Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1400401403405406915

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    That's a massive generalisation.

    In the last recession, I did quite well with multiple pay rises. We didn't buy at the bottom but it was significantly less than the peak.

    A simple outlawing of REITs and btl investors in domestic housing secondhand market would hugely affect the landscape and something SF could easily do. There's so many things SF could do that might rock the comfortable lives of big tech and money managers but improve that of the lower socio economic groups that actually allow our society to function.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,122 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    They can collapse if the buyers who currently represent are no longer willing to pay the current prices.

    This is a fallacy. Sentiment alone will not crash the market, we are miles from that as demand is too high. Every single year, for about a decade now, we've heard "prices are nuts, they won't go up, who is going to pay this?" and guess what, every year prices go up.

    People will stop paying current prices when they can't pay current prices.

    What scenarios do you believe could occur that could result in a market drop without pain for those at the bottom?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,909 ✭✭✭Villa05


    The bubble is global, a small open economy should be OK then



  • Administrators Posts: 55,122 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    The scenario today is chalk and cheese compared to 2008.

    And even at that, you were one of the lucky few.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 132 ✭✭AySeeDoubleYeh


    The issue is that people 2/3's of the way up the ladder are also struggling to buy, it's not just the bottom. And you could hardly label it altruistic but there's a pretty sizeable percentage of people there who are in a position to absorb cost of living increases while also taking advantage of reduced property costs. Hence the desire for prices to fall.

    In terms of voting - you have this huge cohort of people 20s-40s who are royally pissed off. Who will likely turn out in record numbers to vote. And, whether through naivety, anger or anything else you can label it, they will vote SF because, to their mind, why on earth would they vote for the current incumbents?

    I sit in this cohort and will not personally vote for SF, as I do not believe they will improve things, but I can't blame others for voting them in.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,697 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I said the the scenarios involve a change in government policy, not a change in sentiment from Joe Ordinary house buyer.

    Prices are rising because government policy and activity in the market - eg HAP, leasing, purchasing etc - and consequent investor activity constitute a very significant portion of demand. Between HAP, RAS, leasing and acquisition, the government spent 988 million in 2020, this has almost doubled since 2016 and is expected to double again over next few years. https://assets.gov.ie/205491/ab71c182-54e3-4cd0-ae94-8069761d952e.pdf

    That has become a feedback loop - the higher prices rise, the more money government pumps into the market and so on and so forth.

    A change in policy designed to reverse that trend would have the opposite impact. Reducing government spend in the market, and consequently investor spend removes much of the marginal buying activity and prices would fall.

    The problem we have at the minute is the government has no desire to reverse that trend because in the opinion of a lot of their base, rising property prices are a good thing.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,122 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    No what I mean is it's always the bottom of the market that gets pushed out. Always.

    Let's say the market does collapse. The first people to go are the people in the bottom 1/3 of the market, they can't buy anymore for whatever reason. The people who were the 2/3 way up are now the bottom 1/3 as the people beneath them have fallen away.

    And then guess who goes next? And so on, and so on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,612 ✭✭✭fliball123


    No we will be impacted by the recession but the old release valve of people leaving wont be open as the bubble and the recession will be global.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,122 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Let's take an example of HAP, and imagine SF get in and stop HAP.

    What do the people who currently require HAP to house themselves do?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 132 ✭✭AySeeDoubleYeh


    Ah, sorry, I get you now.

    I would be less pronounced in practice, of course - less than 1/3 would fall and those in, say, the 60th-70th percentile of earnings could still benefit - but I understand and accept the larger point!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,697 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Of course SF are not going to suddenly pull HAP overnight. That's totally unrealistic.

    But let's take a different approach to the same problem.

    Imagine SF get in and announce that they are extending the rent a room relief tax free allowance - 14k - to all government supported tenancies in the private market - HAP, RAS, leasing etc.

    From then on a HAP tenancy up to €1,166 per month would be totally income tax free. But if a landlord charges €1,167 per month then they're taxed at your full rate. Marry this to abolishing rent caps across the board and a stiff vacancy tax, exempting PPRs.

    What would the knock on effect in the market be?



  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    So you want the government to not only pay for these people's rent, but also to create a situation whereby landlords favour the people whose rent is being paid by the government?


    Not sure that makes your 30 somethings any less disenfranchised.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,085 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135


    With the Gas situation in Europe even if a bag recession occurs gas prices will not retreat anywhere back to where they were early 2021 when fertilizer prices were 200 euro a ton. As regards food price it lags by at least 10 months which is the growing period realistically before harvesting of the crop where the input prices are then passed on. so if gas fell from 300 euro per cubic meter back down to 5 euro a cubic meter then it would still take a year before food price would see it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    My recession was 2000 - 2004. The great recession didn't really affect me and lots of others in the tech sector.

    SF could do the following:

    - only allow REITs etc. to buy apartments where they have financed the building and restrict all REIT buying in domestic housing market.

    - half the number of international visas 40k --> 20k

    - increase corporation tax to 17.5%

    - declare national bankruptcy and refinance debts.

    - stop selling passports to anyone with €1 million

    That would destroy a large part of social/ video network economy while leaving pharmaceutical/ medical device and high value manufacturing alone. That would probably result in an exodus of circa 300k people, meaning there would be considerable housing capacity as a consequence. The shop assistants might even be able to buy a house and exist in the less financially geared Ireland which would become more like Iceland.

    I'm not saying that SHOULD happen, rather your thesis that reshaping society will affect the bottom 2/3 the worst is not necessarily true.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,612 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Maybe not but you can be guaranteed there is now a real concerted level of concentration going into other sources of energy I see this in teh sector I work in hopefully making our reliance on gas a thing of the pass it will take time do



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,387 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Rent a room can accept HAP. However most people renting and living in a house are very selective who they let into there house.

    Most people renting a room in there house do not want a person with children, they will generally choose other options.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 713 ✭✭✭manniot2


    I agree. This is entirely possible and is not some Lotto win type of scenario. Plenty of people were just aged appropriately to buy cheap houses in 2012-2015. A lot of people working in professional services and IT did just fine during the grim years, yes bonuses and pay rises were rear but the fall in house prices was so much that it didn’t matter.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,122 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Yes, but post-2008 output ground to pretty much nothing, but we still had tons of property to sell because there was a massive oversupply in the Tiger years. We had absurd housing output during the tiger, all fueled by endless credit. You had "normal" people owning multiple properties, but all built on credit.

    These things do not exist today. Houses are bought before they're built today, and credit is tight.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,697 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I’m simply referencing rent a room to choose the same figure, but I am talking about regular tenancies.

    what I am proposing is that any rental property in receipt of direct government payment eg hap, leasing etc can be rented out in its entirety for 1166 per month tax free. Charge more than that threshold and pay tax at full rate on the entire income.

    for example:

    you’re a landlord with a three bed in Dublin currently charging 1950 a month to HAP tenants.

    SF win the election and announce that they are abolishing rent controls and from now on you can a) set the rent at whatever rate you are happy with and b) if that rent is 1166 a month or less you can keep the lot free of income tax.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,122 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I don't think the landlord is going to be much better off signing up to keeping rent at HAP levels based on those figures. In fact, possibly worse off, depending on their exact tax liabilities.

    From the taxpayers point of view, this significantly increases the cost of HAP right, since it's now tax free?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,697 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Sorry, not sure I’m reading your post right - are you saying landlord is likely to drop the rent to 1166 a month or keep it at 1950?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 713 ✭✭✭manniot2


    I see plans have been submitted for the highest building in Dublin on city quay. All office space, who in the name of god to they think will want that office space with everyone WFH. Surely should be ressie



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,737 ✭✭✭pinksoir


    Totally anecdotal, but a friend of my wife's is looking for a house at the moment. He keeps being outbid and has seen the same guy at all the viewings, so reckons they're in the same boat. Gets chatting to him, "how awful it is to be outbid all the time", etc. The guy says, oh that's me. He works for a Chinese investment fund and his mandate is to buy properties regardless of cost.

    Obviously could be bullshit, but if not it's fairly depressing and you'd wonder how widespread it could be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,515 ✭✭✭jj880


    I'm not looking to buy so can only guess. The logic here might be: "At least if there's a property/economic crash I might keep my current salary. That along with a deposit saved is at least some chance of being able to buy. Some chance is better than no chance". I don't blame them. People's lives are being put on hold with this sh!t. Endless limbo year after year. Its not right.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,122 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    That’s assuming the farmer can sell at a profit and pass on input costs. They could get caught out if recession hits and be forced to sell bellow cost especially if they need to bring animals in early due to weather or lack of grass. They won’t be able to feed cattle due to a smaller harvest because they used less fertiliser and be forced to sell at a loss. Can see this unfolding next spring when feed supplies run low.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    The shop assistant would probably loose his/her job in your scenario…300k people no longer spending would kill a lot of small businesses such as shops/bars/restaurants.



  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I see that the auctioneer has withdrawn the scheme after getting hammered today (Jesus…..another inadvertent pun)

    i quote “I understand... it was naive to think there wouldn’t be a backlash. I decided that I’m withdrawing, I’m not getting involved in that again,”

    “I haven’t done it before and won’t be doing it again. There was no offence meant. We hear you. It’s obvious it’s a raw nerve for people and we fully apologise if they took offence.”

    if there is one thing that sorry little episode shows it is how those that are running the game have no intuitive understanding of the desperation of those playing it

    (also is the typical politician’s “sorry that you’re offended” apology)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    They would just up it 2500 a month and there would be a worse crisis than already exists. No landlord would opt for 1166 a month because if rent caps were reintroduced they would be screwed and the chances of that happening would be high once people see the impact of SF policies and vote in a different crowd.

    The suggestion doesn’t address the issue which is a lack of supply. In fact it would reduce supply as what your suggesting lowers the yield. And no landlord would buy a house to rent because the return would be less than 3% PA and more importantly the resale value would be frozen as a result



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,085 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135


    That could happen alright and with the the East if ireland poor grass growth due to hot weather more underfleshed cattle will be killed, but remember the cattle feed lots in Ireland are owned by the meat factories so farmers will sell under fleshed animals instead of spending more inputs fattening them. Under fleshed animals are rife in the factory at the minute, meat yeild well back so the tightening supply may keep prices up.



Advertisement