Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1401402404406407915

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 210 ✭✭Mr Hindley


    I'm feeling naive as I type this, but that can't be true. Can it? I mean - at any cost? How on earth would that be a good approach to investing?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,100 ✭✭✭Browney7


    Whilst not opining on whether it is true or not, the immigrant investor programme (IIP) could be being used for this purpose if the property is leased to a council on long term lease for social housing. A well known property development company in Dublin had been courting investment under the IIP some time ago for new developments but not sure if it's still the case https://best-citizenships.com/2022/07/07/report-on-ireland-immigrant-investor-scheme-2022/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    Because they have used the casinos to change the cash and get it out of China and need to store it somewhere. Holding cash in an inflationary period is avoided and housing is a good hedge for inflation… if they can get an Irish passport at the same time due to there investment it is a bonus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭Tonesjones


    Pretty sure I heard that story last year buy it was a woman buying for the Chinese investment funds rather than a man like in your story.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,085 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135


    Someone posted something similar to this on here about 6 months or so ago. Basically seeing the same chineese woman at every viewing and like that got chatting and lone behold the work for a chineese company that are actively buying property.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 713 ✭✭✭manniot2


    Lads there are no random Chinese women showing up at houses with unlimited cheque books. Someone has dreamt this up.



  • Posts: 14,769 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You wouldn’t be at all concerned about the effect defaulting on our loans? Capital markets will either impose punitive borrowing rates or refuse to lend at all. And credit-rating agencies will no doubt warn against investing in the country. (The NTMA, who borrow from international bond markets on behalf of the Government plans to borrow €14bn this year, to keep the lights on) The IMF would assume control of spending as part of any deal to bail out Ireland again, imposing deep cuts (no house building there) and increased taxation. Does this sound familiar?

    What on earth makes you think your life is going to be better in that scenario?

    You really should give some more thought before typing baloney like that.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,697 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Ok fine, a possibility depending on the individuals circumstances, I chose that figure because of the oft quoted 52% effective rate of tax for landlords, which would leave a take home for the landlord of 936euro from 1950. Most landlords paying 52% tax I think would welcome the chance to drop the rent to the threshold and make an extra 2796 euro a year and avoid the hassle of calculating the correct returns etc.

    But I think you get the point I am making - by setting a totally tax free threshold, it is possible to work out a level that will ensure the majority of landlords with HAP tenancies/leases etc will opt to reduce the rent to the threshold.

    Would you agree with that?



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,697 ✭✭✭hometruths


    We could get into the supply side of this if we were in agreement that the likely impact is that the landlord would drop the rent to 1166 rather than up it to 2500.

    But given the gulf in that fundamental difference of opinion seems a bit pointless to argue over it!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    In the last recession, Dunnes stores et Al continued to run their business so extremely unlikely that the majority of shop assistants would be let go.

    We're a massively indebted country, restructuring our debts and levelling the playing field to a degree should mean many of the bottom 2/3 could afford to buy a house. And why shouldn't they? We've turned into an abhorrent country in the last 7 years and I don't know why.

    And seeking to promote the common good, with due observance of Prudence, Justice and Charity, so that the dignity and freedom of the individual may be assured, true social order attained, the unity of our country restored, and concord established with other nations,

    That's our Constitution. The current gang representing us have failed miserably to uphold the basic principles of our Constitution imho. We've had, what seemed, a demagogue here promoting a Darwinian society as it benefits that individual and their family. This is not what Ireland is meant to be.

    Yeats postulated that some couldn't give a monkeys about anything further than their front door.

    What need you, being come to sense, But fumble in a greasy till And add the halfpence to the pence And prayer to shivering prayer, until You have dried the marrow from the bone;

    I thought it was ott nonsense but listening to some of the garbage spewed here of late......



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    A landlord can already lower their tax if he/she structures his property holding . If they can do this and charge what they want why do you think they would opt for 1166. They are there to maximise profit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,387 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    No because you could never gaurantee that any subsequent government would change the rules and regulations. As well you have forgotten many invest in rentals as part of a pension plan. When you retire you will be on a lower tax rate generally. Will the government then allow you to increase the rent to market rates.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    If you take the spending of 300k people out of the country it will create job losses in other areas of the economy. If you think that is garbage being spewed then you really don’t have a clue and should stick to your poetry and commenting about our Irish forefathers that proved to be inaccurate as was shown in previous posts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    We're not on the same page at all. I'm not a psychiatrist but as advice, maybe read the Brothers Karamazov to stimulate the parts of your mind that perhaps have not been exercised lately.

    I've no wish to derail further this thread. Your point that change can be scary for some is taken



  • Posts: 14,769 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Bankrupting a country and plunging us into IMF controlled austerity, again, isn’t “change”, it is ineptitude.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,697 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Well I guess SF could just use the stick then if landlords are not going to go for the carrot. Point is there are plenty of options for them to reverse the exponential growth of public money distorting the market if they wish to do so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    You said, 'The shop assistant would probably loose his/her job in your scenario'

    In order for that probability to be true, more than the majority of shop assistants need to lose their jobs.

    The constitution is our state. You don't like it, you can try and change it. Whatever. As I said, a downturn COULD benefit many. I'm not promoting a downturn as a solution. However, for those who wish to burn it down, a downturn COULD be very helpful and this is the antithesis to your thesis. Maybe there's a synthesis somewhere.

    Who cares, back to waiting for the dream home to appear.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,737 ✭✭✭pinksoir


    The friend said that the guy was Irish not Chinese. Mid to higher end properties in Dublin, 650k plus.

    Who knows, probably bull. The only reason I'd give any credence to it is because Chinese folk don't invest in stocks but in property. And their domestic property industry is looking at very bleak times ahead. It's hardly unheard of for pension/investment funds to buy up single family homes. It has been happening all over the shop in the US for the past few years due to the halt in construction during COVID etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    As it is we kick the bankruptcy down the road for the next generation. Pain now or pain later.

    A restructuring in favourable conditions is probably better than a forced restructuring and fairer to those who were not even adults when the profligate public sector and lax regulations sunk us into penury.

    This is off topic. Two points made and people can decide.

    As I said, my list is in a response to awec and others that state a recession cannot benefit the lower 2/3 socio economic group. As stated, Iceland did okay by taking pain upfront in the GFC so there is precedent and plenty more if you want to look.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭jimmybobbyschweiz


    The rental bubble will pop as the big tech bubble has already popped and the fallout is starting already. This is a significant risk factor to our economic growth model in Ireland and unless we have something to replace the activity of these tech companies, we will see a big drop in the economy which will impact the rental market. How will it impact the rental market is from two main areas; the first is of course the workers themselves. As hiring freezes and job cuts materialise then demand for rentals takes a hit. The second area impacted is of course the Exchequer which receives corporate and other taxes from the activities of these big tech companies. This will trickle into a need to cut public spending which will particularly impact social or State sponsored housing with the (to be honest, criminal) waste of public money thrown at the rental market the last decade - dead money and people will be scratching their heads wondering where all our prosperity went when the whole thing collapses. Ukranian refugees and the like won't be paying the rents needed to live in this country so to equate bodies on the ground with demand for rentals is woefully inaccurate as a lot of the bodies on the ground (half of all tenancies in fact) are getting State support - that is not a sustainable state of affairs.

    On the rate rises point, when the peak of the market was hit just before COVID, in 2018/19, that was four years ago already - a lot of those 3-5 year mortgages would be coming to an end of the fixed period and they will hopefully be fixing again because some analysts reckon the interest rate rise train has a few more stops to make. Wage rises are lagging inflation but the wage rises are starting to come through now which will feed into even more inflation in a few months and therefore more of a need to raise rates to cool the economy. I think the consensus is generally that 2023 will still see rate rises and 2024 will see rate cuts again and QE. That will be the "soft landing" engineering but it would still see a softening of house prices here as those not fixing their mortgages and those buying new properties will be hit with a few hundred euro extra interest rate payments per month, which of course with the rental market hit to demand, will soften the whole Irish property market.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    the tech companies are going nowhere as they make big savings by being located in Ireland. A slow down in them expanding and recruiting is very different to them shutting up shop and making everyone redundant. Despite this slow down in recruiting in tech we have 100’s of thousands coming to work in the country as labour shortages exist in a wide range of companies. The wage inflation will result in house prices increasing.



  • Posts: 14,769 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    What makes you so sure bankruptcy is a certainty “down the road”? And how will years of IMF control of spending, austerity and higher taxes help people buy a home?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    I don’t think all the people that were forced to migrate after the GFC or the people that were severely impacted (and there was a hell of a lot of people)would agree with you. As you said before your recession was after 2000 when tech took a bit of a hammering but the rest of the country was booming so you’re idea of a recession may not be the same as the majority



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,387 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Since you want to know about what happens to shop assistants in a recession I tell you.

    The builders providers, the hardware shops , paint shops start to lay them off. Those that remain are put on 40 hour weeks with no overtime. Some are put on three days weeks and claim the dole.

    However a lot of those that work as shop assistants are in the retail sector. Most are college students. At present all of these earn at least the minimum wage and many are getting 1-2 euro more per hour. In the service sector they will earn another1-2 euro/ hour from tips

    What happens in a recession is this. Most of these college students are on zero hour contracts as demand reduces the employers cut these students hours. As well any new employee are bought in at the statutory minimum wage for there age which is lower for 17-19 year old. When these get trained they are given more hours than 20+year old staff as there pay is less.

    In the last recession there was a training rate that was abused. When you started with a employer they could put you on a training rate for six months. They then gave you very little hours after the six month or let you go before you had any employment rights and you went on to be trained again and again by different retailers.

    Then you will have the shorter shifts. Because of virtually no unemployment, the retailers are giving staff a minimum of 5-6 hour shifts. My daughter had a part time job in coming up to Christmas 2014, the hourly rate was about 6/,hour ( the famous training rate) but was only getting 4-5 hour shifts. one day she got an eight hour shift but after 4 hours the manager wanted her to go home early as they had too many staff in

    Next in the service sector the tips dry up. The number of hours continually drop from where you as a student had 30+/week to where you may be lucky to have 20 or even less at quite times during the year.

    Some stores had a trick the last time, managers would have an idea of what day you were in college, they used to schedule you hours during these day so you would have to give up the job so they could hire cheaper staff.

    This doubly effects the economy. Students usually spend virtually every bob they earn. Now as they earn less they have less to spend. This reduces demand in the same areas that employ them. Now there parents may have to subsidize there accommodation, trave and food more. This give them less spending power.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163




  • Posts: 14,769 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    And how would austerity help the Government/private sector to build new homes? How would people afford them if they are taxed more/lose their jobs?

    Seriously, this is cringy stuff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    True but again, the thesis is that the bottom 2/3 will not benefit.

    300k leaving represents less than 6% of the population which is not close to the bottom 2/3 socio economic group.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    I did not say I wanted to know what happened to shop assistants.

    Does your anecdote show that the majority lose their jobs? To me it does not.

    Interesting reading here -- Recession in the EU: its impact on retail trade 

    It lists lots of the things you mention but does not list over 50% of people in retail losing their jobs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    It is indeed cringy or perhaps sad is a better description to see your incapacity to do basic subtraction.

    As another example, maybe more intuitive, if ten people want a can of 7up but there are only 9 everyone cannot get a full can. If one leaves then the remaining nine can all have a can.

    Here's a useful resource for you.

    https://ie.ixl.com/maths/class-2

    Again, as I said previously, I am not proposing this as a solution rather pointing to the fact that certain posters may not be wrong in their assertions.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,387 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Because a lot of work in retail is carried out on zero hour contracts. Many are student. 20-20% who move on every year as they leave college and move to there new career.

    I am not did anyone mention 50% losing there jobs. I never gave a jobless figure of that anyway. However if you think retail workers are not seriously effected in a recession you haven't a f@@king clue about recessions and even less if a clue about economics. I go so far as to say the average two year old would have a better grasp that you do.

    Slava Ukrainii



Advertisement