Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

A global recession is on the horizon - please read OP for mod warning

Options
1109110112114115375

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,364 ✭✭✭I see sheep


    Miracle if the continent survives?

    Are you predicting an meteor strike?

    "a terrible war imposed by the provisional IRA"

    Our West Brit Taoiseach



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,324 ✭✭✭jackboy


    It makes sense that the US would want Europe and especially Germany to be limited. German industry combined with Russian raw materials would be a potential serious challenge to US domination. Good relations between Russia and Germany is not in the interest of the US.

    in saying that, Russia started this war and only they are to blame. It just happens to be advantageous to the US.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,965 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Not really. The average rolling capacity for Ireland on-shore wind farms is around 32% of their name plate capacity. For the U.K. a recent report put their off-shore rolling capacity at 42%. But when you are talking about the average rolling capacity over a year for wind or solar it is meaningless. Baring shut for maintenance or breakdown fossil plants and nuclear plant will produce close to 100% of their name plate capacity if fed the fuel they need. For renewables they are intermittent and unreliable because they produce little or nothing if the wind isn`t blowing or the sun isn`t shining.

    The problem with wind generation is the one greens spend a lot of effort attempting to disguise with rolling average percentages. If you just take our on-shore rolling average at face value, you could easily believe that at 32%, twice again the number of turbines would provide 100% The reality is that for three extended periods in the past year we have had renewables, (which presently have enough name plate capacity theoretically to provide 75% of our needs), were providing just 6% and less for those periods. And that included hydro. The reality is that to achieve that 100% would not just require 2X the number of present turbines, it would require 16X the number.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,669 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Niccolò Machiavelli :

    "To ally with great powers to defeat your neighbour is a strategic trap; if you win, you become the slave of the greater power; if the allied power is defeated, you remain alone and defenceless against the angry neighbour, and you are destroyed." - Niccolò Machiavelli



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,669 ✭✭✭brickster69


    His profession was an illustrator for children's books and now he is in charge of Germany's economy and energy.🤦‍♂️


    Niccolò Machiavelli :

    "To ally with great powers to defeat your neighbour is a strategic trap; if you win, you become the slave of the greater power; if the allied power is defeated, you remain alone and defenceless against the angry neighbour, and you are destroyed." - Niccolò Machiavelli



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 29,985 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Comes across like Eamon Ryan with a German accent. Waffling on but hasn't a notion about life in the real world.

    This is the problem with ideologues and zealots like the Greens. They flounder badly when their notions are confronted by that hard unforgiving wall called reality.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,242 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Shale Gas. But in unproven quantities,


    So theoretically yes, as pointed out by ExxonMobils CEO and more importantly in this thread it is a 5 to 10 year project at full speed with full Govt support and that it will not meet the loss


    That's not to say it shouldn't be done but that it's a project for supplying in the 2030s.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,292 ✭✭✭Glenomra


    Funny if it wasn't so alarming. And to think that Germany prided itself on its economics know how!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,242 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    That's frightening, he is a senior minister. In a finance role FFS.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭jimmybobbyschweiz


    I live in Switzerland and we have 80% of our household electricity from renewable sources. Next year we may see up to 25% increases to our energy costs but that seems to be at the extreme end of the scale. In order to ensure energy security we will have to make some preservation measures but then we will not see our energy costs soar like you have in Ireland. This is understandable to those I have spoken to.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,930 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    I'm building a house currently and was speaking to one of my contractors the other day. He was speaking to a rep from Irish cement who have a big plant in Drogheda IIRC. Seemingly their electricity for the month of August 2021 was around €900k. August 2022 it was around €1.2m. That's going to have huge ramifications for the building sector and general inflation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭EOQRTL


    Honestly if it's only gone up that much they are doing really well. I know of businesses that have seen their bills at least doubled from this time last year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,635 ✭✭✭fliball123


    The fact that this rise is not any where near as much as what would of been expected could suggest that the construction sector is struggling. This bill should of been at least double with the amount of new housing the government are aspiring to have this year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,965 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Comparing Ireland to Switzerland on household electricity is apples and oranges unfortunately.

    Last year Switzerland generated 61.5% of it`s electricity from its 680 hydro plants and a further 35% from nuclear.

    Because of our geography there is little or no possibility of further increases for hydro, and greens here are determined to shut down any conversation on nuclear while at the same time being more than happy to avail of it through interconnectors.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,976 ✭✭✭enricoh


    If there's one thing I could never accuse roadstone of its being behind the curve with price rises!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 768 ✭✭✭dontmindme




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 644 ✭✭✭Darth Putin


    Hi, it took much less than five years for US fracking boom and then become independent and they were inventing/perfecting the technology at same time, Europe doesn’t have to reinvent wheel and there are already multiple eu countries bordering Russia where fracking is going ahead.

    in previous post I put down multiple solutions in three time ranges, many of these tasks can run in parallel

    short term (1 year): tax cuts, borrowing while we have low rates, business supports similar to covid, diversification of suppliers, filling stores (all of this is happening already to various degrees in Europe)

    medium term (1-5 years): drill baby drill! build all the renewables and storage possible as fast as possible

    long term (5-15years): interconnections, nuclear power, hydrogen, more renewables and storage, electric cars

    There is no reason why Europe can not be energy independent, prosperous and transition to lower co2

    The only opposition comes from Kremlin funded useful idiots and some of the “Greens” who rabidly oppose nuclear and gas



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 644 ✭✭✭Darth Putin




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,669 ✭✭✭brickster69


    ECB rates up 75 Bps

    Niccolò Machiavelli :

    "To ally with great powers to defeat your neighbour is a strategic trap; if you win, you become the slave of the greater power; if the allied power is defeated, you remain alone and defenceless against the angry neighbour, and you are destroyed." - Niccolò Machiavelli



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,388 ✭✭✭UsBus


    75 bps, strap in lads...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    They are afraid of the people. Seeing what happened in Prague this weekend it is army in the street or early retirement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,149 ✭✭✭monkeybutter


    how did we all survive when it was 3 and 4 % and feckin booomin, save us all, back to normality



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    The force is strong with you. Naivety as well. When the Russian gas will be in your possession then you can set price cap.

    Lol beggars trying to choose :)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    Yep. It is called bitch slap. That is what we are going to get in our face in about a month or two.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    These guys created echo chamber in their russophobic thread and become quite bored there. That is why they come and try to pollute other places with their hateful rhetoric.

    No matter what you try to debate they always go for "but Putin" 🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,714 ✭✭✭Deub


    Lol. You should check the list of threadbanned posters from the Russia thread and look who is posting here.

    Post edited by Deub on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135


    I would bet my life savings (not much), that the ECB would have only gone 25Bps if they had not got the new 'Transmission Protection Instrument' or money printing press that allows them to pump money into the PIGS bonds. 75bps now is a cop out to make them look like their trying to do something.

    I honestly have absolutely no faith in anyone at the ECB - they are a shambles, out of their depth and worst of all have the worst and hardest job a central bank has probably ever faced for the next few years trying to juggle all these timebombs whilst keeping the show on the road.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135


    Fracking will never ever be an option for Ireland. Geologically and Environmentally it is way too dangerous with our rainfall, and watertable levels. You keep spouting on gas reserves in Sligo, North West of Ireland one of the places in Ireland with the heaviest rainfall and highest watertable. It would be insanity to even attempt it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,299 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    The ECB expect a slowdown, but not a recession:

    "After a rebound in the first half of 2022, recent data point to a substantial slowdown in euro area economic growth, with the economy expected to stagnate later in the year and in the first quarter of 2023. Very high energy prices are reducing the purchasing power of people’s incomes and, although supply bottlenecks are easing, they are still constraining economic activity. In addition, the adverse geopolitical situation, especially Russia’s unjustified aggression towards Ukraine, is weighing on the confidence of businesses and consumers. This outlook is reflected in the latest staff projections for economic growth, which have been revised down markedly for the remainder of the current year and throughout 2023. Staff now expect the economy to grow by 3.1% in 2022, 0.9% in 2023 and 1.9% in 2024."



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,635 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Have they ever got this right? Their predictions normally turn out to be overly positive when the outcomes play out.



Advertisement
Advertisement