Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

15625635655675681836

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,026 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    phenomenal opportunity for younger players and for older guys who have dropped down the list

    I really hope we don't see the older guys who've dropped down the list. This tour shouldn't be about them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    “Phenomenal opportunity” seems to be overstating things to me, tbh.

    And I’m not convinced it’ll have little or no effect on the league; 2nd thru 6th was really close fought and exchanged hands a few times over the final weeks of the season last year. And we know home advantage can count for a lot.

    But it’s practically impossible to quantify, so I agree it’ll probably be forgotten about by seasons end. Possibly with one caveat.

    This tour is adding additional games to an already stretched calendar, at a time when player welfare is already in the limelight. If there are (m)any significant injuries, I can see this tour receiving criticism after the fact tbh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    The opposition is irrelevant, compared to the time in camp. With the coaches, learning the systems. Giving the coaches times with players.

    Playing for their provinces against slightly better opposition will benefit Ireland how? Will benefit the players how?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    It’s two games that will be mildly affected. Probably won’t affect the outcomes. If any of the provinces are that badly affected by missing a McCloskey, Prendergast or a Coombes. Then they are probably not good enough to compete anyway.

    Will those games be any less affected than the 2 games in the middle of the 6N? Or the one directly after the 6N. International rugby will always be more important to the unions than the URC. It creates far higher revenue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,471 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    If that squad comes to pass we'll struggle to field a backline in the URC. I'd say Marcus Rea would be the sort of player that Farrell would be looking at as well.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,471 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    I'm not massively against the idea, but it would make more sense to go during the November tests when there are no URC matches (at least there weren't last year). Obviously that would mean sending a completely different coaching and management team which may miss the point of the tour I suppose.



  • Administrators Posts: 56,516 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    If the opposition is irrelevant they'd be as well playing a few games against Lansdowne seniors.

    I would suggest the URC is not only "slightly" better than currie cup teams.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,779 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    I think we ultimately need to wait and see what happens. If they are selecting a few fringe players and then a bunch of kids while also releasing the front line internationals then there may be little to no impact on the provinces and the league. If that’s the case then it’s no big deal.

    If, on the other hand, they take a large group of fringe players and aren’t releasing the internationals then it is a big deal and a terrible move. And there may be degrees in between.

    At this point we simply don’t know what this is going to be nor what the impacts are going to be. So we simply can’t call how good, bad or indifferent the tour is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I think you’re generally a quality poster and contributor here Stephen, so I’m a bit surprised at this:

    If any of the provinces are that badly affected by missing a McCloskey, Prendergast or a Coombes. Then they are probably not good enough to compete anyway.

    We’ll have to wait and see the squad announced, but I think it could easily have a material affect tbh. You’ve possibly singled out the 3 best / most important players for Ulster, Munster and Connacht. And judging by the Māori game (which was referenced in the announcement) it’ll be a lot more than that. Missing for 3 games.

    I don’t see how that is anything other than a material impact.

    And I would’ve thought after last year that even Leinster would’ve learned that the margins towards the end of the season can be fine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,718 ✭✭✭ersatz


    I actually had Marty Moore in mind with that. He was playing well last season and if he keeps it up then I coould see him benefit from tour, if he travels obvs.



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators Posts: 56,516 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    What players from Ulster and Munster do you think they can select where there would be no impact on them, even if the internationals are released?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,294 ✭✭✭TRC10


    The only way it makes sense IMO, is if the touring party is mostly made up of high potential young players who need game time, but wouldn't be involved for their province anyway.

    I'm thinking Jack Boyle, Michael Milne, John McKee, Scott Buckley, Tom Clarkson, Keynan Knox, Izuchuckwu, Edwin Edogbo, Thomas Ahern, Daniel Okeke, Alex Soroka, Alex Kendellan, Matthew Devine, Sam Prendergast, Jack Crowley, Cathal Forde, Jude Postlethwaite, Patrick Campbell etc.

    These guys will likely be holding tackle bags in September anyway, so getting them games makes sense. But taking players out of competitive URC games against good opposition, to go play meaningless games against sub-URC level opposition makes literally no sense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,969 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    It would have to be a meteoric rise for some them to push their way into contention for the World Cup 33. I could see Loughman, Ahern, Deegan - those sorts of players - benefitting from being included, if only because it would probably make them more viable options in Farrell's mind for further Ireland selection later on. But, I suppose we'll wait and see.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,779 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Loughman, Ahern, Treadwell, Kendellan, Crowley, Campbell, Moore, McIlroy all spring to mind. Guys like EOS, Casey or even Doak could go as well without it being the end of the world for the provinces if guys like Warwick, Murray and Cooney were available. I’m sure there’s others that I can’t think of off the top of my head.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,064 ✭✭✭jacothelad


    Sad to say that McIlroy does not have the pace for international rugby despite his other attributes.



  • Administrators Posts: 56,516 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Here's the thing. You either

    1. Pick players who are on the fringe of the Ireland team, who are realistically in a position to get into the squad for the RWC. As far as I know, there are no players in this category, outside of Leinster, who are not very important players for their province.
    2. Pick players who are not important provincial players. As far as I know, there are no players in this category, outside of Leinster, who have a hope in hell of getting into Ireland's senior panel for the RWC.

    #1 **** all over the league, and #2 is pointless.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,779 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    But again, how much of this is purely RWC focused? Is some of it even more long term focused too? Two birds with one stone type thing. Are there guys like Larmour or Frawley where they want to work on very specific things? Are there areas of depth that we want to address specifically by bringing in guys like Loughman and Ed Byrne at LH? Are we keen to develop a bigger tighthead lock type player in someone like Joe McCarthy as well as trying to get promising guys like Treadwell to kick on?

    I can’t imagine there’s a singular purpose here. There’s probably multiple things they are looking to do depending on position and player. And then there could well be a bunch of guys being brought to bring up the numbers and facilitate the whole thing. It’s probable that not all 30+ players are being looked at for the RWC and those that aren’t will be younger guys down the depth chart in the provinces, but who have promise longer term. It might just be a dozen guys or so that they are looking at them in the short term, but deem those players/positions to be important.

    But this is the problem. We just don’t know. Forming an opinion on such little information just seems pointless to me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    But again, how much of this is purely RWC focused?

    This is the IRFU source quote when it was announced:

    “If you look at the lessons from the World Cup in England and Japan I think the depth was an issue in both,” an IRFU source said. “Andy was happy with how much the players learned in New Zealand, so he wants to extend that to give us the required depth for the World Cup. That’s probably 45 when you take into account injuries before the tournament and then when it’s up and running.”

    If we're talking about longer-term promise, I daresay those players would be better off getting gametime against higher calibre opposition, and an interpro.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,209 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    We’ve had years of people complaining about Ireland making the same mistakes at the World Cup. Try something different and it’s being called either pointless or crapping on the URC.

    I doubt he’s bringing players who haven’t a hope of making the WC, it’ll be the guys who played the Māori barring players like Earls and players just outside that level who could get a call up to the WC for injuries.

    I like it it’s a different approach and shows they are at least trying something, the level of opposition is probably no where near as important as getting these players into a camp and not having them as the midweek team whilst the starters do slightly different things.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,779 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    And maybe I’m reading that wrong, but that reads to me that they want 45 guys capable of going to the RWC. The squad size is 33. That’s where the 12 figure I mentioned came from. If they are looking at guys outside the 33 then 12 or so is the number they are looking at. Now how many of the guys they bring are in contention for that 12 and how many are making up the numbers/longer term investments we can’t tell yet. But the overall point is that it’s probable that not all 30+ players are in contention for that back-up RWC group.

    And within that back-up group there may be different things they want to bring on. Maybe they want to develop leadership abilities among some. Maybe they want to identify genuine competition for the RWC squad in others. There’s loads of things that could be going on. Right now it’s impossible to tell what the objectives are and what the impact on anything will be.

    There is a lot of me playing devils advocate here, and if it turns out this has a big impact on 1 or more provinces it would want to be a very productive tour to be worthwhile and I’m not sure it would be. I’m open to the idea that this is total BS. But I’m not going to assume it is when I know feck all about it.



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators Posts: 56,516 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    This is serious strawmanning.

    Being unhappy at our lack of depth in the past does not mean you have to approve of this bizarre move.

    Honestly, the IRFU could have announced they're taking the lads to Butlins for a week and we'd still be hearing how this is going to be valuable time for the group, they'll learn how to live in a hotel for a while.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,779 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    I absolutely love your cynicism. Honestly. Never change!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Two points come to mind on this:

    1. This could turn out to be a productive tour for Ireland AND impact the provinces in the URC. Not saying you, but 1 or 2 seem to be minimising that.
    2. We don’t need to know the aim to have a reasonable guess at what the outcome for the provinces is likely to be. Given the tier of player the tour seems to be aimed at, it’s not unreasonable that the likes of Hume, Lowry, Stockdale, Baloucoune, Doak, Timoney, Treadwell, O’Toole and EOS could all be missing for an interpro v Leinster, say.

    The International game will always have primacy here, but imo it’s just a shame it’s at the expense of the domestic game when we seemed to be making strides in the right direction there recently.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,209 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    Ah everything is strawmanning on the internet now. Especially talk of trips to butlins.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,122 ✭✭✭Shehal


    Got to love the irony of people complaining about players missing big URC games when in the next breath they **** on the URC for not being able to prepare players for test rugby...which one is it? Or do these people just want to have a moan?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    We’ve had years of people complaining about Ireland making the same mistakes at the World Cup. Try something different and it’s being called either pointless or crapping on the URC.

    This can be trying something different, positive for Ireland AND, for want of a better phrase, “crapping on the URC”. It can be all of those things.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    See the problem with this argument? If the URC doesn’t prepare players for Test level, then playing against a lower calibre of player in a tour certainly isn’t.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    I was referring there to posters who keep saying how big an Impact missing McCloskey for 3 games would have on Ulster. Which I think is completely overblown. If they are that reliant on one player, then it doesn’t say much about the state of Ulster rugby. That loosing one player would diminish their value as a team.

    If as I believe will be the case, the frontline internationals aren’t available. Leinster could be missing nearly 30 players here. So it will probably affect Leinster to a larger degree than any other province. They will be away to Ulster, which they would probably lose one way or the other and have sent a weakened team for no matter what. Then have the Sharks at home. By that point I would expect the frontline internationals to be available as their pre-season will be completed. Which means if anything a stronger team than we would have otherwise put out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,122 ✭✭✭Shehal


    The calibre of opposition isn't really relevant here because the main point of this tour would be young players get to be part of the environment and high calibre of coaching that there is in the Irish set up plus they get insight on the ropes what goes on at test level, for a young player this is invaluable and if one or two impress it might go a long way to getting them in with a shout of the Autumn squad.


    In regards to the affect this will have on the URC people forget the likes of Porter to Doris, JGP to Keenan will all still be around...worst case scenario you can play these guys for afew rounds, plus its only 3. I think people are massively over exadurating how much impact this tour will have on the URC, if it was 5-6 rounds + maybe they would have a point but 2 or 3 nah.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,940 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    “In regards to the affect this will have on the URC people forget the likes of Porter to Doris, JGP to Keenan will all still be around”

    I don’t think people are forgetting this at all tbh, and is part of the exact point they’re making; that some people are viewing this thru blue tinted specs.



Advertisement
Advertisement