Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

BoJo banished - Liz Truss down. Is Rishi next for the toaster? **threadbans in OP**

1215216218220221297

Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,964 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    The other side to this is that Labour are actually coming out with proper policies now, just as Biden is doing in the US with his Build Back Better plan. Meanwhile, the Tories are making enemies of just about everyone. Calling the IMF woke ffs....

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,060 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    I don't disagree , the Tories would be where they are in terms of polling , but I firmly believe that if Corbyn was still in charge Labour would not be benefiting anywhere near as much.

    Chunks of those Tory losses would have shifted to the Lib-Dems or into an "undecided" bucket instead of it pretty much all going directly to Labour as it has.

    Instead of showing the 25 and 30 points leads today , you'd be seeing Labour with a 10-15 point lead with the rest spread-out elsewhere due to Corbyn completely un-electable nature.



  • Posts: 6,045 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I swear a word like that has been so abused and overused in recent years it has lost all relevance.

    That's a bit rich, coming from someone who accused Rashford of being a paedophile because he wanted to make sure kids got fed in school.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,313 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Well, sure, if Corbyn was still LOTO the party wouldn't "look" as together. But only because the Labour right had the knives out for him as soon as he was elected leader and went through every possible avenue to sabotage him. Certain sections of Labour would rather have eviscerated itself and hand the Tories power than to stand with Jeremy Corbyn and see a Labour victory. Natch that that would scare voters off, but that's down to Labour's own infighting.

    People may not like Corbyn, and I'd be unsure of his suitability for PM myself, but Labour under Starmer is an empty vehicle fuelled by the shambles of elements outside of it. That's not really something to waving any kind of flag about really. Labour should be Labour. Being "not the Tories and they're worse than us" isn't that laudable.



  • Posts: 1,877 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I think it should be remembered that Corbyn did come close to being PM in 2017. It was said at the time that Labour had been just 2,227 votes away from the chance of government.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,964 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    There's no Nobel Prize for attempted Chemistry. The man was a disaster no matter how you slice it.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,885 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    OT:One of the most recent Chemistry winners (Barry Sharpless) just won the Nobel for the second time. A very rare thing.



  • Posts: 1,877 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Ultimately he was, but I was responding to Tony EH's "Labour should be Labour", I think he has a point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,313 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Was Corbyn a "disaster" though? Or was it down to him being portrayed as that? Was it not more of a case that the party was a disaster, due to the infighting and backstabbing that I mentioned earlier? Remember that party membership soared under Corbyn and the energy of that made Labour look far better than it had for over a decade. Perhaps Corbyn should have handled his leadership responsibilities like Bojo or Keir, in that he might have been better off ejecting the people who had it in for him instead of trying to deal with them.

    In any case none of that energy is there now and Starmer's crowd are merely a "Blairite tribute act", as one party official put it. Bereft of any real ideas, they've been more interested in purging the party of its left wing than building a cohesive plan to tackle the problems of British society that the average Joe faces. They're revelling in the topsy turvy catastrophe that is the Conservative party right now and will reap the temporary rewards to come. But as a party, they leave an awful lot to be desired themselves.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,964 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    He was absolutely a disaster. A career Eurosceptic, his office frustrated the official Labour remain campaign under Alan Johnson. He the went on to give the EU seven out of ten in an interview pre-referendum. In addition, he was the first person to call for triggering article 50. The biggest issue the public voted on in decades and he decided to put his own ideology ahead of the welfare of the people he professes to be fighting for. He then went on to lead Labour to its worst defeat since the 1930s.

    The man was an unmitigated disaster. No amount of Corbynista revisionism alters this.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,313 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,313 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Nobody cares what you think.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,964 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 30,891 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    Also worth remembering that Corbyn led a significant Labour comeback in 2017, surging to within two percentage points of the Tories and forcing Theresa May's government into a catastrophic agreement with the DUP that hamstrung the whole political system for several years. And yes Brexit and Boris Johnson were unprecedented political disruptions that changed the playing field for several years, ultimately to Labour's detriment. But there was a very different outlook barely two years prior to the 2019 election.

    I'm not saying Corbyn was 'perfect', and yes his position on Brexit was confused and often frustrating (although criticising the EU as an institution and wanting reform is a perfectly valid stance). But he is a rare politician with genuine principles, brought Labour back towards its grassroots and working-class roots, and offered up a genuine alternative and progressive Labour party that excited many millions of young people in particular. And both the institutions of his own party and the vast majority of the British media spent the entirety of his tenure trying to undermine him - occasionally fairly, but mostly preposterously.

    The current Labour under Starmer is a husk - any of their progressive standpoints have been forced through by an active membership doing their best to get something through. If the options are only ever going to be the Tories or a sort of Blairite Labour, then it's no surprise so many people in the UK feel disillusioned with that. It's not a stretch to say the current Labour surge has only so much to do with Starmer's leadership and much more to do with the Tories imploding in utterly spectacular fashion.



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    One of the reasons Boris Johnson was able to secure a thumping majority wasn't just because of his commitment to Brexit, but also because the UK population, on the whole, didn't want to back a party that was seeping at the seams with anti-Semitic racism.

    By disinfecting the party of that disgusting stain, Starmer has at least made Labour somewhat electable and, now that Brexit has been effectively done, the policy window has shifted to the cost of living crisis and so on.

    This is something Labour can at least speak to.

    So your whitewashing of history re: Corbyn has not gone unnoticed. Same with some other posts on this thread who paint Corbyn as some sort of second coming of Christ. He wasn't. He was a total disaster.



  • Posts: 1,877 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It is a LOTO's job to get into power and he failed, quite spectacularly so the second time around and as leader he has to take some responsibility for the party being a disaster. He did have a lot to contend with though, especially from the media.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,059 ✭✭✭Shelga


    Another massive factor that has changed since Corbyn’s tenure, and one that I think would make people even less likely to vote for him now than they were then- Ukraine.

    He would have been a complete disaster. Probably wouldn’t have even sent them weapons to defend themselves, thereby extending the war even further. It’s the first time I really got why voters found him such an appalling prospect as PM.

    Give me Keir Starmer over that brand of student union politics, any day.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,964 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Definitely. He's involved with Stop the War who were pushing the NATO Imperialism myth when Putin declared war. Disgusting group. So much for standing up for the oppressed.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    I think Corbyn, Abbot etc were dolts, but the anti-Semite thing was absolute cobblers.

    There was literally a former Israeli embassy staffer putting herself about the Labour Party peddling that nonsense, and she was being protected because it was expedient to other wings of the party.

    More fool to you for puffing it up.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 30,891 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    I don't think Jeremy Corbyn was the second coming of Christ. I do think he offered a compelling vision for a different type of Labour party - one deeply seeded in the party's traditional, pre-Blair roots. I think he made some real mistakes, including ones in the later part of his term and around Brexit which ultimately led to a major election defeat. He faced significant external and internal pressures, some fair and some unfair. And absolutely, Boris Johnson's rise was more multi-faceted than Brexit alone. But I do think it's important to remember there was a significant proportion of new and old Labour voters / members who were deeply supportive of Labour & Corbyn during that period and feel disillusioned by the party's current direction.

    On the anti-Semitism front, from what I have read of it the Forde report offers a fair and balanced account of that particular issue within Labour - how it was a genuine problem within the party that needed addressing and how the issue was politically weaponised by different factions. I do think it's ludicrous to paint any support of Palestinian rights or criticism of the Israeli State as anti-Semitism, accusations Corbyn did face - but I also abhor any genuine anti-Semitism or racism.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,964 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    A compelling vision is ultimately useless without a framework with which to realise it. That means cutting through a hostile media which is there no matter who leads the party. No amount of eloquent speeches and rallies or membership surges compensates for votes at the end of the day.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I do think he offered a compelling vision for a different type of Labour party - one deeply seeded in the party's traditional, pre-Blair roots.

    Nobody is saying that Corbyn didn't offer a compelling vision. What it shows is that very few people in the UK actually shared that vision. We saw the same phenomenon in the 1970s when the previous manifestation of Corbyn was similarly destroyed. It just doesn't work in the UK.

    Modern Labour only work when it moves to the centre, as Starmer has done, as Blair did before him.

    That said, Starmer's support isn't climbing new heights because of his policy platform and innate charisma. It seems to me that it's more of a protest against the Conservatives. Not exactly a great look for what is no doubt an incoming Labour government.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 30,891 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    On that last point, I do agree wholeheartedly :) The Labour surge has much more to do with the dire public perception of the Tories and Liz Truss than the perception of Starmer. I completely disagree with everything Boris Johnson stood for, but I do at least somewhat understand why he was so popular (at least temporarily) as someone whose particular political stylings appealed to a wide base. But they've lost that asset now, and we're seeing the inevitable consequences.

    I can only imagine Labour would be faring even better polling-wise currently with a more naturally compelling leader - and I don't mean another Corbyn or anything, just someone who can inspire voters the way - say - Jacinda Ardern (who is hardly a political radical!) did in NZ.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,313 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    As an old school left winger, I would be surprised if Jeremy Corbyn was anything but a "Eurosceptic", seeing that the EU is essentially a neo-liberal organisation for the most part and closer to the right than he would like. But being sceptical and critical of the EU is not the same as being anti-EU, not by a long shot, and Corbyn supported the principle of the EU trade bloc even if he cast eyes over how the EU conducted its business. Plus, when the Tories bashed Brexit through, both parties were sent into turmoil over how to respond. They still are. It's obvious that such turmoil would result in nobody being sure footed about how to proceed and Corbyn was no different. But the fact of the matter is that in 2016, Brexit was chosen and there was nothing that either he or the Labour party could have done about it. Corbyn "accepted" the fact that Brexit was a reality, but it's not like he would have put the actual referendum to the British in the first place and he originally did add some element of support for a second ballot, which was never really going to happen in any case. In addition, Corbyn had to also think of the large numbers of Labour supporters who were lulled by the lies of the pro-Brexit element too. It's easy to forget, but there were plenty of those supporters who believed, rightly or wrongly, that Brexit was a good idea at the time.

    As I said, I would be unsure as to his suitability as an actual Prime Minister, but Jeremy Corbyn is a decent man with a sense of fair view for British society. Something that is sorely lacking in the majority of politicians, not only in Britain. Unfortunately he is a dying breed which is something every serious political observer should be unhappy about. Because what is replacing him is very poor indeed.

    Agree completely that Starmer's Labour is a "husk". A "husk" that is only enjoying some limelight because the other option is in complete meltdown. But if the Tories had anyone in their ranks who's qualification was something other than Brexiteer, a Rory Stewart perhaps, then Britain would be looking at a Conservative government for the next 10 years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,313 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    There were definitely some members of the Labour party who tweeted some awful antisemitic drivel, but a lot of the allegations, and we must always remember that these were JUST allegations were completely baseless. Plus a lot of the so called "antisemitism" were people's position on Palestine and not Jews. One of the search words to determined whether someone was "antisemitic" or not was if they mentioned Palestine or if they should some sympathy towards BDS.

    The problem is that shouting antisemitism is enough. It rarely has to be actually backed up, because it's such a loaded term these days.

    The former Israeli staffer you're referring to was called Shai Massot, who was caught on camera outlining his plans to disrupt Labour with antisemitism claims. He was quickly withdrawn from the country when he was found out. But his like wasn't the only issue facing Corbyn's Labour. The media were almost universally stacked against him, in such a way that I have never seen. So much so that even the BBC commissioned a hachet job on him that contained so much bullshiting and even outright lies that Corbyn and the party had such an uphill struggle to face it would have been a miracle to turn that around.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    There was the Israeli diplomat, but there was also the (UK citizen) Israeli embassy staffer who was doing his bidding within the Labour Party. She was caught on tape with the same guff.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 30,891 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    Yep, a lot of the leftist criticisms of the EU as an institution are justified and the calls for reform are well earned. Concerns over the neo-liberal nature of the institution and its democratic accountability are fair. That said, I did think Labour struggled to articulate a clear position on Brexit in the run-up to the 2019 election - it was frustrating to hear their various shadow Cabinet members (including Corbyn) talk in circles while they were waiting for a more clearly articulated position. I do agree they had an impossible task and were trying to find a more nuanced position amid a conflicted membership... but they struggled to find that at the worst time, and it's no surprise the more clear-cut Tory language won in a vote that really was a Brexit election above all else. But as you say, I think it's unfortunate that has come to define Corbyn's legacy alone - his ideological foundations and principles stand in the starkest possible contrast to the 'giveaway budget for the rich' we've just seen from Westminster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,165 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Even if Corbyn done everything right as leader he had too much of a past and was a constant breaker of the Labour whip so would never have been able to properly wield it himself.

    I was a Labour member and Corbyn voter but I knew deep down he could never win I just really hoped he could put ideas back on the table that had been made taboo.

    I thought we could come out the other side with a Labour somewhere between the electable Blair Labour and a socialist Labour.

    My only hope is Starmer softens and goes a bit more left once he is in. I don't think he is as right as Blair and I certainly think he would be very against any kind of hurtful cuts we are just not seeing it because he is dead set on the idea that you have to play up to the tabloid sht to get elected.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 43,884 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    ...you're just happy supporting the political version of cancer!



Advertisement