Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

F1 2022 thread - see post 1 for rules

1112113115117118135

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,019 ✭✭✭Cool_CM




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭quokula



    Yeah that's utter nonsense, by all accounts, even if they were over it's by less than the 5% that's specifically called out in the rules as a "minor breach" that will result in a reprimand or fine. They're not the only team over either.

    Given how much costs they incurred as a direct result of their cars being taken out and obliterated by Mercedes drivers during the championship, if there was a further disproportionately severe punishment for the cost of doing repairs then that basically further legitimises the tactic of taking out your rival when you can't beat them in a straight fair fight.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭quokula


    Ugh utterly dreadful news. Sky are such parasites on the sport.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,176 ✭✭✭Idleater


    Ugh utterly dreadful news. Sky are such parasites on sport in general



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Regional West Moderators Posts: 62,851 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gremlinertia


    Hoping Channel 4 can continue their coverage, the deferred qualifying and race shows suit me with work schedule



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Toto says its red bull in breach according to interview on sky and claims its serious. Went on about Merc making 40 people redundant etc

    Problem with it is Hamilton gets paid $40m a year.

    Cost cap is pointless unless it includes everyone



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,669 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Toto and Christian are well used to trading punches at this stage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    It kinda makes a mockery of the cost cap but also kinda makes sense. Lots of things are non competitive but still cost cost a fortune, like transport, catering, running a factory. If the cost cap only included the things then there wouldn't be any diffrrbetween the teams. The fact that drivers and designers are not included in the cap means you can still get some teams which have some key people but are run more efficiently than others and that makes the difference.

    I think they're allowed 5 key people excluded from the cost cap. So that's your drivers, team principal, chief designer and another top person. Those 5 people can make a difference and I think that's fine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,669 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Agreed. The other big issue with this, there is no set punishment for breaking it, just a myriad of ones they could apply. And as you say, teams can spend more in one department over another etc.

    Chances are, there will be a reprimand for the teams, and then further clarification on the rules after it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Merc employed 1500 people which was 2 or 3 times as many as most other teams. Toto whinging about having to make staff redundant but other teams went through that about 2 years ago.

    The engines aren't part of the cap from what I can see, so teams can just transfer people to engine development companies so they are off the cap.

    Cap would be better served being a total cap on everything.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,021 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    Cost cap doesn't include drivers salaries for obvious reasons



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,242 ✭✭✭✭ctrl-alt-delete


    So, if as Horner eludes to that unless comments are taken back that Redbull will look at their options (and he obviously means take legal action) - do those costs come off the cap? 🤣

    It will all come out in the wash anyways but I don't think it is right that Sky are giving significant air time and platforms are been given for people to talk about allegations in a manner as if they were facts, covering themselves by saying alleged every now and then.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭Gru



    They're really pushing this angle and have posted the below on Twitter.





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,046 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    After the fiasco of Abu Dhabi after one of the greatest seasons ever, the FIA wouldn't want to just overturn the results in this fashion, it would only make the credibility ten times worse. A fine to the amount of the overspend plus a bit more would be my preferred punishment.

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,404 ✭✭✭jacool


    Horner says that Red Bull were within the budget, and is prepared to sue.

     “The FIA has stated that they have not completed their process, so unless there is a clear withdrawal of those statements, we will be taking it extremely seriously,” he said. “We will look at all the options available to us because it is absolutely unacceptable to be making the comments that were made yesterday which are totally defamatory to the team, to the brands, and to Formula One.

    “[Mercedes] were very clear in naming Red Bull so when you refer to accusations that I am making, the accusations were actually from the other way round. We don’t know if we are in breach of the rules, and we won’t know until next week when the process has been completed.”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,873 ✭✭✭McFly85


    I don’t mind when they’re being an arse defending their own team but Toto pushing for massive punishment before anything has actually been published is fairly low. And of course he’s being enabled by Sky. As much as they’re a world feed they’re clearly a British channel first which can be really grating.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,617 ✭✭✭NinjaTruncs


    It a bit rich coming from toto when they were throwing new engines at Bottas to figure something out for Hamilton.

