Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXXV-956,720 ROI (5,952 deaths) 452,946 NI (3,002 deaths) (08/01) Read OP

1151315141516151815191580

Comments

  • Posts: 4,806 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Complete rubbish.

    For the vast majority of the pandemic our hospitals were nowhere even remotely close to capacity and still we insisted on cancelling services, screenings, appointments etc.

    Developmental checks for newborns still seems to be stopped for some bizarre reason.


    We didn't have to do that apart from perhaps a brief spell in April 2020 and January 2021.

    It was always a choice and the wrong one at that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,011 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    And what would have happened if they had carried on as normal, with all the usual people coming and going... what would that have done for outbreaks and case counts and staffing levels.

    Regardless, that was not lockdown -which applied to general citizens, not how hospital services were managed. Two totally different policies.

    Post edited by odyssey06 on

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Posts: 12,836 [Deleted User]


    Lockdowns absolutely caused a spike in undiagnosed diseases like cancer, not sure that's even up for debate.



  • Posts: 4,806 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    If hospitals had continued as normal when they weren't overwhelmed then they still wouldn't have been overwhelmed.

    We did the worst thing you can do during a crisis, we panicked.

    And out of an abundance of caution, we locked down far too hard for far too long and cancelled everything.


    Now we are starting to see the results. Huge inflation, recession on the horizon, excess deaths in other areas will increase and actually very little excess deaths from COVID due to the age profile of those at risk.

    The best thing to do now would be to have a review and make sure we don't make mistakes that cost lives again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,011 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Sure it is. What's a "lockdown" in this context.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 568 ✭✭✭72sheep



    The dogs on the street know there's going to be more and more of these articles documenting the countless ways in which the lockdown strategy was more lethal than Covid.

    All vaccines, especially new ones, have a small percentage of people suffering adverse effects but it's still taboo to mention this for Covid. Wait till the media start running those stories too ;-)



  • Posts: 4,806 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Are you actually arguing that cancelled screenings, services and appointments hasn't led to undiagnosed illnesses/conditions?



  • Posts: 4,806 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Unfortunately a lot of the impact will always remain hidden.

    Take the newborn developmental checks as an example. Lots of them didnt happen over the last 2 years.

    That's potentially a huge amount of missed issues that those poor children will have to deal with the fallout and whatever impact it has on their young lives.


    Horrible to fail our young in this manner.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,011 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    No, I'm saying that the cancellations were not due to 'lockdown'. Lockdown and how hospital services are operated are distinct things. There are times when hospital services were curtailed but not restrictions on the general public, and vice versa. Sometimes it was both.

    I'm saying you need to balance the cancellations against what would have happened had they proceeded, in terms of outbreaks, and impact that would have on staff and other patients.

    Hospital services were prioritised for emergency care and procedures. Heart operations, cancer surgery etc all kept operational - some were even done in the private hospitals that were taken over. These are very vulnerable patients. More outbreaks would have meant more deaths.

    I'm saying also long covid has a role in rise of diabetes and cardiac conditions, as per the studies I linked.

    You can't just look at one side of the balance sheet.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,278 ✭✭✭Marty Bird


    But plenty of time for the bullshîte dancing and Tik tok videos.

    🌞6.02kWp⚡️3.01kWp South/East⚡️3.01kWp West



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,677 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    More recent studies are showing no link between covid and heart issues.


    There's only so long the denials that lockdown measures and their knock on effects, as well as let's just say, other interventions which are known to cause heart inflammation, may to be blame can fly. I expect the dam to break soon. Countries like the US , who didnt shut down medical services to the extent of the UK and ireland or even at all are also seeing large numbers of non covid excess deaths.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37 MIDLANDSMAN


    I had to bring my 5 year old to A+E around midday during the first covid lockdown. He was seen within 20 minutes and bloods were taken. I had to wait for the blood results which took about 3 hours to come back. In those 3 hours of waiting, just 1 other person came into A+E and it looked like he didn’t need much more than a bandage. I could not believe it and I’m still shocked as to how they can say the hospitals were overran. This was a regional hospital in the midlands which would normally have a busy A+E.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,011 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Nope, the study does not show no link between covid and "heart issues". Read the study again. Where does it assess heart failure?

    This much wider study shows the opposite for more serious conditions:

    Researchers found that rates of many conditions, such as heart failure and stroke, were substantially higher in people who had recovered from COVID-19 than in similar people who hadn’t had the disease. What’s more, the risk was elevated even for those who were under 65 years of age and lacked risk factors, such as obesity or diabetes...

    The risk of heart failure increased by 72%, or around 12 more people in the COVID-19 group per 1,000 studied.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-00403-0

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Posts: 4,806 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I had to go to A+E in Connolly hospital in Dublin in January 2021 when hospitals were supposedly at their worst.

    Was also seen in less than 20 mins and had blood work, results and X rays etc all done within 3 hours

    Most parts of the hospital were absolutely dead with doctors standing around chatting



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,011 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    And what do you think? People who had broken legs weren't going to A&E? Why do you think A&E might have been quiet at mid-day during a lockdown?

    Did you wander the ICU wards and count beds?

    Maeanwhile, some real data from January 2021:

    Pressure remains on the hospital system, with 13 hospitals having no available intensive care unit (ICU) or high dependency unit (HDU) beds...Pressure also continues on general bed capacity, with beds full at Connolly, Kilkenny, Mullingar, St Vincent’s, Tallaght, and Tullamore hospitals. In total, there were 194 general beds available in 23 hospitals.

    https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/covid-ireland-records-some-10000-cases-with-no-icu-beds-at-13-hospitals-1244116.html

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Posts: 4,806 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Trust me, I got the same outraged reaction from people on here when I posted about it at the time.

    The ICU may well have been busy.

    But the hospital in general was dead. I was in several departments that day.

    The doctors themselves even told me how quiet it was.

    Hard to believe how many appointments etc were cancelled at the time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,678 ✭✭✭Multipass


    Breast check is currently a year behind. So instead of having your first mammogram at 50, you’ll be lucky to get it at 51, and thereafter every 3 years instead of every 2. No-one will bother counting the deaths that will result from this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,692 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    We get it, you hated lockdowns and then chose to call it dangerous for other reasons and you are still banging that drum. I'm surprised you are on here posting at all with no lockdowns when you don't have to be inside on the internet. Surely you should be out partying?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,233 ✭✭✭✭normanoffside


    Now the MSM are telling us that lack of vitamin D caused more severe Covid outcomes. I remember saying this 30 months ago that staying indoors and not getting sunlight could not be healthy. People who talked back then about vitamin D were labelled conspiracy theorists. I even remember a specific NPHET daily conference where they dismissed lack of Vit D as a cause of death. Instead of encouraging people to get some sun they scared them into staying indoors.


    https://www.irishtimes.com/health/2022/08/19/insufficient-vitamin-d-linked-to-fourfold-increase-in-risk-of-death-among-covid-19-patients/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,692 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I took vitamin D from the very start of covid. You don't need to go outside to get vitamin D. Who said you couldn't go outside??



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,668 ✭✭✭walus


    As I was saying from the very beginning of this pandemic, the most strategies undertaken by many countries would have serious negative outcomes, and that the secondary deaths that these policies would ultimately cause would dwarf the covid deaths. Things like zero covid, flattening the curve and lockdowns and various other restrictions were short term solutions to a long term problem. A long term strategy was required from day one and only very few governments understood and implemented it well.

    Most of the world went to the covid olympics where the only number that mattered were covid cases and deaths with covid. Other diseases and deaths became far less important. Those who did well initially in these games were cheered and admired, while those who didn’t were criticised and ridiculed. New Zealand’s PM came very close to getting the Nobel Peace Prize for how she dealt with the pandemic.

    If we however could agree to such a strange concept nowadays that all deaths matter and death with/from covid is as important as a death from day a heart attack, and look at all deaths with excess deaths as the one and only KPI, how countries like NZ, Israel and so on would fare?

    Israel, NZ, Netherlands, Finland, France, Iceland, Norway and many other to various degree are experiencing unexplained deaths (outside of covid deaths) this year. At the same time Sweden is doing just fine and did not have excess deaths to worry about for about 15 months now. Who will win the ‘excess deaths’ olympics over the long run (which is what really matters) remains to be seen but it will not be the countries who embraced lockdowns, flattening the curve and zero covid as they are not doing very well. As with every decision that is to do with a complex system and long time frame the secondary and even higher order effects are more important than the first order effects, and these have to be factored in the decision making.

    Pity that our strong and independent media are somehow missing all that. But sure they are the ones who are telling us what games to play. The fact that most countries have let down their citizens will continue to be brushed under the carpet.

    ”Where’s the revolution? Come on, people you’re letting me down!”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,692 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Can you provide proof of your claims as regards Israel, New Zealand, Netherlands and those other countries?

    If not then are we just supposed to believe you are not making this stuff up?



  • Posts: 4,806 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Great post Walus.

    It would be wonderful if someone actually came forward and said honestly, we panicked and got things very wrong.

    But I guess it's easier to pat yourself on the back, blame Russia for the economy and I'm sure we'll just sweep the many other issues under the carpet.

    There should be a criminal investigation into why we refused to follow the science on antigen tests.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,692 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    You are saying great post without any proof that what he is saying is actually true. Would you not wait for him to provide proof before lauding his post?


    Also, there were people dying all over the place when this thing started, nobody knew how serious it would get. Things eased off once a vaccine arrived which was the sensible thing to do.

    You need to cop on, move on and look forward instead of backwards.

    You can't do anything about the past but you can shape the future.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,917 Mod ✭✭✭✭shesty


    Hospitals could not have continued "as normal".But christ, after Lockdown 1, they could have tried a little harder to get screening services back up and running, and clinics and the rest.

    Maternity hospitals managed.Because they HAD to, you can't defer the 9 months of pregnancy once that test show up positive.Somehow other services couldn't manage though...

    My sister had a newborn in July.That would be ....6 weeks ago.Her PHN who she saw around day 4, asked her was her GP doing in person appointments (the GP STILL isn't), and told her to insist that the GP did the baby's 2 week check in person, as her hips needed checking and she was still fairly jaundiced.The PHN said that if she wouldn't do it in-person, to come back to her and they would find another doctor.That is nothing short of disgraceful.

    My 4 year old got called by the PHN for his 4 year check there in early May.He missed his 2 year check, that would have been May 2020.My now 6 year old missed her 4 year old check (April 2020).When I queried it the PHN said all the 2016 files were in a central area being reviewed and letters were being issued to parents to state the kids were being signed off "if you have problems, please contact us".Thankfully my kids are grand, but how many kids are in that pile who have speech and developmental issues that have been missed or whose parents can't afford to pay privately for it?

    I don't blame the virus for its appearance, but I do blame those in charge for the continued use of extended over-the-top lockdowns and their absolute refusal to consider alternative safe ways of keeping things going - even at 50% capacity - over such a long period of time.



  • Posts: 4,806 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I already know what happens in society when you focus on only 1 issue at the expense of everything else.

    I am focused on the future. A big part of that is reviewing the past to ensure you don't make the same mistakes ever again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,692 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    You are not looking at the past to.improve the future. All you are doing is looking to criticise people and blame people for decisions you perceive as being poor ones.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 568 ✭✭✭72sheep


    Yes, I got the exact same too. The media convinced the general public that the hospitals were like something out of a warzone. And remember that none of the hospital staff said anything to correct that impression.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 568 ✭✭✭72sheep


    Look at this thread to see how casually the rent-a-crowd mob deserted their Covid statistical analysis to go save Ukraine/Climate Change/.. instead. They could not even grasp that there was a gross inconsistency between bring us your unvaxxed children one day and donate your spare room to unvaccinated Ukrainians the next. Tragically they were happy just for the kicking to have stopped and scared to demand to know why. There has to be some criticism or else this is going to repeat.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,692 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Firstly, have you proof that these Ukrainians were unvaccinated?

    Secondly, most people are vaccinated in Ireland and it's not a big deal to contract it now.

    I disagree that things were done wrong as regards lockdowns. The criticism I'd have is letting in Italian rugby fans with no match, letting people off to Cheltenham and telling ski holidayers that they didn't need to self-isolate when they came home. And then letting everybody out before Christmas 2020 which was insane.

    Nobody was locked in their house, you could go outside for a walk or run at any time.



Advertisement