Enoch Burke turns up to school again despite sacking - read OP before posting

You know him personally do you?

Like I said policies around child safety in schools are over engineered for a reason.

This cúntbags behaviour is dangerous, he needs be to ejected immediately.

But again you are more concerned about me than him? 😂

From the Teaching Council annual report.

In 20/21 they received 24 complaints (is the insignificant number of complaints due to the fantastic nature of our teachers or a lack of faith in the Teaching Council?)

Of the 24 complaints, 5 were ruled out of order due to being before 2016. Of the remaining 19, only one was referred to the Disciplinary Committee for inquiry.

Now that doesn't include those complaints held over from previous years and not dealt with. At the start of the reporting year, six inquiries were at planning stage, having been referred and carried forward from previous reporting periods. Preparations to hold inquiries were underway in these six matters. A further seven complaints were referred to the Disciplinary Committee for inquiry in the 2020/2021 reporting year. So in addition to the one of the 19, they managed to refer a further six from previous years.

Four preliminary hearings, relating to three separate complaints and a two-day private inquiry, were held. So out of 13 before them, they managed to deal partially with four, so the backlog increased.

Two applications for confirmation of sanction were made to the High Court. These related to inquiries concluded in the previous reporting period.

Do you think that they would reach Burke this decade, if a complaint was made now? 54 staff in the Teaching Council. A complete waste of time.

Even though I am not well versed in the law you seem to be a bit all over the place with the law there.

People don't get charged with contemp of court, they become in contempt of court when they refuse to do something the court orders them to do.

In this case Burke refused to not go to the school while suspended.

Also you don't get "bail" from contempt of court.

And what are you going to charge him with during this "fair trial" you are going to give him ?

He was suspended from school but refused to observe the suspension, the school got a court order to make him observe the suspension, but he ignored that, he thus was in contempt of court and went to jail for it.

What crime did he commit that he needs a fair trial for, what would he be convicted of ?

He'll probably end up back in jail soon because he has again refused to observe the suspension.

I get you are a fan, now I'm about worried you.

We will leave it there.

Hopefully Tusla and Guards are called soon, not fair on the children or their parents that this dangerous weirdo has closed a section of school.

...so disrespecting a childs wants and needs is the sign of a 'good teacher'?

I can't imagine this whole situation is easy on the child at the centre of it. Any teacher worth their salt would have protected the student by not making a song and dance eabout it. In most schools there is aa calm, measured and careful approach to issues like this, with the wellbeing of the child very much at the centre. He chose to make a song an dance about something and then refused to abide by court orders. I feel for the kids and staff of the school who I'd imagine are just trying to get on with things and protect the students. I have zero respect for anyone who treats the pastoral part of their job with such contempt, it's wildly unchristian

I would imagine this situation has of course hurt the child at the centre, emotional trauma of this sort can really stick and having it incorrectly made a national spectical is especially cruel. How someone choose to identify is hardly of real concern to anyone else. I'd hope we all have larger issues on our minds

This is disgraceful stuff and you should be ashamed of writing that. There is nothing on the public record to back up your nonsense. If anything, he has been acknowledged as a good & competent teacher.

As has been said, you may not agree with him - but you have to admire him for standing up for his beliefs. Some posters here seem to be afraid of such a man.

Tusla should be there because it is very much a child safety, unless you know him personally or can tell the future, you have absolutely no idea what he is capable of. We know his behaviour is erratic and we know from court appearances he has a violent temper.

When it comes to children and schools especially child safety is over engineered for a reason, again I can't fathom how this absolutely degenerate has been tolerated to this point.

Your defence of his behaviour does raise several questions about your own motivations. I think I can very much guess what they are, and the only suitable response would be YAWN.

That was the initial position and absolutely correct.

By his own actions, he has now been found in contempt of court which is a crime (no loger just an allegation to be investigated) so I don't think he should be currently drawing a salary in that case.

Suspension with full during an investiagation is absolutely right and proper, but he was serving an indetermionate prison sentence. If he is still been paid that is surely not proper or just.

lol. I couldn't give fúck about his beliefs.

He is currently trespassing in a place where there is children. He is erratic and he has shown on several occasions he has a violent temper. Also "Good" teacher me hole.

I can't believe I have to keep pointing that out.

Most schools aren't unfortunate enough to have one of the Burkes in their faculty

Any distress caused to that child is entirely the fault of Eunoch Burke

As I've repeatedly pointed out we have 'good and competent' teachers up and down the country who shove religious dogma into the minds of second class national school children. In the past they used to beat it in. And very few raise an eyebrow. If you don't see a problem with that, then why a hullaballoo over this teacher and his choice of words?

Absolutely, it's an absolute disgrace that this is being tolerated. Private security firms are lawfully entitled to fúck him off the premises.

The school has been abandoned. Where the fúck is Norma Foley?

Well a word of advice to you - the Burkes are a litigious family..

Ok Get ya.

The courts really were naive here to think he wasn't going to go straight back.

He begged the judge to get out for Christmas. Got out and carried on like this.

😂

It was your claim, a claim you were asked to back up, so in your own time.

Also Google isn't my friend, it's a search engine. 🤷‍♂️