    They used 3 more engines than any other team last year, which would have blown their budget if engines were included.

    4.3kWp South facing PV System. South Dublin



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    To be fair, there isn't a championship fight to talk about instead. This story was always going to get disproportionate coverage



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    But if RB haven't broken the cap, Merc and Ferreri have pushed the agenda and now the narrative is the FIA have covered it up



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    That might be how the narrative will go. I'd just assumenits actually very hard to prove a breach so I doubt much will come of it. I wouldn't jump straight to a conspiracy.

    Where's the thread's resident red bull apologist?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,242 ✭✭✭✭ctrl-alt-delete




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,167 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Good to see Steve Jones, Billy Monger and Mark Webber all have commen sense and agree that the sprint races are just a silly gimmic and so do the majority of fans. Good to know.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,709 ✭✭✭✭antodeco


    I like the sprint races. An extra bit of racing. It's like knowing your favourite band is playing the 3 Arena on Sunday, but they're doing a shorter show in the Olympia on Saturday too



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭quokula


    That narrative isn't any better. So some people will think it's an FIA cover up, and other people like yourself will say the only reason Red Bull weren't caught were because it's hard to prove.

    Toto Wolff knows exactly what he's doing with this. Tell a big enough lie and repeat it often enough and the truth will cease to matter. You don't need a single shred of evidence, enough suspicion has been cast.

    I think this is why the FIA have felt the need to come out so strongly with a press release to say that these rumours are completely unsubstantiated and why Red Bull are going so far as to talk about suing Wolff for defamation. The truth matters, and when you've got F1 media dominated by Sky F1 who have a complete disregard for facts in their coverage, sometimes you have to go further. They've dealt with enough completely unjustified slander throughout last season from Mercedes PR machine and the British media and even though it's all completely divorced from reality I'm sure it must impact their sponsor relations for example.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    If Red Bull are in the clear next week I hope they issue proceedings against Toto and make him issue an apology live on Sky.

    But like was said above, Toto claimed it was an 'open secret' the last few months and once they keep pushing the agenda, reality doesn't really matter. The end game here is to cast a shadow over Red Bulls achievements because an energy drink provider is kicking the ass of one of the world's biggest motor car manufacturers in the world's highest level of motor car racing.

    The narrative is either going to be Red Bull overspent on the cost cap so cheated, or else they cheated but the FIA covered it up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,593 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    I'm amazed Toto's continued pettyness has been allowed continue by Källenius.

    Its embarassing for Mercedes.



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    Everyone is talking about what should happen to Toto if Red Bull are in the clear.

    But, what if they aren't? R&D for this year's car would have come under the cap last year, and they've churned out a dominant one this year.

    I'd be inclined to believe Horner because of how emphatic and confident he's coming across, but if Red Bull are found to have breached the spending cap with their dominant car this year, it will raise a big question for the FIA in what they do with them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,873 ✭✭✭McFly85


    How about waiting until the FIA actually publish the results instead of sticking Toto in front of a camera and asking him what should happen to Red Bull before we actually know anything?

    If RB have exceeded the limit, then yeah, let’s see how they exceeded it and what their punishment is, and I don’t think anyone disagrees with that. Having a rival pontificate on the punishment as if he has the RB figures himself is a bit suspect.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    I don't assume RB broke the rules. How would I have a clue? I think it's true that it's hard to prove because of financial trickery. But unless they're found guilty I don't assume they're guilty.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Ah, you can't take either Toto or Christian's word for it just because they appear emphatic or confident. Thats not really evidence one way or the other. We don't have any real evidence to make a judgement. The only people who will see the evidence are the FIA's auditors.

    Making a judgement without real evidence is silly. It's not our job to reach a judgement. I'll just wait and see what the investigation concludes.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement