Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

General Rugby Discussion 3

1313234363786

Comments

  • Subscribers Posts: 41,830 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    scotland 6 nations squad to be announced today at 1pm


    Ben Healy is "expected" to be included.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,795 ✭✭✭✭Pudsy33


    Indeed he is. Are Russell and Kinghorn the only other recognised 10s?



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,081 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Yes..

    Adam Hastings is injured which is where Healy gets his chance.

    Assuming everyone is fit I think he'll be doing very well to make a match day squad this time around to be honest.



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,830 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    i think his best chances of making a match day squad is if russell goes on the beer.

    having kinghorn either on the pitch or on the bench negates the need for a specialist 10 in the 22 shirt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,224 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    I see that Scotland have named Ruaridh McConnochie who played in the 2019 RWC for England. Will be interesting to see how this rule change plays out over the next few months.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,081 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    RFU confirm waist high tackling for amateur rugby across England

    The RFU have said: “Tackles must be made at the line of the waist and below” with an aim to “put players’ heads in the safest possible place by defining in law where the line of the tackle may start.”

    A statement reads: “Designed to improve player safety and informed by data, this change aims to reduce head impact exposure and concussion risk in the tackle for both the ball carrier and tackler. Evidence from studies has consistently demonstrated that higher contact on the ball carrier and closer proximity of the ball carrier and tacklers’ heads are associated with larger head impacts (as measured by smart mouthguards) and an increased risk of concussion.

    “Lowering the height of the tackle and encouraging the tackler to bend more at the waist will minimise the risk of this occurring while maintaining the tackle as an integral part of the game.

    Interesting to see if other countries follow suit.

    Will be incredibly difficult to referee I feel.

    Whatever about changing the law at underage before habits have formed , this is a huge change for adult rugby.

    How do you defend against a front-on attacker without getting kicked in the head more often than not?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,262 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    if theres an actual evidence-based reason for this then fair enough

    otherwise just a strict and zero tolerance application of current laws would be sufficient - way too much leeway is given currently with mitigation etc,, if you make contact with the head then youre off, should be as simple as that in 99% of cases



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,151 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Posted it in the laws thread. dont think it will change things enough and would prefer a stricter application of current laws and changes to how teams are coached around certain issues than stopping all tackles above waist



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,545 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    How would you square that law with defenders trying to stop a pick and go for try? Seems like an impossible situation



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,583 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    Seems very dangerous. Tacklers are the ones who get concussed more.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,081 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    There does seem to be universal uproar about it in England - No consultation with clubs etc.

    It just doesn't make sense to implement it like this.

    Completely changes the game -

    No more mauls other than those formed from a lineout.

    Next to impossible to defend a 5 yd tap penalty, or do you also penalise the attacker for "running low" ?

    Does that make a lineout "sack" illegal now?

    There are so many scenarios that be impossible to defend against or where their removal from the game nullifies the entire core of the game.

    I've been coaching and refereeing for a very long time and I can confidently say that the VAST majority of concussion events that I have witnessed in the Amateur Club game are from guys getting their heads on the wrong side and taking a knee to the head.

    A very very small number came from direct contact to the head via a high contact.

    I can see this being reversed.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,489 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Unless they implement a basketball-style rule where if the defender remains completely still and the attacker runs into him it's a defensive penalty, I don't see how you can prevent teams picking-and-going with impunity. Ruck a metre out, player picks and goes low... how do you prevent a try?

    Even with the current laws it's illegal to do it most of the time, but tolerated. Who'd be a ref, expected to deal with this with no notice or discussion?



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,830 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    to make it all the worst... the last time they trailled this they saw a 67% INCREASE in concussions.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,081 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    I also see lots of High Profile Pro players coming out against it.

    And like you said - It didn't go well the last time they did this..




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,188 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Kurtley Beale has been arrested and charged with 'sexual intercourse without consent'. Utterly rotten man.




  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,489 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Is that different from rape somehow?



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,081 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Assume that just the legal specific term in Australia.

    If guilty should never see a pitch again.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    If found guilty I assume he would be too old to ever play again one way or the other.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,415 ✭✭✭Dave_The_Sheep


    Some rather unsavoury stories coming out about the WRU. I believe there's a BBC Wales programme tonight on it all, but it's all pretty disgusting.

