Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Premier League Thread 2022-23 - mod note in OP 12/03/23

1241242244246247345

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 13,227 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    So why didn't said linesman tell the ref about this so called shove? Because it's not something that could be missed by the officials and if he had told the ref about a shove then Bruno would have been sent off. The linesman didn't tell the ref about it is because is was a nothing incident and he wasn't bothered by it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,110 ✭✭✭jacool


    You are isolating one incident and turning it into a non-event. Then you are asking for "common sense" to be applied.

    That's why there are rules. They allow for consistency and clarity across all decisions, and not the application of subjective "common sense". Not all events can be taken in isolation. e.g. Can you look at Casemiro's red card without considering what happened in the Chelsea-Leicester game? (Pereira on Joao Felix). I don't think so. Neither does ten Hag for that matter.


    Also, for comparison you should see what Ronaldo got a 5 match ban for, in Spain!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 912 ✭✭✭Infoseeker1975


    Casemiro's tackle was out of control, could easily have broken the other players leg, if it had then the reaction is probably going to be different from Utd fans. As a Pool fan, I thought Fabinho's tackle in the Brighton match was also out of control and should have been a red.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,110 ✭✭✭jacool


    You may have your rose-tinted glasses on there :) He kicks out at Trent, he pushes Trent and then he pushes the assistant referee.

    He was having a very bad day at the office and it was petulant. If you did that to me in a pub I'd be having a word. (Hang on - How tall are you?)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 687 ✭✭✭joeyboy11


    My exact thoughts after i read that post. I guess the really consistent teams are challenging for the title.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,324 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    I was asking to stick to the Bruno event instead of talking about Refs in Cork not that you can't look at other incidents...

    I think it is incredibly difficult to set rules to a letter and not allow for some kind of subjective application of those rules in football. There are too many variables to take into account.

    The Casemiro and Pererira tackles draw attention because of their lack of common sense application. Same ref.. He either thinks tackles like that are red card offences or he doesn't when applied to the law (now I think in the Chelsea game he was more let down by the VAR official than anything). But it has gathered attention because he seems to have shifted his view on that inside 24hrs.

    You obviously feel what Bruno did was worthy of a red and a ban. I do not and I do not want to see the game descend into a place where players are being sent off for stuff without context and common sense even being considered. I think it will ruin the game long term.

    If you want absolute letter of the law stuff then those laws need to air tight in how they are written. They are not, nor do I think they ever can be.

    I think the answer lies more in the training of match officials - We will never cut out 100% incidents where we feel like a player should have been sent off or other similar incidents on the pitch. It isn't like goal line tech or offside tech where there is a clear line that can be drawn. But we can look for better consistency across decisions and maybe some feedback from Refs as to why they made certain calls.

    Sure just in the Bruno incident that you want to get him banned for so badly, the assistant ref puts his hands on Bruno first - are we gonna start telling players a match official can touch you but you can not touch them back? You see, without context and common sense it doesn't work.

    I'd have a lot more respect if Andre Marriner came out and said the Casemiro tackle is a red in his view and he missed the Pererira tackle in real time on the pitch the day before. Then we could ask the question why did VAR not ask him to review the incident. Maybe we can look at a way that teams can raise an issue for review with VAR but that would need to worked on but if it was done right it could allow Potter to ask for that to be reviewed. (not sure on this idea just spitballing).

    But to be honest I'd be more interested to hear them give reasons for each of the penalty decisions they turned down in the Utd game. A little bit of accountability, if they are constantly getting decisions wrong then there needs to be consequences - just like almost any other job. When these are all kept in house it allows for things to be swept under the carpet a lot easier.

    These are the things I am talking about when I ask for a common sense approach.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,952 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    At the end of the day no player should be putting their hands on an official at all. They also need to cut out the dissent and make it so every single player doing it is booked. Only the team captains should be allowed to speak with the ref, the same as happens in rugby.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,013 ✭✭✭djan


    Exactly, it's rather simple and would easily be eradicated overnight one the refs would start handing out yellows for it just like with timewasting at the world cup.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,324 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    Yeah I don't why we didn't move to team captain only allowed to speak - would add a bit more to the role of captain as well



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,323 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Broadly I agree with it but it's not as easy as in rugby where almost the entire team move up and down the line.

    What good is your goalkeeper captains opinion about something that happened in the opposite box.

    This crowding and shouting thing definitely needs to be stopped though.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,317 ✭✭✭gucci


    Captain shouldnt have the need to comment and argue every single decision the ref makes.

    If the keeper is the captain, he can use an appropriate time to speak to the ref, maybe that would work slightly better as the conversation wouldnt be at the boiling point of whatever incident is after being raised.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,323 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    When is the appropriate time ?

    If your players are constantly being kicked and dragged when is that time.

    The proof is there that some refs are inconsistent or half blind to what's going on.

    Players are not in constant close contact to the captain like rugby so can't just relay their problems to him and then the ref. Honestly the "why can't it be like rugby" thing is far too simplistic.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 18,758 Mod ✭✭✭✭DM_7


    The manager can and does talk to the 4th official so issues could easily be communicated that way, there is no actual need for players to make comments to referees unless the ref invites them to discuss something.

    Games have 5 officials now and if they removed all the time wasted dealing with player complaints they would have a lot more to communicate with each other instead to arrive at better informed decisions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,323 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Cant agree with either paragraph. The officials miss loads and it can't all be blamed on the players. They miss so much we now have camera officials and they still miss loads.

    You have never played sport if you believe that first paragraph (rugby players shout at refs all the time too)



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 4,710 Mod ✭✭✭✭TherapyBoy


    They don’t charge & surround the referee in packs like a bunch of dogs though.

    The “What if your captain is the goalkeeper?” argument is rubbish too. If the rules were enforced properly & only the captain could approach the ref then it would make sense to have an outfield player made captain. Easily remedied problem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,323 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    I agree and said myself the crowding needs to stop.We already have a rule to stop it but refs won't use it.

    Saying certain players have to be captain is not an easy remedy.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,854 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    You don't want it like rugby where the refs talk to players like naughty school children.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 18,758 Mod ✭✭✭✭DM_7


    I did not reference Rugby.

    Players will always give out and make comments and react. The issue in soccer is the number of players who feel they can engage and are allowed to engage the referee in a discussion when there is no need for it and it does not benefit the game.

    Having a captain as the on pitch person that can engage with the ref and a manager that has access to the 4th official should allow sufficient access to the referee for a team to bring an issue to the refs attention.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,323 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Other people were mentioning rugby at the start of the conversation.

    I just think the first thing we should try is just applying the rules. The refs already have the power to card people who shout at them so a new rule changes nothing when it's implementation that's the problem.

    Look at the widespread abuse of the technical area also.



  • Posts: 19,923 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Rugby is also a sport where the team is punished as a whole a lot more than football. The captain can somewhat mitigate that but in football a right back would find it tough to be able to inform a winger of a problem.

    The way a yellow in rugby is given for multiples of the same foul is something worth looking at in football imo. I wouldn't mind a sin bin being brought in for cynical fouls and the ref making it clear to the players what's happening rather than Chinese whispers to the captains.

    Ultimately the rules in football and especially the PL haven't been enforced properly for years and it's becoming unwatchable whereas they have changed the rules in rugby to make the game better and it's twice as good to watch as it was even 10 years ago. Football has been slow to change anything of substance and it's really becoming a slog.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,042 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    Seems to me that posters are trying to enforce their ideals on the worldwide game. Like I doubt most players/fans in Southern Europe, Central/South America etc have much problem with the dark arts, pressurising refs, niggly fouls, repeated fouls, disrupting the game etc. Trying to 'rugby-ify' it seems just a British/Irish idea.

    We should be wary of assuming that what we perceive as a problem in the game is regarded as such worldwide, and assigning ourselves the role of global policeman.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 715 ✭✭✭Mac_Lad71


    Good wins for Brighton and Brentford last night as they continue their excellent seasons.

    Brighton in hunt for top 4.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,110 ✭✭✭jacool


    Vieira gone!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,110 ✭✭✭jacool


    Crystal Palace

    2010 - 2017 14 different managers

    2017 - 2021 stability under Roy Hodgson

    2021 - 2023 Vieira, soon to be followed by the usual manager a year churn again I expect. No names in the ring yet.

    This is their 10th successive season in the top flight, but they have been in free fall since the World Cup. They should lose to Arsenal and then have two "cup finals" against Leicester City and Leeds United. That's where they'll want the new manager bounce to kick in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,754 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    They went 3 games without a shot.

    That is insane.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,033 ✭✭✭✭johnnyryan89


    On today of all days, blasphemy by Crystal Palace.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,110 ✭✭✭jacool


    Arsenal might have thought squad limitations would be their biggest challenge.

    Instead its the "new manager bounce". After getting done by Everton, their only consolation is that there is no way Palace will have a new boss in place for the lads to play out of their collective skins to impress.

    With Vieira gone, the new favourite for the sack is David Moyes. The Gunners travel across London on April 15th, so I'll be expecting David Moyes to be sacked after West Ham lose to Fulham, a week before that, thus paving the way for yet another stumbling block for Arsenal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,323 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Viera had to go. Teams below them were getting their act together and they have been sleepwalking into relegation for a few months now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 224 ✭✭Bluebb993


    Joke of a offside decision there against Newcastle



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement