining about the presence of females somehow causing them an issue. You're plain wrong again.


    There are no males complaining about the presence of females causing them an issue, because you’ve never heard of it so I must be wrong? That’s not even a curious line of reasoning, it’s bloody obvious what the problem is - you’re basing your argument solely on your own experience! It’s an argument from authority given your multi-decade sporting career, but it doesn’t mean I’m wrong. I know I’m not wrong, because I’ve experienced it myself with having to deal with males who had issues with females participating in organised sporting events. I don’t have to have a multi-decade career in sports to make that point.

    There’s a theme emanating from your posts that goes something like - if you don’t see it, then I’m wrong. It’s the kind of reasoning employed in Iran to maintain the idea that there are no gay men or women in Iran, because it’s illegal, and they don’t discriminate against people who are transgender either, Government actually subsidises the surgeries. Factually true on the face of it, but reality tells it’s own stories -

    https://amp.dw.com/en/iran-how-transgender-people-survive-ultraconservative-rule/a-57480850

    Now to place that in the context of female participation in international competitions, the outcome of their policies should be obvious. You don’t have to have seen it to know the outcome.



  • Posts: 2,263 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    the numbers of athletes who are transgender competing in sports is simply insufficient to draw any meaningful conclusions from any available data.

    Then nor should we come to any premature conclusion that there may be no disadvantage.

    At best, we should remain agnostic on the question until any definitive evidence comes through.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,802 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    That’s a rather convenient position from your perspective, but it’s not how human rights principles function in reality. You’re free as an individual to remain agnostic on the question, but sports organisations aren’t free to do so.



  • Posts: 2,263 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    So you appear to be saying that sports organizations should start from the assumption that there is no disadvantage of biological males in women's sport, because that aligns with "human rights principles".

    If evidence were to come to light that there is a clear advantage for biological males - definitive evidence based on a large sample - does that mean you would change your position? Or does that evidence matter at all i.e. we should nonetheless include biological males in women's sport even if the evidence suggests there is a clear advantage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭200mg


    You do not have a human right to participate in sport. You have to be able to fund your sporting activity for one via yourself or sponsorship. No human right violations involved.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,880 ✭✭✭Enduro


    In fairness, It's genuinly is a strong indicator of parenting excellence! And very little is more important in life than that.

    Well that's good that you agree that males in general have a significant advantage over females in most sports. If you hadn't asserted that male advantage was a myth the thread wouldn't have veered down this path. And if you accept that fact then of course having Male and Female sex based categories to reflect that mkaes perfect sense.

    To be honest I'm still not undertanding How you think transgender people are being discriminated against, given that that the male/female categories are sex based categoriies, based on the fact that the male sex has a onsiderable competitive advantage over females in most sports. If gender is not a factor in the rules detemining who can compete in a given category I don't see how someone can be the the victim of any form of gender based discrimination as a result. I know you think there is discrimination. I get that. I just don't see the basis for your opinion.

    Just to re-iterate, if the male/female categories were defined on the basis of gender identiry, then I would be of the opinion that any trandender person should be able to enter the category corresponding to their gender idenity. But for the vast majority of sports events this isn't the case.

    So, to take the Dublin Marathon as a local pertinant example, since they now have a non-binary category, which appears to be a gender based category, then I'd assume that the male and female categories are also gender based. Otherwwise the non-binary category would appear to be nonsensical. So in this case transgender entrants should be free to choose to compete in the category correspoding to their gender identity, which is more likely to be either male or female rather than non-binary from my observations. And I would fullly support any transgender athlete who does so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,880 ✭✭✭Enduro


    A transwoman is still male sex, by defnition. Otherwise she wouldn't be trans. Likewise a transman is still female sex by definition. THe data is not gender identiy based data. It is sex based data. There is no shortage of data.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,880 ✭✭✭Enduro


    I'll reply to this after I get back from my (somewhat delayed now) training session!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,867 ✭✭✭✭BattleCorp


    I'm confused. In the first post above you readily admit that there are performance differences between males and females yet your second post says that there simply isn't sufficient data to draw conclusions. That doesn't make any sense whatsoever because if you are male and transition to female, biologically you are still male. So, absolutely there will be performance differences between transwomen and biological women.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,802 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack




    Don’t strain yourself on my account. There’s no need for any further discussion when you come out with this sort of thing, purposely misrepresenting what I’ve said, rather than engaging with the facts-

    Well that's good that you agree that males in general have a significant advantage over females in most sports.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,802 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    There isn’t sufficient data regarding transgender athletes. It’s not difficult to understand at all. It’s not difficult to understand why there isn’t sufficient data either given that estimates put the numbers of people who are transgender in any given population at about 1%. The number of people who are transgender who participate in sports is much less than that. The number of individuals whose sex is male, but whose gender is female, is even less than that again.



  • Posts: 2,263 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Given that you believe there is insufficient data on advantage, why is it that trans women beat women to a greater extent than when they competed against biological males, but that we never see the same volume of stories of trans men suddenly beating men to a greater extent than when they were competing against biological females?

    To take Lia Thomas as an example, she was ranked very poorly against biological males but when she transitioned to participate in women's sport, her ranking spiked massively:

    During the last season in the NCAA, Lia Thomas competed in the men’s division, in 2018-19. There, she ranked 554th in the 200-yd freestyle, and she is now fifth in the event this year.

    Furthermore, in the 500-yd freestyle, Thomas was 65th in the country. Now, she ranked first place in the event this year.

    Finally, in the 1650 freestyle, she is now eighth in the nation, as opposed to 32nd in the men’s division.

    Lia Thomas is not the only example, either.

    Why do we never see the same spike in rank jumps when trans men compete against biological men?

    Unless the media is conspiring to hide all the cases of trans men suddenly beating biological men to a far greater extent, I can't really see how anyone could explain this other than one side having an advantage where the other does not.

    Surely that obvious imbalance should strike some kind of alarm.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,867 ✭✭✭✭BattleCorp


    But transgender athletes (transwomen) are still biologically male even though they identify as female. Or are you disagreeing with that statement?

    And if they are biologically male, it's not really that hard to join the dots without requiring more data.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,802 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    And leave out the fact that they are transgender? No, if you want to quantify anything, you’re going to need to design a study that would actually include the people you’re referring to! I don’t disagree with your statement, but you’re ignoring a relevant factor in order to join the dots. If it were that easy, then organisations could simply say no go and be done with it. They can’t do that because it would mean they would be in breach of human rights laws, which were introduced to address the discrimination in the first place, faced by people who are transgender.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭200mg


    No human rights laws are affected in spots in this way. Sports rules discriminate all the time. On a basic point of "Time" for example if you don't do a qualifying time you don't get to compete in the next stage of competition. Or are we suggesting that discrimination not allowing failed Qualifiers from another race compete in the next one outside of the next competitor not being dropped for some reason. Is therefore against human rights.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,802 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    They are though, and it’s because they are, that organisations may be held liable if they are found to be in breach of the equality acts, and it’s also why exemptions exist which permit discrimination in limited circumstances -

    Gender, age, disability and/or race/nationality 

    The Acts allow people to be treated differently on the grounds of age, disability, and/or race/nationality in relation to:

    • Sporting events, where the Acts allow people to be treated differently on the basis of their gender, age, disability or nationality in relation to providing or organising sporting facilities or events but only if the differences are reasonably necessary and are relevant;

    https://www.ihrec.ie/guides-and-tools/human-rights-and-equality-in-the-provision-of-good-and-services/what-does-the-law-say/exceptions/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭200mg


    Nabulus law right there you could argue a 35 year old professional football player be allowed to compete in the under 16s. No one would ever argue that and no one would argue Human rights violations in relation to Biological men competing in a biological woman's event. Blade runner would not be able to compete in the none augmented Olympics. There are rules. LIke when they banned shark skin from swimming.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,802 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    Blade runner? 😁

    Oscar Leonard Carl Pistorius (/pɪsˈtɔːriəs/; Afrikaans: [pisˈtɔrjus]; born 22 November 1986) is a South African former professional sprinter and convicted murderer. Both of his feet were amputated when he was 11 months old owing to a congenital defect; he was born missing the outside of both feet and both fibulae. Pistorius ran in both nondisabled sprint events and in sprint events for below-knee amputees. He was the 10th athlete to compete at both the Paralympic Gamesand Olympic Games.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oscar_Pistorius



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭200mg


    learn something new everyday cheers for that one. Will have to find out if they are banned now so point may still stand 🤔



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 323 ✭✭sonar44



    A more likely legal action might be from a woman left maimed or paraplegic from a contact sport that took away her right to compete in a women's only category despite the mountains of evidence that suggested, however gingerly for the faint hearted, that men are generally bigger and more powerful than women.

    It's just a discussion. Something more important is bound to come along.



Advertisement