Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Premier League Thread 2022-23 - mod note in OP 12/03/23

1325326328330331345

Comments

  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,854 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    A lot you've listed there are very talented players that the manager is probably failing to get the best out of.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,677 ✭✭✭doc_17


    I’m wasn’t saying Ten Hag deserved to win it but I also didn’t know it was only Premier League. So yeah, cups are not important so renders my point obsolete.

    6 nominees is a bit much. Was there even 6 clubs who didn’t change manager!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,902 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    That many managers have failed to get the best out of.

    But I'm sure it is all the fault of the managers and not the players.

    United Pep DDG would be sweeping and passing out with the best of them. Fred would be a technical king. Weghorst would be showing Haaland how its done. Martial wouldn't be injured every time he breaks past a jog. McTominay would be Busquests regened.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,854 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    Would you contend then that he has done a better job this season than any other of the nominees?

    Better than Aterta who led Arsenal who would have been predicted to hopefully challenge for top 4 to a title challenge?

    Better than De Zerbi who looks to have secured European football for Brighton?

    Better than Emery who has turned Villa around for relegation candidates into European challengers?

    Better than Pep who has created one of the greatest teams of all time?

    Better than Eddie Howe who looks to have gotten Newcastle to the Champions League for the first time in 20 years?

    Better than Marco Silva who has taken Fulham from relegation fodder to the top half despite missing their best player for a lot of the season?

    Or would you have in Erik Ten Hag who might get an extremely expensively assembled, well resourced and rather talented Manchester United team into possibly meeting pre-season expectations finishing 4th which would be their first Champions League appearance since not qualifying last year?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,244 ✭✭✭kowloonkev


    I think either you don't follow the PL much and are unaware of what EtH walked into last summer, or else you're on a bit of a wind up.

    It's hard to argue with the first five of the nominees even if one is big cheater, the PL still need to pretend its competition is legit.

    Marco Silva has done a good job but lack of expectation makes it a much easier job to do. I wouldn't even mind people saying Silva has done a better job than EtH.

    But to suggest EtH hasn't done a good job and is failing to get performances out of such a 'talented' (expensively assembled - as if that suggests good recruitment) squad after what happened last season, and the state of confidence coming into the season is a bit much.

    Simon Harris is monitoring the situation...



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,854 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    He's done an ok job. They didn't have a great season last season but hardly in crisis like a lot of people make out, it's always exaggerated with Manchester United. Last five seasons have been 2nd, 6th, 3rd, 2nd, 6th. Coming 4th or 5th isn't a huge departure from that. Pre-season odds had them in 5th.

    At no point I'm saying he's done a bad job. I think he's met expectations, certainly not done enough to deserve a MOTY nomination.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,324 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    ETH has taken Utd from their worst ever PL season to back into CL football while dealing with a bunch of off field distractions and a mismatched playing squad.

    It hasn't been a season without lows but ETH is achieving more with the squad than most people were predicting at the start of the season. Now the narrative is switching to this is the absolute least we could have expected him to achieve. Nahh

    If posters want to screenshot post or tweets they made last August/September where they predicted Utd would get CL football then by means... but most had Utd miles off the pace and some even had them fighting to be top half

    I don't know if he should be on the list over the others nominated - I can understand why all are there. But to pretend he has no business being in the conversation is strange stance to take



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 662 ✭✭✭jeff bingham


    I think Ten Hag is a good coach and will probably get United back competing but his scorecard would read “meeting expectations”.

    Did he not loan in Wout? And theres talks of renewing DeGea’s contract so those players were his choice. He also made Ronaldo captain after Ronaldo’s snub. At least he eventually made the right call and got rid of him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,342 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    United are where I'd hoped they would be at the start of the season ie they have a trophy won, a chance, albeit a small one at another and are challenging for top 4 so ETH has achieved my own personal expectations. At the end of last season United were at the lowest ebb Ive seen them. Players like Shaw, Rashford and AWB were destined for the hangmans noose but have all had (compared to recent) good seasons. I dont think ETH deserves a nom for MOTY however it is doing him a disservice to say he has only done ok, he has done well considering where the team was at this time last year, how the team started the season and how the team have reacted in the main to set backs. For MOTY Id say either DeZerbi or Arteta are most deserving as both have well exceeded preseason expectations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,226 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    Why can't they wait till to end of the season to nominate this ****?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,902 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    No.

    But when saying he should have done better with the squad and resources available I think it only fair to comment on the quality of the squad (weghorst first choice player for 20 games) and resources; weghorst the only striker he was allowed to bring in despite martial being injured all season, greenwood suspended and Ronaldo sacked.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,324 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    Whose expectations exactly had Utd in the CL last September?

    Loaned in Wout as there was no other option - no money available to spend to replace Ronaldo.

    De Gea - we'll wait and see what's happening. Could be forced to focus on other areas of the team first. It's clear as day though that De Gea is not what he will want long term in a keeper.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,902 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    I genuinely don't believe such decisions are anything more than pragmatic compromises based on the finances the club world provide.

    Ddg can't be any further from his archetypal goal keeper, even if he wasn't also rubbish at the one thing he's supposed to be good at.

    And no way weghorst was anywhere near top of a list of targets he'd want. Club would allow him to make any long term signings in January, none. Had to be a low cost loan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,508 ✭✭✭✭Collie D


    I’m always more surprised that people even care about these awards



  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,854 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    Can you point out where I said he should have done better? There are certainly players he's not getting a tune out of and some there are. This is about being MOTY, ie, the best manager in the league this season. I'm saying pro-rata, he's not been in the top 6 on the basis of how they've done. For a team that were supposedly in "crisis" during the summer, they still managed to spend 200 million on transfers on highly rated players including a five time champions league winner, a future world cup winner and even managed to bag one of the best midfielders of his generation on a free. Having one bad season and Cristiano Ronaldo throwing a tantrum is hardly a crisis.

    They were 5th favorites with the bookmakers which is a pretty decent aggregate guide to what expectations are for most teams, I would say that's firmly in CL contender territory. You could probably put together a bunch of tweets or find people that say they will finish 1st, 4th, 10th, 20th and anywhere in-between. They could also still finish 5th.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,328 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    What Emery has done is astounding. That Villa side always had potential but to pick them up from the mess Gerrard left them in and get them where they are mid season is huge.

    Newcastle, Fulham and Brighton are ahead of where I would expect them so for me that's more impressive than Pep or ETH who have teams exactly where I expect them. I also don't think Arteta has Arsenal way ahead of expectations either rather that they are 2nd because everyone around them conspired to fall apart this year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,391 ✭✭✭Brendan Flowers


    I wont pretend to know the goings on at all the PL clubs, but I'd be confident in saying I doubt too many other managers have had as many long term injuries to first team players as MUFC have had this season.

    Martinez: Season ended early due to injury

    Varane: A couple of injuries throughout the season that have kept him out of the team for significant periods

    Eriksen: Injured by an opponent and out for a long period

    Garnacho: Injured by an opponent and out for a long period

    Van de Beek: Injured by an opponent and out for a long period

    Martial: Injured for most of the season

    Sancho: Mental health issues meant he was unavailable for a long period



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,902 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Imo if someone has done an OK job with the tools at their disposal, the inference us they should have done better. Imo, good is above OK I'm ratings.

    Justbdint see how you can say someone has done an OK job, with out meaning you think they should have done a better one.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,854 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    He did what was expected. Could he have done better? Yes of course, should he have? Not if he reached expected levels. I don't think you can infer someone saying someone did an ok, as expected job meaning that they should have done better.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,244 ✭✭✭kowloonkev


    I think it's a bit harsh on Arteta. Even though I don't like him they are going to finish with a points total in the mid 80s. It's no fluke that they are second.

    Simon Harris is monitoring the situation...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,328 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    I think every manager I named has done a good job but if we are talking who has done "the best" job then it's not Arteta for me. He is probably somewhere in between the really surprised and done as expected groups which is why I put him separate to ETH and Pep.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,324 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    image.png

    5 teams above them there shorter priced to finish top4 before the start of the season (**** knows what it went to after the Brentford and Brighton games) and they will finish above 3 of those 5.

    ETH overachieved. Not as much as some other managers (Howe), but he did.

    Reached 2 domestic cup finals at the same time, don't give me the "oh this is just about league". The cup games have an impact on the overall season. To look at it correctly you have to take on board the fact that Utd played a lot more games than those around them and STILL overachieved on pre season expectations.

    It cannot be called "Meeting expectations". The numbers are there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,902 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    I think the last month has massively taken the shine off what he has done, and what he got from the team.

    The Seville games, West Ham and Brighton in particular (being 2 up at Spurs and messing that up infuriating too).

    Had they not imploded in the first game vs Seville, and won either the West Ham or Brighton games, things would look far better.

    But, the fragility of the side that led to those results is also on ETH, so if they have taken a shine off then that is what it is.

    Reality also is i they don't close out the CL spot and then go on to lose vs City (which would be expected), finishing 5th and a league cup will not be considered a good return for the season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,328 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    No he didn't overachieve.

    1 of the teams above him had a biblically sht season and 2 more fell apart. United moved up by default in the churn.

    They essentially moved up the GC in a cycling tour because 3 other rider crashed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,952 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    Sky Sports or The Athletic had a table a few weeks ago showing games missed or days missed by players due to injury broken down by club.

    Liverpool were miles out in front at the time with Chelsea second I think.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,226 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    yeah but ox dont count unless jones was also included



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,952 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    Ox was on the squad list for the PL so that's why they had him included. Is Jones on the squad list for United?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,328 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Ya but that's very misleading because it's not how many players but which players.

    Also it doesn't say anything about the relative ability to build strength in depth to mitigate the injury.

    For instance City need to lose about 6 players to be worth as much as 1 for Brighton (ratio is a guess so don't dwell on it)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,324 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    Nope, not how it works.

    If you are odds against to win something then it is more likely you won't do it. That's how it works. For you to overcome those odds you have to overachieve.

    As I said it is not as big an overachievement as Newcastle given their odds. But it still is overachieving if you are the 6th Favorite and you finish 3/4th.

    They are on course for a points total that would have got top4 last season also. 1 win away from 4th place total with 3 to play. So saying it is down to other teams being bad doesn't work.

    If you are a cyclists and ride the course in a time that wins it most years then you can't say they won because other cyclists crashed!

    They on course for 15-18 point improvement on last seasons club total. Now I'm not a great fan of comparing point totals across different seasons but we can see a clear improvement. Especially when actually watching the team.

    I'd agree they have stumbled over the line at the end of the season but that's a squad depth issue. As Mitch said that has taken some of the shine off and changed a few peoples perception of the season.

    But the only competition you can say they slightly underachieved in was Europa League. 1 out of the 4 they were in. All other competitions they have done better than expected.

    For a first season and considering where the club was 12 months ago it's about as good a turnaround as you could hope for.

    And the key is that it's more than was expected. An overachievement!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,226 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    doubt it cos injured from the start for the whole season.

    did liverpool register 25 players for their PL squad, i actually cant find it online, but i think liverpool have a problem with home grown while utd dont. hence why 1 was included (but left out of CL squad) while the other was not.

    i've not seen the article but i hope if from the athletic it goes into the nuance of these stats, ie: losing ox for a season aint the same as losing salah for a season.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement