Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1260526062608261026113690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    @cnocbui I think your taking an opinion of one pilot/commander and applying it across the boards ,

    A limited number of Ukrainan pilots have in the US along side US aircraft,

    The Ukrainan only have a few qualified mig29 pilots and they already lost a few of them,

    For instance the UK has a number of typhoon aircraft in storage,those are used for spares and canibalisaton to keep their operational aircraft flying,you give 30 modern aircraft away you then have to take a similar number of aircraft out of service to cover that loss which in turn reduces their cover by 60 aircraft,of which they barely have 100 flying operations and aircover over the UK ,

    None of this is as simple as your making it out to be ,


    https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/will-the-uk-send-combat-aircraft-to-ukraine/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,068 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Yes and no. The 46 planes I am talking about are what's left currently after the Canadian purchase deal concluded, which it has. The private agreesor deal hasn't happened and is highly likely to have fallen through because the deal was predicated on them securring contracts with the US government, which they failed to do, apparently.

    The planes are still in Australia.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    It was reported earlier that the Chinese would be submitting a plan to end the war in Ukraine around March.

    That's nice of them,

    Wonder if it involves putting Chinese peace keepers in occupied territory of Ukraine



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Not seen any reports that's says it didn't happen,or the deal fell through,by all accounts the aircraft were to be delivered to the states over a number of years .

    According to the Australian airforce they currently only have 24 F18s



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,011 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Guessing their "peace plan" regarding Ukraine will largely leave Ukraine out of the discussion and carve up the S and E Ukraine for the Russians minus a little bit for "compromise". Russia will feign interest, Ukraine will rightfully say "not a chance", Chinese will walk away with the optics that Ukraine don't want peace.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,421 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    I completely understand the training argument, and ground support etc...

    But that's not what Ben Wallace said. He said they won't be handing over any aircraft till after the war (if training starts after the war ends) then that's years after that.

    Absolutely nothing to do with training. If Ukraine has pilots already trained on western aircraft to NATO standards etc... The UK would give them aircraft.... But only after the war.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    There is also other reason such as the typhoon is geared towards low level close air support, it's also not designed for rough ground take off and landing along with the cost of maintenance and support facilities,

    It's not a simple case of here 30/40 of our best aircraft go fight the Russians with them a month later the majority are lost or out of service then what, give them another similar number leaving themselves operationally screwed if anything else happens outside of Ukraine,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,421 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    I'm just going by what Ben Wallace had said.

    He simple could have said they won't hand over aircraft as the aircraft the UK could supply would be of no use in this war for Ukraine. Or they feel Ukraine wouldn't be able to use them efficiency or Ukraine has no runways that they can use etc...

    Especially after all the talk about training Ukrainian pilots and seeing what aircraft they can deliver to no aircraft until the war is over. He could have at least said until Ukraine win the war. Ya know a little motivation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Several MPs have suggested gifting tranche 1 Typhoon aircraft to Ukraine.

    Tranche 1 Typhoons are currently planned to go out of service in March 2025. The Ministry of Defence says withdrawing the aircraft “enables the reinvestment required” to keep the rest of the Typhoon fleet flying until tranches 2 and 3 retire in 2040.

    Justin Bronk says that while at first glance it might be appealing, there are significant practical limitations with donating tranche 1 aircraft. He says Typhoon aircraft are not optimised for the low-level flying likely required in Ukraine, as they have limited abilities in attacking ground targets from the air.

    Typhoon is also not designed for short-field landings on rough surfaces, meaning they would need a relatively smooth runway and require considerable maintenance and support, meaning any base could become an easy target for Russian missiles..


    The offer to train Ukrainian pilots has drawn attention to long-standing issues with fighter jet pilots in the UK.


    In 2019, the National Audit Office found students taking longer than expected to complete training; fast-jet pilots took an average of 7.1 years to be trained rather than the Ministry of Defence’s optimum time of 3.9 years.


    When he first became Defence Secretary in 2019, Ben Wallace told the Chief of the Air Staff his number one priority was to improve the fighter jet training pipeline: “there is no point in buying planes if there is no one to fly them. It is incredibly important that we get those pilots.”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,068 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    The 24 you mention are planes currently in service and they are superhornets, not original F-18s which are what I am talking about. Originally Australia had 75 F-18s - 57 single seaters and 18 twin seaters. Canada bought 25, which started arriving there in Feb 2019.

    Leaving 50, of which it seems 4 are being retained for museum display. The deal to supply Air USA inc with the remaining 46 planes arose in 2020. It's now 2023 and the deal looks to be dead. The company has changed name to Ravn Aerospace. Visit their news page and there is nothing: https://www.ravnaero.com/latestnews

    Besides there isn't a hint of news of any contracts being signed, so Australia can still do whatever it likes with them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    More on Poland and their mig29s we will send ours only as part of a coalition of aircraft but we won't be sending out F16s ...





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,456 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Seems the Jets are another tank situation. Everyone waiting for someone to make the move first.

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    But only as long they are older Soviet aircraft,

    Nobody is giving up F16s , Typhoons ,or F18s .

    Holland had 24 f16s in total but it's been suggested they pony up these, where is the rest coming from and why would the get rid of their only fighter jet leaving with F35s which aren't dogfighters



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It doest matter if it for the war or after the war, pilots still need training,regardless

    Like i said,training takes a few years atleast,and it doesnt matter if Ukraines pilots have been flying f15 or f16,Eurofighter typhoon is a totally different bird to fly alltogether with mainly european radars,avionics and missiles.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,068 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    I suggested weeks ago that even if countries didn't want to supply fighters, they should at least start training Ukrainian pilots on them, in case it was realised they needed them in a hurry.

    Ukraine should try a different tactic. Offer to buy Australias 46 F-18s, then start asking for financial assitance to help with the purchase.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 728 ✭✭✭20Wheel


    Something tells me that nobody in the real world is listening to the suggestions on this thread.

    One guy on here was saying that he hears the voices from unreal tournament in his head when watching Ukraine war footage.

    Another wanted ships to have balloons flying over them, with carbonium strings attached so that a plane flying overhead would have its wings cut off.

    Those are verifiable posts in this thread, just referencing what has previously been said.

    Putin is a dictator. Putin should face justice at the Hague. All good Russians should work to depose Putin. Russias war in Ukraine is illegal and morally wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,062 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    I'm guessing Ukraine hasn't got a lot of spare fast jet pilots - they wouldn't have been training huge numbers over the last decade, cos it's expensive...

    Yes every available Ukrainian who's ever been capable of flying their jets have likely turned up for service ,

    But they've lost a lot of planes ,and pilots ..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Being there is zero discussion anywhere else out side of this thread,I think it's safe to say that there isn't 40+ F18s sitting there waiting to be flown to Ukraine,

    America has a fleet of migs and other SU 4th generation fighters flying as part of the US Airforce yet Mention of these either,

    The British have more or less ruled out any of their aircraft going and pretty much everyone outside of Poland (mig29s) has rules out jets for Ukraine,

    Chances are even if the war ended in the next 6 months they would be waiting a long time to purchase new aircraft from America or the EU



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 728 ✭✭✭20Wheel


    You'd probably know better than most, being in Langley, Virginia.

    You are in Langley as per your sign off, right?

    Putin is a dictator. Putin should face justice at the Hague. All good Russians should work to depose Putin. Russias war in Ukraine is illegal and morally wrong.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,011 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Master strategy there,

    Remember when we were told we'd all be freezing to death in our beds if we didn't let Putin win ,

    Hyperinflation is going to hit Russia in the next while, wait till people have to start queuing for bread again



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,002 ✭✭✭Dufflecoat Fanny


    mig29s are a great jet for their needs in fairness



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    It makes more sense,than giving them aircraft they have zero experience flying or maintaining,and already have munitions for .

    The idea that they would be given f16s/18s and immediately become Top gun efficient fighters is laughable considering it takes years to physically master a modern aircraft and that's before your proficient enough to start dropping bombs are missles accurately is laughable,yes some Ukrainan pilots have flown in the US ,no mention of them training and qualifying on US jets and combat missions



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,456 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    The rest of us have a problem?

    Putin is not Hitler?

    The West is in the wrong here???

    What absolute sh1te are you typing about.

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    @realitykeeper not one inch east - not true



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭Curious_Case




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭Curious_Case


    Take our lead from 1941, are you stupid ???

    Things have changed, e.g. technology, that's how the World knows what's happening !!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,138 ✭✭✭realitykeeper


    That is what Regan promised Gorbechev. Gorbechev was a Communist (which I am not) but he was also a good and a very honourable man. He was certainly a reformer. I remember those days because the old hostility seemed to fade away and the pervasive fear we lived with was suddenly lifted. It was like we could all breath easily for the first time in our lives. Not only that but the serious, stoic Russians we would see in the olympics started smiling! East and west began talking in friendly terms. I remember those days fondly. I think the Cold war suited some people here in the west. I think it was agent M, in one of the Daniel Craig James Bonds who said "I miss the Cold war." Agent M may be ficticious but her sentiment wasn`t.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,322 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    why would the get rid of their only fighter jet leaving with F35s which aren't dogfighters

    Eh.... what? 1) the F35 is a multirole fifth generation platform and this includes air superiority and "dogfighting". 2) Dog fights are consigned to the history books and Hollywood for the most part. Much like Tom Cruise evading an AA missile fired at close range... The reality is very different. An F35 operating against say Russian fourth gen fighters no matter how maneuverable they are as they do their thing at air shows to whoops from the crowd, would acquire, track and fire a beyond visual range AA missile at the Russian aircraft long before the Russian aircraft's radars had even seen the F35's. A flight of F35's would also be acting as a fully connected datalink swarm among themselves and overall battlefield intel from AWACS and the like. Even if they were somehow jumped by Sukhois and forced to fight on their terms it would still be a likely win for the F35s.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement