Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

General Premier League Thread 2022-23 - mod note in OP 12/03/23

17778808283345

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,662 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    The Glazers and the club are 2 different entities though.

    I could be wrong of course, and the club with all their directors who have previous connections to the club like Ferguson etc agree to the deal. They will lose an awful lot of respect if they do IMO.

    I would imagine that the likes of Ferguson, Robson, Irwin, Charlton, Gill etc who are still in and around the club all have a bit of know-how and a word in the ear. When the likes of Rio and Evra can dictate transfers, then the club must be listening to them. Those 2 might be inclined to lean towards the Saudis tho.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,882 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    With the amount of money spent , dont think the owner is expecting to go down, think Benitez might be a better fit , with all the added pressure.

    and BTW I'm up for liverpool tonight



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,203 ✭✭✭theoneeyedman


    I'm not arguing with you here, but how long should all that actually take?

    I'm not talking about building a championship winning team or anything, but a functional side capable of operating competently at the bottom half of the EPL.

    These are all supposed to be top professional players, being mentored by the top coaches in the world, in terms of fitness, analysis, performance, stats, conditioning etc....

    It's not like they are taking in lads off the street. There should be a decent level of performance inherent in this group, and it should be showing by now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 216 ✭✭BobDole22


    Once they made that decision to spend all that money Cooper would have known the score getting humped 4 nil off bottom of the league Leicester and even worse losing 3-2 at home to Bournemouth having been 2 up are unforgiveable results. They've had a pretty decent run of games as well only top team they've played is City.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,012 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    Not every club wants / needs to be a sports washing exercise to be successful.

    I don't think the whole Utd fan base would be against the Saudi but I would be 100% confident there would be a LOT more opposition to it at Man Utd than City or Newcastle.

    I think the fact the Glazers were trying to sell off shares for 700m maybe points to them not being able to work the numbers to get the stadium upgraded etc... They saw this as their chance to get it upgraded without them actually putting anything in or taking any risk themselves which would line up with every decision they have ever made around Utd.

    They can't really load much more debit onto the club without it causing major issues to the clubs ability to generate income and in turn for them to collect their dividends.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,012 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    Other thing to note is if they valued 30% at 700m last year and now are potentially getting offers around 4-5B for a full sale then surely there will be some of them who are very very tempted to sell and cash out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 216 ✭✭BobDole22


    No Manchester United don't need state backing and sports washing to be successful probably one of the few clubs that don't they just need competent multi billionaire owners as opposed to the leeches they have now.

    TBH I think you're way over-hyping any potential protests I doubt they'd amount to more than a hill of beans sales of Norwich scarves would go up and the few that walk away would be instantly replaced. Another issue is that anyone with the money to buy Man Utd is by definition going to be an absolute bastard due to accumulating that kind of wealth in the first place.



  • Posts: 45,738 [Deleted User]


    There would be little protests I'd imagine. Look how quick the Glazer protest died out. It'll crop up again and die out again.

    You'd have lots of whatabout arguments like you see with City and Newcastle fans when the subject comes up.

    The key difference is Utd aren't desperate like City and Newcastle were, and have achieved their success off their own bat. They don't need the Saudis.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,035 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 216 ✭✭BobDole22


    Correct they haven't won a trophy since 2016 and haven't been within an asses roar of winning the league in 10 years and are getting further and further away all the time.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,773 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    I think almost anyone is within 5 years of winning a league if things go right tbh... as far away as they seem, it only takes 3 or 4 windows of getting things right to really kick things on. Sure look at Liverpool, when Rodgers was sacked, Liverpool looked miles off a league challenge, but were genuine contenders only 4 years later.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,035 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    United would need to drop the Glazers now and hire a competent director.

    Things won't "go right" with the current set up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,012 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan



    ...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,012 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    The Glazer protest hasn't totally died out though. There's protests before neary every home game but Sky don't show it.

    There isn't naturally the same level as there was for the Liverpool game. It would be impossible to maintain that level every 2 weeks but it has definitely not died out. They will pick their moments throughout the season to cause the most disruption they can.

    Sky will show fans leaving the stadium at half time but they won't show the protests before hand.

    Sky have also been muting fan chants about the Glazers during the games. It's very noticeable for games that are on BT rather than Sky. You can hear the protests very clearly on BT.

    Not sure why Sky are so against showing anything of the protests but they are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,035 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    I find Sky always have the crowd levels very low. I notice it on BT but especially on RTE where it always seems way up.

    I'de say Sky showed a few protests and got bored when they realized there was no juicy "violent yob" stories to tut at.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,203 ✭✭✭theoneeyedman


    Reports (Telegraph) that Hassenhutl is getting the push from Southampton soon....

    Hard to know what to make of them, Southampton have veered from very good to very poor under him, very little in between.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,272 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Rodger’s is going to put last them all at this stage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,662 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*



    Sky definitely lower the crowd volume in some games, and in certain times. It's very obvious in games at Elland Road for example where you can hear the volume change live for certain chants.

    There was a Liverpool - Man City game a year or two ago that sounded terrible on TV - dead as a doorknob. Lots of twitter talk about the 'Anfield myth' etc. But every player made it a point to talk about the atmosphere and I had a few friends at it who said it was the best in a long time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,953 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    Sky 100% turn down the games,

    Watch any Liverpool home game on sky & then a few days after watch "Inside Anfield " on YouTube & you get the real feel for the atmosphere levels



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,773 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Hiring a competent director is a part of 'going right'. Loads needs to change, of course, my only point is that it's not a 10 year process. If all the right decisions and changes are made at almost any club (and certainly Utd), they can be in a position to win a league within 5 years. It takes up to about 3 to 4 years to gather a squad that can win a league. Any longer, and you've gone backwards through your first guys moving on/aging out.

    (I don't think they necessarily need to be rid of the Glazers to do it either, the Glazers have a rake of titles in the bag already, and do still allow enough transfer funds to build - they just need the people running the football/transfer side to be better).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 216 ✭✭BobDole22


    That's not really the same though Liverpool had properly challenged for the title under Rodgers and the gap to the top and the rest wasn't as big then for me Man Utd are an absolute minimum of 5 years off challenging for the title. Manchester United are a Europa League level team now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,773 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Why specifically? Like, the point revolves around the right transfer decisions being made from the start of that 5 year period - obviously it's a long shot, it's simply that it can be done if the right people are there, making the right decisions. 5 years is 10 transfer windows. You can obviously build a core of 14 decent players in that time, with just 3 or 4 real standouts required.

    On the Liverpool point, almost every bit of the Rodgers team that challenged was gone when we challenged again. Only Jordan Henderson was a part of both... which is part of the point, you have to do it fast if you're going to do it. From the point at which you start making right decisions the clock is ticking, as team cycles pass by a lot faster than we sometimes recognise.

    At any club, at whatever point they step up and go and win a league, it'll have overwhelmingly been the actions of the 5 years previous that made it happen. (Also, 5 years is a REALLY long time in football).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 216 ✭✭BobDole22


    I take your point but there are differences Liverpool appointed a proven world class manager and then modified their whole recruitment process around signing players to fit his style of play there was on overall strategy for success I don't think anything like that exists at Man Utd. Now if Man Utd appoint the right people to work with ETH and change the culture around the club they could challenge again but all known history of this ownership would suggest that will not happen. There's also a huge amount of dross on big contracts at Man Utd that nobody will sign.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,035 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    "Rake of titles"

    I thought it was just 3 second rate cups ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,773 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Yeah, that's what I mean - there's heavy "ifs" involved. And who knows if any of those things will be done. it's just that with the right business, the route to a league challenge (for anyone, beit Man Utd or Aston Villa) is actually not as long as often gets said. As an extreme example, can see Leicester - a bunch of good solid pros with 2 or 3 genius buys can go a long way. Or for Rodgers, adding Coutinho and Sturridge to Suarez. There's no one thing that inherently requires a long time (like the 10 years mentioned) - whether thats hiring a new manager, or bringing in a new director of football or recruitment setup, or doing a few transfers etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,773 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    5 Premier Leagues, a Champions League, four EFL Cups, the Europa League, the FA Cup and the FIFA Club World Cup since the Glazers came in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 201 ✭✭WillmaDickfit




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,662 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    This is what everyone is competing with, funded by dodgy deals with fake made up companies to cheat the rules.


    I'm well aware that signing on fees etc will be factored into this headline figure to make it sound larger, and the goal bonuses. But it's still a massive total number that nobody else is going to be able to get to, without also cheating or cooking the books.

    Brilliant goalscorer Haaland is, but this is an obscene number. No player should be earning that amount, anywhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,035 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Sorry I forget they were there before Ferguson left.

    Mad to think they are around for about 20 years now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,910 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    Basic £350k

    Appearance fee £100k

    Goal bonus £50k

    Wearing Jersey in the correct manner £100k

    Putting boots on the correct feet £50k

    Not getting locked in the toilets £50k

    Saying hello to the tea lady at least once a week £50k

    Not hiding Peps scalp polish £50k

    It all adds up tbf.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement