Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Evgeny Prigozhin sends greetings from Soledar with the following message

“The divisions of PMC Wagner took control of the entire territory of Soledar. A cauldron has been formed in the center of the city, in which urban battles are being fought.

The number of prisoners will be announced tomorrow.

Once again, I want to emphasize that no units except for the fighters of the Wagner PMC took part in the assault on Soledar.

Political scientist Sergei Markov in his telegram channel in a separate post urged me to restraint and stop "criticism of the supreme commander." Expressing, at the same time, the hope that my "talents will be used not only as a theoretician."

Sergei Alexandrovich is far from the first who (publicly and privately) draws my attention to the fact that Putin V.V. should not, in conditions of war, share responsibility for the events taking place with his (he appointed) subordinates. And, accordingly, they should not be criticized for their countless military and economic failures either.

However, I have valid objections:

- 300 billion dollars of Russian reserves after the start of the NWO were arrested abroad. The head of the Central Bank, Elvira Nabiullina, who was responsible for the placement, remains in her place to this day (in China, for example, she would have already been shot);

- heads and responsible persons of intelligence agencies (political and military) of the Russian Federation, who provided the country's leadership with deliberately false information about the operational situation and the mood of the army / population of the so-called. "Ukraine", on the basis of which the initially failed (due to the falsity of the indicated data) Special Military Operation was planned - everyone is still in their places, they have not suffered the slightest punishment and continue their successful career;

- the leadership of the RF Armed Forces, which carried out a number of military operations extremely unsuccessfully and allowed heavy defeats that had no "fatal" reasons in their basis, continues to lead the operation;

- the leadership of the Russian Defense Ministry, which failed to provide the Armed Forces with a number of types of modern weapons (including those at the disposal of the enemy) and for many years engaged in simulation of combat training of troops instead of real ones - in their places and "does not blow in the mustache";

- the leaders of the military industry, who deceived the president and society with fairy tales about "transition to import substitution", and now are unable to ensure the production of the most necessary types of weapons and equipment - everyone is in their places and flourishing.

- advisers and representatives of the "inner circle", hindering the most necessary and "long overripe" mobilization measures in the rear and industry, capable of straightening out the situation on the fronts in the future and ensuring victory. - have not changed for the last fifteen years.

They are all appointed by the president - all these blatantly incompetent, thieving, hedonistic officials with business interests, relatives and property abroad.

And if - despite the visual catastrophes (which are impossible to hide from the educated part of society) and criticism directed at THEM - their replacement (not to mention punishment!) Is not made "from the word at all" - then who else to make claims on the doorstep defeat in WAR?

Answer this question - indicate in our country - who else is to blame for the implementation (and stubborn maintenance contrary to common sense) of the existing personnel policy, which lies at the root of all strategically failed decisions?

I am categorically against both violent and "peaceful" (for example - according to the scheme of Borka the drunk - "I'm tired, I'm a fly-cat") change of the president and commander-in-chief during the war. Since this will cause new additional problems, and in the first case ("overthrow"), it will immediately lead to a military (and soon civil) catastrophe. But the trouble is that if the president's personnel policy remains unchanged, then a military defeat, alas, awaits us in any case.

And, by the way, if Mr. Markov is not "waited" either in Kyiv or in The Hague (in the event of our defeat, he is unlikely to be of interest even to liberals who have come to power), then they dream of seeing me there. Of course, less than President Vladimir Putin, but certainly.