Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Tesla Model 3 - V3.0

1253254256258259497

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 435 ✭✭mc2022B2TF


    You will be guessing by trying to extrapolate actual usable capacity from charging sessions.

    The 2 best ways to determine usable capacity are:

    1) Use the Scan my tesla app, but this requires a piece of purchased hardware

    2) Call Tesla and ask them - this is cheaper but you will be taking their word as being correct

    The 3rd way would be to get in your car when it's fully charged and drive it continuously until you get down to 0%. Look at the trips screen and see what the used energy figure for that trip is - it will always be rounded down to the nearest whole number. This is how i knew my battery was nowhere near what i believed. I have never seen the total used energy go above 51kWh. Others have said that they are getting 55kWh+ but i have yet to see any screenshots to back this up.

    On a side note i noticed that in the patch notes for the next software upgrade the energy app is going to show figures for energy used while driving, when idle and other activities non-driving related that use battery. Hopefully it will be decent and provide an insight.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,608 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    I think the OP is more getting at the battery capacity conversation rather than the known loses on charging.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,608 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Method 3 is not exactly a good way to do it as the screens trip computer doesn’t take into account any of the battery used for heating, lighting, 12v charging etc etc

    It purely gives you the kWh used for propelling the car.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,986 ✭✭✭rocky


    I thought it would account for everything while driving the car? Yes, when the car is stopped it won't count the Sentry Mode, preheating etc, but while driving, everything is included in the consumption.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 435 ✭✭mc2022B2TF


    I agree but it's a lot better than trying to extrapolate out figures from the app or your charger as there are way too many variables there and unknowns. I'd say if you could look at the coding in the Tesla app you'd be surprised where it gets its figures from, that's all i can say on that.

    Drive from 100% to 0% during the day with no heating or lights on and no phones plugged in or whatever and your energy consumption will be very close to the actual energy used. I've seen videos online and this is certainly the case - also remember that the M3 has a heat pump which drastically reduces the energy the battery used for heating the cabin.

    If you want an example of this, take a look at this video below - i have timestamped the link to the exact part - ok he didnt drive to 0% but he has extrapolated out the real world test and uses the trip data as his source. I did the same test yet i drove to zero and could only manage 51kWh - this also ties in with what Tesla have told me is usable.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnD_UZ5Jurs&t=687s

    Yet in the above video in a car delivered approx 10 months earlier than mine the usable battery is closer to 57kWh. So quite obviously a way smaller buffer in the end of 2021 model.

    Tesla have decreased the usable battery size by approx 5kWh since then (or at least in my particular car) but they have not decreased the WLTP advertised range. Maybe they expect us to all drive to about -10% to achieve this.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 891 ✭✭✭Zurbaran


    I asked before and I’m not trying to be smart or anything but what is the app telling you going into the car at a low state of charge to 100%? There are people who are measuring it outside the app and it is very close to what the app says. Of course there are losses in it but if yours is different to what mine has shown and the above example which looks the same at a slightly different state of charge. Then is there is a difference between yours and others cars?

    what the car output is important of course but if it’s the same as everyone else why would you be worried? No car does it’s estimated range unless driving incredibly easy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 435 ✭✭mc2022B2TF


    Last night it said it took 57kWh from 5% to 100 which just isn't right. I genuinely think the app just works off 100% = 60kWh and works back from there which is totally misleading.

    Let's take today for example. I charged to 100% and drove down and back from Dublin with no a/c and no lights. 30 mins stop off to meet a man about a dog and then straight home.

    At 50% remaining I had used 25kWh energy but it was at 25kWh for a few minutes so probably closer to 26. So extrapolated out that's almost 52kWh if I ran it down to zero. Totally consistent with what tesla have told me and from my own previous tests.

    I'm still waiting for others to post figures on a similar test but no one has yet.

    If someone can post some energy usage on a similar test showing more that 52kWh energy usage then I'll definitely be getting back on to tesla. I probably will anyway.

    My average energy usage is 150 wh/km which equates to 6.67km per kWh

    That means for me the car is a 345km range without having to drive past zero percent. When it should actually be 380km if the battery had a usable capacity of 57kWh like late 2021 lfp have.

    Like the battery capacity is 60.5kWh and the usable only 52kWh so I'm lugging around extra weight that can't be used. The buffer is pretty crazy.

    I'd appreciate if others could actually post some stats from their trips but no one seems to be coming forward yet but are happy to question my calculations without actually providing their own evidence.

    Ant takers?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 435 ✭✭mc2022B2TF


    So just clarify the challenge:

    Charge to 100%

    Drive until battery has 50% remaining

    No a/c or lights if possible

    Post a screenshot of your "since last charge" stats from the "trips" menu of the car

    Can you get more that 26kWh energy used?



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,608 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    As above.

    Must be a 2022 LFP car yeah?

    No point those of us with P’s or LR’s doing it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 435 ✭✭mc2022B2TF


    Yes a 2022 RWD LFP delivered from September 2022 onwards.

    No point in it being pre-Sept 2022 delivery either as they have already shown to have the smaller buffer. Something has changed buffer-wise in my car from those delivered earlier this year. Trying to see if it is widespread - if so, does it affect all Sept 2022 deliveries etc.

    I've seen people claim on this thread that they have gotten 55kWh+ from a Sept 2022 RWD but yet to see any evidence of it.

    As i said earlier this isn't a pi$$ing contest - its a genuine query to see if there are differences between Sept 2022 deliveries.

    And to be honest it's a fairly easy test that most people that own a RWD delivered in Sept could do quite quickly.

    Thanks.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 689 ✭✭✭Mike2006


    I will charge to 100% tonight and I will have 200kms done by Friday morning and I will let you know how I get on... I took delivery on 17th Sept and mine is also a RWD LFP.

    Mike



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 435 ✭✭mc2022B2TF


    Excellent - thank you!

    For ease of calculations it is best to take a picture of the TRIPS menu when as soon as the battery is at 50%.

    Good luck!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 97 ✭✭gkp1


    70% stats here if that helps. September RWD. By my calculations this would give 51.4kWh and 343km for 100%.

    image.png




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 435 ✭✭mc2022B2TF


    Thanks - figures look good! Ties in with what i'm seeing in mine - allow for a bit of rounding and we will call it 52kWh. Bang on with what Tesla have told me and what i'm seeing in my own car.

    Bear in mind that 148 wh/km was an efficient drive compared to your overall average efficiency of 160 wh/km

    My efficiency has settled around 154 wh/km but i do a good bit of motorway driving and i've put nearly 3000km on her already.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92 ✭✭gallagheri


    Would it make any difference, in a practical sense, if the battery is actually 60kwh but the buffer is, say, 8kwh? I mean, the battery capacity is still there, and you barely won't get to 55kwh (if you had a buffer of 5kwh instead of 8kwh) very often? It would be too close to 0%, and nobody does that really.

    That is of course, considering the battery is 60kwh in total, regardless of the distribution between usable and "buffer".

    This seems to be more of a battery life management strategy than something else from Tesla?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,246 ✭✭✭ADSLUSER


    Seeing similar results here with Sept 2022 RWD. 20kWh used = 62% remaining. That would equate to approx. 52.6kWh. With such a large buffer in use, it's worth getting back to Tesla to understand why this changed compared with pre-Sept LFP models. I think it's a very reasonable question to ask.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 435 ✭✭mc2022B2TF


    But sure that's like saying why don't we just have a 40kWh battery and that doesn't make any difference that a 50kWh. Of course it matters - ok the margins may be small enough but it all counts.

    I understand that it may be a battery management issue but if you need to pack in a 60.5kWh battery to only have 52kWh usable, that seems crazy.

    There is already a 2.5~3kWh "hard buffer" on the LFP's so adding another 6 seems excessive.

    However, more to the point is the advertising - Tesla increased the WLTP advertised range 409km to 448km to 491km over the past 3 years. I want to know what the 491km was based off as it coincided with the usable battery for late 2021/early 2022 models being increased to 57kWh (4.5kWh buffer). That's the range that i was advertised and bought. However that range has been reduced by reducing the usable battery size to 52kWh. On the face of it the product has been mis-sold with an incorrect WLTP range.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92 ✭✭gallagheri


    Don't get me wrong I agree with all the points you mentioned. Was just trying to validate my understanding of the issue (I just ordered the car and trying to get a hang of the whole EV/Tesla stuff). I agree it's a problem with the way the battery is advertised and the WLTP figures and should be made clear by Tesla.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 280 ✭✭jordan191


    I understand where you're coming from, but as far as i know Tesla don't advertise battery size in their specs, so technically they're not misleading anyone. It is a 60Kwh battery but they currently have it locked as a buffer & will probably unlock the additional buffer in the future



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,265 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    Tesla increased the WLTP advertised range 409km to 448km to 491km over the past 3 years.

    There was also a very short lived 428km WLTP version here which was a Fremont SR+ with original CATL battery and the heat pump as well as the interior refresh, and very soon afterwards our SR+ started coming from China with the LFP battery (which then became the 448km version).



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,919 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    Yes, there is range loss on-board. It's okay for folk like us to "know" there's an extra 30km range below zero but that's not the point. In car sat nav will not recognise this and decline a possible journey or route unnecessarily for a charging session.

    I don't need a 30minute reroute (taking into time distance reroute and potential charging time) when there's no need for it whatsoever

    My stuff on Adverts, mostly Tesla Pre Highland Model 3

    Public Profile active ads for slave1



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,580 ✭✭✭eagerv


    I wish that Tesla would show the total energy you are using, not just the energy while driving. You cannot rely on the energy used from the trip computer, I am sure the powerful chip, sitting in car with all on, plus of course Sentry etc add a good whack to this figure.

    My last car showed a total including all usage, so if you were stationary you could see what car was using, usually up to 2kW in normal weather, but much more in cold weather.

    The trip will not show you totally energy used, more accurate is what goes back in..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 435 ✭✭mc2022B2TF


    Next software update I believe the "energy" app is going to include all of this data.

    However on a dry day, no Aircon, no phone charging and no sentry is when I've done the tests so very little in reality is going to anything other than powering the car.

    As I've said before tesla have actually confirmed the massive buffer to me. Just looking for confirmation from a wider sample size that got rwds delivered in September 2022.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 891 ✭✭✭Zurbaran


    What confuses me is the amount they are taking in. I know there is losses involved but if I took in 54kWh 11% or whatever it was and others have done matching amounts at different percentages of battery and have had it verified by their charger.. Where did it all go if there is only 52kWh from 100 to 0? That seems a massive amount of loss?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,003 ✭✭✭✭mfceiling


    Quick question.


    Tyre size on the car is 235 35 20.

    Anything stopping me from going 235 45 20?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 435 ✭✭mc2022B2TF


    Although this guy is a bit of a nerd and also based in the US it does give a good idea of how charging loss works.

    https://youtu.be/AiCSnwoAs0c



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 435 ✭✭mc2022B2TF


    Basically forget about trying to extrapolate out from what your charger says or the cars says when it comes to charging, you're guessing with waaaay too much margin for error.

    Either:

    Get tesla to verify your usable battery

    Use the scan my tesla app

    Or do the real world test I have outlined last night

    Cheers.

    No one yet has been able to post any data to refute my calcs using any of the above parameters so it is looking like September rwd m3's are all at a usable battery of circa 52kWh



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 104 ✭✭drver1


    This was from 8%, got 56 kWh MIC Sept 2022 M3 From Supercharger.

    PXL_20220929_095628297.jpg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 435 ✭✭mc2022B2TF


    Sorry but that's not what we are looking for.

    Out of interest what did u get charged for I.e. in the app how many kwh were u charged for?

    If u have a screenshot of your trips screen before u charged that would also be interesting



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 435 ✭✭mc2022B2TF


    Like there is no way 56kwh went into your car. Given the battery only has 60.5kwh and has a hard buffer of about 3kwh.

    I genuinely think the calculation used there is on the assumption that 100% to 0% is 60kwh.

    In other words it's useless



Advertisement