Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Leinster v Munster match thread

191012141522

Comments

  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    He expected osborne to run directly into him the 6’7 lock?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,690 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Yeah. Dr Evil/jean Kleyn

    You do know his evil plan relied entirely on Osbourne running directly into him. Most kickers run around the other players instead if straight into them


    It was a rugby incident, an accident, that should have been at the very most a penalty, and that penalty could easily have gone against Osbourne for taking out a guy in the air.

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Posts: 2,519 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Why do Munster carry James French as a professional rugby player if they wouldn't bring him off the bench today? Their scrum was getting absolutely demolished and still it made more sense to make Loughman switch across and play 80 than give the guy a chance?

    French is about to turn 24 and has been in the Munster set up since the 2018 season. What is the thinking?



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    Because the ball was over his head before he even left the ground.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,349 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    A rugby incident involving deliberately dropping an elbow into the head of an unprotected player.

    Nice one.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,690 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    I said he deliberately committed a dangerous act not caring whether he injured a player or not.

    He did that, and a player got injured.

    That's a fact.

    Unless you're prepared to argue that he didn't know he was diving into that ruck from about 70 degrees from the gate.

    You can try to argue that, but it would be arguing against reality.

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,595 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    To me on Osbourne Kleyn whats important in terms of sanction is

    At the moment that Kleyn jumped could Osbourne have turned aside. Personally I feel that Osbourne was committed running when he kicked. He took 2 steps after he kicked. Thats few enough that he probably couldn't have turned.

    So at the moment Kleyn jumped the inevitable outcome was a collision with Osbourne.


    Did Kleyn have a chance of making the block. IE was he genuinely competing for the ball or was it a reckless jump with no hope. If he had a chance of catching the ball he has a much better argument that he was competing for the ball which I believe is important in terms of sanction.



  • Posts: 2,519 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Yeah, Doris was superb. I don't think Coombes had a bad game (and he showed a lovely bit of awareness and skill for the pass to set up his cousin's try), but it's not hard to see on days like today why Doris is the more complete player who has pretty much always been picked ahead of him (including back to underage days). Doris does a lot more work around the field, and is more dynamic in the carries with a step.



  • Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭ Morgan Squeaking Wall


    How is clearing out a ruck dangerous play, you muppet?



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    As for performances. I thought Rory Scannell played well for Munster, Hodnett too.

    Crowley needs to be given the keys at 10. I genuinely believe he’s come on a lot over the last year and that the World Cup is a genuine possibility for him.

    For Leinster, Ringrose was the star of the show. Funnily enough a few days after some were (yet again) suggesting that someone else should be playing ahead of him at 13 for Ireland. It always happens and the same nay-sayers will go back into their holes until the Six Nations comes around and we’ll have the same conversations again. Rinse and repeat.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    How do you know toner committed a deliberate act, are you a mind reader ???


    Or are you just full of sh1t



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,690 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Coombes had to be direct because we were missing a lot of power due to injuries so he spent the game soaking up clearouts and carrying into contact (to suck in defenders)

    Normally, Coombes would be free to play more varied rugby

    But even still, he produced a sublime pass to put his brother in for that try

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Are we talking about this one? Seems clean to me. If it isnt; there should be a lot more penalties in each game.


    you dont often see neck rolls where they go straight back.



  • Posts: 2,519 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I don't think there is anything wrong with that, as in no foul play from Crowley, but Byrne was on the ball long enough that he should have had the penalty. Clear no release.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,690 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    I'd like to know this too.

    Maybe he was just selected to have the required cover on the bench and wasn't actually fit

    Munster were gutted with injuries

    He is in his first senior contract, and it's only a 1 year deal. Could have been a financial decision because he's cheap and we needed to cut our wage bill

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Posts: 742 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]



    If you read my post from the beginning to the end - challenging I grant you, given that the second sentence was a massive 9 words long- then you'd have understood that it remains to be seen whether or not you were posting through your hole. If Klein is cited, then, as my first sentence made clear, your opinion will be validated.



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I only remember him playing in that game against wasps last year with tons of people out… and he was really good in the loose…. but dodgy in the scrum.



  • Posts: 2,519 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Don't even know though how you look the guy in the eye in the dressing room afterwards today. It couldn't have gone any worse in those last 20 mins had French been given some game time, as worst case they'd get minced in the scrum, which was happening anyway. The damage to the player's confidence must be worse from thinking your head coach (a top class prop himself in his heyday) doesn't trust you at all rather than just getting worked over by a top class international prop like Porter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,690 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Yeah, thats his only cap for munster.

    I don't know why he wasn't brought on. There must be a reason. Nobody plays without a tighthead prop if they can avoid it

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    All in all, something for everyone. Leinster took care of business. Doris was class as was most of their other top guys. I thought Frawley looked pretty good at FB.

    Munster got to see who would stand up and who wouldn’t. That’s helpful during a rebuild. They can build a real team around Crowley, Ahern, Hodnett, Barron imo.

    And Ulster have the ****, so they should be good for a win next week.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,690 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Am I a mind reader? No, Does Toner know the laws of rugby? Of course he does.

    Are you suggesting that Toner, a massively experienced player in a position that involves joining rucks tens of times per game, didn't know he was coming in from the side?

    You can see the gif here. Unless you're saying Toner is an idiot, he knew what he was doing

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,200 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Anyone blaming Osborne is talking nonsense.

    Also anyone claiming Kleyn deliberately elbowed Osborne / is a scumbag is also talking nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 475 ✭✭Former Coach




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,690 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Looking forward to next week. Have my tickets already

    Could well be a sell-out

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,200 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    For Leinster, Ringrose was the star of the show. Funnily enough a few days after some were (yet again) suggesting that someone else should be playing ahead of him at 13 for Ireland

    I mean, this is just not true, Faugheen. The discussion was about Ringrose as wing cover, giving Farrell more comfort selecting a centre at 23 (which he seems happy doing).

    That can happen with Ringrose starting at 13.

    I even posted 12. Henshaw 13. Ringrose and 23. Aki.

    You seem to talk any even mild criticism of Ringrose as a personal affront. And in those case it wasn’t even criticism!

    Anyways…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,690 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,123 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    A lot of arguing in bad faith going on here.

    Strangely aggressive response. Apologies if I upset you with my initial post.

    I think we can all agree that an important thing was that none of our front liners got injured tonight before the Autumn Internationals.

    Edit: just seen Joey Carbery is a doubt.



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I’m worried about what kind of team we can put out there.

    normally i think international window games are good for us because i usually think we have the best players who arent selected for ireland.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,903 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    “He jumped after the ball was kicked”


    was there ever a stupider thing said????


    You hardly expect hit to jump before the ball is kicked.


    Some lads never held a rugby ball let alone played the game!!!



Advertisement