Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

World Cup 2022 - Team and Match Discussion

18283858788168

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,832 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    The default Irish TV pundit position seems to just be to complain about stuff in a jaded tone of voice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,237 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    And the gas bit he said I am not too keen on Brazil’s chances after today. He has written them off completely on that basis.

    I watched a program on Brazil 82 and they were dancing their way to the final but lost. And everyone loved them.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,237 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    If Ndo was on he would be dancing on the couch I’d say.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,248 ✭✭✭Damien360


    How many years of Dunphy, Giles and Brady doing exactly that. RTE is not known for its innovation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,097 ✭✭✭kksaints


    He said the same 8 years ago when Columbia did it. Some ex professionals really don't like keepers been subbed on unless injured or sending off for some reason.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,419 ✭✭✭trashcan


    Welcome to Eaven !

    I remember 82 and that Brazilian team. They were a joy to watch. Just about everyone was convinced they were going to Samba their way to the trophy (think Dunphy actually was the exception, and thereby set the template for the rest of his punditry career) until Italy and Rossi did a number on them. I was devastated at the time. The Italy game was epic and could have gone either way. Still have to be the best team not to win the trophy (possibly Hungary in 1954, but that was way before my time.)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,858 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    You'd expect England to beat Spain, Portugal, Swiss, or Morocco, in next round, so for England the next game is by far the hardest. Beat France and it's a walk to the final.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,137 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Ide say Italy in 94. Amazing players in every position and 2 of the best defenders in the history of the game in one team.

    Easy for lads who played positions where you are subbed on and off the whole time to say that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,591 ✭✭✭✭dastardly00


    The face on Kenny Cunningham when agreeing with Didi about 'bad karma' for Colombia 😂

    Also, I can't believe Richie has been on the panel for over 8 years... It seems like only am3 or 4 years... I feel old 😬



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,607 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Cant see England getting past France. Too much quality in that French side and Mbappe is playing out of his skin. Win it with a couple of goals I reckon.

    Same with Croatia. They’ve been just ok, and they haven’t really had any tough opposition so far. Japan’s energy in the first half caused them problems and Brazil will have that and more.

    The most interesting QF is Netherlands v Argentina - could go either way, but I’d probably back Argentina to shade it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,137 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Jeysus if the semis are Brazil, Argentina, England and Portugal I might start agreeing with the boycott lads.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,264 ✭✭✭fyfe79


    Brazil must've been over the moon with Korea getting through - they knew they'd play it clean. Uruguay would've kicked Brazil up and down the park. Brazil would still have won, of course, but there wouldn't have been much dancing... hard to dance on knobbled ankles!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,237 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    I found the thing now. It was on YouTube. At the start I was thinking ‘ah they can’t be that good’. Has to be an exaggeration surely?

    By the end of it I ran out of ‘Jayus’s’ And was thinking ‘this team should be talked about all the time!’

    This Brazil 22 team seem to be trying to copy the 82 vibe at least. 82 team would wallop the 22 team I think.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,419 ✭✭✭trashcan


    Yeah, they really were that good. They were punished by Italy for a couple of mistakes, but still looked like scoring more in that game, at least that’s my recollection of it. Still think it’s a travesty they didn’t win it. I don’t remember the 70 Brazil side, but in 82 they were something else. I think you’re right, this current team doesn’t compare. In fact I think they won it in 94 and 2002 with inferior teams to that side, at least skill wise.

    Also, Ireland were very unlucky not to qualify in 82, out of a group with Holland, France and Belgium. We only missed out on goal difference, and were robbed by the ref in Brussels. I remember being quite sore that Northern Ireland qualified out of a far easier group when I really felt we had better players at the time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 287 ✭✭patob


    Thought Brazil should have pushed on in 2nd half and got a few more. Maybe they lack a ruthless streak. Neymar was a bit tentative but at least he was moving the ball on quickly for a change and not inviting tackles. Rafinhas finishing was chronic but otherwise probably had his best match so far and still a better option than Antony. Defence still looking solid with Alisson supreme. Hopefully they will still be dancing on Sunday week.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,907 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Sounds like I'm not missing much without ITV

    Second half. Less exhilarating, Brazil all danced out, Jon Champion reduced to telling Ally about a local tourist attraction, a desalination plant.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,457 ✭✭✭Deeper Blue


    I'm very surprised at the amount of people I've spoken to that think England could win the whole thing.

    They've played nobody yet, and the two best teams they've played (Senegal and USA) were both easily dispatched by an average (imo) Dutch team.

    The QF will be a different kettle of fish altogether. I think France will beat them comfortably.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 35,162 CMod ✭✭✭✭ShamoBuc


    I too think France will knock them out. Maguire and Pickford - I'm just waiting for a mistake that really costs them. Every game now will be tougher and tougher and the weak links get shown up for what they are. France have been compact enough before taking their chances when they inevitably come,0-0 ht 2-0 France is how I see it panning out.



  • Posts: 847 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Didn’t the Dutch score 2 in the last 5 minutes against senegal and the game was pretty even throughout? Pretty sure the USA game wasn’t comfortable, think the Americans had more chances overall and the first 20 or so had them on the ropes.

    These threads the last few years generally consist of

    England, played no one yet,

    colombia will show them - England win - Colombia are just awful …… Ukraine are the ones, no, Germany defiantly , Denmark will get them, - Senegal etc etc - England win - “such average sides, these England lads have played no one” Keep repeating until they eventually lose and say I told you so!!!

    France are the favourites and rightly so but honestly you would think England are a bunch of no hopers, not a team that has conceded 2 in 4, have the most goals in the tournament and some of the best attacking players in the world.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,219 ✭✭✭theoneeyedman


    Re Brazil 82 and the comparisons with now.

    That was a brilliant side, no doubt. However, there was a huge aura around those sides back in the 80s. We simply didn't see them play until the world cups. We had heard of the likes of Zico, Falcao, Socrates, but apart from an odd clip, we were only familiar with them from reading of their exploits, tv coverage was pretty non existent.

    Nowadays, we see the likes of Richarlison and Casemiro on a weekly basis, warts and all. The aura and mystery is gone.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,457 ✭✭✭Deeper Blue


    I said nothing about them being no hopers, I just think some have gone way overboard in their praise, based on what they've done in this tournament so far. I didn't mention 2018.



  • Posts: 847 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    To be fair I never said you did, just the threads in general.

    Bar the English press, who has gone overboard? A few people saying they can win it doesn’t seem overboard, a team in the QF with Kane, Saka, Foden, Bellingham, Rice, Sterling, Rashford etc, hardly seems excessive.

    if there was a France / England combined 11 I would think it would be a fairly even split with France being clearly superior at cb.

    Keepers - both have mistakes so 50/50

    full backs - walker and Hernandez

    Cb’s - both France

    CM’s - Bellingham, Rice, Tchouameni

    forwards - Mbappe, Kane, Foden

    So I have it as an even split, granted not everyone would be the same but it’s not unrealistic to think England can win this game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,321 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    the brazilian dance celebrations are reaching All Black Haka levels for me at this point. Its not that I dont want them celebratig, or don't want them dancing - but the AMOUNT of time they dedicate to it is disrespectful to their opponents, and shameless self-indulgance. Was basically three seperate celebrations for the Richarlson third. Just kick off already!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,928 ✭✭✭Did you smash it


    correct, I’m dubious about any of the great players or sides unless I saw them play.


    for example if Cristiano’s career was transferred to the 80s or 70s no one would have known or talked about that he completely fell off at the end of his career and the sides he played suffered from having him and he reacted in the worst possible way to being past it. The age of micro analysis of football means this will never happen again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,607 ✭✭✭McFly85


    England have some of the best attacking players in the world, but also have a shaky defence along with a conservative and tactically limited manager who essentially hasn’t evolved or improved the team in the 5 odd years he’s been there. Protect the defence and play on the counter is the sum total of it.

    In pretty much every tournament they’ve played they fall against teams with comparable talent to theirs. The exception is probably Germany in the Euros but even still they had home advantage for that one. This year in the nations league they were destroyed as pretty much everyone knows what England are going to do, it’s just a question of having the ability to stop them.

    Id give them a small chance against France but nothing more, and that’s largely down to Bellingham adding a bit of unpredictability to their attack. I still expect Mbappe to cause complete havoc against their back line, though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,668 ✭✭✭jacool


    2018 is key though to this team though. They lost to teams rated higher than them, Belgium (5) (twice) and beat the teams rated lower than them in Tunisia (28), Panama (49) and Sweden (25). They drew with Colombia (13) and Croatia (18). England were ranked at 12.

    England are now ranked 5, but France is ahead of them at 3. Waterloo, and all that!



  • Posts: 847 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    england we’re almost no hopers in 2018 though, expectations were very low! I’m not disputing France are the favs here, mbappe could ruin that defence but France have conceded against everyone they have played and not one of those sides can compare to englands attack.

    …. agincourt….!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,137 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,907 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Yeah that's the Eamon Dunphy move when a team he doesn't like is getting good results: "Wait till they play a real team." And when you dig down you find there's only one or two 'real teams' in the whole thing...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,237 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    What would be funny is if Brazilian players got booked for ‘excessive celebrations’ and then a second yellow later on. Could change a game. Plus with the refs adding on loads of extra time those celebrations could bite back.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



Advertisement