Price advertised not being honoured on website

OP is right, he is armed with "facts" therefore all of our opinions and every customer service agent is wrong. Ticket closed. Please open a fresh ticket if you have further queries.

I asked you a question as my first reaction, that is not an assumption. The fact that you believe that a question is an assumption would now lead me to believe that your comprehension of a situation isn't to be relied upon 100%... that is an assumption, for the record, based on the evidence that you've presented.

I then provided my opinion in answer to both of your questions. In no case would my answer to both questions change regardless of the "facts" that you presented and my answer was not based upon any assumption or pre-empting your answer to my question. I don't think you should ever be entitled to the lower price based on the company's mistake on the website nor do I believe they should offer it as a gesture of goodwill, even if in fact the website was the issue rather than your own interpretation of the terms.

At no point did you specify in your post whether any T&Cs were referenced anywhere in the page. I find it hard to believe that you dealt with any reputable retailer that did not link to a cafefully worded T&C page that would caveat a price so hence why I asked the question! If a price states "for €999" but there is a link somewhere on that page to a T&C page that states prices may vary at checkout based on factors such as the plan chosen then that is in effect a from price and has been clearly stated as such. That was my question, not an assumption. But in general, the main problem is becoming more obvious the longer I interact with you.

That's an assumption right there! How do you know that I don't work there and haven't been reviewing your case notes? Not many people in a similar situation or attitude to yourself on that small island!

Yes because that would be very clever on a public forum discussing a very specific and pedantic issue and all opinions expressed are solely my own without misreprenting anyone else.

Yes I know the answer and I know the T&Cs and the general law is not in your favour for getting the fully reduced price. A reduced price on the higher plan is not a reduced price but the purchase price deferred across the life of the contract so therefore you're unreasonbly asking the business to take a loss based your intrepretation of how their system should work since it didn't suit you when you saw the final price displayed to form the contract. You'll need to pin your hopes on grinding someone down to get a favourable result more out of appeasement than anything else.