Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1184518461848185018513690

Comments

  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I very much doubt there would be western support for the retaking of Crimea. There are a lot of genuine Russians there, it will be defended to the last, and may well tip Putin over the edge in terms of mobilisation or escalating the type of weaponry. It would an easy sell to the Russian public that Ukraine and NATO were actually invading Russian territory, would likely unify the hierarchy and media and would change the tone of the whole situation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,449 ✭✭✭nigeldaniel


    I would say they have one or two on here doing work placements to polish their online flubberblustering skills. As for Wagner lads, skills in crashing cars and shooting their own big toes off is about it.

    Dan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,115 ✭✭✭thomil


    If/when Kherson falls, Russia may not have much of a choice but to withdraw. It is in Kherson Oblast, more precisely at the Nova Kahovka dam, that the North Crimean Canal, the primary source of fresh water for Crimea, branches off. The canal provides 85% of drinking water for the peninsula. If this were to fall back into Ukrainian hands, Crimea would be left high and dry, literally. Don't forget that much of the land area of Crimea, up to 75%, consists of steppe land that has only been made arable thanks to the canal. Only the southeastern part of the peninsula, the Crimean Mountains, produce significant amounts of their own drinking water, mostly in the form of rain runoff from the mountains.

    As for international support for retaking Crimea, even that vacillating useless wet blanket called Olaf Scholz has on numerous occasions stated a return to pre-2014 borders is the only acceptable outcome of this conflict, and both the US and the UK have in the past gone on record in supporting this as well. I doubt that the latter two are going to go back on their word.

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,053 ✭✭✭jmreire


    I wonder how many recruits that little sales pitch yielded???? Prison in Russia maybe bad ( see Black Dolphin ) but the front ( or any lines ) in Ukraine would be infinitely worse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,002 ✭✭✭Dufflecoat Fanny




  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I’ll believe that when I see it. I’ve mentioned earlier that I’ve Russian friends who I have been in touch with and spoke in detail earlier in the conflict. They are anti Putin and against the whole thing….western educated and were employed by western business. But their view of Crimea was that it was Russian and took a very different perspective on it being part of this conflict. Even they could swing behind Putin if Crimea was in play.

    you’re right in that the next approach a probably to isolate it. Effectively put it under siege

    retaking Crimea by force may be supported but it will without question change the balance within Russia and would be a very bloody battle



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,053 ✭✭✭jmreire


    It will be Ukraine who decides the future of Ukraine, not the west or Putin. And my money would be on they restoring it to where it rightfully belongs, in Ukraine. And as for it being "Red Line" for Rusia, so what???? How many lines have they crossed now? ( Red Blue, Black Yellow? )



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    "By the way, cutting off water to civilians is a war crime. The Ukrainians cut the water supply to Crimea since 2014."

    Give us a break FFS!!!!!! Considering the havoc your heroes have inflicted on innocent people of the region.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    The thing about Kherson and Crimea is that it makes sense for Ukraine to expand their counter offensive that direction in coming months. It would also be a huge setback to Russia if Crimea were to be retaken. That might eventually bring home to the wider Russian public, what a complete cock up their government has got them in. Bringing the war to major Russian cities would also do that but that's not going to happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Reuters report on German equipment supplies planned. I'd forgotten about that circular arrangement they were working on.

    Reuters is reporting that Germany has given more details of its intention to supply further equipment to Ukraine. Defence minister Christine Lambrecht said in Berlin that her country will supply two more multiple rocket launchers to Kyiv.

    “We have decided to deliver two more MARS II multiple rocket launchers including 200 rockets to Ukraine,” she told a Bundeswehr conference, adding the training of the Ukrainian operators was expected to start in September.

    “On top of this, we will send 50 Dingo armoured personnel carriers to Ukraine,” Lambrecht announced, referring to a type of armoured vehicle.

    She also said a deal on a circle swap of infantry fighting vehicles with Greece and Ukraine was almost completed, meaning Germany would soon hand over 40 Marder IFVs to Greece while Greece, in turn, would pass on 40 of its Soviet-built BMP-1 IFVs to Ukraine.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭Hobgoblin11



    Zakarpattia Oblast, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ivano-Frankivska Oblast, Volynska Oblast, Khmelnytska Oblast, Poltavska Oblast, Kyiv Oblast, Kharkiv, Kharkivska Oblast, Donetsk Oblast, Zaporizka Oblast, Dnipro, Dnipropetrovska Oblast, Zhytomyr, Zhytomyrska Oblast, Vinnytska Oblast(16:50). Red Alert: aerial threat. Sirens sounding. Take cover now!

    Dundalk, Co. Louth



  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I think that taking the war to Crimea would be seen by many in Russia as taking the war to a major Russian city and would definitely solidify support for the war across the population (at least that’s the message from my small statistical sample of Russian work colleagues and friends)

    maybe it will be done and will be supported, but I think that the allies will pause and give it serious thought. It’s certainly not a no brainer, irrespective of what Zelensky wants



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,655 ✭✭✭Dubh Geannain


    They're already being told Western forces are operating in Ukraine and that Belgorod is under constant attack. Will they care more about Crimea than Belgorod?

    I'm not sure what the solution should be for Crimea myself but Russia can't be rewarded for taking it. If international peacekeepers could have been allowed in in 2014 we might have have more than a sham referendum.

    I think an independent Donetsk and Crimea should be negotiated as part of a Russian withdrawal with an eye to a referendum in each after a few years when the dust has settled. At that point the options could be integrate with Ukraine, integrate with Russia or defer for another period. Even though Russia hasn't even managed to take over the complete Donetsk but it can be claimed that it's giving them Russia some of their initial goals of going into Ukraine in the first place. I don't know though. Just spitballing really.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,613 ✭✭✭rogber


    A lot of criminals aren't the brightest. I can imagine plenty of men serving 10-15 years for brutal crimes fancying a stint in Ukraine, planning to murder some poor bloke in some random village, steal his clothes and slip anonymously into the a vast country where many speak Russian as a first language and just hope they don't get caught



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Two loud explosions have been reported this afternoon in the southern part of the Russian-occupied Melitopol, a city in the Zaporizhzhia oblast, Melitopol mayor Ivan Fedorov said on Telegram. He did not elaborate on the explosions, but hinted at “losses of the enemy”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,053 ✭✭✭jmreire


    And what about ( I know, I know...whataboutery!!! ) the original Crimean occupants ( Tatars? ?? ) who were driven out, and replaced with Russian passport holders? Same as what they did in Georgia??? And bear in mind, what has been going on since February in Ukraine has been a full scale war....never mind Putin.s "limited Military Action ", and now they are scraping the bottom of the military barrel for weapons and manpower..even to recruiting in the prisons, and getting weapons from N K. That does not sound to me presently like a Country in any condition to start another war.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,419 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    There's 140,000 Ukrainians that were bullied out of Crimea and their homes taken that might disagree @[Deleted User] .

    It's been a part of Ukraine since the 50's. Putin being allowed by the world to take it in 2014 was a precurser in allowing the thought process to develop in Russian military minds for this current invasion.

    Russia has enough of land and country as is to resettle any residents in Crimea that have an affinity with Putin's warmongering.



  • Posts: 2,015 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    When Russia says losses of the enemy,it means russian losses



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,507 ✭✭✭zv2


    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout



    Would they be prepared to actually join the army and fight for Crimea though? At the end of the day that's what Russia will need if and when it comes to that battle. There are only so many impoverished ethnic minorities and prisoners they can bribe to go off and fight for them. At some point they will need educated white, Christians from Moscow and St Petersburg.

    When 9/11 happened the US Army got a lot more volunteer recruits from the educated middle class. They felt like their country was under attack and it was their duty to defend it in whatever way they could. I am curious to see if Russians would feel the same way about the Ukrainians rolling into Crimea.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout



    I was listening to a podcast the other day and the host said that attacking Kherson region is similar to the USA attacking the pacific islands held by Japan during WW2. That's because in Kherson, the settlements are surrounded by vase expanses of flat fields where it is impossible to sneak up unseen. The Ukrainians therefore have to fight against defenders without any element of surprise in each village and town.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    @[Deleted User] I very much doubt there would be western support for the retaking of Crimea. There are a lot of genuine Russians there, it will be defended to the last...

    Of course they are going to retake Crimea wether it by force or the Russians leave,once the Ukrainans reach Crimea they will go hell for leather to take back what's theirs.

    A bunch of russian holiday maker's and retiree's won't change the outcome,

    Crimea will likely face massive derussafication,once the Ukrainans arrive it's the main reason they haven't targeted the kerch bridge



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,793 ✭✭✭greenpilot


    Sky were quite downbeat on Ukranian future options. They made the valid point that, while Ukraine has made some progress, there is now a huge amount of Russian troops in the Donbass, plus, the front line is now shorter, making it easier for Russia to defend. Ukraine better have the logistical support to keep driving on, or we are back to square 1.



  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I don’t disagree. I just don’t think it will be by way of full frontal assault with huge casualties on both sides plus civilians. Cut it off and negotiate is probably how it’ll play out.

    anyway, it’s way in the future. There’ll be twists and turns in the whole thing yet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,865 ✭✭✭✭josip


    How many Russian troops are still in the Donbass? 100,000? 50,000?

    A shorter front line is shorter for both sides.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,593 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Those saying that Ukraine cannot enter Crimea are ignoring that Crimea is not recognised by anyone internationally as being a legitimate part of Russia. They are viewed as illegal occupiers - therefore such an incursion would not breach Russian sovereignty (as far as the international community is concerned).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,223 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Well we know from that wounded Russian phone intercept that the Russian field hospitals are all full.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Not true at all .

    There will be a fight but it won't be a full frontal assault, were not talking WW2 anymore , ukraine took thousands of kilometers from Russians and yet there was no mass civilian casualties.

    The will happen in Crimea, once the Ukrainans arrive nobody is going to fight to the death against Ukraine,they Will all slink across the kerch bridge never to be allowed return to Ukraine



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,489 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Ya don't want too short a front line when himars can still target depots!

    So it would still be a 100 mile round trip for the Russians. Obviously less depending on how close Ukraine attack from.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Well they're almost guaranteed a victory in Kherson, at some stage. That's 20,000 Russian troops who cannot be adequately resupplied and will have some tough decisions to make in the near future. Whenever that does happen that will also free up a lot of Ukrainian troops and equipment. I certainly wouldn't be pessimistic about their options.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement