Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Budget 2023

1181921232430

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,327 ✭✭✭Sammy2012


    Sorry that's a typo. It should have said you should be worried.

    Free school books details remain to be seen. I assume it'll be a cost per child given in a grant form to the school but who knows if the grant will cover it all.

    Guess we all have different opinions. I'm not complaining as we will (hopefully) be fine and the extra will be welcome but there are lots who still will be disappointed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,257 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Paschal himself acknowledged that our tax base is too small and we are over reliant on a small percentage of people paying the majority of income tax. This budget only makes it worse from what I can see. we desperately need another tax band, say 30% from 40k to 150k before the top rates kick in.

    The 600 for electricity is indeed welcomed but then you need to realise most of that money goes straight back to the government anyway through tax and dividends from the ESB.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,068 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Or are just good at maths and plan their finances, and the first one again, are just even moderately good at maths, just even good with a calculator.



    Given the circumstances it was a good budget though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,703 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    How does reducing taxation between €40k and €150k deal with the problem of having too small a tax base in any way? It leaves our tax base the exact same size but shifts the relative burden further onto an even smaller pool of very high earners.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,257 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    People in that bracket may actually have a reason to do overtime or additional work rather than handing over 40+% to the government for every euro earned over 40k. I know so many people who just take time off in lieu rather than get paid for overtime because of this exact reason.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,570 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    In reality what it will do in the near future is put further pressures on the new letting market, with the last of the "reluctant" landlords dumping their property whilst the market is still buoyant, it will also discourage this type of rental in the future. For the landlords who hang in their and become tax compliant it will further raise rental prices.

    We have already seen it in the student accommodation market where private landlords masked the chronic underfunding and planning to supply suitable student accommodation.

    If they really wanted to raise money, they simply could have just ended the tax breaks for the investment funds who are hoovering up property and driving up prices.

    "Genius" would be acknowledging there will be a negative side to this and plan appropriately, because a tax credit won't be much good to be people if they are forced to move back in with Mammy or live in a hotel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,703 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    I understand the basic idea; I take every second of overtime as time in lieu. By the time everything is taken into consideration, over 50% of any overtime would end up in the government coffers. I'm not sure that making it 40% instead of 50% would be the game changer you think it would; I'd continue to take time in lieu.

    It also doesn't address how this actually does anything to widen our tax base? You're talking about changes for the existing tax base, it still doesn't put a single extra body into that tax base, but rather reduces the taxation of a huge amount of that tax base, like I said pushing pressure upwards onto an even smaller tax base of very high earners.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,792 ✭✭✭✭murpho999


    What countries do you want to be compared too? UK is our nearest neighbour but ireland holds up well and is more similar to North European countries.



  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The overtime argument is always a bit ludicrous, its like not taking a promotion because you don't like the higher rate of tax.



  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    But this is incredibly rare, you'd literally have be making 36,800 for overtime to be 'pushing you into the higher tax bracket'. Its a made up complaint



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,748 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I laughed out loud at the spoofer Kwasi Kwarteng, quoted on Sky News online this morning. When speaking to panicked Tory MPs he's reported to have said 'I removed the 45p tax rate for higher earners, because we were out of kilter with Ireland'.!!

    In what way you lying sod and why should that matter to 'global ambition* Britain?!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,103 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It was blocks manufacturers who were responsible for the mica and pyrite issues. Why shouldn't there be a levy?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,257 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    I wouldn't have increased the threshold for USC for a start. That's narrowing the tax base.

    In a way you are correct but I suppose what I meant to say was widening the over tax take across a wider section by giving people an incentive to take home more pay at the end of each month while also adding additional money to the tax take. The current model discourages people working more hours because they lose so much of it in tax.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,471 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Is there any clarity on the new Childcare support?

    It mentions a 25% reduction in fees, up to 2100 savings a year, but is that per household or per child?

    Guy from KPMG on PrimeTime last night said if was per child but I am not so sure, I think its per household.

    So in effect, if you have two children availing of childcare, its really a 12.5% reduction not a 25% reduction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,792 ✭✭✭✭murpho999


    How is adjusting a threshold for USC narrowing the tax base?

    People will still pay USC just at a lowered rate. Tax base is not affected.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,133 ✭✭✭I see sheep


    What? Can you not read?

    I said it's funny people cry all the time about the dole being a great life but never do it themselves.

    "a terrible war imposed by the provisional IRA"

    Our West Brit Taoiseach



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,902 ✭✭✭thomas 123


    It’s not though, your not doing extra hours(in most cases) for no reason when you get promoted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,864 ✭✭✭893bet


    I think it will be per child. Makes no sense otherwise.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 14,288 Mod ✭✭✭✭pc7



    Is it confirmed if its the Universal subsidy increasing from 50c to 1.40 or the means tested one? Cant find any info only the leaks yday, thanks.



  • Posts: 3,330 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It's a brilliant idea. To claim your renters tax credit enter an indetifying piece of information on your residence. Revenue cross check it with their records. Oh there's a few landlords not declaring rental income, and they recoup the €500 many times over.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,610 ✭✭✭Luxembourgo




  • Posts: 3,330 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    This will drastically reduce the income tax take. Not sure you've thought this through.



  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 12,676 Mod ✭✭✭✭2011


    This is not the same for everyone.

    A consequence of a promtion is often that extra hours must be worked in my experience. Many of us are well into the higher tax bracket before we do any overtime.

    Due to resourcing issues many of us have no real choice other than to work overtime.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,513 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    When I first heard of this €500 credit I thought, great that'll pay for almost a third of the rent people pay... Then realised it was an annual credit, not a monthly one so completely farcical...

    I suspect the dodgy landlords you talk about will be asking tenants not to claim the credit and in return they'll reduce one monthly payment by €500



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,513 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    The shinners were calling for a price cap on unit prices, paid for by a windfall tax on energy companies profits... I think that's the one area where the civil war parties could have hoovered up the leftie votes instead of giving us money to pay the energy companies



  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    €500 tax credit a month would be farcial, christ.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭mohawk


    I agree about the national debt that it’s going to come back and really bite us so we should be paying it down more.

    Regards minimum wage workers they are a mixed bag. Some are young and it’s only a job for a bit of pocket money, some are women who are working in roles that they can fit around their children, some are women going back to work after raising their children, some are carers for elderly parents and just do part time hours, then there are those in very low paid industries. Everyone working is gaining skills and experience and therefore many will get opportunities to enter higher paid jobs. Sometimes people lack confidence to ask for pay rises, change roles or even careers, but the hardest jobs I ever had were those minimum wages jobs. Tax cuts don’t help the very lowest paid, that is where the welfare system hopefully comes in with things like HAP, medical cards etc. Realistically most people are better off working especially if they take a long term view.

    Many of us go through tough times in our lives and I definitely questioned working back when I had my eldest was in an entry level job, paying childcare, rent and had nothing left over at end of month. Thankfully I kept going moved roles, companies and industries along the way. It’s not possible for everyone on low wages but life will get better for many. It can be very hard to see light at end of tunnel when your in the thick of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,436 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    The Home Carers tax credit was increased, but just by 100 pa.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,863 ✭✭✭snowgal


    I think the budget was overall an ok one, everyone got something, no tax increases etc. The timing of this was great for the Government, I think they'll regain alot of voters, esp older now. 2 things for me:

    1 the whole idea of doing the budget now was to give people immediate relief for the coat of living crisis, as stated by Leo himself. However, I dont see anything really immediate to be honest..........

    2 I think this keeps people happy at the minute, on the lead up to Christmas, people worried about money and now theres abit of relax, relief. I still think that in December or maybe January, when people are getting their actual bills, they will get a shock that all is not as rosy as they think and that actually the energy credits, reliefs will not go far enough....



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,630 ✭✭✭jrosen


    I think overall the budget was ok. There did seem to be an attempt to make sure everyone got something. We benefit from the widening of the tax band, plus CB payments and energy payment.

    BUT and there is always a but, as a parent to teens in secondary school I am getting a little fed up on the constant supporting younger families. Free pre school, free Gp and now free books plus childcare supplement. Im not saying they shouldn't get it just the cost of raising a teen is far higher than a young child. I spent more on books for one child this year than I spent on books plus uniforms for 2 in primary school. There are many families who really find the cost of secondary difficult but who also dont qualify for any sort of allowance. I would hope there is a move from the dept of education to really push schools into keeping the same books, not this new edition crap which would allow parents to save up to 60% on book costs



Advertisement