Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1447448450452453914

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 744 ✭✭✭drogon.


    The Tánaiste said property rights of landlords are not “absolute” when asked if the ban would breach the constitutional rights of property owners who want to sell up their houses and have to evict tenants to do so.


    “When it comes to constitutional issues, it’s always been the case in Ireland that property rights are subject to the common good, they’re not absolute.

    So what you have is not yours, but hey lets have REIT keep their apartment empty so they can continue to keep rents high.

    Source: - https://www.newstalk.com/news/leaving-dublin-luxury-apartments-vacant-doesnt-break-competition-rules-review-finds-1188114



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭jimmybobbyschweiz


    In my view the rental market is being prevented from crashing with repeated supply-quenching measures from the government from eviction bans, shuttering construction sites, social housing leases and purchases to take properties out of the private rental market, no efforts to introduce vacancy taxes etc. Whilst not the obvious intention to quench supply, each of these measures has directly reduced supply of rentals to the private rental market.

    If the rental market crashes the whole property market crashes for reasons I've stated before. It is a charade that the property market is sustainable and reflects a booming, successful economy and I think the government needs constant new schemes to reduce the supply of rentals in order to prop up the whole property market. However, that doesn't seem to be possible in my view so when it does start to unwind, and I think it already has started that process, it will be quite a substantial reversal in the rental market - thinking of €2.5k pm rent for basic, small two bed apartments becoming €1.8-2k pm representing a 20-30% decline in rents type of a correction from the headline averages, with the more ridiculous rents taking much larger haircuts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 744 ✭✭✭drogon.


    I would agree with you there 100%. I bet if you lived in REIT owned property and don’t pay rent. They would no doubt find some way to kick you out and then drag any case against them till you give up and move on. Ordinary citizens\Land Lords are the ones that are going to struggle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    The CCPC found that there are many vacant high-end properties around Dublin. It referenced a report from Goodbody stockbrokers, which estimated that vacancy rates in some new luxury developments are at “about 30%”.

    Seems insane the government are allowing this to persist. That's what lobbyists are for I suppose....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,084 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135


    That's the disgusting thing, there is no government we are ran by NGOs and lobbyists for big buisness. Likewise at EU level too.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭jimmybobbyschweiz


    I just had a search on the rental section of daft. If you strip out studios, one beds and places costing more than €3k pm, there are 110 ads for rentals in Dublin city, with what I can tell as around €2.5k pm average for a 2 bed apartment.

    When the average rent for the bare minimum sized place to have a small (IE one child) family requires a household income of at least €150k pa in order to pay maybe 25-30% on rent, something is seriously wrong. If you had two kids and maybe wanted a third bedroom as a renting family, you will pay on average €3k rent per month for something basic, which would be a household income of €200k pa to only pay 25-30% of income on rent.

    The net effect of this catastrophic, generational devastation being inflicted via the rental market means that the country will need to keep importing the future pension pot contributors as there is no sustainability being created for young people and young families in particular to build a future in the country so long as they are renting. Ireland is definitely unique in this regard and do not believe that other countries have such a dearth in available housing as it is utter bollox.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    missed the date on it.

    30 APR 2021

    I think we're in a different position now and maybe the vacancy rate is not so high.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 744 ✭✭✭drogon.


    it was brought up (Funds leaving apartments empty to keep rents high) during a recent episode of The crazy house prices podcast that Darragh O'Brien was on. All he said was, I don’t think it happens at the levels it happened before. But without any data who can guess how valid of a statement it is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 744 ✭✭✭drogon.


    Fair enough, I suppose having ban on eviction is the best course of action if people have no where to go.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 12,836 [Deleted User]


    Ban on evictions is an absolutely dreadful idea that will make the rental market even worse



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    Just looked on daft.

    297 Properties to Rent in Dublin (County)

    Is that an increase? I thought someone was saying only 70 in Dublin or something like that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,907 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Hook, line & sinker

    As stated in the past, state should have had projects ready to go for when the downturn came. How long has the Land Development Agency been in existence

    Funding projects designed for investment funds at unsustainable rent levels at the top of the market is a recipe for disaster that you will be paying for.

    Fine Gael ministers said this weekend Tánaiste Leo Varadkar intends to ‘enthusiastically back’ the purchase of build-to-let apartments when he becomes Taoiseach again on December 15. A Cabinet source told Extra.ie: ‘If we need to allocate billions more to housing, it will be done. Leo Varadkar is a nakedly political leader, but that won’t stop him doing some good. Whatever the motives behind it we all believe that Leo will bring new vigour to housing, working with Darragh [O’Brien]. 




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    Surely this is better than renting off cuckoo funds?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 744 ✭✭✭drogon.


    The rental market is already screwed up with over 40% of people getting some subsidies from the government. Maybe it is best they continue with their bad policy otherwise they have nothing else to do. This way at least people that have a rented home is safe for now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,907 ✭✭✭Villa05


    This is the process of investment funds transferring risk to the state at the top of the market. I recall one poster in particular hailing investment funds as they were taking the risk

    Privatise profits and make losses public



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    Which is better, paying ludicrous rents to investment funds or paying ludicrous money to buy the building. In the long term surely the later is better?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    Just found this.

    https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2022/0809/1314797-rents-sought-rose-record-12-6-in-second-quarter-daft/

    The report also found that on 1 August there were just 716 homes available to rent across the country, with fewer than 300 in Dublin.

    Not much difference.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,357 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    There was no way the IMF or the EU would have allowed state funding of housing straight after the last downturn. Neither would the people screaming about housing now with the cut backs that went on then.

    The question is should the state have started making plans to build in Dublin in 2014 and other urban area from 2016 on. Again would Joe Public accept it.

    There is no doubt that maybe more should have been done from 2016-2018/19, however it would have increased building prices ( more demand on labour and materials) more than they did at the time.

    Our big problem is that from 2014-2019 there was massive demand for commercial development in Dublin particularly but also in larger urban centers ( extension to shopping centers, some new hotels, factories etc) so was it really possible. Builders and building labour will got to where it is paid the most.

    There was a certain amount of spare capacity in rural and smaller urban area but that was not where the requirement was. There is still houses for sale below build costs in smaller urban or rural area. Getting fewer all the time but it is exists.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭jimmybobbyschweiz


    A lot of the commercial stuff is totally dead in the water now. I wonder if this will result in builders, materials, architects, surveyors, machinery etc now being at risk of sitting idle (or if not now, not long after the temporary energy crisis abates) unless they are redirected to the homebuilding sector. This will materially bring down housing construction costs to redirect the significant and redundant commercial property sector efforts towards that area. The State should be preparing a war chest to incentivise new housing developments for when the economic slowdown starts to reflect in our data instead of wasting the cash now on bailing out investors before the crash happens.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭jimmybobbyschweiz


    The more I think about it the more I feel this eviction ban is absolutely absurd. What the hell is going on that makes it necessary and why does it last half a year at least? It is such a heavy handed, extreme State measure that there must be some incredible catastrophe possible that the State is seeking to avoid but I am very worried for the country and what is expected over the coming months that warrants this eviction ban.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,907 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Read the tea leaves

    If these are unviable for investment funds, there even moreso for affordable/social/cost rental etc.

    You let the private market stew in their own pot, while you pick up the available labour to build on your own land. This helps free up some of the 40% rentals that are under HAP and brings down rents to affordable levels and increase supply the economy is crying out for.

    In the past the mantra was where are we going to get the labour, well now all the ingredients are there for the state and there chosen solution is to bail out the developers and investment funds



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 491 ✭✭SwimClub


    If it is a ban on issuing notice of termination you have 6 months notice effectively going out to 11 months with this. Landlords are effectively being given an ultimatum to issue notice in the next few weeks (or however long it takes to get this into law) or be locked out from selling any time over the next year, regardless of their own personal circumstances.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,907 ✭✭✭Villa05


    I'm referring to the current/incoming downturn.

    In respect to the last downturn

    We began it as the largest owner of real estate in the world

    Was it around 2015/2016 Noonan instructed the acceleration of the disposal of assets, yet when there were requests for Nama to help with housing supply we were told there could be no political interference in Nama's operations



  • Posts: 168 [Deleted User]


    People will exaggerate everything, you must be new round here?



  • Posts: 168 [Deleted User]


    Absolute joke, enough of these pocksy supports...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,714 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    Well its slowed to a trickle, they were warned don't leave it to the private sector to build homes. What happens now? Open the cheque book and throw more money at developers to entice them to build?

    I'm in the market for a new build in Cork and there is literally nothing still.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,714 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    The left parties and populist vote are screaming for it ,its the only reason I can see why.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 491 ✭✭SwimClub


    It is confirmed as a ban on issuing, so there are 13 days to get a notice in before this takes effect. I wonder will we see a spike in these over the next couple of weeks, including people who had no desire to sell before eviction bans became the norm.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 168 [Deleted User]


    https://www.daft.ie/new-homes-for-sale/cork

    A hell of a lot more choice than alot of other county's, albeit the prices are ridiculous.



Advertisement