Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Ukrainian refugees in Ireland - Megathread

1329330332334335452

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,211 ✭✭✭✭Suckit


    That's the reality, but some here are, of course, twisting that to "feckless lazy Ukrainians watching telly all day." But we're not allowed say they're xenophobic... 🙄

    You can twist anything you want and have done.

    Some are stating that we can and must fit them all in and of course continue to pay for everything while giving them a prize amount of benefits every week, but we're not allowed to suggest that's not sustainable and will cause a massive strain on the whole country among other things, without being called a racist or xenophobe - among other things.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,349 ✭✭✭bloopy


    A bigger issue down the line is when people wont give a s**t anymore about being called a racist or xenophobe.

    That is when the fun will really start. We are already quite a ways down that path as it is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,132 ✭✭✭malinheader


    Sooner the better , especially for public representative's and mainstream media outlets. Then some of the proper issues affecting the country might be addressed properly.



  • Posts: 17,847 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Strange way to phrase single parents allowance!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭Tonesjones


    So we have lost control of our borders.

    Brussels has assumed command.

    The UK can let in 10 or 10 million. Ireland gets no choice .


    Is that accurate? Yes it is



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    I'm sure there is something in this legislation that has provisions about safety ability and sustainability of catering for said refugees. Even bad legislation from the EU tends to have caveats. Anyone got a link.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,954 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    I’m in generally in favour of our EU membership but what’s wearing very very thin now is our massively overpaid political class here devolving everything to Brussels and moreover anything remotely unpopular- “oh, it’s the EU what done it”- well the why the Fcukin hell are we paying you €250k per annum if we don’t even have control of our own country anymore?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,261 ✭✭✭Gant21


    One can see why uk jumped ship now. Parts of the uk are concrete jungles. We aren’t far behind them now.



  • Posts: 1,677 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Seems to be absolutely heaps more Ukrainians after arriving near my local town.

    Men, women, children all ages

    We're gonna have some child benefit bill in the next few year's. Money for jam, being paid straight into the bank account now no matter where you are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 420 ✭✭head82


    I have a sister in-law who works in the hospitality sector, a popular hotel/eatery on the outskirts of Dublin. She's in her early 50s and this is her sole source of income. A short while back, a couple of Ukrainian women.. early 30s.. joined the workforce. Typical hotel work, hoovering, changing bed linen, replacing soap in the bathrooms.. that type of stuff.

    Anyway, both of them quit after two weeks claiming it was 'backbreaking' work and that my sister in-law was "crayzee!" for doing this type of work. Back in Kiev they were both 'beauticians'!

    They were only working 16 hours a week as I believe that's all they're allowed work before their SW payments are affected. I don't know what rate of pay they were on but even if it was minimum wage it would have been a nice little top-up to their SW and an ideal opportunity to integrate and contribute (although there would have been little or no deductions on that wage).

    I know this is anecdotal and hopefully doesn't reflect on all Ukrainians but it doesn't paint a great picture of their willingness to participate in contributing to their 'Host' nation. Maybe someone has a more positive picture to paint?



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 17,847 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    “They were only working 16 hours a week as I believe that's all they're allowed work before their SW payments are affected.” Do you have a link to that? It’s my understanding that unemployment assistance is reduced bu so much for every day worked up to a maximum of 4. Single parents allowance recipients can earn €165 before their claim is affected.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 420 ✭✭head82


    I don't have a 'link' and I'm not going looking for one either. You seem to be more of an expert on SW payments than me so you provide the link. Perhaps they were single parents and that €165 allowance equates to approx. 16 hours work per week on minimum wage.

    What you most definitely are an expert on is pedantics!

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Paul on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    Seems there is no link to this directive people use constantly. Would have thought it was bookmarked. Anyone know what it's actually called my have to look on the EU site myself.



  • Posts: 17,847 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Yep. I get annoyed when people post supposition as possible facts. Gullible people might believe it and repeat it as being true.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,371 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    As predicted…. Taxpayers in this country just an afterthought… get used to it.



  • Posts: 7,681 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I know we do but we also need to think about the muppet who just have a "thing" about public sector employees 🤣



  • Posts: 7,681 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I know one starting a job next week with the likelihood she along with her family will be moved to a different town a week later due to being in student accommodation.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Paul on


  • Posts: 7,681 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    If they work 3 days they loose 3 days social welfare just like any other resident in the state. Provided of course they informed social welfare. But revenue has a practice of informing DSP of earnings and PRSI contributions

    DSP will catch up on them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭cuttingtimber22


    Should we:

    • offer an amnesty to work in Ireland (2 years but no benefit entitlement).
    • offer Fas courses (especially construction sector).
    • when the emergency ends then benefits are cut within weeks with repatriation arranged for (EU can pay for the flights).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,337 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    I pasted links to it a few times in the thread already.


    If you can't find it, there is this handy website called "google.com". You should check it out, It will help you find it very quickly



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,337 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    What figures do you have there for comparison to show our "vastly superior" benefits package.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    You could have just posted me the like tbh. Why the secrecy. For one I don't know the exact name of the directive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,337 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    There is no secrecy. It is the EU temporary protection directive. Not hard to find. I've already posted it a few times - and I'm fairly sure you were active on the thread by that stage.


    Actual directive:


    Triggering for Ukrainian situation




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,337 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    No. Ireland is part of the EU and has/had a say on triggering the Directive. Triggering it was the correct thing to do.

    The Directive is about 20 years old and was put in place for such a situation like this.

    I wouldn't be deferring to the clowns running the UK for anything. It is a sign that things are going fairly badly for their argument if someone is doing that!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    (15) The Member States' obligations as to the conditions of reception and residence of persons enjoying temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons should be determined. These obligations should be fair and offer an adequate level of protection to those concerned.

    (20) Provision should be made for a solidarity mechanism intended to contribute to the attainment of a balance of effort between Member States in receiving and bearing the consequences of receiving displaced persons in the event of a mass influx. The mechanism should consist of two components. The first is financial and the second concerns the actual reception of persons in the Member States.

    (21) The implementation of temporary protection should be accompanied by administrative cooperation between the Member States in liaison with the Commission.

    (22) It is necessary to determine criteria for the exclusion of certain persons from temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons.

    (25) Pursuant to Article 1 of the said Protocol, Ireland is not participating in the adoption of this Directive. Consequently and without prejudice to Article 4 of the aforementioned Protocol, the provisions of this Directive do not apply to Ireland.

    (26) In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark is not participating in the adoption of this Directive, and is therefore not bound by it nor subject to its application,


    What I have gleaned so far


    Will update dinner is out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,261 ✭✭✭Gant21



    Student accommodation issues, Pandora’s box is open.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,202 ✭✭✭0ph0rce0


    haha what???

    1. Social welfare since march.
    2. Children's allowance since march.
    3. Free room, food, healthcare...etc.
    4. Soon to be free house ( forever home) for life

    No subsidising there at all on our part 😂

    Ukrainian, Syian, Afghani, Tte ould congo None of these people should be getting anything.

    But they do, and they get all of the above.

    **** JOKE

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Paul on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,211 ✭✭✭✭Suckit


    You won't get one either, as it will forward you to the "mywelfare" page and ask you some questions that don't apply to refugees anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,211 ✭✭✭✭Suckit


    Triggering it may have been the correct thing to do. But it wasn't to be abused. These clowns (our government - before anyone spits out their tea), don't seem to have a clue what would be considered fair or adequate. It is almost as though they said "feck it if I am bothered working out what this could take, just throw the works at them and we can sort it out later or leave it for the next lot".

    It's going to be interesting when the civil servants want their extra pay for their increased workload trying to sort out all the Ukrainians documents.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    3. The Council Decision shall have the effect of introducing temporary protection for the displaced persons to which it refers, in all the Member States, in accordance with the provisions of this Directive. The Decision shall include at least:

    (a) a description of the specific groups of persons to whom the temporary protection applies;

    (b) the date on which the temporary protection will take effect;

    (c) information received from Member States on their reception capacity;

    (d) information from the Commission, UNHCR and other relevant international organisations.


    So It seems there is 0 obligation to take in any number. Devil always in the Details in the EU. So why is there no cap ? And this treaty does not seem to apply to Ireland anyway. Stand to be corrected. Not suggesting we take in no one.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement