Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

New Irish Rail Intercity, Commuter and DART Timetable Public Consultation

135

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,729 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    It’ll change when there are sufficient drivers and rolling stock available.

    There is no rolling stock available to add extra peak hour trains at the moment.

    More drivers are being trained, but it will take time to add services as it takes over a year to pass out a driver.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,055 ✭✭✭Emme


    If the service was equally bad on all intercity trains I would accept this explanation but it is not. Services on other lines have been improved over the years but Waterford line customers get fobbed off with excuses and overpriced fares. Overcrowding is getting dangerous on the 06:45 (formerly 07:00) from Waterford since Kilkenny was incorporated into the itinerary.

    It is not acceptable to ask people to pay so much to stand for over an hour twice a day.

    Why is Irish Rail deliberately running down the Waterford line when there is such demand for the service but fund other lines? People from Sallins and Naas pay a reduced rate and get a great selection of trains. People in Newbridge and Kildare pay full fare but get a fantastic service. The Portlaoise service is much better than the service on the Waterford line with more frequent trains.

    The service is so bad that there are people in Athy who drive 30 minutes to Kildare to get the train to Dublin rather than walk 10 minutes up the road to suffer the Waterford line. Not very environmentally friendly but if there is no adequate service what else is there to do?

    Would Irish Rail be willing to reduce fares for regular travellers on the Waterford line until an adequate service is provided? I think this is reasonable. The excuse "reduced fares will increase demand" won't wash because the trains are full to capacity including aisles and spaces between carriages already!

    .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,055 ✭✭✭Emme


    The people who really suffer are those in Carlow and Athy. People from Kildare onwards have a decent choice of trains.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,867 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    Agree with this. I don’t think the Waterford trains should be stopping in both Kildare and newbridge- while I get it’s important for connections and newbridge is a big town in it’s own right - though I guess that still doesn’t help Carlow athy much. The new late morning service will hopefully ease some of that pressure



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,867 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    The Waterford line has actually improved a lot from what it was. It’s somewhat different to the other lines are it has a few larger urban centres that generate a lot of traffic in their own right. It really does need more services



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,514 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    they would in their hoop.

    south eastern passengers get nothing and will get nothing, we are not wanted but are just tolerated.

    nobody to stand up for us and irish rail are a law on to themselves and do what they do because they can.

    forget about the NTA they couldn't give a toss either, just more management to manage the management and so on and shur you know the rest.

    anyway my genuine sympathy to you and the other waterford passengers.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,729 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The regulated fares (i.e. the booking office fares) on the Dublin/Waterford line are already on the lowest Intercity fare scale (lower than the Dublin to Cork and Dublin to Galway routes) reflecting the historically poorer service levels.

    Sallins & Naas is within 35km of Dublin and as such is on the Dublin suburban fares matrix. Changing that distance any further would be a political decision as it would require a lot of extra funding.

    Like it or not there are three practical limiting factors in terms of operations on the Waterford route right now:

    1) Trains running through Kilkenny cannot be any longer than six coaches long due to infrastructure issues there

    2) There is no spare rolling stock available to add extra peak hour trains and that won’t change until the new orders being built are commissioned into service starting later next year

    3) There’s still a shortage of drivers that is limiting what extra trains can be added across the network even where the rolling stock is available which means you are only seeing small incremental changes

    i would strongly suspect that the NTA will want to increase service levels on the line when they can, but there’s not much that they can do right now at the times you’re concerned with, which are peak times.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭howiya


    Interestingly it is party policy of both FF and FG to extend the short hop zone. It must be the Greens holding them back.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,200 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    I just checked a timetable and Dublin to Waterford is roughly 2h 30min, very similar is the intercity bus. Train is 13-14 Eur while a bus is 12 Eur. I think we can close this train line for a few years and use trains on other lines. Private coach companies would be more than happy to jump in the market.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,514 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    this is absolute nonsense straight out of the 1960s and was destroyed even back then.

    waterford has already got plenty of private coach operations and yet the train line is heavily used.

    guess what, close the train line and all you will do is mostly increase car traffic, because even if the private coach companies stepped in, they won't get much more then they are already getting since if the rail passengers felt the coach was more suitable they would already be using it.

    you also won't free up very much trains.

    2022 and people are still parroting this crap.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,200 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    Why do Waterford people use a train instead of a coach, can someone explain as I genuinely don't understand?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,729 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer



    But that railway doesn’t exist to serve just Waterford people.

    It’s people from Athy, Carlow, Bagnelstown, Kilkenny and Thomastown too.

    Many people prefer the train than a coach for a whole variety of reasons. More space, a table to work at, accessibility, easily accessible toilets, etc.

    There is no plan whatsoever to start closing any railway lines, especially ones when the existing trains are full. The political fallout of that would be suicidal, so forget it!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,200 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    So we have a very sick train line which we refuse to kill and end the suffer but rather all watch being tortured and do nothing. No problem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,729 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    That trains on that railway line are very busy - why would you ever close it? The only problem that the line has is that it hasn’t enough trains!

    I am finding very hard to take these posts seriously.

    You clearly haven’t got a clue about how busy the trains on the route are, coming up with an idea off the top of your head, which, and I cannot emphasise this enough, would be political suicide for any government to even think of.

    Even if we rolled with it, where would you find all those buses from? Most bus operators are struggling to get staff as it is, let alone fill in a void of that magnitude.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,200 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    I clearly said temporarily close - until things improve and a proper service can be rolled out... At least ticket prices could be increased to take the pressure off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,514 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    again, why would we do that given the trains are busy?

    if we close it temporary then given the coach companies cant get staff and there are now no trains that means increased car traffic which makes things worse for the coach users.

    so you have taken away capacity and thrown it on to the roads ultimately for nothing because closing it until things improve rather then keeping it open and improving things delivers nothing.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,200 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    I completely understand that, and I understand my suggestions are a bit off, but they reflect the reality. What's the point to keep a not properly functioning system. A managerial decision has to be made: increase the fares, reduce the stations to focus on the main problem at Waterford etc. Was there at least an attempt to fix this?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,729 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    With all due respect, you’re basing your idea on the postings of one single person who travels to/from the first station on the line.

    I think you need a bigger and more balanced sample size before coming to the conclusion that the railway line is broken.

    There isn’t a problem at Waterford and I don’t know why you think there is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,514 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    off? they are completely and utterly stupid and address and solve absolutely nothing since the problem on the line is there isn't enough trains and there isn't enough carages on the trains that exist which won't be addressed by any sort of closure.

    anyway we are done here as there is nothing to discuss further.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,200 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    Stupid? Nice attitude. You need to calm down here.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,514 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    i'm very calm thanks, don't worry.

    no i just call and say things as i see them as others will tell you.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,867 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    The Waterford line is not dying (pretty far from it) it’s actually a victim of its own success as the numbers using it have grown massively. It would be unthinkable to close it. Very little relative investment would do massive improvement



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,867 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    You clearly never sat on the N7/M7 and crawled into Dublin on a wet commuter morning have you? Else you wouldn’t be asking this ridiculous question



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,867 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    There’s a ton of room at Kilkenny station- seems frankly ridiculous that if there’s an issue with the platforms that they cannot be extended if that’s what’s needed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,200 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    This is exactly why I'm asking, Mr Smarty Pants. Your unwelcoming cheeky answers shows you're being annoyed by these questions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,729 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Nothing to do with the platforms. It’s the track and signalling positions to the east.

    You would need to replace the bridge to the east to allow space for additional track work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,838 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Or the cheaper alternative built a proper accessible footbridge. Its just terible decision made considering we are only talking 20 -25 meters.

    Granted there was no 7 ICRs operating then however it was only a few years later the same people taught there was no need for an ICR longer than 4 cars. Total disconnect within the organisation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 95 ✭✭densification


    We will have 22 x 6 car ICR units when then 41 new intermediate carriages are in service. We currently have 10 x 5 Car ICR units.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,867 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    What they do in the UK- all the time, as a work around short platforms they tell passengers for say Kilkenny to sit in coaches 1-6. It's regularly announced on board. Can't see why IR cannot do this too.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,729 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The ICR fleet isn’t fitted with selective door opening sadly. That would require a major modification programme to the entire fleet.



Advertisement