Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Westmeath school gets temporary injunction banning a suspended teacher from it's premises

18911131476

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,867 ✭✭✭✭BattleCorp


    The family excel academically but ................

    download.jpg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 908 ✭✭✭French Toast




  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,287 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Again however, in that case the person involved followed the procedures and went through the process and eventually the court found in their favour.

    Which is how it should be - Follow the process to the end and accept the outcome whatever that might be.

    The Burke family have a history of not doing that - They feel they are "wronged" in some way and then they completely over react and behave dreadfully at every turn and refuse point blank to engage in any kind of process to remotely attempt to resolve the issue.

    As much as a don't like it . he is absolutely entitled to his viewpoint - But there is a way to do things which he and his family seem to think doesn't apply to them.

    They seem to feel that once their moral alarm has been set off that then they are free to rant and rave and disrupt without any care or attention to any other party involved.

    That is the entirety of the issue at hand - Not Pronouns or otherwise , it's him and his appalling behaviour and his refusal to engage in any form for mature discourse or negotiation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,921 ✭✭✭John Doe1


    The old zealots vs the modern zealots😅

    If I was a teacher and a kid asked me to call them Spongebob Squarepants, i would do it to be nice but that would not make me believe they were an animated sea sponge



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,232 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    Agreed. EB isnt a nice person but hiniting he should be raped in prison like a few posters here have done is disgusting.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,232 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    Not sure how thats relevant. Maya Forstater didnt go shouting the odds, chasing her boss around the place and have to be legally restrained from turning upto her workplace.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Posts: 264 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Just an example that some things just aren't as " cut and dried " as some may think .

    As regards the teacher's actions , I would definitely agree with yourself and others that he acted like a " complete Tool " ( to put it mildly ) . He should have sought legal advice and followed due process .

    I am also of the opinion that the school shares some responsibility for this issue also . The teachers beliefs should have been given more consideration , instead of what looks like some " decree " being issued .

    We should live in a society where ALL faiths / beliefs / versions of humanity live in harmony.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,959 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    No the dangerously simple fúckwit who chased his female boss around and refused to vacate a school is the bad one.

    Anything else you near clarity on, I'm here. 👍️



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Again, establishing facts via boards posts, dont be silly 😂

    I'm very familiar with the current attempt to pull a three card trick around pronouns from the quarters that are trying to do the same with sex.

    For hundreds of years we were not referring to people as they/them because that person was neither a "he" or a "she", because we knew that such a notion was all guff and nonsense. As it is now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,954 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    In your opinion,

    In my opinion also someone complaining about not being called "They" shows the world has gone mad



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 195 ✭✭FoxForce5




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,049 ✭✭✭growleaves


    He followed her around a hall and "questioned her loudly" 😦😦😦 Yes it's improper but I can't say I'm shocked to the core of my being.

    I've seen worse things in places I've worked - both on construction sites and in offices.

    The pronoun angle, with the initial clickbait coverage, is how it came to be national news. Breaking the injunction is fairly dramatic though I grant you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,413 ✭✭✭h2005


    How the hell was he ever hired? A 2 second Google will tell you all you need to know about him and the family of shitheads he comes from. The school board of management have a lot to answer for. Hiring him was really negligent on their behalf.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,991 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    I think the major objection is his standing up and declaiming the issue at a public event to mark the 260th anniversary of the school and, reportedly, persistently following the principal at the event speaking loudly to the extent that others had to intervene to shelter the principal.


    If true these are certainly very poor behaviours and would seem to justify a suspension pending an investigation. To then continue to come into school premises and subsequently thwart an injunction not to do so means that it is essentially irrelevant whether the school had grounds to require him to respect the pupil’s views. He certainly does not seem to act in a sensitive and child-centred manner.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,991 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    In fairness, construction sites and offices are rarely populated by children. Whatever the merits of his original complaint, his failure to try and deal with them appropriately will likely be his undoing.


    likewise with his sister, the family picketed Arthur Cox on a number of occasions after she left. Personally that was not in her best interest irrespective of the merits of her case. It would make any future employer wary. Their behaviour at the WRC marks them out as failing to respect accepted procedures etc. I thought that the should not have had to take the case to get accredited grades for their home-schooled child and the DoEd should have seen that it was likely to work out. They succeeded by following procedure in that case.


    elsewise it seems that if the procedures don’t follow their chosen path then they act like belligerent toddlers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Well, in fairness, he might have been a decent teacher, all things aside. That said, I wonder how long he teaching there and what the kids thought of him before that.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,355 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    Clearly you're not very familiar with the facts on hand and you might learn something from boards posts. While I wouldn't ever suggest you take them as gospel, when they point at something elsewhere that you can check, they're an excellent starting point. So here's a couple for you. Are Chaucer, Shakespeare, and Jane Austen good enough as sources for singular they?

    Singular "they/them" pronouns are nothing new.


    Examples of the singular "they" being used to describe someone features as early as 1386 in Geoffrey Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales and also in famous literary works like Shakespeare's Hamlet in 1599.


    "They" and "them" were still being used by literary authors to describe people in the 17th Century too - including by Jane Austin in her 1813 novel Pride and Prejudice. ~ https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-49754930


    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,959 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    I've seen worse things in places I've worked - both on construction sites and in offices.

    Cool, we should base what is acceptable in work based on your anecdotes

    I'll email the WRC.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,049 ✭✭✭growleaves


    I didn't say it was acceptable. I said was "improper".



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,959 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Did someone complain? Or did you just invent that?

    My definition of mad would be a weaselled faced hateful cúnt using the story of God to legitimise his scumbaggery in a school.

    Maybe he can reflect when he is in the Joy.

    Amen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,959 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Yeah, but in reality you and the boys chasing each other around on construction sites aside, what he has done is probably a firing offence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,232 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,049 ✭✭✭growleaves


    Yeah probably but there's a limit to how shocked people can claim to be by it.

    Given your language ('c*nts') I doubt you fainted from indignation when you heard the story first.



  • Posts: 4,575 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    There is nothing alleged about behaviour, as it was witnessed by a room full of people and by those who had to intervene to stop him from following the principal around the venue.

    There is also plenty of examples earlier in the thread of when its appropriate to refer to one person as "they" or "them".

    Again - If only you had bothered to read it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,959 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    That's about as relevant as your construction site anecdote.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,049 ✭✭✭growleaves


    Lol. It is relevant if you can't even be part of a discussion without becoming intemperate but at the same time we're meant to believe you're shocked to your very core by intemperate behaviour (raising one's voice etc.)

    Do you not see how your own behaviour is going to affect how others judge your sincerity?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,959 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Lol. I don't think cursing on the internet is the same thing as chasing my boss around aggressively or being in contempt of court, also I don't think I am the one that is being judged here. Extremely bizarre tangent you are on.

    David Koresh Lite will be, Monday apparently.

    I imagine by the time all the judging is finished he will be unemployable.

    Amen to that.



  • Posts: 756 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    1. Quin_Dub posted the following: “The School make a completely legal and reasonable request for all Staff to treat a child going through a challenging time with dignity and respect.”

    In fairness this was described as a simplified version which is entirely accurate.

    I’m going to leave the rest of the events and injunction aside.

    The description offered while accurate about the legal basis is very much an interpretation which elides some very interesting areas. It may well be that the elided areas never see the light of day in court. In other words, Mr Burke may have, in the current metaphor, chosen the wrong hill to die on.

    The school allegedly made a decision to ask staff to accept and use the new name and pronouns of a transgender student who was transitioning. Note that the verb “ask” isn’t quite what it seems. In normal usage it implies a right of refusal. That is a ground of contention in this episode if not the current High Court case.

    Mr Burke allegedly refused to do that. He was placed on paid administrative leave.

    Had Mr Burke avoided the rest he might have been on a very interesting legal trail. That would be a clash between school ethos/characteristic spirit and the transgender issue which is supported in Irish law. As it’s a CoI school the ethos may be somewhat more …. elastic. Wrong hill Mr Burke.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,049 ✭✭✭growleaves


    You don't sound like a withering violet to me.

    I suppose he'll work for himself or the mammy after all this.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement