Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1294329442946294829493690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭Curious_Case


    I'm not saying they won't be kicked out of Ukraine.

    I'm just saying that, unlike Germany & Japan, they aren't being threatened on their own turf (not militarily anyway, not really).

    They'll never sign any surrender agreement, they'll simply say that they're so delighted with their SMO that they're going back across the border.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,023 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    I find it very unlikely that Putin would be ousted. My point is that the Ru war effort could run into significant issues independent of that. Low morale among troops, poor equipment, in-fighting, few battlefield successes, trying to hold a 1,000 km frontline - they've already resorted to draining prisons and using cheap drone attacks on largely non-military targets. It's a very expensive war for them, for a country with a GDP equivalent to that of Italy, which has burned a lot of economic bridges. Any number of these cracks could start to turn into serious fractures which could impact the whole war effort, which seems, at the moment, to be producing nothing but humiliation and Russian coffins.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Gerry T


    The trade it lost with Europe is nothing compared to what it gained from India / China. Mostly those countries are taking advantage of this situation to buy Oil at greatly discounted prices. on top of that China is pushing to land grab from the south. Russia has no real friends. As time goes by the outlook for Russia gets bleaker.

    While War's required boots on the ground that is changing, precision weapons do that grunt work, starving the opposition of supply lines, demoralising them as they get picked off. That's my guess as to why UKR hasn't yet driven its counter-offensive, why risk their troops when they are having such success. Another couple of months of this and the Russian front line will be dysfunctional. The days of the ww1 western front slog is over, Russia could possibly hold out if such a tactical battle was fought, but it won't be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,373 ✭✭✭paul71


    It is a lie, you mentioned nothing in your post reposted about Russia. It was Israel and nothing else, you deflected and now are telling lies to distract from that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,373 ✭✭✭paul71


    There you go, that is your reply. You deflected directly to Israel.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,626 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Yes, there it is and where, as I have stated numerous times by now , have I tried to absolve Russia of blame. I have not. Deflection would be if I had refused to condemn Russia in that post. I have clearly stated in the post that Russia should be held to account. It is pointless to continue this since you won't admit to what is in front of you. I give up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Gerry T


    I see russia like a pack of wild animals. If Putin shows weakness he's finished. It won't take the crushing defeats of the world wars, Russia being forced to retreat with nothing but body bags and continuing sanctions will do the trick. Sanctions continue to tighten which is cutting off the final lifelines the rich and wealthy Russians have. The tide is turning and the noose is getting tighter for Putin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 170 ✭✭WheelieKing


    Sounds pretty authoritarian tbh. I'm sorry if you don't agree with what Daly is saying (neither do i for instance) but iv'e no time for a society that doesn't argue against people of her ilk. If you don't like somebodies point of view/politics/flavour of beer they drink then just debate it. Banning free speech isn't the answer to the world's ill's.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 287 ✭✭dennis72


    West has to seperate the war from the barbaric missile striking and give Ukraine weapons to counter the russian missile origin sites in Russian territory and it operators I think f16s on the way but tomahawks CM will only end this.

    Militarily Russia is spent it continues to under deliver so time to bring it to an end.

    Indiscriminate missile firing is terrorism on civilians all world leaders & even the pope should condemn this separately to the invasion



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,501 ✭✭✭circadian


    I completely agree with the sentiment, and people like Daly and Wallace should be openly challenged when possible, but it does come across at times as a planned "rage bait" by the media. There were two people on the panel and obviously finding someone supporting the Daly point of view on the Ukranian war is going to be harder, at least represent that, a broader panel that offers more than a binary debate would be healthier.


    You just have to look at Nolan on BBC NI, he often has wee Jamie on and just provokes people. There's rarely a range of opinions for debate, this is purely by design and just like Hannon's show which would benefit from a broader range of discussion.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,468 ✭✭✭zv2


    I doubt it. She was invited on the show, by Ukrainians in the audience, to go there.

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,216 ✭✭✭pcardin


    and how is debating with war crime, fascism, nazism, rashism suporters going? Fruitful? Has it ever been? You are mixing up actual free speech with crime advertising and just plain idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,468 ✭✭✭zv2




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,037 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Grumpy, for Ukraine, its a matter of survival, pure and simple. And Ukrainians are not going to just lay down and die. They will fight to the last man, and while doing it they will continue to be supported. Whatever about propaganda, politics and administrations, the military's in each Country know very well what is the real picture, and they are not easily fooled. Putin is on a loser, one way or another, and he's feeling the pinch now, a pinch that will only get worse and worse, with the worst possible outcome for him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout



    "A very small portion of its people is being dragged into the war in Ukraine mostly its poor."

    That may be true if you look at the raw numbers of men fighting in Ukraine versus the total population of the country. That's a simplistic way of looking at things though. When you start looking at the working age men then things start getting more concentrated especially in the regional areas that have been disproportionately affected. In Republics like Buryatia it's difficult to find any able-bodied men who haven't been called up. That's the sort of thing that will cripple a local economy and devastate demographics for generations to come.

    "but Buryatia is poor" you may say. Well the likes of Moscow and St. Petersburg don't have many men fighting, in proportion to their populations but they have their own crisis - that of young men fleeing the country. Many of these are highly skilled - since it takes means to flee and support oneself abroad. This is a veritable brain drain. That's a monumental disaster for any country.

    Of course, you don't actually need to sent to the front or have fled to have been affected by this war. The entire country has been affected in one way or another. Every man who is fighting will have an entire family network who is personally affected through their relations with him. Repressions have gone up throughout society as the Kremlin has tightened the screws on its people. Many goods and services, including medicines, are no longer available - or have been replaced by inferior products. Thousands of men will be re-entering society, many of whom are freed prisoners with a history of violent crime. A stint at the front will likely have honed their skills at violence and destruction and that will have ripples in society for years to come.

    Even the elites in Moscow have been affected. Many have met premature deaths as the pie that they loot has shrunk and mouths need to be eliminated. The nature of society is that everyone who has been allowed to rise through the ranks has kompromat on them - a sword of Damocles that can fall at them at any time. If you aren't murdered who can end up in prison for corruption. The likelihood of any of that happening has gone way up since the invaston happened. Beyond all of that their international mobility has been affected as they have become pariahs in many of the western circles that they previously swanned through.

    The entire country has been dragged into this way in one way or another.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,501 ✭✭✭circadian


    A completely different scenario. Russia has time and time again reneged on agreements and accords, invaded and interefered with their neighbours. The Ukranians have suffered under Russian aggression and oppression for centuries, there is no trust. Russia has completely disregarded their agreements with both Belarus and Ukraine in the Budapest Memorandum, that'd be similar to the UK ignoring the Good Friday Agreement and rolling the army and funding Loyalist groups again.


    Why would anyone sit down with them after something like that?


    Thankfully, this is not the case and despite all their flaws the UK does hold itself to a diplomatic standard unlike the Russian regime who will invade and terrorise their neighbours if they see fit, they are untrustworthy and as far as the Ukranians are concerned, not to be trusted. I very much doubt the supposed "April 2022" deal would have created anything of any great substance or value. Momentary peace? Yeah, sure, until the Russians were ready for another attempt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 170 ✭✭WheelieKing


    The polar opposite is needed otherwise all you are left with is an echo chamber. I'm actually glad to see the likes of Daly and Wallace on RTE and other outlets putting across their beliefs as absurd as it is. It makes a change from RTE's handling of the Covid pandemic where only the one side of the argument was permitted. Maybe they are learning, i live in hope.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout



    Absolutely. Another perfect example is that Nigel Farage has been a guest on BBC's Question Time more times (33) then anyone else in the 21st century, despite the fact that he has never been elected to the UK Parliament (despite running for it 7 times)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,501 ✭✭✭circadian


    So instead of presenting their opinions alongside a range of other opinions make it a binary shouting match that does nothing to continue to polarise people and show absolutely no nuance?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout



    April 2022 deal? 2 months after Russia's full scale invasion? What deal would that be then?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,560 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    @circadian don't feed the trolls.

    The attempt to deflect from Russia's crimes by referencing Northern Ireland is a classic Kremlin tactic and the notion that Ukraine's western allies blocked a "deal" in April 2022 is pure fantasy disinfo / conspiracy theorist nonsense.

    The only point of interest in grumpy's post is referencing Ukraine and it's supporters as "the allies"... it seems even Putinbots have accepted that this time around, Russia are the nazis! 😉



  • Posts: 1,656 [Deleted User]


    NY Times have a not very flattering report on the group who did the border attack

    Some analysts dismissed the significance of the R.D.K. as a fighting force even as they warn of the dangers they pose. Michael Colborne, a researcher at Bellingcat who reports on the international far right, said he was hesitant even to call the Russian Volunteer Corps a military unit.

    “They are largely a far-right group of neo-Nazi exiles who are undertaking these incursions into Russian-held territory who seem far more concerned about making social media content than anything else,” Mr. Colborne said.

    Mr. Colborne said the images of Mr. Kapustin and his fighters could damage Ukraine’s defense by making allies wary they could be supporting far-right armed groups.

    “I worry that something like this could backfire on Ukraine because these are not ambiguous people,” he said. “These are not unknown people, and they are not helping Ukraine in any practical sense.”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,362 ✭✭✭Sigma101



    You posted a link to a blog which you claimed was "an amalgamation of war news". The blog you referred to is a shameless pro-russian propaganda vessel, with articles full of lies, ridiculous consparicy theories, racist hatred of Ukrainians and deliberate misrepresentations of western media reports. I (reluctantly) post your link again so that people can make up their own minds.

    When you're challenged about its contents, you post in response a link to an academic study confirming that bots are successfully spreading misinformation about the war. Perhaps you're the only person reading this who doesn't appreciate the irony of your own post?

    to fully address your statement would take too long and I suspect you wouldn't listen anyways

    You realise that on a discussion forum that kind of response doesn't wash? There's also an unpleasant arrogance about it; it infers that you believe your views are too complex and insightful for others to understand. I find regular posters on this thread are generally well informed, regardless of their views on the war, and will see through bullshit like this no matter where it emanates from.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 209 ✭✭Lionel Fusco


    I suppose Bellingcat and the New York times will now be accused of parroting Kremlin talking points? Ukraine needs to ditch these dirtbags and quickly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Interesting detail here. I have timestamped the relevant section


    Can anyone tell me why those planes would fly for several hours in order that they fire their cruise missiles over the Caspian Sea? Is it so that if they fail and fall to ground they will only end up in the sea or is it maybe something to do with the flight path from that position?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,040 ✭✭✭Big Ears



    The problem really is that it's not balanced. We have the middle ground opinion supporting Ukraine, and we've the mad Pro Russian opinion put against it.

    Balanced would be having another person presenting an argument on trying to destroy Russia and that NATO should invade it, even if it ended in Nuclear war.


    So either just give the middle ground, or include both sides of madness aswell. Instead they have opted to only include pro Russian madness.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Putin planning local elections in occupied territories for September, looks like he's actually doubling down trying to legitimise his land grab





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,383 ✭✭✭Field east




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,383 ✭✭✭Field east


    naive - maybe delusional might be more appropriate ?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    We certainly do have very different viewpoints. And your comparison to our friends up in NI and across the water is utterly facile. These are mostly our friends and neighbours - they are not trying to crush us, kill our people, kidnap our children, rape our women, take over our resources and they are not raining missiles down on our cities.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement