Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Cities around the world that are reducing car access

1545557596073

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,186 ✭✭✭OEP


    Apologies for it ending up going down a different route but a poster was saying that life is better without cars (didn't specify whether urban or more general use), and I disagree with that.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,266 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Life is better without cars in an urban setting is something that I could definitely agree with. In general, no, I wouldn't agree but I also think we have sacrificed investment in public transport alternatives for almost limitless spending on car-centric models for far too long. Life almost certainly could be better without the car-centric development focus of the last 70 years.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,167 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,612 ✭✭✭Yellow_Fern


    Have you evidence that most Irish people dont want cars? I am sure most people want short commutes, but perhaps most want both good public transport and cars.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,862 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Has anyone tried driving in Oxford?

    Most of the city is owned by medieval University Colleges that jealously guard their extensive property portfolios and have prevented much normal urban development. It is nearly impossible to use the centre of Oxford as a through route and using the excellent bypass is the best option. Plus they have an excellent P&R system with plentiful feeder buses. Parking within the city is hard to find and expensive.

    Now it is twenty years since I last visited Oxford, but I doubt it has changed much.

    The right-wing conspiratorial wackos jump on any likely issue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,477 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    I actually drove there and parked in the centre last year, and it wasn't terrible to navigate or find a space, was a Sunday though. I did notice that it's pretty carcentric, me not helping matters either.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,290 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    I didn't say that people don't want them. I simply said that they need them more than they want them. Of course there will always be an element of want involved.

    However, from your question, are you suggesting that most people happily choose to spend a large proportion of their income on cars? Are you seriously thinking that the prevalent two-car culture is based mainly on want? My point was that ownership is based more on need, not want and this was because of public policies for decades - sure just think of the political donations and rezoning of the 60s, 70s and 80s.

    People don't have a choice. A car is almost a necessity for many and as I said this is down to crap public policies creating a car dependant culture. Even in urban areas where there is public transport, people still make the choice to drive because public transport has been allowed to take second place (and I'm conscious this is slowly changing). People feel the need to drive but international evidence shows that they will take public transport (or other options) if they are feasible.

    We've become more and more American with our shopping malls and retail parks that are designed for those that drive. Even the five large local supermarkets near me have massive car parks but nowhere secure to lock a bike. The massive increase in retail centres has created the situation that most rural towns have little to offer as most places have closed.

    Look at the prevalence of one-off housing. We"ve allowed these McMansions blight the landscape all over the country, yet all have boxed themselves into their own car dependence. We should not have allowed this sporadic development.

    Most people would prefer not to live miles away from family. Most people would prefer not to have long commutes to work. Most people would prefer shorter travelling times to local services. They are not being given those choices though. This is why people are commuting to Dublin from Longford, Cavan, Nenagh and so on by car. It costs them money. It costs them family time.

    Were reaping exactly what we've sowed!



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,266 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Its admittedly a good 12 years since I lived there, but it has terrible traffic and quite a good bit of traffic flow on the main arteries. What it doesn't really have is any rat running.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,266 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Also a car is so standard that I don't think many people actually put much thought into how much it is costing them.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,862 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I think most people think - 'After I have paid for the car, (or borrowed for the car), paid to park it, paid the motor tax, paid the insurance, paid for the annual maintenance and NCT (requiring a day off work), then I might as well use it, because it is just €1 a km for the juice, and I can go where I want when I want - providing there is not a lot of traffic about, because I hate traffic jams.'



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,612 ✭✭✭Yellow_Fern


    It is not easy to prove either way, but it is notable that car ownership is much higher in Germany and the Netherlands than Ireland despite the great public transport. I lived in Germany and I loved using Germany public transport, but I missed a lot without a car. A lot and I lived in a large city. A car is much more important in rural Germany. In Germany they have car orientated shopping centres and retail parks too. Ideally it is something for the weekends.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,612 ✭✭✭Yellow_Fern


    >There are significant societal impacts also. Roads can separate an area. Motorways will have the effect of cutting people off from what weree neighbours. Within urban areas, dial carriageways and alrge wide roads segregate communities. It has gotten to the point in Ireland and elsewhere that it is regarded as unsafe to allow children play outside on the streets. Many children remain indoors which contributes to childhood obesity. Similarly, because roads are regarded as too dangerous, most parents won't let their kids cycle to school. Many parents won't even let their kids walk. You also see large numbers of parents driving their kids to and from school.

    Arguments against roads don’t really resonate with me as you need roads for buses and freight.

    >Within a city, I'm definitely faster by bike.

    You said your 12km commute is faster with a bike but I don’t think so outside rush hour. Id love of there was a good spatial analysis of this by the CSO or someone else because I find it hard to believe that in most areas of the country, rural or urban, a 12km journey is quicker on bike.


    However, to pick you up on your "extending peoples lives" - over-reliance on cars to travel also contributes towards health issues which can reduce people's lives.

    >A moral imperitave? What utter crap!

    Nope. There is a moral imperative for cars. That doesn’t mean I only appreciate cars. I am passionately for cycling, buses and trains too. I just hate the dishonesty here that cars are bad. Cars have made life much better. Cycling is more dangerous than car use and that isn’t a new thing. Cycling used to be a lot more dangerous, so cycling would not become risk free if cars were removed. In the 1930s US, there was twice as many cycling deaths per capita as present despite a vastly lower ownership rate of cars.


    As for the balancing of road space - any reallocation of road space has been difficult with people in cars not being able to see past the windscreen view of the world. They have grudgingly allowed to share space despite the obvious effect of reducting the numbers of people driving

    The balance is shifting though, especially in cities with more and more progressive societies allocating more and more funding towards sustainable travel - public transit, active travel, etc.

    Again funding for roads is funding for buses.

    Progressivism isn’t a good thing. It is a toxic ideology.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,167 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    You said your 12km commute is faster with a bike but I don’t think so outside rush hour. Id love of there was a good spatial analysis of this by the CSO or someone else because I find it hard to believe that in most areas of the country, rural or urban, a 12km journey is quicker on bike.

    at the moment (7:12pm on a friday evening), google maps is estimating 33 minutes to drive from DCU to UCD, which is just shy of the example 12km; and 43 minutes to cycle. a fit cyclist would do it in noticeably less than that, but a fast car driver would not be able to make any dent in the car time.

    anyone doing a 12km commute on a bike regularly would be decently fit.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,167 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    Cycling is more dangerous than car use and that isn’t a new thing. Cycling used to be a lot more dangerous, so cycling would not become risk free if cars were removed. In the 1930s US, there was twice as many cycling deaths per capita as present despite a vastly lower ownership rate of cars.

    probably vastly higher numbers of people cycling though too? impossible to draw any conclusions from raw stats without knowing just how popular each mode of transport was.

    the fatality rates for the states is interesting if you check the source - each figure is consistently a multiple of 10 from 1932 to 1974, and often a multiple of 50. clearly based on estimates, but i guess that's hardly a surprise.

    https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/motor-vehicle/historical-fatality-trends/deaths-by-type-of-incident/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,631 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six




  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,862 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I just rounded it up. 🙂

    I was using simple numbers, but it should be more like 15c per km. But even at €1 per km there are many who would still drive unnecessary journeys.

    [I was future proofing the post - given the sudden rise in prices. Look at how high the ESB charges have got for the charges they provide since their latest rise].



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,631 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    I'm 12.5c per km on a tank average. In a 15 year old diesel.

    But I totally get your point. Sure the amount of people who just idle their cars for no reason is unreal. Passed a building site at the end of my road this week, at lunch time. Six of the workers in their vehicles, eating lunch, with the engines going.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,862 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    It is the sunk cost of owning a car that causes many owners to use the car unnecessarily for short journeys that might be made more appropriately by walking or by bike.

    When I pass a marina full of very expensive yachts that are tied up 90% to 100% of the time, I think of the waste of assets for 15 minutes of sailing time per day if actual sailing time was spread out over the year. It is like owning a holiday home so you can visit it for the month of August.

    People do not understand their effect on other people, and that they can be their own worst enemy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,477 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    lots of these around where i live in hackney. cars have absolutely destroyed where i grew up in dublin and where my parents live now, kids cant play outside any more and there are traffic jams on a tiny residential street. despite all this i could never see ltns being tolerated much in dublin as people are so brainwashed by cars and the mere thought of reducing car use seems to be ridiculed by everyone over there. that's not to say there's a loud minority here, black cab drivers etc., but councils seem to mostly ignore them.

    after the salthill and sandymount debacle i don't have much hope for dublin.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,242 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Works have started on the Liffey Street upgrade! Upper Liffey Street has been in need of a refresh for a while now.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,167 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    there's a section in here about stroads, and quite aptly i was listening to it while driving up through ballymun; if ever there was a dublin example of a stroad, i'd say the main road through ballymun is a classic.




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,513 ✭✭✭bb1234567


    They faced backlash in London too though and the only reason most were built was under the cover of smoke during COVID when nobody was taking much notice. As usual nobody actually minds as much as they think they will once it's actually all said and done.

    I live in similar type of neighbourhoods with these interventions near Brixton, but today post covid when new cycle lanes, pedestrianisation or traffic calming are proposed there's 'community outcry' from the usual loud mouths. There's literally a group called 'save herne hill' who protest here and put up flyers because the council want to reduce a 3 lane one way road down to two to put in cycle lanes. Deep second hang cringe on behalf of that group when I realised what they were 'fighting for'. JFC.

    Post edited by bb1234567 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,477 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    I lived around that way 10 years ago or so and I don't think anyone even knew what an LTN was. Where in Herne Hill are they doing this? Used to drink in the Prince Regent by the Lido! Lovely place.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,513 ✭✭✭bb1234567


    Yes it's lovely! But the junction by the Half moon pub could do with some more pedestrian friendly measures.

    This is the road which is proposed to be made two lane. https://www.google.com/maps/@51.4520672,-0.1013699,3a,75y,354.63h,80.72t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1shKfK-FMOwEjysZDphBEdWQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

    Additionally they want to pedestrianise this road by the station.

    https://www.google.com/maps/@51.4528582,-0.1012471,3a,75y,323.82h,80.86t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1slf1hVHiroOVZ4IGkyCvXQA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

    It all sounds great to me , and there are other proposed measures, some streets in the area also being made closed to through traffic I think.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,477 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    vaguely related to this thread but it's actually pretty hilarious, I wonder how many people have paid heed to that sign over the years, i'd go out on a limb and say zero. we need a guerilla sign removing team at night like the tire extinguishers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,753 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Dublin is full of silly amounts of signage and associated poles with no rational explanation. If you're depending on signs to reach the m50 from South William St you'll be very lost.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,167 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    IIRC when they put up a standard sign showing motorists there's a public car park ahead, they're not allowed 'advertise' the car park by naming it.

    so they put up a second sign with the name of the car park, in case people are looking for a specific one. so you end up with two signs each time, letting motorists know where the car park is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,395 ✭✭✭McGrath5


    Did anyone see the incredible bike parking facility recently opened in Amsterdam? I know its the Netherlands and how they do cycling infrastructure but this on another level.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,753 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    an ambitious plan for the south quays. Hopefully DCC have the nerve to get it done.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,290 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    This is an interesting Twiter thread regarding a survey on cultural blind spots - how we as a society allow certain bad behaviour (in this case by drivers) whereas we don't accept somewhat similar behaviour by similar but non-driving related scenarios...

    The responses to the survey...




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,477 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    this is a great thread. actually where I'm from in Dublin has plenty of shops but the greengrocers and butchers are all gone due to supermarket influx, but there are plenty of supermarkets within a 15 minute walk.

    what worries me are the swathes of new apartments and houses being built in places like clongriffin and elsewhere that don't seem to have any amenities whatsoever nearby. no pubs or cafes, nothing.

    what's the solution to this? should councils be subsidising businesses to start in these areas? the overheads are so expensive in ireland now that no one is going to risk competing against the supermarkets everyone will drive to.

    also it's funny how this 15 minute city thing is being hijacked by the loonies as some kind of communist credit scheme, or something.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,395 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    I have been looking for to seeing this case come back up. The Strand Road Trial is back in the courts, with the council rightly appealing the original decision. At the time, I and others were astonished at the judgment, with the judge seemingly ignoring all the evidence that the works were to be a time limited trial, and that the council had the right to do so. I have zero legal knowledge, but I knew enough that the decision was extremely weird, and it seems that the President of the High Court, along with a member of the Supreme Court and another high court judge, agrees.

    They haven't made a judgement themselves yet, but from this article, they are not pleased with the High Courts behaviour or judgement in this case at all. Check this out:

    Referring to Browne’s outline of the High Court judgment that planning permission was required, Justice Collins said that the “conclusion is wrong”. He said it was an “explicit statement” that appears intended to “bind the council in the future”.

    Justice Collins said that if the High Court decision was incorrect that needs to be corrected rather than letting such a precedent stand. He said that it would be wrong to let a judgment stand that implies virtually any form of traffic calming requires planning permission.

    These are not the words of people willing to let the current decision stand.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 634 ✭✭✭noelfirl


    Fingers crossed from that initial sounding for a reversal of the decision.

    But presumably then to the Supreme Court for the burghers and denizens of Sandymount, and their feckless councillor enablers? After all, this is a case of national and indeed constitutional importance... 😁



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I can't see Mannix et al taking this to the SC



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,753 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Are they not at all concerned about the 'mortification'? Or is that a working class concern.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,862 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    It is ironic that currently Strand Road is closed for Northbound traffic from Merrion Gates, so the problem with traffic so complained about by the residents of Sandymount appears to be OK as no-one is complaining. I have noticed that the Merrion Road has much heavier traffic of late.

    [I think there is a major water pipe going in along Strand Road which is why the road is closed.]



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,242 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    It seems more congested yes, but then any time I've been down it there's only been a few cars that proceed to turn down Serpentine Road - most continue straight towards Ballsbridge

    Also bear in mind that there's roadworks around Booterstown-Trimblestone which probably aids in clumping all of the cars together.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,242 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Seen this today, finally there'll be pretty much continuous pedestrianisation from Talbot Street junction to Capel Street from the end of this month!

    In terms of pedestrian areas, the north inner city centre should look like this in the near future (yellow lines being pedestrian areas):

    The strech between Capel Street and Talbot Street alone will be just over 700 meters long.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,720 ✭✭✭serfboard


    I was over in London in the last few weeks. I came out of Euston train station and was walking around the area. This was at about 5PM.

    When I came out of the train station I expected to hear the usual roar of a city. What really struck me was how quiet it was. Almost eerily quiet. You could even hear the birds clearly.

    And this was despite the fact that the area is not pedestrianised.

    I put it down to several factors:

    1. It was a Monday and a lot of people work from home on Mondays now.
    2. The congestion charge in London removing a lot of cars from the roads.
    3. The electrification of the remaining fleet of cars and vans. In fact whenever I did hear an old diesel engine, it really stood out.

    As well as cutting down on actual pollution, the amount by which the changes have reduced noise pollution was striking.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,290 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Dot density map of car ownership in London. 1 dot apparently equals 10 households...




  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,862 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    That is a lot of no-cars in a household.

    Is it poverty or congestion charges?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Its more likely down to good alternatives i.e. PT (Buses & tube) and the expansion of cycling infrastructure. There are now more people cycling in London than driving



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,477 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    you don't really need one so it's just an unnecessary expense. where i am in hackney it's really quiet too, hardly any cars around until you go down to kingsland road towards the city and even that isn't too bad. you'd only really need a car if you're leaving the city everything else is accessible by pub tran or walking/bike. i honestly can't think of anyone in my social circle that owns a car here, except one but he lives a bit further out in croydon direction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,753 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    It's funny because last time I was in London I found public transport to be quite poor, feck all capacity relative to the amount of people trying to use it. Poor frequency on a lot of lines, again relative to usage, interchanges were often cumbersome. And Needless to say the most expensive public transport I've been on anywhere in the world. Yet they've still followed a policy of car reduction. Here any attempt to restrict cars is usually met with 'improve public transport first'.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Just on the recent posts, here's the article with the details on numbers of cars/bike




  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,290 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle




  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 35,100 Mod ✭✭✭✭AlmightyCushion


    We could have the best public transport in the world and people will still say that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,477 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    Yeah I don't get that post, I find the public transport in London jaw droppingly good. Especially now that Lizzy line is up and running. It's usually quicker to cycle though most of the time and they have made some improvements, but much of the city is still awful for cycling, they've done nothing around the city of london for e.g. and people drive like dickheads.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,631 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    Saw recent complaints online about how packed the Elizabeth Line is. But sounds more like it's doing it's job if it's full of commuters.



Advertisement