    Wales rugby: Former women's boss says colleague made rape jibe

    Welsh rugby: 'Ticking timebomb' equality warning to bosses

    Wales Online (I know) "reporting" that Gatland said he wasn't really aware of the story, but that there were two sides to every story when asked about the allegations.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,081 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Those reports are not good at all.

    Very very poor indeed if that stuff is true.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,489 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    This is absolutely chilling

    Another female former WRU employee, a mum of one, said she wrote a manual for her husband in case she killed herself.

    Imagine doing that and going back into work?



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,830 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat




  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,616 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Benetton have suspended their prop Ivan Nemer, an Argentinian born 11 times capped Italian international as the guy who gifted Cherif Traore with the rotten banana as part of the Secret Santa prank.

    His suspension runs to the end of the season.



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,830 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Good



  • Registered Users Posts: 576 ✭✭✭iffandonlyif


    I had a look at the World Cup draw and saw that Ireland are arguably better off coming second in their group. If they win it they play the loser of France and NZ in the QF, whereas they (likely) play England if second. Can anyone tell me if there’s a discussion about this in the sub?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,795 ✭✭✭✭Pudsy33


    They will play France or New Zealand regardless, there is no way they meet England in the QF



  • Registered Users Posts: 576 ✭✭✭iffandonlyif




  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,081 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    One of the awesome benefits of locking the rankings years in advance of the actual tournament.

    The top 4 teams in the world all on the same side of the draw so that 2 of the top 4 will be gone before the QF stage.

    Basically , if England or Australia get their act together they have a virtual stroll to the Semi-finals at least.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,822 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    2 of the top 4 will be gone after the quarter final stage, not before it



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,822 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    If we win the pool we’ll play the 2nd placed team in Pool B, probably Nee Zealand,

    Then if we win we’ll face the winner of pool D vs the runner up of pool C. Since England will probably top pool D, there’s a good chance we would face them in a semi-final.

    The alternative would be to come second in the pool, face First place probably France, then the winner between probably Australia vs Argentina.

    Neither route would be any easier than the other really.

    Best to go out to win every match and forget about what the draw is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,545 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Very real chance that the Welsh players go on strike to protest the appalling mishandling of contracts and financial affairs by the WRU. It would be nice if players from other nations showed some solidarity with the Welsh. Absolute shambolic treatment of the professional game by the WRU and a pretty desperate and vulnerable position to leave players in.





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,670 ✭✭✭StevenToast


    Gatland must be wondering what sort of shìtshow he came back to....

    Brutal on and off the pitch....

    Welsh rugby is in the shìtter.....

    "Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining." - Fletcher



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,224 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    In fairness to the WRU, all we know is that the financial deal has not been signed. It may well be the regions who are refusing to agree to it.

    Awful mess regardless.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,415 ✭✭✭Dave_The_Sheep


    Gatland is and was a part of it all. He was the WRU hired coach from 2007-2019 and is back again now. This is chickens coming home to roost for him too.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,291 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Yup seeing many Welsh fans blaming Gatland for this in the first place.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,081 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Everything about the WRU is a shambles.

    They are really in a massive hole right now.

    A clearly toxic culture & work environment in the administration , appalling financial planning/management and a complete failure to create any kind of rugby structure to develop the regions and players.

    Hard to see any kind of short term improvement, anything that's needed is a 5+ year effort.

    Have to have sympathy with the Wales based players - none of them have any kind of security or clarity about their jobs and their futures.

    Hearing that International players can't get mortgages and are struggling with their mental health is awful - These are supposed to be elite athletes doing something they love..



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Wales could quite quickly find themselves in the same bracket as Italy if things keep going as they are. Wales obviously have a recent history of success and a track record as a top tier side but the challenges facing them are very significant.

    The WRU clearly has a major governance issue. The decision makers appear to be self interested, problematically old school and intractable. It would appear that a major restructure of personnel is required but people don't step off the gravy train voluntarily. Their acting CEO has a decent background but realistically a full clear out is in order and a complete operational rethink needs to happen at all levels of the game in Wales.

    The governance issues have leeched into everything at this stage and are directly impacting both the regions, the national team and indeed juvenile development. All three are at an almost historically low ebb concurrently and there is potential for a complete collapse with the u20's now a non entity, the regions sitting at the bottom of the URC and the national team potentially about to go on strike before their biggest fixture.

    With England at home and then Italy and France away there is a real risk her of 0 wins from 5. Whilst that would be a disaster - it might also be a catalyst for some hard decisions to be made.

    Astonishing reading the last 24 hours in relation to the contracts, lot's of players being very public about their concerns. Absolutely dire situation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,073 ✭✭✭Blut2


    You'd really feel for the players putting their bodies on the line for such uncertainty, thats an awful situation for them.

    The WRU is an absolute disaster by all accounts. They need to bring in actual qualified business people instead of people who used to be good at rugby to reform the whole system. And, in all likelihood, probably disband one of the regions, on top.

    This struck me as one thing outside of their control though: "when the WRU took a £20million loan from the Welsh Government. The money was handed out to the regions and without it, they would not have survived. But each of Dragons, Cardiff, Ospreys and Scarlets have to repay their £5m share over 20 years with an annual interest of 10 per cent."

    At a time when interest rates were 0% is this not the Welsh government deliberately screwing over the WRU? 10% is an insane interest rate, thats going to be very difficult to get out from under.



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Madelynn Wailing Speedometer


    10%??

    What in the name of god. That'll about double the amount they're repaying over the 20 years.



  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers Posts: 41,830 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    i hope thats a simple interest rate and not compound !!



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,081 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Don't think it will make much difference.

    They are screwed.

    They are talking about the 4 regions having a budget of £4.5M per year and for the majority of players to be on "variable" contracts - Meaning a low base salary and then the rest being based on number of games played etc. According to the reports most players will have a base salary of between 30-100k per year.

    Most of them currently have playing squads of ~50 plus however many coaches and support staff, maybe another 20/25 people.

    £4.5M divided by 70/75 people does not go very far at all

    Such a tiny budget will mean much smaller squads which means more games for the players and with their salaries being based on the number of games played , players will feel obliged to play as much as possible to ensure they make enough money.

    Player welfare will be out the window - Any half decent player will be gone overseas - A regional player would probably earn more playing in Pro D2 in France than they would turning out for the Dragons or the Scarlets.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    If this is accurate then I can't see any situation whereby they retain all four provinces - the model you describe isn't sustainable and anyone capable of making the Welsh 23 will almost certainly be playing outside of Wales.

    There are no good solutions here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,599 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    At the moment the wru subsidise the regions to a combined tune of 23 million a year with the current deal expiring this year.


    They are now offering a 5 year deal with 28 million in year 1 and 18 million a year thereafter.


    The principality premiership gets 4 million in subsidies while the amateur game gets about 12 million which mainly goes in boot money at j2 to j5 levels.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,073 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Boot money is a huge problem in Wales. Lots of the clubs try to poach each others players with ever increasing amounts of it, so its just become an arms race to spend it. And the vast majority of the guys it goes to would be playing either way without it, all it does is move them from club to club. It'd be much better off invested in facilities and/or coaching.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,489 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Is this the opportunity they've been looking for to join the premiership? Kill off two clubs and replace Worcester/Wasps with the other two?

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Wasn't there an article or something recently where it was abundantly clear that premiership rugby had zero interest in Welsh teams?



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,081 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Which again speaks to the utter lack of professionalism (and deep seated cronyism) in the WRU.

    Boot money gets killed off with decent budget oversight - Clubs receiving funding from the WRU should have to submit certified accounts to show how it is being spent - If it's on boot money then they don't get any money next season.

    But given that the WRU is controlled by those very same "amateur" clubs that are paying the boot money , nothing gets done.

    Having been involved in club administration here I know that every penny received from either Branch or Union level has to be accounted for in minute detail and is typically only received after making an application for a specific item like rugby equipment or facilities improvements , there's just no way that IRFU money gets to be spent on boot money here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,599 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    Premiership rugby CEO more or less stated it being interviewed by a commons select Committee after collapse of Worcester and Wasps.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,617 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    It looks now like the welsh teams need the english and the english need the welsh, but thats not looking at every aspect of the equation.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement