Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Rugby Discussion 3

Options
13233353738222

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,121 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    I kind of agree to be fair, (wasn’t having a go at you by the way, just bustin your balls a bit). However I think it may have just been honest ignorance, he got injured and his career was over, took a dose to help with recovery and didn’t realise that the rules also applied to amateur coaching! Absolutely stupid mistake but let’s not end a career before it’s even started because he was a bit of a gobshite! and I’m affiliated with a rival AIL club, I should be calling for his head haha!



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,488 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    the issue very much is that he was taking the banned substance when he was still contracted to vannes and no where near the malone job. He hadnt officially retired, even if he had decided to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,642 ✭✭✭✭errlloyd


    Yeah, he's really getting away with this narrative that he was retired. He took the drugs for four months, and got tested a week after his official retirement. That means he'd been taking it for 17 weeks while still a contracted player, and started taking it just a few weeks after the injury. He clearly took it in the hopes of returning to rugby and if that is his attitude to injury recovery he shouldn't be coaching.



  • Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭ Madelynn Wailing Speedometer


    He was taking the drugs while still under contract and before he retired.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,779 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    I think there’s a lot of filling in the blanks that people are doing. It’s likely that he got desperate to return from injury to play some rugby before retiring. However he did say that the injury meant that he couldn’t even hold a drink in his hand so it was affecting his day to day life. While I’d be inclined to believe that this was a cynical thing on his part to get back playing before he retired, there is a possibility that he knew he wasn’t going to get back playing regardless and took this stuff for personal reasons.

    He had been taking it for 4 months before announcing his retirement. But the decision to retire generally comes a while before the announcement. We just don’t know the timelines behind that decision and the drugs etc. And we were never going to get that kind of balance from a Kimmage article. When there are big holes in the story like there are we need to be careful not to condemn him off the bat. It was probably a stupid and desperate decision made to allow him some rugby before he retired. But it may not have been that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,116 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Every drugs cheat has a sob story about why they gave into a moment of madness when they felt they had no other option.

    And for him then to come out ranting about rugby being rotten and the old values being forgotten?

    Give me a break.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,116 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    BTW, the finding of the French anti-doping agency is publicly available;

    Le Secrétaire général (afld.fr)

    Very explicitly prohibits him from coaching.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,121 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,015 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    A lot of players take the opportunity to "bulk up" while out injured.

    Looking at the jawlines of some Irish internationals, I'd be surprised if they haven't used HGH at some point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,585 ✭✭✭Blut2


    "semantics", hilarious, you were completely and utterly wrong.

    Taking a fully legal SARM is no different from taking creatine in the eyes of the law. You can buy both over the counter.

    Do you also think someone should be banned from coaching because they smoke weed in their spare time, with no effect on their Monday-Friday career? Because thats a hell of a lot more illegal. A coach taking SARMs in his spare time to help his personal training is no different, apart from being much more legal.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭ Madelynn Wailing Speedometer


    So the ban has expired.

    Dates d’effets de l’interdiction : du 27 février 2020 au 27 février 2022 inclus

    The IRFU has had employed known drugs cheats (Gerbrandt Grobbler) in the past so surely they've set a precedent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,116 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


     A coach taking SARMs in his spare time to help his personal training is no different

    "A coach taking SARMs in his spare time" isn't remotely relevant to the Tuohy case. He was neither a coach nor taking it in his spare time at the time of the offence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,116 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    It has expired now, but the ban was in effect when he took the job at Malone.

    Grobler is different in that he had served his ban and it was widely known when he was signed up. You could at least say he'd served his time and deserved a fresh start. Tuohy though...

    Post edited by Former Former Former on


  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,488 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    so it was ligandrol. he knew exactly what he was doing. The fact he got caught whist back in training with vannes shows that the decision to retire was partially due being caught.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,506 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    If a substance can help a person go from not being able to hold a drink to being able to hold a drink and potentially play sport, why exactly is this viewed as a bad thing?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,116 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Because the substance in question absolutely, 100% does not do that.



  • Posts: 20,606 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    While not performance enhancing- if you get caught with illegal drugs in your sample you will be sanctioned and banned in many if not most sports.



  • Posts: 20,606 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I think on the balance of probabilities and with respect to the ban handed down by the FRU - Touhy is probably more likely to have taken drugs as a means to cheat as opposed to the excuse offered up, but I don't know the guy and I wouldn't automatically dismiss his excuse given the proximity to his career ending.

    The whole lift a cup thing, you break bones in your arm you can't lift a cup - doesn't mean you won't be lifting weights again a few months so I'm not sold on that as a reason. No doctor is going prescribe this stuff as part of your recovery.

    The bigger question is do you want someone who was prepared to intentionally take prohibited substances influencing a playing group.

    Many would say move on and there is no evidence Touhy would direct players to cheat. But again, on the balance of probabilities he'd be more likely to do so than players who had never been banned in my opinion.

    I don't know what the right outcome is here, if he is a good coach and can help players within the rules then I'd probably be against losing that over this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭The Iron Giant


    It says he had retired the week before so he had formally stopped playing a week before he was tested/caught.

    Post edited by The Iron Giant on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭The Iron Giant


    Sure. But the post I was responding to claimed that he retired because he was caught. Which couldn't have been the case if he retired a week before he was tested.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,116 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Tuohy didn't claim the drug was to restore movement or help him hold a cup. It was to build muscle. That is the only function of this drug and Tuohy isn't claiming otherwise. No different to taking stanozolol, deca durabolin, or whatever else. More muscle, quicker recovery, it'll even shrink your balls if that's what you're into.

    I guess people haven't read the full article but this is as clear a case of deliberate doping as you're likely to see. Tuohy isn't making any excuses as to what he was hoping to do.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,488 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    wonder what he was doing at vannes training session then, a week after he retired?

    id imagine there are insurance consequences if this is the case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭The Iron Giant


    It says he was in the gym. People go to the gym.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,488 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭The Iron Giant


    He took them when he was active. He retired before he was tested and subsequently caught.

    You originally said he was retired partially because he was caught, which is factually incorrect unless he travelled back in time.

    I imagine the doping authorities have the right to test whenever but the timeline of his retirement as it relates to his testing has been consistently reported.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,116 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    He was still a contracted employee when the testers arrived. He had made an announcement that he wouldn't be playing again but he was still a Vannes player and thus still subject to testing.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,488 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    And I'm not at all subtly suggesting the "retired" aspect of this is conveniently back dated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭The Iron Giant


    Suggest all you want but unless you can prove that the reported facts are wrong, you're just baselessly creating a narrative to make it sound worse.

    This was a four year ban reduced to two years so I can't see how it would have been reduced if the doping agency had any grounds to believe the retirement was "conveniently backdated".

    I'm not saying his behavior is any way mitigated but you're flat out wrong to say he retired partly because of a failed drugs test.

    Post edited by The Iron Giant on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    This was a four year ban reduced to two years so I can't see how it would have been reduced if the doping agency had any grounds to believe the retirement was "conveniently backdated".

    He admitted to taking them for four months before the test. They clearly didn’t care about the retirement date.



Advertisement
Advertisement