Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1592593595597598915

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    Finally starting to see green shoots


    13,782 properties on Myhome up from 13,452 on 5th April.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,633 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    In what world could we be close to oversupply of property in this country?

    Oversupply of large offices maybe, houses not a chance



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,697 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I think there is a lot in what he says, some data does indicate we are nowhere near as crisis levels of supply as the headlines would have you believe.

    It's important to distinguish between whether somebody means supply as in houses actually on the market versus supply as in volume of existing housing stock.

    Sure the data shows that supply of houses on the market is at record lows.

    But the data of supply of housing stock suggests the picture is nowhere as bleak as most claim.

    And I think Skehan's point if we ramp up a housing program that builds 60/70/80k houses a year for next decade, we are likely to have turn quickly into a position of oversupply.

    And that then causes the same problems of 07/08 all over again.

    Skehan is not a particularly likeable fellow, but he's no idiot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,633 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    What data shows us having enough stock to meet our housing needs?

    And where is all this presumably empty stock that isnt making it to market?

    Genuinely this is the first im hearing about risks of oversupply, perplexed as to how this can be the case.

    In 06/07 people were not struggling to find any place, there was a clear bubble but there was supply and lots more coming on stream



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,697 ✭✭✭hometruths


    2022 census for one.

    According to the CSO the total housing stock is 2,124,590 and the average household size is 2.75 in Ireland.

    Total housing stock of 2,124,590 x Average household size 2.75 = 5,842,622 total housing person capacity

    And the population is 5,123,536.

    So on the face of it based on average household size we have "spare" capacity for 719,086 people. Or to put it another way - 719,086 / avg household size 2.75 = 261,485 spare housing units.

    Obviously it is not that simple because in order to facilitate a healthy turnover of stock in a functioning market you need some spare capacity at all times - this is in the region of 6% of housing stock equating to 127,475 units.

    261,485 spare housing stock - 127,475 turnover stock = 134,010 oversupply

    That potential oversupply we have will have dropped a bit because of significant net immigration since April 2022, but the raw numbers are still nowhere near as alarming as the headlines.

    Or to put it another way, if you had never read a newspaper article on Irish property, or tried to rent/buy a house recently, and were coming to the situation with no preconceived idea of the situation and you looked at the number of houses in Ireland compared to the number of people you would conclude there is no shortage of houses.

    If you have a few years of building 60/70/80k into to those housing stock numbers you will run into oversupply sooner or later. The longer it takes, the bigger the impact.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    I think Rory ahern made a good point in response to Skehan. In 2007, people were buying second properties as an investment.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,697 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Just listened to both interviews, and feel a bit bad about my comment on Skehan not being likeable. I thought he came across well, nervous as he knew he'd get it in the neck.

    Re Ahernes point about people buying investment properties, we didn't really have a investment landlord class back then.

    I daresay if we still didn't have the institutional landlords, and all the units that have been delivered in last 7 or so years that have not made it to market because of build to rent, REITs bulk buying, PArt V delivery etc, had been on the open market it would feel like every Tom, Dick and Harry had been buying second properties as an investment.

    I agree with Aherne's thinking re the government should putting all the public money eggs in one basket to supplying the social housing demand and leave the private market to look after itself by and large.

    I just did same housing stock / average household size / population calculations using the numbers from the 2006 census.

    And the result was an oversupply of 159,187, only 25,000 units more than 134,010 figure from the 2022 census.

    And in the year or so following the 2006 census another 100k new units were built, which led to a huge crash due to oversupply. Skehan is just warning to be careful we don't repeat the same mistake again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 169 ✭✭mayo londoner


    And it's not worth 285k, personally I'd have gone 275k max, alas irrelevant point to my main crux of the house suspiciously going up by 30k in 20hrs after everyone had arrived to view. As I said earlier, if people want to pay way over the odds let them at it, fools and their money are easily parted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    Interesting. I wonder what would happen if th Ukraine war ended and Google pulled out of Dublin with the new 15%.

    As far as I can tell, Skehan doing his best to be calm in the storm. It's interesting what he says and if you're saying REIT's are the new investment home bodies akin to people investing in a second home...

    Who knows, there seems to be a fair few very large apartment developments coming on stream this year. Will be interesting to see how things pan out.

    In the meantime feel sorry for the many people in accommodation distress.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭tesla_newbie


    Rory Hearne is a Marxist ideologue, he is a blight on the conversation surrounding this issue and does a lot of harm and no good



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,327 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Is that "134,010 oversupply" figure not completely ignoring holiday homes (62,000), vacant homes (185,000) and airbnbs (15,000)?

    And also not accounting for the housing units required to house Ukrainians and international protection arrivals (which numbered almost 100,000 in 2022 alone, and are still increasingly rapidly) - another 35,000 units required for 2022, and looking pretty high for 2023 too?

    The average household size is also decreasing consistently over time on top, from 2.94 in 2002 to 2.75 in 2022. That continuing decline all by itself, even if our population wasn't growing, would require a big number of new housing units to accommodate - approx 7000 new units a year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,301 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    How much of that 2.1 million housing stock is habitable and in turn key condition?



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,697 ✭✭✭hometruths


    No, it doesn't ignore vacants and airbnbs - these would be accounted for in the 6% I allowed for spare capacity:

    Obviously it is not that simple because in order to facilitate a healthy turnover of stock in a functioning market you need some spare capacity at all times - this is in the region of 6% of housing stock equating to 127,475 units.

    Re holiday homes - I think the housing stock figure does not include dedicated holiday homes, ie those which are restricted by planning for holiday home use only. I will check that. I'm not sure how many that is of the total holiday home figure.

    You're correct it doesn't account for Ukrainians hence why I said figure would have reduced since April 2022.

    The average household size decline is an in interesting one - a lot of the upper estimates of new builds required is predicated on the assumption that we will converge with the European average household size which is much closer to 2.

    Does that theory really stack up?

    Our household size is larger which because our housing stock is made up of larger properties. We have a lot more houses than most of Europe who have a lot more apartments.

    Are there really a ton of people in Ireland living in 3 bed houses who are yearning to live in small apartments? It seems unlikely.

    So if the case is we need 50k plus apartments per annum in order to meet demand for smaller household sizes then I think the maths holds up.

    But the developers will tell you they won't build them because everybody wants to buy 3/4 bed houses. And we certainly don't need 65k 3/4 bed semis a year!



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,697 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Whatever about turnkey, all of it is habitable. The housing stock count does not include derelicts/uninhabitable houses.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,301 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    interesting if its all habitable. But i would be mightly suprised if that were the case.

    There has to be some conditions that render some of those properties not turn key, which then stops them hitting the residential market.

    I am sure there are a lot that wouldnt take too much input to get to residential stage, though.

    I dont understamd why the govt doesnt have a taskforce doing exactly that - supporting minor rennovations to bring homes to market, where the owner doesnt have the funds or means to do so.

    State putchases them and does the maintenance.

    Then releases them back on to the market as cost rental/social or affordable homes for sale.

    Has to be so much quicker than wading through our planning process and then building.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,301 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Also, i wonder how many of that stock is 2nd home or vacant investment property, not to mention homes in probabte or other off market determinants.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 996 ✭✭✭Ozark707



    Appears that some large scale valuations are being revised downwards.

    “International investors remain confident in Ireland as an investment location, particularly because our demographic profile underpins strong demand,” said John McCartney, head of research at BNP in Dublin.

    “However, rising interest rates have triggered a reassessment of property values and, in a small market like Ireland, it takes time for an evidence-base of transactions to bring vendors’ and buyers’ pricing expectations into alignment.”

    BNP said the “pricing adjustment has a way to go”.


    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/reduced-price-for-marker-apartments-suggests-market-is-on-the-down-slope-for-investors/a1441550705.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 641 ✭✭✭J_1980


    Seeing the same thing. Record prices and stampedes at open days.


    Only property types with low interest and without bidding wars are apartments, old red bricks that need refurbishment (in price segment above 700k) and houses with tiny gardens/patios.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,333 ✭✭✭enricoh


    Often see his opinion piece's in the journal, rarely agree with any of it. An academic that never spent a day in the real world.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,301 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Rhyming is repeating itself.

    Just over a longer cycle.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,697 ✭✭✭hometruths


    The vast majority will be second home/vacant investment/probate etc but as mentioned that sort of stock usage accounted for in the 6% of spare capacity you'd expect to find in a functioning housing market.

    The point I am making that is if you look at the best available data we have on existing housing capacity in Ireland, you would not expect to see a shortage of supply on the market. In that context I think Skehan's warnings about oversupply are not as crazy as they sound.

    I think we're so fixated on the solution of ramping up new build supply, that we're totally ignoring the other biggest cause and thus potential solution which is turnover of existing stock - i,e people buying and selling existing 2nd hand stock.

    The turnover of existing stock facilitates a big game of musical chairs within the housing market. A healthy turnover rate ensures the most efficient allocation of both the stock and the capital in the market.

    In a healthy market people buy and sell when they want to, need to, or when they have to. Everybody's wants/needs/finances are different but in the whole they are all moving up/down/sideways and there is something for everyone. This is enabled largely by a proportion of existing property owners selling and buying.

    For 15 years or so existing property owners have not been selling in anything like the numbers you'd expect. I think the root cause of this goes back to negative equity/bank issues but thats had a knock on effect that has been getting worse every year, and thus the housing market turnover rate has been extremely low by historical standards.

    These sort of things tend to revert to the mean over time, but in order to do so it means at some stage the turnover rate will exceed the historic average for a period of time. It's just a release of pent up supply, built over 15 years. An increase in turnover will have the same knock on effects in reverse as the decrease has had. It could feel like we're in an oversupplied market very quickly.

    In all the talk about the housing market you never hear anything about the low turnover of existing stock, it's quite odd.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,333 ✭✭✭enricoh


    Interesting article below, hard to argue with any of it. Can't see house prices increasing once new corporation tax rules are in tbh.

    https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/04/27/ireland-economy-taxes-jobs-apple-us-tech-companies-eu/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 210 ✭✭Mr Hindley


    Yeah, I’m pretty much abandoning buying a house for now, and am expecting to settle for an apartment. I’m at a stage in my life where I’d love a house but the market for houses is going nuts again. Maybe things will be more sane in five years, or maybe I’ll have missed my last chance and will be in an apartment forever. But I’m just tired of the market being all over the shop the last few years. Every time common sense seems to dictate one thing, the market does the other.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,301 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    All good points, but i think there are other variables.

    An obvious one being location, location, location.

    From the 2016 census, there were 1.3% vacant dwellings in South Dublin per 1000 of population, excluding holiday homes.

    1.7% in Fingal.

    2% in Kildare.

    Nationally, we averaged at 3.8%.

    But a massive 11.2% in Leitrim.

    Donegal, Mayo, Roscommon all above 7%.

    All of Greater Dublin below the national average of 3.8%.

    So there is clearly housing stock available in rural areas, but do people want to live there and if so, why is so much of it vacant?

    Granted figures are from 2016, but the principal is clear and will likley be echoed when the 2022 data is out shortly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,328 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    You've said it. It is desperation. People see prices continue to rise, rents continue to rise, population continue to rise, and completed units remain static at best.

    While people can access the finance to bid higher, in this market, prices will continue to rise given the desperate state of supply and cost to build.

    If you don't own your own home you are at the whim of the rental market. At least if you own a home with a mortgage you have some level of security and so long as you can maintain your repayments it is a far better option than renting. If they day comes when you cannot maintain your repayments you have many options available to you and at worst a very very long repossession process.

    People are only seeing the access to property getting more difficult and are making decisions accordingly.

    And who would blame them?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭combat14


    very interesting article, sounds like repeated rising interest rates are starting to wreak havoc on valuations as market for "bulk sales of residential property – has become very soft, especially in recent months"


    "Property advisers JLL Ireland said large-scale residential prices were down 3.7pc in the first three months of 2023 and had fallen 7.1pc in the last 12 months."


    https://m.independent.ie/irish-news/reduced-price-for-marker-apartments-suggests-market-is-on-the-down-slope-for-investors/a1441550705.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,909 ✭✭✭Villa05


    It would appear that, in the short term at least, investment fund activity will be predominantly confined to purchasing existing stock.

    Gov really need to look at that tax free status and apply it to brand new supply only



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,327 ✭✭✭Blut2


    How exactly does your 6% spare capacity figure (127,445) cover vacant homes (185,000) and airbnbs (15,000) when they add up to significantly almost double that said figure?

    And where does that leave the also required spare capacity for turnover every month - people moving homes, places available to rent etc?

    You can't count long term vacant homes towards the spare capacity figure because they're not used as such.

    "Are there really a ton of people in Ireland living in 3 bed houses who are yearning to live in small apartments? It seems unlikely."

    With the declining household size the issue isn't that there are far more people who prefer small apartments given the choice, its that there are far more single person and smaller family households now. Fewer people are getting married, and even fewer are having lots of kids. Its not practical for a single 50 year old to be living in a 3bed semi-detached house. Or even for a couple with one kid to be living in a 5 bed house. That couple needs the smaller house, and the single person needs the apartment.

    The days of the vast majority of people getting married and having 3-4 kids are over in Ireland, but that isn't reflected yet in our housing stock.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,697 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Sure a high number of holiday homes and higher vacancies in Donegal, Mayo, Roscommon etc compared to Dublin would be entirely expected.

    The CSO has released vacancy data from 2022 - https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-cpr/censusofpopulation2022-preliminaryresults/housing/

    Dublin as a whole running at 5.5% of stock. The interesting thing is how skewed the rates are by individual areas. If you look at the LEA map you'll see the highest values areas of Dublin have the highest vacancy rates - many in excess of 10%. The cheapest areas - Ballymun etc - have rates under 3%.

    So at a national level it's location, location, location - high vacancy rates are expected in lowest value/demand areas. They're vacant because nobody wants to live there.

    Whereas in Dublin, where the housing crisis is most acutely felt, it's the total opposite - the highest vacancies are in the highest value/demand areas.

    Another interesting about Dublin is that pre-Covid, about 2016-19, it was the only county in which the number of holiday homes increased year on year. Again that might be unexpected.

    You can do the same housing stock/avg house size/population calculations for Dublin:

    Total housing stock 571280 x Average household size 2.73 = 1,559,594 total housing person capacity.


    And the population is 1,450,701


    So on the face of it based on average household size we have "spare" capacity for 108,893 people. Or to put it another way - 108893 / avg household size 2.73 = 39,887 spare housing units.


    Obviously it is not that simple because in order to facilitate a healthy turnover of stock in a functioning market you need some vacant spare capacity at all times - this is in the region of 6% of housing stock equating to 34,277 units.


    39,887 spare housing stock - 34,277 base rate vacancies = 5,610 oversupply

    So not quite as damning. Oversupply is only about 1%, a rounding error in such matters.

    But bear in mind it is oversupply nonetheless. The 6% base rate spare capacity is what you would expect in an efficiently functioning market with a healthy turnover leading to a healthy supply of sales and rental stock.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,697 ✭✭✭hometruths


    How exactly does your 6% spare capacity figure (127,445) cover vacant homes (185,000) and airbnbs (15,000) when they add up to significantly almost double that said figure?

    Because in a normal functioning market you would would expect vacant houses/probate etc to be within the order of 6%.

    If you have more than that it the market is oversupplied.

    If you have less the market is undersupplied.

    The fact that we appear to have more in an undersupplied market is the point I am making.

    Something doesn't add up, what is it?



Advertisement