Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Donald Trump discussion Thread IX (threadbanned users listed in OP)

19394969899164

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,213 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    True, but the CFO of the Trump ORg pleading guilty to fraud is. And as Trump always claims, he was the brains, he made the deals.

    There are two options. Either Trump knew about what the CFO was up to and therefore is implicated, or he didn't know and never suspected anything.

    Option 1 speaks for itself. Option 2 means Trump hasn't a clue what is going on, isn't able to control his own companies and staff, cannot understand the information presented to him and has no ability to understand risks or see potential issues.

    Which one are you going to pick?



  • Posts: 821 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    In that case, how many votes did these Facebook posts sway to win the election for Trump. If you can state explicitly that public opinion can be hacked then surely you can put a number on the amount of votes that were swayed?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,213 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Russia my have interfered, China may have interfered, Iran may have interfered. But the idea that Trump colluded with Russia to get him elected is a debunked conspiracy theory aka “a hoax”.


    Why are you still beating this drum? So what if he did or didn't at this point. He made sure the GOP avoided ever holding him to account, he got in an AG that lied in his summary of the report so as to make it look like there was no case to answer.

    But again, so what? Is it that you believe that he was unfairly treated? That a POTUS shouldn't be held to account if it is even suspected that he conspired with a foreign country to alter the outcome of an election?

    None of that gives him the right to continue to try to steal an election he lost. None of that gives him the right to try to bully state governors to make up votes for him. None of that gives him the right to allow the insurrection to happen and do nothing to stop it. None of that gives him the right to debase the democratic system of the country. He faced an investigation and was found not to have a case to answer. Happens to people everyday. He is not some special put upon person.


    But even after all that, what you have is clear evidence, and accepted by Trump himself, that he stole classified documents and failed to give them back even when they were requested. Do you not see any issue with that?



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,287 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    ##Mod Note##

    Brenbrady thread-banned for a week.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,222 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Edit: just seen the mod note



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,021 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    I never said influenced, you asked for proof, which I gave in the form of an FBI warrant, usually they're not issued on the basis of a 'hoax' as judges who issue them can face disbarrment for that. To dispute the judicial system's motivations is not exactly becomming of the party of law and order now is it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,727 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    It's not a myth. It's a lie.

    A lie that idiots wish to believe in.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Just to get a taste of what Ron DeSantis will probably pursue if he runs on the 2024 ticket...His attempts at a "Woke Act", targeting Critical Race Theory and gender dialogues in the workplace or classrooms, have been shot down at the Federal Level. I last saw DeSantis attacking some kids at a press conference for wearing masks.

    Trump losing hasn't seen the last of this dog whistle, anti-free speech, tactic from the right of centre. Funny how those who scream loudest about cancel culture et al are the ones trying to actually codify the muzzling of free speech.

    Reads exactly like a vague, wishy washy law that was designed purely to appeal to the base that believes "woke" is ruining America, and would probably have been a nightmare to enact. I'd be lying if I said I didn't find workplace diversity training tedious ... but I see their value at the same time. Mine is not the only perspective and banning that kind of inclusivity or awareness is a slippery slope.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,684 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Senator Graham has lost his latest attempt to avoid giving testimony before a grand jury as a federal judge denied his application. The senator tried to persuade the judge that his conversations with Georgia state election officials about the Georgia vote result loss for Trump was part of his senatorial duties but the judge was having none of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,684 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Trump's legal team has asked a federal judge to appoint a special master to review the documents the FBI took from his Mar-A-Lago home and block the DOJ from reviewing them. It might be a further attempt to pursue the "lawyer-client privileged documents" angle in the hope a neutral person might find some such item amongst the documents seized by the FBI and drag out the DOJ/FBI job of finding definitive evidence of criminal acts by him when he took the documents from the White House - taint the evidence as it were. No pun intended, just the legal term used to describe what they ARE trying to do.

    Post edited by aloyisious on


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    So these same documents which are private lawyer/ client communication, are also classified documents, un-classified documents, planted by the FBI and also don't exist because he'd already handed them back, even though he didn't have them?!?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,684 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    That about sums it up, Plus Don knows the FBI, because its Federal, can be trusted to abuse the trust placed in it. He should know having gone through several AGs and heads of FBI he found disloyal in his own administration. When it come to documentary evidence, some he's claiming is from his own hand, I'd imagine his lawyers see the FBI reading Trump his rights like this: you are not obliged to say anything unless you wish to do so but whatever you say will be taken down in writing, twisted around and used in evidence against you....



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,287 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    In other news , that again will surprise absolutely no one with a functioning brain - Bill Barr lied his ass off about the Mueller report before it was published to protect Donald Trump.


    It is now apparent that the March 2019 memorandum recommended reaching a conclusion on the evidentiary viability of an obstruction-of-justice charge as a means of preempting a potential public reaction to the Mueller Report. In that light, if the Department’s submissions to the district court had connected the memorandum to a decision about making a public statement, then the district court might well have concluded that the memorandum was privileged. But that is not how the Department elected to justify its invocation of the privilege in the district court.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,684 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Can Barr be prosecuted for obstruction of justice and/or contempt of congress by making and/or [as the lead lawyer in the DOJ and for the nation - a position outside that of personal lawyer of the president] releasing a deliberately misleading, if not fraudulent, statement about the Mueller report content and what the report author meant on what was legally permissible for congress to do on receipt of the report? Is there a statute of limitations bar on going after an AG who lied to pervert the route of justice and mislead the courts on the actions of the president? It's only a few short years since Barr made his pronouncement about the Mueller report.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,287 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    The answer to "Could Barr be charged" is probably yes , but the chances of it happening are next to nil.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,684 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Best to try and get him turn states evidence then. He should know when and where it's best not to abuse the 5th and when it's necessary if he does take the stand or sit in a committee room before it's lawyers to reply to it's questions. Hopefully he'll offer testimony when he see's Trump is no longer any career use to him, like when Trump is reaching for a lifebelt and not the nearest neck.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,684 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    It seems that Trump's legal team basing its application to the judge for a special master to review the documents is around it's reading of the 4th amendment on the rights of home-owners to be protected from improper search and seizure. In a statement he released in conjunction with the legal team's move, Trump is also contending the use of a warrant by the FBI was not needed . His statement includes this claim: “This Mar-a-Lago Break-In, Search, and Seizure was illegal and unconstitutional, and we are taking all actions necessary to get the documents back, which we would have given to them without the necessity of the despicable raid of my home, so that I can give them to the National Archives until they are required for the future Donald J. Trump Presidential Library and Museum.”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,618 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    IMHO his attempt at having a special master appointed is 2 weeks too late. A competent legal team would have made an application for that on the day of the raid. The claim of privilege over anything that the FBI took? Is moot, they've had it 2 weeks and no judge is going to revoke evidence or stay any material retrieved from the execution of a valid search warrant.

    All this effort does is keep Trump's claims of "illegitimate search" active and in the news even though it is an action that will be struck down. Trump is playing to the crowd whilst DoJ is finally doing its job and building their case.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,287 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    More lies and fantasies.

    The warrant was needed because they've been "asking" for over a year and still didn't get everything back.

    Also the "Presidential Library" isn't his either, so even when Presidential documents go there they are still not his to take and have.

    And to top it off the legal precedent his submission is trying to leverage around privilege doesn't exist - His crack team of lawyers quote from a page number in the US vs. Nixon judgement that doesn't exist and use a statement that doesn't exist either, regardless of what non existent page they reference.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,475 ✭✭✭amandstu



    "It found that "there is no precedent" for a former president to shield records from a sitting president using executive privilege when the materials in question legally belong to the federal government, according to the letter."


    A parasite on the body politic.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,684 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    It's been mentioned in media reports about communications between Trump's team and NARA that one of the lead Trump team members [one tasked specifically with Comms between the two parties] published a letter from NARA that puts a hole in Trump's story-line as it clearly contradicts what trump and Co have been claiming is the truth about his possession of the documents in question.

    In other news, Kevin Priola, a Colorado State Senate senator, has changed his party affiliation from the GOP to the Dems yesterday, citing the Jan 6th Capitol event as the reason for switching party allegiance. Looking at Colorado State voters results for the Presidency, it seems it voted GOP from 1920 up to 2004 when it swung to the Dems for the past 4 Presidential elections, incl Bidens 13.5 margin, the first double-digit since Johnson over Goldwater in 1964. I haven't gone looking for the stats on US Senate and the US House of Reps. It has also increased it's voter numbers with an increase in [collegiate] electoral numbers from 6 to 10 due to an increase in population. I don't know if there are stats available on Colorado voter ethnicity AND if it might come to affecting voter party choice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,684 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Yup, Nara is the federal agency set up for the specific purpose of collating, controlling and preserving Government documents, incl all the contents of ALL the presidential libraries. It reached an agreement with Trump a year or two ago whereby it would have the same federal role in the Trump presidential Library as part of that library's establishment. He's out, except for the name on the plate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,959 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    All this effort does is keep Trump's claims of "illegitimate search" active and in the news even though it is an action that will be struck down. Trump is playing to the crowd whilst DoJ is finally doing its job and building their case.

    If I knew I wasn't going to get out of this through the courts, and if I thought I was an expert dealmaker, I'd be firing up the base as much as possible in the belief that I could negotiate my way out of it with the implied threat of massive civil disturbance from my followers. Seeing the president's request for an impartial special master shot down by a judge who I'm sure is now being called a RINO is only going to help with this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,684 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    It'll continue until those from his base funding him admit the truth, that he's succeeded in conning them for years now and cut off his dollar supply.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,684 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Another one Trump got wrong. The jury at the kidnap and explosives trial of two men - Adam Fox and Barry Croft Jr - accused of plotting to kidnap Michigan Gov Whitmer two years ago has convicted them on the conspiracy to kidnap charge and found them guilty of conspiring to obtain a weapon of mass destruction, namely a bomb to blow up a bridge and stymie police if the kidnapping could be pulled off at Whitmer’s vacation home. Croft, 46, a trucker from Bear, Delaware, was also convicted of another explosives charge.

    The jury in an earlier trial couldn't reach a unanimous verdict in the spring. As for other defendants in the larger case, NBC News’ report added that two other men were acquitted and two more pleaded guilty and testified for prosecutors.

    Earlier this month, Trump appeared at a far-right gathering and went further. “[T]his thing they did involving Gretchen Whitmer was fake,” the Republican said to applause. “Just like those who instigated January 6. It was a fake deal. Fake. It was a fake deal.”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,612 ✭✭✭✭martingriff


    The special master I see given and probably no objection by the other side. But this will be ordered as the files are looked at anyway and not as you get to see them first and stop the investigation



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,287 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    A Special Master will get him nothing.

    Their might be some personal stuff between him and a lawyer mixed among what was taken by the FBI which could be excluded , but every single document that he took from the White House is not his and he has about as much authority to claim privilege over them as any of us do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,612 ✭✭✭✭martingriff


    It may not get him anything. May say hey look something they took they shouldn't have (which was in the middle of what they could take) but it would cost nothing and it be calling his bluff



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,684 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    The judge hearing the case about revealing the affidavit used to provide the grounds for the Mar-A-Lago search warrant has instructed the DOJ to release the redacted version he's approved of by 12 mid-day today. The affidavit apparently has the words "uncharged persons" included amongst witnesses who provided details of the presence of the documents found in Mar-A-Lago.

    Using those two words can seem to imply that there are persons in Trump's Mar-A-Lago home who may have been contacted by the DOJ and may have an offer made to to them to give testimony against Trump in exchange for a lesser or no prosecution. However unlikely as it might seem, the use of the words might be a bluff to put the **** up Trump and make him come to the table for a deal with the DOJ himself. It would avoid a trial which most would be happy with, incl people in the senate and congress of both parties. It would have to include Trump's signature before notaries which he could not wriggle out of, deny or call fake, however much he wants to shout "witch-hunt".

    Another thing is the import Trump put into getting his passports back as they should be needed for any foreign travel. It's noticeable that Trump cancelled his visit to his club here in Ireland, making it plain the court case is taking all of his interest now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,612 ✭✭✭✭martingriff


    So you think the DOJ would put untruths in an affidavit that was used to get a search warrant. Have you any idea of the crap storm that would produce if known.

    1st Trump and the Republicans would have ammo against the Democrats for years.

    2nd Without those witnesses the DOJ effectively said it was a fishing expedition.


    3rd The search would be declared an illegal one so any and all documents found could not be used in any prosecution that was to come.


    Who knows given the documents were taken illegally they might have to return them.

    Do you really think the DOJ and Garland are that stupid



Advertisement