Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump discussion Thread IX (threadbanned users listed in OP)

Options
19394969899154

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 40,184 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail




  • Registered Users Posts: 11,159 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    Apparently the arrest warrent from the FBI isn't enough proof of russian interference of the 2016 election



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,982 ✭✭✭McFly85


    So you don’t think the FBI fabricated documents, and Trump did have top secret items he shouldn’t have in his house?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You’re changing the narrative again. Initially you said Russia influenced the election now you’re saying they interfered. People who’s understanding of politics pre dates 2016 know that rival countries have interfered in each other’s elections for decades.

    Just because a few bots made a few posts on Facebook does not mean they influenced the outcome of an election. You cannot hack public opinion so the idea that a few Facebook posts influenced an election is a bit if a stretch and the idea that Trump was colluding with Vladimir Putin via financial and sexual blackmail is the biggest debunked conspiracy theory in history yet it is repeated and constantly re-circulated by liberals who are the ones that apparently care the most about disinformation.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Btw, an arrest warrant isn’t proof of anything.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Russia my have interfered, China may have interfered, Iran may have interfered. But the idea that Trump colluded with Russia to get him elected is a debunked conspiracy theory aka “a hoax”.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Btw, an arrest warrant isn’t proof of anything.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,982 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Well, it turns out, with enough data, you can absolutely hack public opinion.

    They had the data and the means to identify voters susceptible to change in swing states. These people were shown false ads demonising Clinton. You repeatedly downplay this as a few bots making a few posts.

    This is common, verifiable information by now, why do you choose to ignore it?



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,493 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    True, but the CFO of the Trump ORg pleading guilty to fraud is. And as Trump always claims, he was the brains, he made the deals.

    There are two options. Either Trump knew about what the CFO was up to and therefore is implicated, or he didn't know and never suspected anything.

    Option 1 speaks for itself. Option 2 means Trump hasn't a clue what is going on, isn't able to control his own companies and staff, cannot understand the information presented to him and has no ability to understand risks or see potential issues.

    Which one are you going to pick?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    In that case, how many votes did these Facebook posts sway to win the election for Trump. If you can state explicitly that public opinion can be hacked then surely you can put a number on the amount of votes that were swayed?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 15,493 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Russia my have interfered, China may have interfered, Iran may have interfered. But the idea that Trump colluded with Russia to get him elected is a debunked conspiracy theory aka “a hoax”.


    Why are you still beating this drum? So what if he did or didn't at this point. He made sure the GOP avoided ever holding him to account, he got in an AG that lied in his summary of the report so as to make it look like there was no case to answer.

    But again, so what? Is it that you believe that he was unfairly treated? That a POTUS shouldn't be held to account if it is even suspected that he conspired with a foreign country to alter the outcome of an election?

    None of that gives him the right to continue to try to steal an election he lost. None of that gives him the right to try to bully state governors to make up votes for him. None of that gives him the right to allow the insurrection to happen and do nothing to stop it. None of that gives him the right to debase the democratic system of the country. He faced an investigation and was found not to have a case to answer. Happens to people everyday. He is not some special put upon person.


    But even after all that, what you have is clear evidence, and accepted by Trump himself, that he stole classified documents and failed to give them back even when they were requested. Do you not see any issue with that?



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 15,061 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    ##Mod Note##

    Brenbrady thread-banned for a week.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,793 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Edit: just seen the mod note



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,159 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    I never said influenced, you asked for proof, which I gave in the form of an FBI warrant, usually they're not issued on the basis of a 'hoax' as judges who issue them can face disbarrment for that. To dispute the judicial system's motivations is not exactly becomming of the party of law and order now is it?



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,957 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    It's not a myth. It's a lie.

    A lie that idiots wish to believe in.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 35,941 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Just to get a taste of what Ron DeSantis will probably pursue if he runs on the 2024 ticket...His attempts at a "Woke Act", targeting Critical Race Theory and gender dialogues in the workplace or classrooms, have been shot down at the Federal Level. I last saw DeSantis attacking some kids at a press conference for wearing masks.

    Trump losing hasn't seen the last of this dog whistle, anti-free speech, tactic from the right of centre. Funny how those who scream loudest about cancel culture et al are the ones trying to actually codify the muzzling of free speech.

    Reads exactly like a vague, wishy washy law that was designed purely to appeal to the base that believes "woke" is ruining America, and would probably have been a nightmare to enact. I'd be lying if I said I didn't find workplace diversity training tedious ... but I see their value at the same time. Mine is not the only perspective and banning that kind of inclusivity or awareness is a slippery slope.




  • Registered Users Posts: 11,553 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Senator Graham has lost his latest attempt to avoid giving testimony before a grand jury as a federal judge denied his application. The senator tried to persuade the judge that his conversations with Georgia state election officials about the Georgia vote result loss for Trump was part of his senatorial duties but the judge was having none of it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,553 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Trump's legal team has asked a federal judge to appoint a special master to review the documents the FBI took from his Mar-A-Lago home and block the DOJ from reviewing them. It might be a further attempt to pursue the "lawyer-client privileged documents" angle in the hope a neutral person might find some such item amongst the documents seized by the FBI and drag out the DOJ/FBI job of finding definitive evidence of criminal acts by him when he took the documents from the White House - taint the evidence as it were. No pun intended, just the legal term used to describe what they ARE trying to do.

    Post edited by aloyisious on


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,077 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    So these same documents which are private lawyer/ client communication, are also classified documents, un-classified documents, planted by the FBI and also don't exist because he'd already handed them back, even though he didn't have them?!?



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,553 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    That about sums it up, Plus Don knows the FBI, because its Federal, can be trusted to abuse the trust placed in it. He should know having gone through several AGs and heads of FBI he found disloyal in his own administration. When it come to documentary evidence, some he's claiming is from his own hand, I'd imagine his lawyers see the FBI reading Trump his rights like this: you are not obliged to say anything unless you wish to do so but whatever you say will be taken down in writing, twisted around and used in evidence against you....



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 15,061 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    In other news , that again will surprise absolutely no one with a functioning brain - Bill Barr lied his ass off about the Mueller report before it was published to protect Donald Trump.


    It is now apparent that the March 2019 memorandum recommended reaching a conclusion on the evidentiary viability of an obstruction-of-justice charge as a means of preempting a potential public reaction to the Mueller Report. In that light, if the Department’s submissions to the district court had connected the memorandum to a decision about making a public statement, then the district court might well have concluded that the memorandum was privileged. But that is not how the Department elected to justify its invocation of the privilege in the district court.




  • Registered Users Posts: 11,553 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Can Barr be prosecuted for obstruction of justice and/or contempt of congress by making and/or [as the lead lawyer in the DOJ and for the nation - a position outside that of personal lawyer of the president] releasing a deliberately misleading, if not fraudulent, statement about the Mueller report content and what the report author meant on what was legally permissible for congress to do on receipt of the report? Is there a statute of limitations bar on going after an AG who lied to pervert the route of justice and mislead the courts on the actions of the president? It's only a few short years since Barr made his pronouncement about the Mueller report.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 15,061 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    The answer to "Could Barr be charged" is probably yes , but the chances of it happening are next to nil.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,553 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Best to try and get him turn states evidence then. He should know when and where it's best not to abuse the 5th and when it's necessary if he does take the stand or sit in a committee room before it's lawyers to reply to it's questions. Hopefully he'll offer testimony when he see's Trump is no longer any career use to him, like when Trump is reaching for a lifebelt and not the nearest neck.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,553 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    It seems that Trump's legal team basing its application to the judge for a special master to review the documents is around it's reading of the 4th amendment on the rights of home-owners to be protected from improper search and seizure. In a statement he released in conjunction with the legal team's move, Trump is also contending the use of a warrant by the FBI was not needed . His statement includes this claim: “This Mar-a-Lago Break-In, Search, and Seizure was illegal and unconstitutional, and we are taking all actions necessary to get the documents back, which we would have given to them without the necessity of the despicable raid of my home, so that I can give them to the National Archives until they are required for the future Donald J. Trump Presidential Library and Museum.”



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,513 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    IMHO his attempt at having a special master appointed is 2 weeks too late. A competent legal team would have made an application for that on the day of the raid. The claim of privilege over anything that the FBI took? Is moot, they've had it 2 weeks and no judge is going to revoke evidence or stay any material retrieved from the execution of a valid search warrant.

    All this effort does is keep Trump's claims of "illegitimate search" active and in the news even though it is an action that will be struck down. Trump is playing to the crowd whilst DoJ is finally doing its job and building their case.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 15,061 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    More lies and fantasies.

    The warrant was needed because they've been "asking" for over a year and still didn't get everything back.

    Also the "Presidential Library" isn't his either, so even when Presidential documents go there they are still not his to take and have.

    And to top it off the legal precedent his submission is trying to leverage around privilege doesn't exist - His crack team of lawyers quote from a page number in the US vs. Nixon judgement that doesn't exist and use a statement that doesn't exist either, regardless of what non existent page they reference.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,402 ✭✭✭amandstu



    "It found that "there is no precedent" for a former president to shield records from a sitting president using executive privilege when the materials in question legally belong to the federal government, according to the letter."


    A parasite on the body politic.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,553 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    It's been mentioned in media reports about communications between Trump's team and NARA that one of the lead Trump team members [one tasked specifically with Comms between the two parties] published a letter from NARA that puts a hole in Trump's story-line as it clearly contradicts what trump and Co have been claiming is the truth about his possession of the documents in question.

    In other news, Kevin Priola, a Colorado State Senate senator, has changed his party affiliation from the GOP to the Dems yesterday, citing the Jan 6th Capitol event as the reason for switching party allegiance. Looking at Colorado State voters results for the Presidency, it seems it voted GOP from 1920 up to 2004 when it swung to the Dems for the past 4 Presidential elections, incl Bidens 13.5 margin, the first double-digit since Johnson over Goldwater in 1964. I haven't gone looking for the stats on US Senate and the US House of Reps. It has also increased it's voter numbers with an increase in [collegiate] electoral numbers from 6 to 10 due to an increase in population. I don't know if there are stats available on Colorado voter ethnicity AND if it might come to affecting voter party choice.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,553 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Yup, Nara is the federal agency set up for the specific purpose of collating, controlling and preserving Government documents, incl all the contents of ALL the presidential libraries. It reached an agreement with Trump a year or two ago whereby it would have the same federal role in the Trump presidential Library as part of that library's establishment. He's out, except for the name on the plate.



Advertisement