Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1229122922294229622973690

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The term “Soviet” or “Russian” is often interchangeable when discussing WW2 casualty tolls.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,372 ✭✭✭paul71


    Yes often to support spurious points.


    Shall we ask how many Russians the Soviets killed? If why why not, since you have brought all other kinds of whataboutism to the table.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    What spurious points? You can ask how many Russians were killed by the Soviets if you like. I'm not here to defend the crimes of Stalin, Putin etc as I'll condemn them in the strongest possible terms if you want me to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,372 ✭✭✭paul71


    There you go, you are not here to defend Stalin, yet you wish to discuss every single thing that is completely and utterly irrelevant to the war in Ukraine. Stalin is as relevant as NATO expansion, in other words neither have any relevance yet you want to discuss one but not the other.


    You are throwing SHITE out there to deflect the debate so I am simply throwing SHITE back.


    Deflecting debate to WW2 Germany, refuses to discuss Stalin. Get a grip!!!



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Nope. All I was doing was responding to this ignorance and also a piece of racial stereotyping to boot IMO:

    "perhaps you are russian and hence unable to comprehend concepts of humanity developed since Middle Ages".



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,372 ✭✭✭paul71


    Nope you were deflecting since your first post. Discredited rubbish about NATO expansion. Totally irrelevent garbage, Northern Ireland border was comparable in Size to NATO Russian border until Russia launched into aggressive landgrabs against peaceful nieghbours.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Eh?

    You have me confused with somebody else. Never mentioned NATO (I've nothing against NATO BTW), Northern Ireland?????



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    "perhaps you are russian and hence unable to comprehend concepts of humanity developed since Middle Ages".

    Group think mate. People should know better than post this type of dehumanising rubbish. By all means condemn Putin and his regime and their actions, but don't post generalising tripe. Because thats what this is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 426 ✭✭grumpyperson


    No source for yesterday. I have seen sources arguing both cases.

    I don't know how many times Russia broke the Budapest agreement.

    I have pointed to peer reviewed article by mearsheimer describing 2014 as a coup. There are countless articles describing NATO oral commitment not to expand East of Germany. I'm not here to defend Russia. I have said repeatedly it's the objectively most corrupt country in Europe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 426 ✭✭grumpyperson


    Of course it is their decision and Russia's decision too. Although the USA and UK may also be involved in the decision process..... This is a discussion forum is it not? Maybe you somehow think this is an advisory forum for Ukraine?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,574 ✭✭✭rogber


    It must be horrendous over there with a crippled energy system as winter sets in, constant blackouts, lack of water and heat and you're basically saying it's no big deal, the snowflakes should just get on with it like people used to do?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,648 ✭✭✭Dubh Geannain


    That's the thing. It's not Russia's decision because it's not their country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,771 ✭✭✭Apiarist



    The reason why Putin started the war, from one of the smartest Russian politicians.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 853 ✭✭✭mikewest


    Talk about deliberately misinterpreting a post just to be offended . Can you reread what Furze99 actually wrote about resilience.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I'd be genuinely bloody depressed if the average Russian really did voluntarily support the war. But then again they live under the yoke of an authoritarian regime that has total control of the media and bloodily cracks down on dissent. They could be fearful of expressing their actual opinion?? This piece from the Washington Post suggests that beyond the headline support for the war, divisions are emerging in Russian society.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭Hobgoblin11


    Czech Republic Army Chief Řehka: We would be involved from the first minute if there would be a conflict between Russia and NATO. Army's main priority now should be preparation for a large-scale war against a strong opponent.


    Dundalk, Co. Louth



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,283 ✭✭✭brickster69


    ..

    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,895 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Note how many weasel words are deployed in this one post.

    You ran away from the post yesterday because you know you have no real comeback other than weasel words, smokescreens and deflections.

    "You have seen sources arguing both cases."

    Sure you have, how about showing some discernment and deciding for yourself who is lying instead of spreading more 'both sides' relativism and uncertainty here - unless that is your agenda.

    "There are countless articles." Countless articles of what veracity? Well? That is proof of nothing. Which version is more compelling and why?

    Similarly, why aren't you posting any of the articles that don't call it a coup then? Why are you only ever posting from the side of Russian propaganda cues?

    "You don't know how many times Russia broke the Budapest agreement"?

    Strange you don't seem bothered to educate yourself on this fundamental document to Ukraine-Russia relations when you are oh so faux concerned about Ukraine ceasefire violations...

    Read the NATO-Russia Founding Act. That is a signed international treaty between NATO and Russia which supersedes any oral discussions. NATO broke no commitments to Russia. There are no NATO forces permanently stationed East of Germany as per the commitments given. There are no NATO weapons systems stationed anywhere that would violate that treaty.

    The Founding Act states that all signatories, including Russia, will work with “the aim of creating in Europe a common space of security and stability, without dividing lines or spheres of influence limiting the sovereignty of any state” and respect “the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of all states and their inherent right to choose the means to ensure their own security.

    Russia has signed international treaties which allow Ukraine, as a sovereign state, to choose the means to ensure its security ie join NATO.

    Russia has violated the commitments it gave in this treaty, not NATO.

    Just as it violated Budapest.

    So can you give us good reasons why a Ukraine not in NATO should trust Russia to abide by any future peace treaty?

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,776 ✭✭✭Homelander


    They didn't go in with Shock & Awe because they're not remotely capable of an operation of that scale and effectiveness. That is the only reason.

    Russia spends about 6% of what the USA does on its military on a generally obsolete and bloated army. The only way they can wage war is by blunt force. They have no high-tech equipment, no effective combined arms, no strong logistics network, nothing remotely comparable to the USA.

    The US army is unmatched in the world, no other military comes close, though plenty of countries have strong, well trained and equipped, and well-led armies. Russian army is none of those things, it's just your average ex-Soviet state military with more of all the out-dated equipment.

    The war going terrible for them in Ukraine isn't surprising because it's happened before. It happened in Georgia in 2008, obviously Russia won because the Georgian military is minuscule, but the world noticed how badly the RU military performed given the absolutely massive disparity on paper, tenfold bigger between that of Ukraine and Russia.

    Interesting point about the tank games. And by interesting, I of course really mean embarrassing barrel-scraping. Things have really hit rock bottom if that's supposed to be a showcase of Russia military prowess given the reality of their fortunes thus far in Ukraine.

    Just have a good long hard look at the list of international participants and then try and repeat that flex. Seriously. Comical is probably the best word I would use but I can think of a few others.

    I don't suppose you've anything to say on those horrific tank losses in Ukraine and the fact they're resorting to pulling increasingly obsolete models out of storage as a result.

    Tanks in modern war are useless with proper leadership and effective combined operations between branches, and especially against a superior enemy. Simply throwing them into the grinder gets you nowhere. Thousands of tanks were lost in the Gulf Wars for that reason.

    Ukraine might not be a superior military based on paper strength but it is unquestionably a better trained and led one thanks to major investment in those aspects since 2014.

    Russia is still operating on the battlefield like it's 1945, with weaponry from the 1980s.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,466 ✭✭✭zv2


    At least they got one of them-

    Russian colonel Yuri Budanov show Moscow

    "Russian colonel Yuri Budanov, convicted of murdering Elza Kungayeva in 2000, was gunned down in Moscow, Russian authorities say. Photograph: Sergey Venyavsky/AP

    A former army officer who tortured and killed a young woman in one of the most notorious crimes of the Kremlin's "dirty war" in Chechnya, was murdered in Moscow.

    Yuri Budanov, 47, a former tank commander – lauded by Russian nationalists, but reviled in Chechnya – was shot four times in the head by bullets fired from a silenced pistol. His body could be seen slumped on a pathway next to a playground.

    The attacker had apparently waited in a white Mitsubishi Lancer, which was driven by an accomplice and later found abandoned on a nearby street."

    Russian colonel who killed Chechen woman shot dead in Moscow | Russia | The Guardian

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,648 ✭✭✭Dubh Geannain



    You should be depressed then. If you're only joining the thread now, you've a bit of catching up to do.

    Did you not see the Z rally's outside of Russia? It's not just those within the borders. The Russian's that fled fled more out of fear for being conscripted themselves as opposed to any opposition to the regime. Otherwise, they would have fled sooner. The ones that left before perhaps were of a different attitude. There's no silent majority. There's major indifference for the most part.

    It was only when the mobilisation happened that the borders with Russia really had to be firmed up. Divisions are only happening now because they are not winning. Putin is a despot alright, but he could be replaced by worse. I don't hold much optimism for them guiding themselves away from the path they've gone down. But that's their choice. As I said, lets worry about Russia's future once Ukraine's has been secured.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,204 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    What would be the reaction in your regiment if any of the crews performed like that during exercises?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I lived through and remembered the Cold War of the early 1980s where talk of nuclear armaggeddon was commonplace. It's where my concern about the USSR then and Russia now comes from, plus a carryover fear of nuclear war from that age.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,861 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Oh trust me, they are. Did you even read your own link? Look at the "teams" Russia was up against and then ask yourself again why they won 🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,648 ✭✭✭Dubh Geannain


    That threat has allowed things to get to this point. Should they be allowed march all the way to France because of that threat?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Ideally, of course not. Leaving aside for now the crap performance of Putins army in Ukraine so far, how do you control all of the escalatory scenarios that would probably result if they tried? Would it be a conventional (ie, a non-nuclear) conflict?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,648 ✭✭✭Dubh Geannain


    That's just it. They've threatened escalation umpteen times. China has finally told them to tone it down. They've bluffed big time with Ukraine. Have Ukraine not attacked annexed Russian territories? Where were the nukes?


    Did Turkey not shoot down a Russian fighter previously? We're no closer to nuclear Armageddon unless some ridiculous chain of events happens. Russia won't go nuclear over Ukraine.


    They need to be turfed out and the lesson they should learn is that having "the bomb" doesn't give you free reign over your neighbours fledgling democracies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,895 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    And the country they attacked gave up the bomb, in return for commitment from Russia not to destabilise or invade and to respect its territorial integrity.

    So there's another message from Russia guaranteed to ensure no other country follows Ukraine down that path.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    That was comedy gold, but I suspect a clever plan by the Russians to get NATO to reduce their military budget by 90%.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Two things to note. Nothing to be worried about re the Chinese & will the Russians be able to field a team in the next competition 🤣



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement