Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Madeleine McCann

1150151153155156171

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,333 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Both scenarios are a case of victim blaming, and people who choose to focus on the actions of the victim for what happened to them, and not the person who victimised them are in the wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 818 ✭✭✭reclose


    Madeleine is the victim in comparison to your rape scenario.

    Also to use your rape scenario. A security guard is required to walk that girl up the street that night but chooses not to.

    Everyone will still blame the rapist but people will also ask why the security guard was negligent

    He didn’t mean for the girl to get raped but it still happened.

    It most likely wouldn’t have happened if he accompanied her like he was supposed to



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,400 ✭✭✭chicorytip


    I did not mean criminally negligent in the literal sense of the term although I think the McCann's and their friends would be deserving of charges of child neglect being brought against them, if it were possible. It was an act of gross irresponsibility to say the least.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,250 ✭✭✭Immortal Starlight


    Yes it’s that simple. There’s one victim in this case and that is Madeleine. Other people have most certainly been affected by whatever happened to Madeleine but they are not victims. I don’t believe Madeleine’s parents negligence was criminally minuscule as without their negligence their daughter would not have been taken. If you want to believe I’m misguided about that that is most certainly your prerogative but I don’t believe I’m in any way misguided. I have no idea what you mean by saying it’s not enjoyable. I don’t think anyone is enjoying the fact a child is missing for sixteen years. I also have children and know exactly what it is to be a parent. My posts are far from smug I am most certainly not a perfect parent but I’ve most definitely never ever neglected my children. I’m not ignoring that something horrific happened to little Madeleine and it makes me extremely angry when I think of the role her parents played in this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,333 ✭✭✭✭briany


    This is a semantic argument you're going into as everyone knows the McCann parents are also victims in this. The point is very clear: when someone is hurt by the actions of a criminal, it is the criminal who is liable, and people who get into the decisions made by the victim to give the opportunity are quite badly missing the point.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,867 ✭✭✭✭BattleCorp


    Jaysus, who p1ssed in your cornflakes.

    Madeline, alright?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,624 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    Your gas. Still obsessing on the parents and ignoring the fact that someone abducted her and most likely killed her.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 142 ✭✭Annascaul


    Can't you just stop this? During the whole discussion we've been reading your comments about how the poor McCann's are suffering for the loss of their daughter.

    Fact is, they've lost their daughter due to their own negligence and incompetence, - a mistake few of us would ever make. Also legally they've gotten clean away even though it's a criminal offense, - whilst others would have been prosecuted. But still you keep going on about the poor suffering McCann's.

    Would you leave gold ingots, money and jewelry in an unlocked apartment, not seeing who comes and goes and then complain that you've been robbed? Common sense should tell you not to do that.

    So why would you do that to your children?

    And then protect the parents in your comments that they are not responsible? Your comments are sadly totally unjustifiable and disturbing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,404 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Again a false linking of any criticism of the McCanns to being part of a conspiracy.

    That may be the mad ideas of some but others have the cop on to realise they obviously didn't conspire to have their daughter taken.

    But through utter stupidity they made it incredibly easy for whoever it was to be able to take her in great comfort knowing it was risk free.

    They didnt have any master plan to be rid of her, but they made the decision to prioritise a night out over the safety of their child.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 142 ✭✭Annascaul


    I wasn't saying that. So why start the posting with "again"?

    What bothers me here is that some users are failing to see that criminal negligence and plain and obvious in incompetent parenting has lead to the abduction and possible murder.

    Also in the mind of some users grieving parents should be made up for any possible criminal negligence. The McCann's and their friends put their drinking and dining before the well being of the children. That is unacceptable in my opinion. Ciminal behaviour togehter with selfishness.

    I am clearly not saying that the McCann's have tried to cover something up, like an accident with Madeleine in their absence. However it's theoretically possible, nothing is proven. It's not even proven that the current prime suspect, that German guy, is the perpetrator of the crime.

    At the moment, all we can do is wait, until the police come up with the lab results of the items they've collected and analyzed.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,404 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    I was agreeing with you about the "woe is parents" nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,250 ✭✭✭Immortal Starlight


    Yes the parents who as good as handed her over on a plate to someone who abducted her. The parents who should have been there to protect her so nobody and nothing could harm her but put having a good few nights out in front of looking after their children. Yes I’m hilarious really to think that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,614 ✭✭✭Padraig Mor


    In relation to Wolters, think I saw somewhere that the German system is set up such that evidence is only released at trial - i.e. he's not allowed to say what evidence he has until someone is charged.



  • Posts: 24,207 ✭✭✭✭ Harmoni Faint Skirmish


    I presume the unstated element is that they want the return of Madeleine even if to bury her. On the tony off-chance she is alive and sees the appeals I assume the parents would want her to realise they haven’t given up on finding her.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,656 ✭✭✭happyoutscan


    I would have to agree with John_Rambo on his comment. Seems like a personal witch-hunt from your posts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,250 ✭✭✭Immortal Starlight


    Label me however you like I couldn’t care less. The facts are if Madeleine was looked after properly she wouldn’t be missing today.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 36,851 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe


    If a friend of yours had gold ingots stolen from their home due to them accidentally leaving the door unlocked - would you continue to berate them for years upon years afterward or at some point would you have some sympathy and maybe direct your anger towards the thief who actually stole them?

    There has to be a point where people actually have sympathy for two people who lost their child, more than likely to a murdering rapist. The extra horror of knowing you could have been there to stop the person is unimaginable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,268 ✭✭✭✭iamwhoiam


    I would imagine that her parents berate themselves every single day for it . There is no worse hell than your child to be missing and you have no idea where she is , how she is and if someone is hurting her . I think they paid the ultimate punishment for their decision . I think 16 years of that hell is enough with salt being rubbed in it by others

    Constantly repeating how they made a mistake is neither going to bring her back or turn back the clock . In fact its pointless in my opinion



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,624 ✭✭✭✭John_Rambo


    I think you've clearly labeled yourself as a victim blamer with an unnatural persecution for the McCanns. A pure warrior.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 639 ✭✭✭juno10353


    There is no proof of Madeleine being abducted. It is one theory. Others being an accident in apartment causing death and cover up. Another theory is Madeleine awakening and wandering from apartment in search of parents and being knocked down and body disposed. All theories possible and none proven.


    One common point of above is negligence in protection by parents.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,250 ✭✭✭Immortal Starlight


    I’m discussing the facts of the case. A lot of people on this thread share the same opinion as I do. I’m not constantly repeating. I’m replying to others who have spoken to me. I don’t think it’s pointless as it played a huge part of the little girl’s disappearance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,389 ✭✭✭tibruit


    That`s a very fluffy reply. Gaspar is a GP. Do you think she made it all up? Payne was late on the night as he tended to be habitually. Gerry explained that his check on Madeleine took longer than usual because he met somebody on the street which was corroborated, he spent some time gazing at a sleeping Madeleine and he used the apartment toilet. The bins were emptied in the early hours after Madeleine was reported missing. There was no organized search of them. The bins were large wheelie types. I would say they were 4 to 5 times bigger than your bog standard Irish wheelie bin. There was no search at all through the underground rubbish containers. The whole lot was removed to landfill.

    I find it a bit surreal that all the posters here just assume now that this was an abduction. I mean it might have been, but based on what Gaspar said, I wouldn`t be letting Gerry McCann or David Payne anywhere near my kids.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,250 ✭✭✭Immortal Starlight


    There’s one victim in this case. Her name is Madeleine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,902 ✭✭✭thomas 123


    The amount of apologists on this thread is actually frightening!

    Imagine leaving 3 children under the age of 3 unsupervised for 10 mins let alone for the night while your out on the piss.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 36,851 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe


    Of course it's not okay to leave three young children unsupervised for that length of time. nobody is saying it is, you're actually not arguing against anyone but yourself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,902 ✭✭✭thomas 123


    I've read through 15 pages of this thread before posting that, id suggest you take a look over it yourself. Ill add though, not only is it not okay, its absolutely criminal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 36,851 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe


    If you are making a statement about people being apologists then a link to an apologist statement would be great. There's a quote function after all. Otherwise you are just making unfounded statements.

    You cant just tell someone to go back and read through 4,500 posts to try to find something that you may deem to be apologist. That's ridiculous.

    Regarding it being criminal, I agree. I don't think the punishment for it though is to have your child murdered by a rapist. Therefore I still see The McCanns as being victims of a crime.

    (this is all based on their story being true mind you!)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 423 ✭✭Robert Nairac


    Interesting how Jim Gamble believed the McCanns were responsible until he befriended them. The dogs don't lie.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,902 ✭✭✭thomas 123


    If you are going to challenge someone on a statement its best you at least read a bit. Id advise against calling out posters for unfounded statements if you are unwilling to leaf back through a few pages of a thread to fact check me.

    On desktop from pages 146-150 there are plenty of comments suggesting leaving the kids unattended was the done thing for instance.

    Regarding your comment re punishment - its speculation, nobody knows what actually happened.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,046 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Ah, the 'have you stopped beating your wife yet' type gotcha.

    Quite possibly, if there were no MM type events in the past 40 years to serve as a warning. I would have to replicate the McCanns situation - walk a mile in their shoes - and see how the situation felt. One of them is responsible enough he cuts people chests open and messes with their still beating hearts and the other was a GP. Neither were or are idiots, so the situation probably seemed safe.

    I would far rather do that than let any of those children out of my sight for 40 seconds anywhere there was water about, which is what hundreds of parents do, and suffer for, every single year.



Advertisement