Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

What does the future hold for Donald Trump? - threadbans in OP

16026036056076081189

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Well, yes.

    I'm surprised to hear she still hasn't learned about Kalief Browder. By contrast insurrectionists still being held in pretrial confinement doesn't faze me.

    She tried to complain that alleged improving of conditions is evidence of mistreating the inmates 🤔



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Trumps claims of executive privilege have failed and Judge orders Pence to be compelled to testify about conversations he had with POTUS Trump about January 6.

    However it is noted, Pence could still appeal and assert his own privilege as President of the Senate for his own actions on January 6 itself.

    I don't think the Framers really thought out these privilege arguments much, but I guess if 2 or more branches of government are already engaged in illegal collusion you're already fucked in the a as a citizen anyway right? The madness it feels like that Pence might have more Legislative Branch privilege to not testify than Trump has Exectutive Privelege to not testify. However iirc Lindsay Graham already tried to weasel out of testifying (and failed) under the Speech and Debate clause in Article I.

    And to think the last hurdle to anything sticking to Trump is still the court that's been getting packed since Scalia. Given their recent rulings I wouldn't be surprised if the Roberts court came out with "it's not historically traditional to prosecute former presidents, therefore we won't" - yes, the Roberts court cited History and Tradition in Dobbs v Jackson to overturn Roe vs Wade, and in Bruen it recently ruled along the same line of History and Tradition to render null a heap of gun regulations across the country, just last month:

    image.png

    I might have already mentioned this case earlier in the thread or some other, and if so I'm sorry, actually only heard the report about it this morning and it still blows me away that the United States legal system is going to come apart at the seams soon because these chucklefucks want to enshrine literally "the most dangerous phrase in business" as the reason why we no longer allow the Legislature(s) to Legislate. And they're **** republicans I was told they knew how the **** to Business. And their best reason for defeating abortion and gun rights is, 'well we understand that's the intent of the law that the lawmakers wrote and got signed into law but in our opinion... that's not the way we've always done things, you can't just ... make new laws, that's ridiculous.'



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,775 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    de Santis is way behind in national polls but he is also an undeclared candidate who isnt currently campaigning nationally. But he has been running a shadow campaign masquerading as a book tour in the early voting states. In Iowa (who vote first in February 2024) he has an 8 point lead over Trump and in New Hampshire who vote next they are neck and neck.

    I dont think de Santis can beat Trump but it could be a lot closer than how things look right now as national polls dont really matter, only state ones do. de Santis' main problem though will be the primary debates, Trump can say anything he likes about him, call him a loser and so on but he cant do the same to Trump because he cannot alienate the MAGA base who he needs onside to win the White House. Se he's going to be constantly boxing defensively against Trump, it very hard for him to attack him in any meaningful way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,383 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    FsVtdQPWIAA_KmN.jpeg

    Damn the liberal owner of twitter!

    Oh wait...

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    What's funny is the florida house speaker said “In this case, it’s an honor for someone from Florida to even consider running for President.” Basically suggesting that yeah, it's against the resign to run law, but cmonnnn, its our good old boy! Doing the things! cmaaaaan!

    Ultimately it's like Trump with the Hatch Act violations in office, Ron is skirting the laws of his own state to use the Governorship not to focus on the governing of Florida, but on his presidential shadow campaign as you put it, and using the apparatus of his office to pull off stunts for the national stage like shipping migrants from Texas to Martha's Vineyard and signing laws that will wither in federal court just to steer the electoral narrative.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,383 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    His interview was exactly the same as all his previous interviews.

    They were always horrific.

    The only reason he is saying that this one was horrific is because he realises Trump will not win 2024.

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,500 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover


    "He was whining. He was complaining. He was playing the victim card again and again"..... have... Have they not heard him speak in the last 4 years? In the last 6 years? In the last 8 years?

    Notice though: They STILL couch their words: They say this was the worst interview they heard "The President" give.... They complained about his INTERVIEW. Not he himself. So then he rails on them they can crawl back on their bellies "Well lord President, we specifically said the this was the worst interview you gave. We said 'Where is Donald Trump?' ". So they said he was awful in the interview...

    Also, I notice your man said he voted for trump twice. As he voted for trump, does this mean he voted twice for him in the same election? The GOP's only study said the only evidence they saw for multiple votes was republican 😀



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,038 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    No, if he voted for Trump twice I'd take that to mean 2016 and 2020.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,775 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    That Dominion vs Fox News case is coming to the boil nicely at the moment. Dominion want a good few Fox News anchors in the witness box as well as the Murdochs. While they may not get the Murdochs in the box they are likely to get Fox news anchors in it, Hannity and Ingham are their chief targets. We'll definitely be seeing Sidney Powell and Guiliani in the box anyway as they started this stuff about election machines being rigged in Venezuela. Reports say Foxs lawyers have battled tooth and nail against Dominion on every single Fox anchor they want to call so far, it seems Fox are really running scared on this one and are desperate to keep them out of the witness box rather than using them as a defence.

    Dominion claim they have internal messages among Fox staff that proves they knew that Trumps rigged election stuff was a lie but they decided to run with it anyway. Fox are claiming 1st amendment rights and the medias right to report the news so this will go all the way to the Supreme Court eventually. Ultimately Fox are going to claim under the 1st amendment they can say what they like but I dont think knowingly spreading lies about a stolen election is going to pass the shouting 'fire' in a crowded theatre test. Its $1.2bn in compensation that Dominion are seeking so its pretty serious stuff, will be interesting watching how it plays out.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,969 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Fox are more concerned about the reputational damage of the case that the actual outcome I suspect.

    The actual monetary damages that Dominion might win will take years to have to be paid and will likely only be a fraction of the headline ask.

    But , if Dominion get Hannity et al on the stand , Dominions lawyers will burn Fox to the ground with their viewers by forcing them all to admit that they make stuff up and deliberately lie to the viewers.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,383 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    "Dominions lawyers will burn Fox to the ground with their viewers by forcing them all to admit that they make stuff up and deliberately lie to the viewers"

    will they though?

    Was it not the case that Fox already admitted on the stand that Carlson is entertainment and not news? It's not that much of a difference from that for those folk

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,500 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover


    Fox are more concerned about the reputational damage of the case that the actual outcome I suspect.

    I wouldn't think so. Their viewers take them at 100% true. They will not believe ANY evidence against fox and ALL evidence to support fox. Remember the mindset of the people. Why would they disbelieve fox when fox state that their insurrectionist buddies are innocent tourists who were invited in for a guided tour?


    The ONLY way this MAY have an impact is if they they get fox to say: "Yes, we knew this was a lie. We told the lie intentionally because we wanted to get more money from trump supporters................... to support our Mexican LGBTQI+ abortion clinics"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 470 ✭✭archermoo


    Carlson and Fox have repeatedly stated in court that his show is entertainment, not news. And that no reasonable person would believe the things that he says on air are actually true. These admissions have not stopped his viewers from believing him even a little.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,500 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover


    Untitled Image

    Tourist



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,969 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    The "Talent" have never been on the stand and cross examined though.

    They or their producers have submitted statements or sat for depositions before , but never in open court.

    Also - Fox are significantly more vulnerable now then they have been in the past so I think the risk of damage is far higher today than it might have been in the past. The MAGA's already don't trust them so by admitting that they lied about the election , or at least in the MAGA view by "saying" it was lies they will be viewed as having sold Trump out even more .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,110 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Thing is, the core viewers probably don't really care that they're being lied to. Or they'll just shift the gears in the tiny brains to believing that Dominion and tHe lEft are behind (another) massive conspiracy to silence the "truth" by going after their propaganda outlet.

    You'd think, at this stage, that everyone with even half a functioning mind would have given Fox, Trump, et al, a wide berth. But they continue to negotiate around sense and logic to comfort their own idiocy and belief systems.

    Fox will fight the case with all the bullshit they can muster, but I don't think any monetary or reputational damage will damaging enough. Fox has already admitted to basically being an "entertainment" channel and not a conveyor of news in court, and I'd say a lot of their viewers just thought that that was a wise "defence". So they'll, most likely, just come up with more swivel eyed bollocks in this case too and their viewers will still be snafu.

    There really is no helping some people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Well you forget a large portion of the audience are completely cognizant and aware of the wink and nudge nature of the enterprise. They know it’s an alternative facts silo, they know it’s a political machine for delivering talking points to them to go disseminate out into the world to ‘own the libs’ and prevent a watergate from ever happening again. The entire point of the network is to insulate one political party from criticism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,110 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    On the contrary, I'm well aware of that.

    A lot of Fox viewers tune in because what the channel broadcasts salves and encourages their already solidified beliefs. And if Fox has to muddy the waters now and again to continue doing that, they'll just let that pass.

    FFS, the likes of Alex Jones still has viewers, because people believe he's fighting the good fight. It wouldn't surprise me, in the least, that a significant number of Fox viewers won't even bat an eyelid if the network came out and admitted to lying about a large number of items. They'll just park that and continue watching because something, something, CNN, communism, tHe lEfT...ad nauseam.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,289 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Dominion has no interest in trying to convince Trump voters of anything. There reputation was damaged and they're seeking compensation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,189 ✭✭✭Doc07


    unfortunately this is very accurate.

    Tucker could call his ‘fans’ stupid redneck c&nts’ tonight and Trump could call them all gobshites for not getting vaccinated or whatever. But as long as they ended it by saying something like ‘watch out for those librards /Biden/Fauci/they’ll steal your guns etc and join us again tomorrow night ’ they’ll all be back



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 9,475 CMod ✭✭✭✭Fathom


    Perhaps an out of court settlement by Fox for an amount less than demanded by Dominion? But will Dominion also want an admission of guilt by Fox to protect their reputation?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,500 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover


    I presume they will want an admission of guilt/fraud by fox and a metric tonne of money for losses.

    Fox will not lose reputation as a valid news source simply because they are not a news source... by their own admission.

    So hopefully it will as embarrassing as possible for all involved with fox. Their cult will continue to watch of course. But they just need to made a laughing stock. When they are called for questions at any press conference, be it political, sports, entertainment, whatever, people should smirk. Genuine journalists should be embarrassed to work for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,383 ✭✭✭✭everlast75




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,383 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    In other news, speculation abound as to what this means...



    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,969 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    I read an article just this morning on this issue.

    Apparently , Bragg has asked for further interviews with Weisselberg in the last week or two.

    The fact that Weisselberg has now replaced his Trump funded lawyers with his own brings forth the suggestion that Bragg has uncovered more crimes implicating Weisselberg and Trump and Bragg is now offering him a deal to start talking.

    The thinking being that having spent a few months in Rikers Island (A raging shithole by all accounts even by US Prison standards) a man of his age is probably not that keen on having more time added to his sentence, especially given that Trump hasn't exactly shown him much loyalty in return.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,289 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Dominion would want repair of their good name. That is a grovelling apology, Their future reputation is important. More important than the damages cheque.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,812 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Since the Bragg Grand Jury is about to recess for April (!) unless something indictment-like happens today, it's tune in for the summer replacement Apprentice: Grand Jury edition in May.

    I had a boss on a GJ for 6 months (he was the foreman.) It's really REALLY tedious and they get long breaks, so no surprise. So, I think the media focus will shift back to the Georgia case now, unless something happens in the E. Jean rape suit.

    Leaves TFG leeway to wander around holding rallies. He'll keep the $$ coming in that way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,088 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Indeed but what is an apology without repercussions surely some heads will have to roll as part of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,020 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,775 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    I think whatever comes of this Dominion are going to want accountability to be seen to be done in public so its unlikely they will allow some out of court settlement with an NDA on the compensation amount. And they will want a very public apology by Tucker Carlson et al on air during his show.

    At the end of the day Dominion are an electronic voting machine company and as a business they live or die on running a secure software system to count votes that is tamperproof. A false allegations of the US election being rigged from Venezualea by hacking their software is an existential threat for a company who deal solely in the integrity of elections. Fox then amplified those false allegations hugely and gave belief to the lie that the election was rigged. Which then put Dominions entire reputation and its future as a business on the line. Its as serious as it gets for a company who sells voting counting machines and software.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement