Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

BoJo banished - Liz Truss down. Is Rishi next for the toaster? **threadbans in OP**

1277278280282283297

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout



    Yeah I don't get it either. If he wants to try and keep the ERG onside couldn't he just appointed one of their other headbanger members?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,972 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Contentious but only among the Avocado-devouring wokerati who read the Guardian. Sunak has inherited a party that's also become its own opposition. He needs to get it together now that Labour pose a real threat.

    I saw it in a headline for The Atlantic as well.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,629 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    Just how many MPs are currently part of the ERG?

    With a working majority of 71 I'm wondering if Sunak would have the room to maneouver to expel some, or all of, it's worst members (e.g. Jacob Rees-Mogg, Priti Patel, Dorries, Braverman etc.) from the Conservative Party without giving up a majority? I'm presuming he has the power to do this based on my understanding that Rory Stewart was expelled over the "no deal" vote...

    I suspect that ousting some of the most reviled members of the party would go a long way to reducing the forecasted losses at the next election.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,972 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    21 according to Wikipedia. Not big if that number is true.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,136 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    But that would imply that the wider Tory party does not agree with the main points that the ERG are running.

    There has never been any rebellion against the deal. The Tory party, as a whole, is deeply anti EU, and the ERG are just the collection of those with the drive to ensure it happens.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    That's an "average" number. If you look further down the page it names 46 current MPs as the "wider membership"



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,972 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I think the ERG would have shrank since their raison d'etre was accomplish back in 2020. They have no reason to exist unless it's some sort of self-congratulatory circle where they pat themselves on the back or something.

    MPs might hate the protocol but the government knows that the cost of removing it will be ruinously expensive. That's why it endures.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,542 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    So Suella Braverman is getting rewarded for being useless ?



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,060 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    I would figure the "ERG Aligned" numbers as roughly analogous with the actual confirmed Boris vote , so around 50 or so potentially.



  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I said in the other thread that it could be so that she can just go off fail on her own, meaning he doesn’t have to worry too much about immigration matters. Can subsequently tell ERG people that he gave her the opportunity to try. Puts some distance between him and inevitable immigration policy failure



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,127 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    Has there been any likening him to Number 5 from Umbrella Academy yet? 😁


    The updated thread title reminded me of the old song 99 bottles of beer -

    99 Conservative MPs on the wall,

    99 Conservative MPs,

    They can’t shut their gobs, they act like knobs,

    98 Conservative MPs on the wall…



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,060 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,441 ✭✭✭HalloweenJack


    'Perceived competence' - what a joke. Everyone could see Sunak was miles more capable than Truss yet the members voted for her because she represented their views. I can't be sure that the members voted for Truss over Sunak because of her skin colour (though it wouldn't surprise me). I'd be fairly certain they voted for her because of what she was advocating, which would have me doubt their judgement.

    There is a clear difference between the profile of the party membership when so many members are rich, old white men and yet their parliamentary party is far more diverse as you love to point out. Given the PP has avoided a membership vote for the leadership this time suggests there is quite a disconnect between the MPs and the membership.

    And again, your defence of the Tories from racism is to point at the prominent members who are from minorities. How about how their policies in shaping the British state impact on ethnic minorities? That's what the charge of racism is related to.

    There was loads of back-slapping regarding their being no white men in the four great offices and yet three of them resigned in record time due to incompetence.

    If that had been Labour, Tory fanboys would be banging on about tokenism. So in the case of the Tories, what is it: tokenism or general incompetence? Neither are reassuring answers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,833 ✭✭✭quokula


    So Dominic Raab as Deputy PM and Justice Minister, James Cleverly as Foreign Secretary, sources reporting that Suella Braverman will be back in as Home Secretary. Michael Gove back in the fold too. It seems like he's keeping the worst of both Johnson's and Truss's cabinets.

    Not a good start for those hoping Sunak might signal a return to mature and competent politicians running things.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,060 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Braverman sends a really poor message - I mean they are all poor , but Braverman resigned for a breach of protocols/rules a week ago.

    If she had resigned on principal (*snigger*) because she couldn't work for Truss that would be different , but she broke the rules and resigned.

    How can she get the same job back without any penalty?

    I mean I know how , but do the Tories think that sends a message to the voters that they are "serious" about fixing things and making them more a more attractive voting choice?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout



    Indeed. It seems, from these picks, that the primary lesson that he learned from Truss is that he needed to share the cabinet roles out amongst people who were loyal to his rivals. Unfortunately he doesn't appear to be picking the best of the rest.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,260 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Found it odd that Sunak in his speech was so openly critical of Truss and talked about 'undoing damage'... any of his fellow Conservative MPs or indeed anyone working for him .. should be taking note of that....



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    So far, here's who's in Sunak's cabinet:

    • Jeremy Hunt has kept his job as Chancellor of the Exchequer
    • Dominic Raab has been appointed deputy prime minister and justice secretary
    • Suella Braverman is back as home secretary
    • James Cleverly will stay on as foreign secretary
    • Ben Wallace is also keeping his job as defence secretary
    • Grant Shapps has been made business secretary
    • Nadhim Zahawi was appointed Conservative Party chair
    • Oliver Dowden has become chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster 




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,896 ✭✭✭Hoop66


    I think it was Thomas Aquinas who said "If you keep reaching into a bucket of shit, don't be surprised when you keep getting turds".



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,060 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    To be fair , he did say during the last campaign that the economic polices that Truss was proposing would do huge damage and they did.

    So while he is definitely throwing Truss under the bus (nice alliteration!) he did tell everyone that the bus was coming..



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,181 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Braverman being back in 1 week after leaving the same job is a farce especially considering the reasons it happened



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,175 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    I would have thought Cleverley and Gove were both fairly respected figures. Who in the Tory ranks would you have regarded as 'mature and competent' enough for high office?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,059 ✭✭✭Shelga


    I knew it. I knew she wouldn’t have supported Sunak without being guaranteed that role. This tells me everything I need to know about the character of Rishi Sunak anyway. No doubt justifying welcoming a fascist into the Home Office in order to ensure “party unity”. 🙄

    Having a vile extremist who is devoid of empathy, like Braverman, in this position, is genuinely better in Sunak’s mind than having a GE. Just absolutely disgusting.



  • Posts: 276 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    His choice of Home Secretary just indicates that the anti immigration and generally nasty approach to home affairs is set to continue.

    I suspect you’ll just continue to see more of the same, particularly around the very ideological stuff.

    Change of leader isn’t change of leadership. They’re still going to have all the same issues they had under May, Johnson and Truss.

    I can’t really see the NI protocol being ironed out until there’s a general election tbh.

    My gut instinct tells me that Sunak could end up being rapidly dragged into a position very like May, being unable to deliver because he’s going to be trying to implement a set of policies that are a complete paradox driven by hardcore ideologies and various red lines that can’t be resolved. Compromise, consensus building, pragmatism and nuance don’t really exist in the Tory vocabulary.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,157 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Braverman, Zahawi and Cleverly have my eyebrows raised.

    I can see exactly what he's up to - put hard right wingers into the government in order to keep the right wing of the party / Johnson supporters on board but it seems risky. It almost appears he's far more concerned with the party than with the country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,833 ✭✭✭quokula


    It's a fair point that the party is massively devoid of talent and there are almost no good choices but they could do better than someone like Cleverley who makes an idiot of himself every time he speaks and Gove who's track record is utterly atrocious and who did untold damage to education and justice in his time in those ministries.

    For some examples of Tory MPs who've performed their roles without completely **** the bed like those two, there's Alok Sharma, Tom Tugenhadt, Ben Wallace, Damien Green, Tobias Ellwood, Sajid Javid, even David Davis outside of his run as Brexit minister. Countless others who would still better choices.

    In fairness it is true though that compared to his other selections like Braverman and Raab, those two look positively respectable.

    I think you can sum up this cabinet by looking at Jeremy Hunt - he served under Cameron and was very widely acknowledged as the most unpopular minister in the country amongst the public, overseeing huge damage to the NHS during his tenure. Now the standards have fallen so much that he's the one everyone looks at as the one reliable adult in the room to make good decisions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout



    Yes, you called it yesterday and I dismissed it out of hand. Turns out I over-estimated Sunak.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout



    His last 3 predecessors were defenestrated by the party but given that he only has 2 years, tops, until the next general election I'm guessing that the voters are going to be the ones to turf him out of #10. On that basis he should probably be worrying more about what the country thinks of him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,157 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    One assumes that Braverman is now free to pursue her anti-immigration and anti-refugee policies (the ones that she had a huge bust up with Truss over). It's a bit of a shock appointment to be honest, even if we can see what he's up to.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,260 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    True, but Sunak was going up for leadership then too. So it was in his interest…

    id say he’s one to be wary of.



Advertisement